Section L Attachment L-1 Energy Magazine Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (12-26-19).docx

DOCX document 32 KB Posted

Attached to
Multi-Application Shipboard Energy Magazine Requirements Development- Amendment 0006 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N00024-20-R-4112
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command

About this file

This solicitation requests proposals for the development, qualification, and delivery of a Shipboard Energy Magazine for use in naval warships. The Naval Sea Systems Command seeks preliminary design, detailed design, first unit manufacture and testing, associated engineering services, low rate initial production options, and provisioned item orders. Interested offerors must request controlled technical documents by providing contact information and documentation including a DD Form 2345. Proposals are due August 5, 2020 and must be submitted electronically. Questions are due by specified dates in July and will be posted with answers to the SAM website. Offerors must register in the System for Award Management and possess certification through the United States/Canada Joint Certification Program to receive export-controlled technical information.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Multi-Application Shipboard Energy Magazine Requirements Development- Amendment 0006, newest first.
File Type Posted
N00024-20-R-4112 -Amendment 0006.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Information-Responses-Amendment 0004.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00024-20-R-4112 -Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
N00024-20-R-4112 -Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Information-Responses-Amendment 0003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00024-20-R-4112-Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Information-Responses-Amendment 0002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Section J Attachment G EM PCC to ESC ICD Rev 1.0.1.pdf PDF
Section J Attachment B Technical Specification for Energy Magazine Rev 1.0.2.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Information-Respones-Amendment 0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00024-20-R-4112-Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
N00024-20-R-4112-Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
T9070-AJ-DPC-120_3010 SHOCK DESIGN CRITERIA FOR SURFACE SHIPS.pdf PDF
T9070-AL-DPC-020 077-2 NAVSEA Hazardous Material Avoidance Process 2015-09.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Information-Respones.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00024-20-R-4112-Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Section L Attachment L-2 Generic Cost Summary Spreadsheet (2-14-20).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00024-20-R-4112.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Information-Question.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DD-2345.pdf PDF
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ENERGY MAGZINE

SOLICITATION NO. N00024-19-R-4112

SECTION L ATTACHMENT L-1

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to Offeror

1.For each reference submitted in your proposal, enter the required information in Section A below.
2.Offerors are responsible for sending copies of the PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE to references. Transmit the entire questionnaire to the identified Points of Contact (POCs) and place one copy of each Section A submission in your proposal submittal.
3.Once completed by the POC, PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES must be directly transmitted to the Government as described on the following page. Completed PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES received from the Offerors as not acceptable.

SECTION A: PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Offeror):

NAME OF OFFEROR:

CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER:

PROJECT TITLE:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE START DATE:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE END DATE (including options):

CUSTOMER POINT OF CONTACT NAME:

POINT OF CONTACT TITLE:

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE:

POINT OF CONTACT MAILING ADDRESS:

POINT OF CONTACT EMAIL:

TYPE OF CONTRACT: (CPFF, CPIF, FFP, ETC.):

AMOUNT OF CONTRACT ($USD):

DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES / SERVICES (Provide reason if terminated):

Instructions to Evaluator The Naval Sea Systems Command is procuring the design, development and production of an Energy Magazine for use in next generation shipboard electrical architectures and combat systems. Evaluation of an Offeror’s past performance is integral to our source selection process. Accordingly, we request your candid assessment of the Offeror’s past performance; please see Section below for the identity of the Offeror and contract of interest.

Once completed, this questionnaire and any appended information becomes Source Selection Sensitive and must be protected from disclosure. Access to this information shall be limited to Government procurement officials.

Please forward the completed questionnaire no later than XX Month 2020 to:

Naval Sea Systems Command, Code 0241
Attn: Mr. Rufus Brown
Telephone No. 202-781-1451
Email Address: rufus.brown@navy.mil

Hand-written evaluations are acceptable. All evaluations must relate solely to the Offeror and the contract, task, or order identified in SECTION A.

For each of the criteria listed below, the evaluator must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box (double-clicking the box), as applicable. Please provide supporting comments for each rating. Please use your supporting comments to highlight the Offeror’s specific strengths and weaknesses. You may use additional sheets if required. Your ratings and comments should reflect only “contractor liable” performance. You may supplement your knowledge with the knowledge and judgment of others in your organization.

Please enter the requested information in SECTION B for the person primarily responsible for completing the questionnaire, then transmit the completed questionnaire to the point of contact identified above. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

PLEASE DO NOT PROVIDE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES TO THE OFFEROR

Section B: PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Evaluator):

NAME:

TITLE:

AGENCY/CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION:

PHONE:

E-MAIL

Signature:

1. Overall Contract Outcome Ability to satisfactorily complete all tasks while conforming to customer requirements, standards of good workmanship and safe practices.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

SUBSTANTIATING COMMENTS:

2. Cost Performance Ability to accurately forecast and control costs throughout all phases of the contract.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. Schedule Performance Ability to develop accurate work schedules and adhere to those schedules as well as the ability to adapt to changes in requirements and work schedules.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4. Technical Performance Ability to overcome technical challenges by applying sound engineering principles, complete required engineering analyses, and develop adequate technical reports and plans.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

5. Customer Relations Degree of customer satisfaction based on the contractor's cooperative behavior, general business-like concern for the interest of the customer, and customer orientated management practices.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

6. Small, Small Disadvantaged, and Women-Owned Business Utilization Compliance with subcontracting plan goals for Small, Small Disadvantaged, and Women-owned business concerns and monetary targets for such concerns.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .