S-2 PP Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 39 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6817126RN001
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a naval contract related to the U.S. AEGIS Ashore Missile Defense System (USAAMDS) in Deveselu, Romania. The questionnaire is designed to collect detailed feedback from previous customers about a contractor's performance across key evaluation areas including quality, timeliness, responsiveness, and cost control. The document instructs potential offerors to have their current or former customers complete and return the questionnaire to specified Navy contract specialists before the solicitation's closing date.
The associated federal contract opportunity (Solicitation Number N6817126RN001) involves conducting Fiscal Year 26 Selected Restrictive Availability (SRA) and Continuous Maintenance Availability (CMAV) work packages for the USAAMDS Romania, located at the Naval Support Facility in Deveselu. The procurement is being managed by the Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command, with the specific work to be performed at the naval facility in Romania. The questionnaire aims to gather comprehensive performance data that will be used in the source selection documentation to evaluate potential contractors for this ship repair and maintenance project.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Amendment N6817126RN0010004 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Sol. Amendment N6817126RN0010003 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Sol. Amendment N6817126RN0010002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Sol. Amendment N6817126RN0010001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| J-1 Pricing Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J-2 SRA and CMAV Work Items (19 NOV).pdf | ||
| S-1 _PP Information.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation - N6817126RN001.pdf | ||
| S-3 NDA.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
US AEGIS ASHORE MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM (USAAMDS)
ATTACHMENT S-2 (Past Performance Questionnaire)
OFFEROR __________________________
NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Sigonella (FLCSI), Code 200 is currently evaluating competitive offers for ship repair and maintenance utilizing a dry-dock to be performed at USAAMDS Naval Facility, in Deveselu, Romania
INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror shall request its current or former customers to complete the Attachment S-2 (Past Performance Questionnaire) and return it before the closing date of this solicitation to the following:
Guarino, Annamaria, Contract Specialist, email: anna.guarino4.ln@us.navy.mil Tapia, Juan Carlos, Contract Specialist, email: juan.c.tapia5.civ@us.navy.mil Maria di Lieto, Contract Specialist, email: maria.dilieto2.ln@us.navy.mil Stamatiades, Elias L, Supervisory Contracting Officer, email: elias.L.stamatiades.civ@us.navy.mil
The name of the Offeror must be indicated at the top of this page.
Any questionnaires received after the proposal due date/time may be considered late and may not be considered in the Offeror’s past performance evaluation. The Government, at its discretion, will determine whether or not questionnaires received after the proposal due date will be considered. Questionnaires submitted directly by the Offeror will be disregarded.
The information provided below will become part of the source selection documentation; however, the name and the content of the questionnaire will not be released to any of the parties. Should you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Contract Specialists:
Guarino, Annamaria, Contract Specialist, email: anna.guarino4.ln@us.navy.mil Tapia, Juan Carlos, Contract Specialist, email: juan.c.tapia5.civ@us.navy.mil
SECTION A (To Be Completed by the Offeror)
1. Name of Offeror/Contractor: __________________________________________________
Address of Offeror/Contractor: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Number: ___________________________________________
3A. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________
3B. Place of Performance: _______________________________________________________
4. Detailed Description of Work/Scope of Effort:
| 5. | POC | Name: |
| Address: | ||
| Tel. No.: | ||
| Voice: | ||
| Facsimile: |
| 6. | Method and Date Questionnaire Sent to Current or Former Customer POC: |
| Date: ____________________ | |
| Method: _______________________________ |
SECTION B (To Be Completed by the Evaluator)
1. Name of Evaluator: _______________________________________________________
2. Position Title: __________________________________________________________
3. Administrating Authority/Agency: ___________________________________________
4. Telephone Number: ________________________
5. Signature: ______________________________ Date: ____________
6. Background Information
| a. | Detailed description of services: |
| ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
b. Period of Performance (all years): ____________________________________
c. Total value of the contract (all years): _________________________________
2. Contractor's Past Performance
a. Please answer each of the following questions circling the appropriate letter for each item on the questionnaire correspondent to the adjectival rating below:
Adjectival Rating Description
Outstanding (O) Superior accomplishment of contract requirements and very high customer satisfaction.
Acceptable (A) Fully compliant accomplishment of contract requirements and positive customer satisfaction.
Unacceptable (U) Failure to properly accomplish contract requirements and failure to satisfy customer.
Not Applicable (N) Unable to provide a rating. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.
Please see next page for questions.
Questions: (circle appropriate letter)
(1) Quality/Achieving Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
1. Rate the contractor’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that meet or exceeded the requirements of this contract
O A U N ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
O AMSC U N ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(2) Timeliness.
1. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
O A U N _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, Contract Change Order proposals, reports and invoicing.
O A U N
1. Rate the Contractor’s ability to absorb growth and/or new work with no or reasonable impacts to the Delivery Date.
O A U N
(3) Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
1. Respond to customer concerns (Identify specific concerns and the contractor’s resolution)
O A U N
1. Isolate and resolve problems
4. the number and severity of problems,
4. the effectiveness of corrective actions taken,
4. the ability to implement corrective actions on future work.
O A U N
(4) Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
O A U N
(5) Were there significant problems with contract administration and/or interpretation of the contract after award? If YES, please explain in the additional comments section below.
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(6) Would you do business with this company again?
Past Performance Questionnaire
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .