RFPAttD~2.doc
DOC document 52 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP- JANUS PROTOCOL REVIEW AND OPTIMIZATION
- Solicitation number
- S-25700-00003431
- Issued by
- Clackamas County, Oregon
About this file
This document is a Reference Check Form that is part of a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the Agency for a contract to provide protocol review, optimization, and expert-level training on the Agency's JANUS automated liquid handling workstations. The contract is anticipated to be less than one (1) year in duration and will be awarded to one (1) contractor. The RFP is for services in the state of Oregon, specifically for Marion County and the City of Salem.
The Reference Check Form requests information about the proposer's overall quality of services, delivery of service, and responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests. Respondents are asked to rate these factors on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being "Not satisfied" and 10 being "Extremely satisfied". The form also includes sections for comments from the reference.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| IntRFP S-25700-00003431-JANUS protocol review and optimization v2.doc | DOC document | |
| RFPAttF~2.doc | DOC document | |
| RFPAttC~2.doc | DOC document | |
| RFPAttB~2.doc | DOC document | |
| RFPAttG~3.doc | DOC document | |
| IntRFPAttA- Service PO- JANUS protocol review and optimization~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFPAttE- Price Proposal Form~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| ITB 22-029-PW Bid Tab.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]
ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
S-25700-00003431– JANUS protocol review and optimization Att D
ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
Proposer Name:
Reference Entity:
Reference Contact Name:
Contact Telephone Number:
Contact Email Address:
Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-10:
0 = Not satisfied 5 = Moderately satisfied 10 = Extremely satisfied.
1. How would you rate the Proposer’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Proposer?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
2. How would you rate the Proposer’s delivery of service?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
3. How would you rate the Proposer’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014 DAS Procurement Services, Version 2.0 – December 9, 2016
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .