RFPAttD~3.doc

DOC document 53 KB Posted

Attached to
RFP- 2004 CESSNA 182 AIRCRAFT- ENGINE REPLACEMENT & PROPELLER OVERHAULS
Solicitation number
S-25700-00003433
Issued by
Deschutes County, Oregon

About this file

This document is a Reference Check Form for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the Oregon State Police for the replacement of the engine and overhaul of the propeller on their 2004 Cessna 182 (N2181N) aircraft. The RFP seeks quotes from qualified vendors to provide the requested services under a one-time contract. The final contract will be in the form of a Service Purchase Order, as included as Attachment A.

The RFP involves the following jurisdictions: Marion County, Salem City, and Salem City. The document does not provide specific details on pricing terms, set-asides, incumbents, funding requirements, or sources. It focuses solely on the reference check process, asking the reference to rate the proposer's overall quality of services, delivery of service, and responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests on a scale of 0-10.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFPAttB~3.doc DOC document
SP Attachment 3_Federal GrantAward.pdf PDF
IntRFPAttA- Service PO.docx DOCX document
RFPAttC~3.doc DOC document
RFPAttE- Price Proposal Form~2.docx DOCX document
IntRFP S-25700-00003433-ORBuys Airplane Engine Replacement and Repair.doc DOC document
RFPAttF~3.doc DOC document
RFPAttG~4.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]

ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

S-25700-00003433– 2004 CESSNA 182 AIRCRAFT- ENGINE REPLACEMENT & PROPELLER OVERHAULS Att D

ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

Proposer Name:

Reference Entity:

Reference Contact Name:

Contact Telephone Number:

Contact Email Address:

Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-10:

0 = Not satisfied 5 = Moderately satisfied 10 = Extremely satisfied.

1. How would you rate the Proposer’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Proposer?

Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________

2. How would you rate the Proposer’s delivery of service?

Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________

3. How would you rate the Proposer’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?

Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________

Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014 DAS Procurement Services, Version 2.0 – December 9, 2016

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .