PPQuestionaireDOS.doc
DOC document 116 KB Posted
- Attached to
- UH1 Retrofit and Avionics Upgrade
- Solicitation number
- SAQMMA10R0206
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Quote (RFQ) 8200NBS001
SAQMMA10R0206
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror:
Dollar Amount Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
Title:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Email Address:
C. Instructions on how to forward questionnaire. When you have completed your portion of this questionnaire, forward it to Patrick Murphy, 4:00 pm EST by June 30, 2010. It is preferred that you forward this via electronic means to murphypj@state.gov . It is advised that you use return receipt, to ensure form is received.
D.
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| None |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Exceptional |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive. |
| Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner |
QUALITY OF SERVICE
| a. Ability to meet minimum quality standards specific for performance |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| b. Ability to effectively control the quality of services provided |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| c. Quality of parts provided for maintenance |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| d. Overall rating of contractor’s quality of service |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
| a. Ability to meet specific response time and scheduled time-frames for completion of specific tasks |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| b. Responsiveness/timeliness for providing administrative reports/documents required by the contract |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| c. Availability and delivery of ordered parts in required time-period |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| d. Ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| e. Willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| f. Ability to use effective approaches and provide technical expertise and resources to solve contract problems |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| g. Extent to which the contractor has demonstrated reasonable and cooperative behavior |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| h. Working relationship with the Contracting Officer, quality assurance personnel, and customers |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| i. Flexibility in satisfying the requirements of its customers |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| j. Extent to which the contractor provided prompt and courteous service when responding to customer complaints |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| k. Overall rating of customer satisfaction |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| l. Overall rating of business relations |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
| a. Ability to select and retain cooperative and effective key personnel, such as contract manager and quality control personnel |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| b. Extent key personnel were knowledgeable about contractual requirements |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| c. Ability to meet appropriate staffing levels with qualified personnel in order to provide required services |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| d. Ability to effectively manage subcontractors |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| e. Overall rating of contractor’s management of key personnel |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY, HEALTH, AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
| YES |
| NO |
| a. Has the contractor ever received Notices of Violations for noncompliance with environmental laws or regulations? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
| b. Compliance with environmental requirements |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| c. Compliance with safety requirements |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| d. Compliance with health requirements |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| e. Compliance with security requirements |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
CONTRACTUAL CONSIDERATIONS
| YES |
| NO |
| a. Has an election ever been made not to exercise an option or continue relations because of contractor’s poor performance? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
| b. Has a Contract Discrepancy Report ever been issued? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
| c. Has a cure notice or show cause notice ever been issued? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
| d. Extent to which the contractor provided reliable supportable cost estimates or proposals |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| e. Overall rating of contractor’s performance under this contract |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| YES |
| NO |
| f. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
Remarks (use additional pages if required):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .