Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award.pdf
PDF 156 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SP4702-26-Q-0018
- Issued by
-
Defense Logistics Agency
About this file
This document is Section M of a federal solicitation outlining the evaluation factors and award methodology for a firm-fixed-price Task Order.
The Government will award to the responsible Offeror submitting the lowest-priced proposal that meets technical acceptability standards using a "Low Price Technically Acceptable" evaluation process. Proposals will be evaluated across four factors: Technical Approach, Key Personnel, Past Performance, and Price. To receive an overall "Acceptable" rating and be considered for award, Offerors must achieve an "Acceptable" rating in all evaluation factors. Technical Approach requires a narrative not exceeding five pages demonstrating understanding of requirements, specific execution strategy, understanding of primary challenges (long-lead materials, site access, contractor coordination), and job site safety approach, particularly regarding LPG tank replacement work. Key Personnel evaluation requires identification of three positions: a Project Manager with minimum five years' experience in project, contract, or logistics management on gas supply or hazardous materials transportation contracts of similar size and complexity; a Quality Assurance & Regulatory Compliance Representative with minimum three years' combined experience in quality control, testing, and regulatory compliance ensuring USP medical-grade oxygen and industrial welding mixtures meet FDA, DOT, and CGA standards; and a Lead Delivery Driver possessing a valid Commercial Driver's License with HAZMAT and Tanker endorsements and experience transporting hazardous materials in compliance with DOT, EPA, OSHA, and CGA safety standards. Past Performance evaluation requires submission of three relevant projects completed within the last five years, including project descriptions highlighting PWS relevance, final contract values, and current client points of contact with name, title, email, and phone number. Price will be evaluated for fairness, reasonableness, and completeness, with verification that all required CLINs are priced and total evaluated price mathematically reflects the sum of proposed line items.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DSCC_Site_Visit_Map.pdf | ||
| Section L - Instructions Conditions and Notices to Offerors.pdf | ||
| PWS.pdf | ||
| SP4702-26-Q-0018.pdf | ||
| DSCC_Real_ID_Act.pdf | ||
| QA Matrix Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| BID SHEET_20260722.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| QASP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Section M Evaluation Factors for Award 07/28/2026
Section M: Evaluation Factors for Award
M.1 BASIS FOR AWARD
The Government intends to award a single, firm-fixed-price Task Order to the responsible Offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined Lowest Price Technically Acceptable.
M.2 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
The Government will evaluate proposals based on the following four (4) factors, which are comprised of the subfactors listed below:
• Factor 1: Technical Approach
• Factor 2: Key Personnel
• Factor 3: Past Performance
• Factor 4: Price
M.3 RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF FACTORS
The evaluation will be conducted using a "Low Price Technically Acceptable" process.
The Government intends to award to the lowest price proposal that meets the technical acceptability Between Section L&M of this solicitation in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
M.4 EVALUATION APPROACH
Technical Evaluation Ratings The Government will assign an adjectival rating to the Technical Approach subfactor based on the definitions below. A proposal must receive a rating of "Acceptable" or higher to be considered for award.
•Acceptable: Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the subfactor based on the evidence submitted.
•Unacceptable: Proposal fails to clearly meet the minimum requirements of the subfactor.
To receive an overall "Acceptable" rating, the offeror must receive an "Acceptable" rating in all evaluation factors detailed below:
Factor 1: Technical Approach The Offeror shall provide a narrative (not to exceed 5 pages) demonstrating their understanding of the requirements and their proposed approach to executing the work. At a minimum, this narrative must address:
• The Offeror's specific approach to executing the work, including their understanding of the primary challenges (e.g., long-lead time materials, site access, coordination with other contractors).
• The Offeror's approach to job site safety, (e.g., addressing the work associated with the LPG tank replacement, etc.).
L.3.2 Factor 2: Key Personnel The Offeror shall name a primary project manager/POC employed by the prime contractor that will work directly with the Government COR/POC:
• Project Manager
Section M Evaluation Factors for Award 07/28/2026
Role: Serves as the primary liaison with the DSCC Contracting Officer (CO) and COR, coordinates logistics schedules, manages base access, and resolves billing/demurrage discrepancies.
Qualifications: Minimum of five years of experience as a project manager, contract manager, or logistics manager on gas supply or hazardous materials transportation contracts of similar size and complexity.
• Quality Assurance & Regulatory Compliance Representative Role: Ensures that all gas deliveries (specifically USP medical-grade oxygen and industrial welding mixtures) meet purity standards, and that cylinder maintenance, hydrostatic testing, and labeling adhere to FDA, DOT, and CGA regulations.
Qualifications: Minimum of three years of combined experience in quality control, testing, and regulatory compliance within the industry.
• Lead Delivery Driver Lead Delivery Driver Role: Directly executes transport, loading, and secure placement of cylinders on the installation; acts as the on-site safety point of contact in accordance with federal DOT Hazmat rules, EPA guidelines, and OSHA regulations.
Qualifications: Must possess a valid Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) with HAZMAT and Tanker endorsements. Previous experience transporting hazardous materials/gases. Must comply with the safety standards of CGA, OSHA, and military base hazard identification.
L.3.3 Factor 3: Past Performance The Offeror shall provide a list of three (3) relevant projects of similar size, scope, and complexity to this Task Order, completed within the last five (5) years. For each project, the Offeror shall provide:
• A brief description of the project, highlighting its relevance to this PWS.
• The final contract value.
• A current and accurate point of contact for the client, including name, title, email address, and phone number.
M.4.1 PRICE EVALUATION
Price will be evaluated for fairness, reasonableness, and completeness. The Government will verify that prices are provided for all required CLINs and that the total evaluated price mathematically reflects the sum of the proposed line items.
Section M: Evaluation Factors for Award
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .