RFQC_2026_IDIQ_addendum A.pdf
PDF 61 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PE-54300-RFQC-2026-000000115
- Issued by
- Cobb County, Georgia
About this file
This is an addendum to a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) issued by the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia on behalf of Kennesaw State University (KSU) for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Architectural, Planning, Engineering, and Commissioning Services. The procurement seeks qualified architectural and/or engineering firms to provide planning, design, and construction administration services for projects at KSU's Kennesaw and Marietta, Georgia campuses. The contract term is one year with the possibility of a two-year renewal, and selected consultants may be required to develop and deliver contract documents under various delivery methods including Task Order, CM at Risk, Design Bid Build, Letter Bid, and Direct Award. The deadline for written questions and clarifications is 2:00 p.m. EDT on March 13, 2026, directed to tneylon@kennesaw.edu. More than one firm may be selected as a provider under this IDIQ contract.
The addendum revises two key requirements from the original RFQ advertisement. The geographic requirement for firm location has been expanded from within 30 miles of either KSU campus to within 50 miles of either campus. Additionally, the addendum provides the previously omitted evaluation criteria for Statements of Qualifications, weighted as follows: 25% for firm stability including corporate history, growth, resources, litigation history, and financial information; 45% for relevant project experience and qualifications, including demonstrated ability in designing facilities of comparable complexity and size for the State of Georgia and similar organizations, and the qualifications of principal design professionals and lead staff; and 30% for apparent suitability to provide services, including past performance, proximity to project location, workload capacity, and services offered, with specific consideration given to non-discrimination policies, minority and women-owned business enterprise inclusion efforts, and experience with public buildings regarding public safety, health, accessibility for persons with disabilities, and environmental concerns.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQC_2026_IDIQ_RFQ questions 3.pdf | ||
| RFQC_2026_IDIQ_addendum C.pdf | ||
| RFQC_2026_IDIQ_addendum B.pdf | ||
| Addendum 1_PE_54300_RFQC_2026_000000115.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQC_2026_IDIQ_RFQ questions 2.pdf | ||
| RFQC_2026_IDIQ_RFQ questions.pdf | ||
| IDIQ AE_ Planning_ and Commissioning Services.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2026 IDIQ_Shortlist.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1/1
The following addendum is issued related to the RFQ for
Project No. PE-54300-RFQC-2026-000000115, ‘Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) for
Architectural, Planning, Engineering and Commissioning Services’, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw and Marietta, Georgia:
1. The distance for a firm’s location from the Kennesaw State University campuses noted in ‘B. General
Requirements’ is revised from ‘within 30 miles of any of the two KSU campuses’ to ‘within 50 miles of any of the two KSU campuses’.
2. The criteria for evalua(on of the Qualifica(ons submi+als was inadvertently omi+ed from the RFQ adver(sement:
Criteria for Evalua(on of Statements of Qualifica(ons
25% Factor: Stability of the firm, including the firm’s corporate history, growth, resources, form of ownership, li(ga(on history, financial informa(on, and other evidence of stability.
45% Factor: Firm’s relevant project experience and qualifica(ons, including the demonstrated ability of firm in effec(ve design of facili(es comparable in complexity, size, and func(on, for
Owners such as the State of Georgia and other similarly-structured organiza(ons. This includes relevant experience and qualifica(ons of the principal Design Professional(s) and lead staff, and evidence of relevant competencies for this project.
30% Factor: Firm’s apparent suitability to provide services for project, including past performance and firm’s apparent fit to the project type and/or needs of the Owner, performance on past work and any special or unique qualifica(ons for the project, current and projected workloads, the proximity of office to project loca(on, and services offered by the firm. The firm’s non-discrimina(on policies, any affirma(ve ac(on policies and/or stated efforts for the inclusion of Minority-Owned Business Enterprises and/or Woman-Owned Business Enterprises will be a part of this evalua(on. Experience and proficiency with the design of public buildings with regard to the areas of public safety and health, accessibility for persons with disabili(es and special needs, and environmental concerns will be considered.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .