F_-_Evaluation_Criteria.pdf

PDF 34 KB Posted

Attached to
Video Teleconference Solutions IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
SAQMMA13R0297
Issued by
Department of State Office of Acquisition Management

About this file

F - Evaluation Criteria***This Attachment replaces all previous***

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Video Teleconference Solutions IDIQ, newest first.
File Type Posted
Brand_Name_Justification_and_Approval_-_SAQMMA13R0297.pdf PDF
NAICS_APPEAL_DOC.pdf PDF
F_-_Evaluation_Criteria.pdf PDF
C_-_DD_Form_254_(Bidders).pdf PDF
E_-_Sample_Service_Level_Agreements.docx DOCX document
H_-_PP_Contract_Profile.docx DOCX document
G_-Vendor_Prop_Config_Wksht(A004).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
D_-_GPAT.docx DOCX document
B_-Contract_Line_Item_Price_Schedule(A004).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A_-_Statement_of_Work(A004).docx DOCX document
J_-_Eval_Qty(A004).pdf PDF
C_-_DD_Form_254_(Bidders).pdf PDF
G_-Vendor_Prop_Config_Wksht(A003).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B_-Contract_Line_Item_Price_Schedule(A003).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
I_-_PP_Cust_Satis_Surv.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
NAICS_APPEAL_DOC.pdf PDF
J_-_Eval_Qty(A003).pdf PDF
A_-_Statement_of_Work(A003).docx DOCX document
RFP_SAQMMA13R0297_A003.pdf PDF
D_-_GPAT.docx DOCX document
Brand_Name_Justification_and_Approval_-_SAQMMA13R0297.pdf PDF
E_-_Sample_Service_Level_Agreements.docx DOCX document
G_-Vendor_Prop_Config_Wksht(A002).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B_-Contract_Line_Item_Price_Schedule(A002).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J_-_Eval_Qty(A002).pdf PDF
D_-_GPAT.docx DOCX document
A_-_Statement_of_Work(A002).docx DOCX document
NAICS_Appeal_SBA_Decision.pdf PDF
H_-_PP_Contract_Profile.docx DOCX document
NAICS_APPEAL_DOC.pdf PDF
RFP_SAQMMA13R0297_A002.pdf PDF
E_-_Sample_Service_Level_Agreements.docx DOCX document
C_-_DD_Form_254_(Bidders).pdf PDF
B_-Contract_Line_Item_Price_Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP_SAQMMA13R0297_A001.pdf PDF
I_-_PP_Cust_Satis_Surv.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
G_-Vendor_Prop_Config_Wksht.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J_-Eval_QTY.pdf PDF
A_-_Statement_of_Work.docx DOCX document
Brand_Name_Justification_and_Approval_-_SAQMMA13R0297.pdf PDF
F_-_Evaluation_Criteria.pdf PDF
B_-Contract_Line_Item_Price_Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A_-_Statement_of_Work.docx DOCX document
I_-_PP_Cust_Satis_Surv.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
E_-_Sample_Service_Level_Agreements.docx DOCX document
J_-Eval_QTY.pdf PDF
_VTC_IDIQ_RFP_SAQMMA13R0297.pdf PDF
D_-_GPAT.docx DOCX document
H_-_PP_Contract_Profile.docx DOCX document
G_-Vendor_Prop_Config_Wksht.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 50

Video Teleconference Solutions IDIQ has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

VTD IDIQ Attachment F -- EVALUATION CRITERIA [For evaluation purposes only - to be removed upon award]

Factor/Rating Acceptable Unacceptable Neutral Technical Specifications

All items proposed for "exact match" line items are the same manufacturer, brand, and part number as required by the RFP.

All items proposed for "Brand Name or Equal" line items meet the salient physical, functional, and performance characteristics specified in the RFP.

One or more items proposed for "exact match" line items are not the same manufacturer, brand, or part number required by the RFP, or one or more items proposed for "Brand Name or Equal" line items do not meet the salient physical, functional, and performance characteristics specified in the RFP.

Past Performance Based on the offeror's recent (within 3 years), relevant past performance history, the Government has confidence the offeror can successfully perform the requirements in the Statement of Work.

Based on the offeror's recent (within 3 years), relevant past performance history, the Government has no confidence the offeror can successfully perform the requirements in the Statement of Work. Any documented instances of poor past performance in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or any Termination for Cause/Default in the past (12) months will result in an unacceptable past performance rating.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevent past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and will be given a neutral rating.

Similar Experience The offeror has demonstrated experience performing work similar in size, scope, and complexity to the requirements of the Statement of Work within the past three

(3) years.

The offeror does not have demonstrated experience performing work similar in size, scope, and complexity to the requirements of the Statement of Work within the past three (3) years.

VTD IDIQ Attachment F -- EVALUATION CRITERIA [For evaluation purposes only - to be removed upon award]

Performance Incentive Plan

The offeror proposes a performance incentive plan that includes all necessary performance metrics and service level agreements that are meaningful, measurable, and controllable. The proposed plan adequately explains how performance metrics and incentives will ensure and enhance both operational performance and achievement of Government objectives and business results, using adequate service level targets that are consistent with both cost effectiveness and the offeror's service delivery approach. The plan clearly explains how performance metrics and incentives will be tracked, calculated, and communicated to the Government. The plan proposes incentives and disincentives that are commensurate with stated performance goals and service levels, and has few weaknesses and no significant weaknesses or deficiencies.

The performance incentive plan does not include all necessary performance metrics and service level agreements or proposed metrics and service level agreements are not meaningful, measurable, or controllable. The proposed plan does not adequately explain how performance metrics and incentives will ensure and enhance operational performance or achievement of Government objectives and business results, or service level targets are inconsistent with cost effectiveness or the offeror's service delivery approach. The plan does not clearly explain how performance metrics and incentives will be tracked, calculated, or communicated to the Government. The plan proposes incentives and disincentives that are not commensurate with stated performance goals and service levels or are inappropriate for services under this contract. The proposed performance incentive plan has major weaknesses or deficiencies that cannot be corrected without major changes to the proposal, and substantial or extreme doubt exists that the offeror is capable of adequately quantifying, measuring, tracking, and reporting applicable performance measures.

Sheet1

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .