RFP Solicitation No. N6945020R0078 Paving IDIQ FL Panhandle.pdf

DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) FIRM-FIXED PRICE (FFP) PAVING INDEFINITE-DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) FLORIDA PANHANDLE AREA

OF OPERATION

This procurement is being solicited in accordance w ith Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 6.1 inviting full and open competition.

This solicitation w ill result in a Paving DBB IDIQ single contract aw ard.

The North American Industry Classif ication Code System (NAICS) is 237310, Highw ay, Street, and Bridge Construction.

The seed project for this solicitation is Project Repair Davis Road NAS Pensacola FL. The estimated cost of construction for the seed project is betw een $50,000 and $100,000.

DIANNE L. HAYMANS 904-542-6101

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

10-Jun-2020

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________1095 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________FAR 52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________0 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________14 Jul 2020 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

CORE CONSTRUCTION

BLDG 903 YORKTOWN

PO BOX 0030

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

03:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N6945020R0078 66

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N6945020R0078

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0001 20,000,000 Each Base Period-Paving Projects

FFP

Design-Bid-Build (DBB), Firm-Fixed Price (FFP), Paving Indefinite- Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Construction Contract for the Florida Panhandle Area of Operation (AOO) for a period of 365 days.

FOB: Destination

PROJECT: WON 1637384

PSC CD: Z2BD

MAX

NET AMT

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0002 UNDEFINED Each OPTION Option Period 1-Paving Projects

FFP

Design-Bid-Build (DBB), Firm-Fixed Price (FFP), Paving Indefinite- Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Construction Contract for the Florida Panhandle Area of Operation (AOO) for a period of 365 days.

FOB: Destination

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0003 UNDEFINED Each OPTION Option Period 2-Paving Projects

FFP

Design-Bid-Build (DBB), Firm-Fixed Price (FFP), Paving Indefinite- Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Construction Contract for the Florida Panhandle Area of Operation (AOO) for a period of 365 days.

FOB: Destination

CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE

The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity and contract value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

$20,000,000.00

DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

$15,000.00 $1,000,000.00

CLIN DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

CLIN

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government 0002 Destination Government Destination Government 0003 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 365 dys. ADC 20,000,000 NAVFAC SOUTHEAST SOUTH ATLANTIC

DIANNE L HAYMANS

YORKTOWN AVE BLDG 903 PO BOX 30

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-05

9045426101 FOB: Destination

0002 365 dys. ADC (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

0003 365 dys. ADC (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

PRICE EVALUATION SHEET

N69450-20-R-0078 Paving IDIQ FL Panhandle AOO

Price Evaluation Sheet

Offerors shall insert the total prices proposed for the seed project, ELINs on Annex A, and ELINs Annex B below.

Contract Line Items / Schedule of Supplies and Services

Total for Seed Project

Repair Davis Road, NAS Pensacola, FL $________________________

Total for Annex A

ELINS A001-A102 $________________________

Total for Annex B ELINS B001-B102 $________________________

Grand Total:

The evaluation of price consists of the Grand Total as listed above. In the event of a math error in the Grand Total, the total evaluated price will be calculated using the pricing per line item.

*Upon award prices submitted on Annex A and B for ELINS A and B shall be incorporated into the contract for the life of the contract.

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

00100 INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION 00100 – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

This procurement is being solicited in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 6.1 inviting full and open competition. The North American Industry Classification Code System (NAICS) is 237310, Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction. The small business size standard is $39,500,000.

ATTACHMENTS AND EXHIBITS: The following documents are provided and are considered part of the solicitation. (Posted at www.beta.sam.gov)

Attachment A - ProjNet How To Guide Attachment B – Site map for Pre-Proposal Meeting/Site Visit Attachment C - SECNAV 5512 Base Access Pass Registration Form Attachment D – COVID-19 Screening Questionnaire (for Pre-Proposal Meeting/Site Visit)

Exhibit A – Construction Experience Project Data Sheet Exhibit B – Safety Data Sheet Exhibit C – NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) Exhibit D – Historical Small Business Utilization Exhibit E – Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD) Exhibit F – Small Business Subcontracting Plan

The following solicitation document files have been posted on www.beta.sam.gov:

RFP_Specifications_Paving IDIQ WON 1637384 RFP_Annex A - Exhibit Line Items (ELINS) A001 - A102 (FL Panhandle AOO) RFP_Annex B - Exhibit Line Items (ELINS) B001 – B102 (NOLFs AL)

PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs) (ProjNet Bidder Inquiries)

All pre-proposal inquiries (PPIs) concerning the solicitation, including technical aspects of the specifications, must be submitted in writing via a “Bidder Inquiry” in ProjNet at www.projnet.org/projnet. The bidder inquiry key for this solicitation is 8JYA3Y-92Y37S. Be sure to select “NAVFAC” as the agency in the dropdown menu. The “Project ID” is shown as “N69450-20-R-0078” and the “Project Name” is shown as “Paving IDIQ FL Panhandle”.

All inquiries shall be submitted at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the closing date of the solicitation in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiry. Responses will be made via ProjNet; however, answers do not amend the solicitation. Any changes to the solicitation will be made via a formal amendment to the RFP and will be posted at www.beta.sam.gov.

All offerors are encouraged to register on ProjNet for alerts, to stay abreast of bidder inquiries and Government responses that are posted in reference to this solicitation. Only self-registered users on ProjNet can submit and review inquiries. A ProjNet How To Guide has been provided as Attachment A. Those submitting inquiries will receive a system generated e-mail notification when their inquiry has been processed and responded to.

Notifications are not sent to registered users when a new inquiry is posted. It is the offeror's responsibility to monitor for inquiries and responses.

BETA.SAM.GOV

Amendments will be posted directly to www.beta.sam.gov. It is the offeror’s responsibility to check www.beta.sam.gov for all postings.

PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING AND SITE VISIT (To be scheduled by future amendment)

In accordance with FAR 52.236-27 Alt 1, the pre-proposal meeting and site visit will be scheduled at Naval Air Station Pensacola FL. A site visit to the Repair Davis Road project site will follow the pre-proposal meeting. A site map is provided as Attachment B. This is the only anticipated site visit.

Registration: A maximum of three (3) individuals may attend the site visit on behalf of an offeror. Each individual planning to attend the site visit must send an email listing their name and company name to: To be provided by future amendment.

NAS Pensacola Base Access: All Contractors/Personnel will need to complete a SECNAV form 5512 (Attachment C) and bring it with them to the Naval Air Station Pensacola front gate pass office (located off of Navy Blvd. and Duncan Rd) on the day of the site visit, along with valid identification from the List of Acceptable Documents on Form SECNAV 5512. All visitors are subject to a background investigation. All vehicles driven on the base must have current registration and insurance.

COVID-19: All Contractors/Personnel will need to comply with COVID-19 Screening Questionnaire (Attachment D) and bring it with them on the day of the pre-proposal meeting and site visit.

Although interested parties are highly encouraged to attend, participation in this meeting and site visit is voluntary and in no way obligates the Government to award any contracts, or pay any costs associated with such participation.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

Proposals submitted in response to this Request for Proposal (RFP) must be received by electronic mail (E-Mail) no later than the date and time specified in the RFP. Hard copies will not be accepted. Proposals not received by the time and date specified shall be treated in accordance with FAR 52.215-1 “Instruction to Offerors - Competitive Acquisitions” and may be rejected. You are highly advised to submit at least one day prior to avoid late submission (See FAR 15.208(b)(1)(i)). The Offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions.

In response to this request for proposal, the complete proposal shall include both the Price Proposal and Non-Price Proposal, submitted as follows:

A. Price Proposal - Submit an electronic copy of the Price Proposal solicitation submittal requirements as an Adobe PDF file. The entire Price proposal shall not exceed 20 pages in length utilizing a minimum Arial Font of 12 with pages numbered. Title page, table of contents, dividers and any pages specifically excluded under each section do not count towards the total page count and should not be numbered. If page count exceeds 20 pages, only the first 20 pages will be reviewed.

Price proposal shall be organized as follows:

Section 1 - Cover letter with required information Section 2 – Standard Form 1442 completed and acknowledgement of all amendments Section 3 - Executed DD Form 1155 and the price proposed on Page 2 of the DD1155 Section 4 - Bonding Section 5 - SAM registration Section 6 - FAPIIS Certification Section 7 - VETS-4212 registration Section 8 – Responsibility Determination Information

Note: The DD1155, bid bond, SAM, FAPIIS and VETS-4212 registrations and responsibility determination information must be in the name and address, CAGE and Entity Identifier of the offeror identified on the SF1442.

B. Non-Price Factors: - Submit an electronic copy of the Non-Price Proposal solicitation submittal requirements as an Adobe PDF file. The entire Non-Price proposal shall not exceed 50 pages in length utilizing a minimum Arial Font of 12 with pages numbered. Title page, table of contents, dividers and any pages specifically excluded under each section do not count towards the total page count and should not be numbered. If page count exceeds 50 pages, only the first 50 pages will be reviewed. The 50 page limitation does not include Joint Venture Agreement, CPARS evaluations, and/or past performance questionnaires.

Non-Price proposal shall be organized as follows:

Section 1 - Cover letter with required information Section 2 – Factor 1 – Experience (Exhibit A) Section 3 – Factor 2 - Past Performance (Exhibit B) Section 4 - Factor 3 – Safety (Exhibit C) Section 5 - Factor 4 – Small Business Utilization and Participation (Exhibits D and E) Section 6 – Factor 4 – Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Exhibit F)

Electronic proposals shall be e-mailed to dianne.haymans@navy.mil and rebecca.m.jones@navy.mil and contain “RFP N69450-20-R-0078 Paving IDIQ FL Panhandle” in the subject line. Non-Price and Price Proposals shall be separate attached files and shall be labeled “Non-Price Proposal” and “Price Proposal” as appropriate. Files shall be Adobe PDF formatted and be under 10MB.

The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required by the solicitation and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for non-conformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

TIMELY RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS

PROPOSALS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) MUST BE

RECEIVED BY ELECTRONIC MAIL (E-MAIL) NO LATER THAN THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED IN THE RFP. Hard copies will not be accepted. Proposals not received by the time and date specified shall be treated in accordance with FAR 52.215-1 “Instruction to Offerors - Competitive Acquisitions” and may be rejected.

Incurred Expenses - The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

No Alternate or Multiple Proposals - Neither multiple proposals, nor proposal variations or options, nor alternate or alternative proposals will be considered in the evaluation.

00150 EVALUATION FACTORS

SECTION 00150 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Intentionally left blank

B. DESCRIPTION OF ACQUISITION

1. This acquisition will result in the award of a Design-Bid-Build (DBB), Firm-Fixed Price (FFP), Paving Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Construction Contract for the Florida Panhandle Area of Operation

(AOO).

2. Construction projects to be performed will primarily consist of general asphalt/concrete paving projects including airfield, roadway, and parking area pavement resurfacing, isolated repair, full-depth reconstruction and incidental related paving work for Department of Defense (DoD) activities managed by NAVFAC SE located in the Florida Panhandle AOO to include, but not limited to: Naval Air Station (NAS) Pensacola in Escambia County, FL;

NAS Whiting Field in the city of Milton in Santa Rosa County, FL; Naval Support Activity (NSA) Panama City in Bay County, FL; and Naval Operational Support Centers (NOSC) and Naval Outlying Landing Fields (NOLF) located in Florida and Alabama.

The planned seed project for this solicitation is Repair Davis Road NAS Pensacola FL. The magnitude of construction for the seed project is between $50,000 and $100,000.

3. The description of the basic contract award CLIN(s) is as follows:

CLIN 0001: Base Period - Paving Construction Projects CLIN 0002: Option Period 1 - Paving Construction Projects CLIN 0003: Option Period 2 - Paving Construction Projects

4. The IDIQ contract will contain a base period and two (2) option periods for a maximum of thirty six

(36) months, or an aggregate maximum value of $20,000,000 for all contracts, whichever comes first.

5. The Government’s cost estimate for this work and total aggregate for all years is NTE $20,000,000.

Task orders will be firm-fixed-priced with a minimum value of $15,000 to a maximum value of $1,000,000 per order. However, task orders under or over these amounts may be considered if deemed to be in the Government’s best interest and approved by the NAVFAC SE Chief of Contracting Office.

6. The Government intends to award a single contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors and their relative importance in the solicitation.

7. This acquisition is solicited on an unrestricted basis inviting full and open competition.

II. Intentionally left blank

III. EVALUATION

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal.

6. The Contractor’s technical proposal, including revisions and amendments, made prior to contract award and a copy of which is in the possession of both parties, will be incorporated into this contract upon award by reference with the same force and effect as if set forth in full text.

B. Intentionally left blank C. Intentionally left blank D. Intentionally left blank E. Intentionally left blank

F. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Experience Factor 2 – Past Performance Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Small Business Utilization and Participation

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is that the technical factors (Factors, 1, 3, and 4) are of equal importance to each other, respectively, and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 2). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

Proposals Submitted in response to this Request for Proposal (RFP) must be received by electronic mail (E- Mail) no later than the date and time specified in the RFP. Hard copies will not be accepted. Proposals not received by the time and date specified shall be treated in accordance with FAR 52.215-1 “Instruction to Offerors - Competitive Acquisitions” and may be rejected. You are highly advised to submit at least one day prior to avoid late submission (See FAR 15.208(b)(1)(i)). The Offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions.

Electronic proposals shall be e-mailed to dianne.haymans@navy.mil and rebecca.m.jones@navy.mil and contain “RFP N69450-20-R-0078 Paving IDIQ FL Panhandle” in the subject line. Non-Price and Price Proposals shall be separate attached files and shall be labeled “Non-Price Proposal” and “Price Proposal” as appropriate. Files shall be Adobe PDF formatted and be under 10MB.

The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required by the solicitation and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for non-conformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

Incurred Expenses - The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

No Alternate or Multiple Proposals - Neither multiple proposals, nor proposal variations or options, nor alternate or alternative proposals will be considered in the evaluation.

In response to this request for proposal, the complete proposal shall include both the Price Proposal and Non-Price Proposal, submitted as follows:

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Submit an electronic copy of the Price Proposal solicitation submittals requirements as an Adobe PDF file.

The entire Price proposal shall not exceed 20 pages in length utilizing a minimum Arial Font of 12 with pages numbered. Title page, table of contents, dividers and any pages specifically excluded under each section do not count towards the total page count and should not be numbered. If page count exceeds 20 pages, only the first 20 pages will be reviewed.

Section 1 - Cover letter with the following information:

Type of Proposal (Price Proposal or Non-Price Proposal) RFP Number and Title of Project

Offeror’s Name Authorized negotiator’s (POC) name POC telephone number POC email address CAGE Code Entity Identifier (formerly DUNS) TIN (Taxpayer ID number) Business Size (Large or Small Business)

Section 2 - SF1442 (Solicitation, Offer, and Award) with blocks 14 through 20C completed and acknowledgement of all amendments.

Section 3 - Executed DD Form 1155 (DD1155). Offerors shall insert their company name and address in Block 9, signature, date signed, and name and title of person authorized to sign in Block 16, and the price proposed for the seed project on Page 2 of the DD1155. Offerors shall insert the prices proposed for ELINs on Annex A and Annex B. Total prices proposed for the seed, ELINS A and ELINS B shall be input on the Price Evaluation Sheet.

Offerors are required to enter a unit price for each ELIN or SUBLIN on Annex’s A and B for the base year, first option year and second option year. Prices proposed for the first option year and second option years should include escalation if necessary.

Section 4 - Bonding. Offerors shall submit a bid bond (SF-24) in the amount of 20% of total project bid price or $3M, whichever amount is less, for the Seed Project - Repair Davis Road. The bid bond shall be in the name of the offeror identified on the SF1442 and DD1155. In addition, the offeror shall provide a letter from its bonding company confirming that it has a single award bonding capacity of at least $100,000.00 and an aggregate bonding capacity of at least $20,000,000.

Section 5 - SAM registration. Offerors shall ensure current registration on the BETA.SAM.GOV Website, https://www.beta.sam.gov, including Annual Representations and Certifications are completed and updated for this procurement required by Section 00600 of the RFP. If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00600 of the RFP is not provided in BETA.SAM.GOV, include a copy of the representation or certification in your price proposal. These pages do not count towards the total page count.

Section 6 - FAPIIS Certification. Offerors shall ensure Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Certification as required by FAR 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters

Section 7 - VETS-4212 registration. Copy of annual Vet’s Report or confirmation notification email from VETS-4212 (demonstrating proof of registration)

Section 8 – Responsibility Determination Information

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION - In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. In a separate tab, the offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:

1. One (1) signed bank reference demonstrating adequate financial resources.

If offeror's firm has a line of credit - provide information on how many figures the offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three (3) complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization.

Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three (3) complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies.

The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

3. Description of offeror's facilities and equipment.

4. Other offeror's work presently under contract.

Although required to be submitted with offeror's price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm's responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

Note: The DD1155, bid bond, SAM, FAPIIS and VETS-4212 registrations and responsibility determination information must be in the name and address, CAGE and Entity Identifier of the offeror identified on the SF1442.

2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the proposed price for the seed project combined with the total sum of both ELINS A and B for the base year. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b) Non-Price Factors:

Submit an electronic copy of the Non-Price Proposal solicitation submittals requirements as an Adobe PDF file. The entire Non-Price proposal shall not exceed 50 pages in length utilizing a minimum Arial Font of 12 with pages numbered. Title page, table of contents, dividers and any pages specifically excluded under each section do not count towards the total page count and should not be numbered. If page count exceeds 50 pages, only the first 50 pages will be reviewed. The 50 page limitation does not include Joint Venture Agreement, CPARS evaluations, and/or past performance questionnaires.

(1) Factor 1 - Experience

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit the following information:

Submit a minimum of four (4) and a maximum of five (5) relevant paving construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates the Offeror’s experience on projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. A minimum of two (2) of the projects shall be related to airfield pavement repair (asphalt and/or concrete) on active airfields. Acceptable projects will include those where work was executed on runway, taxiway, and/or apron pavements. A minimum of two (2) projects shall be related to roadway and/or parking lot pavement.

Acceptable projects will include resurfacing, isolated repairs, and full-depth reconstruction.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

a. Completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

b. With an approximate completed value of $100,000 or greater.

A project is further defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

To be considered complete, a project must be 100% complete as defined by the construction dollar value invoiced and executing agency accepted.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) projects for construction. Any projects submitted in excess of five (5) will not be considered.

(2) Factor 2, Past Performance:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1 for Experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, the offeror shall submit Past Performance Questionnaire (Exhibit B) for each project included in Factor 1 for Experience. The offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs.

However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Dianne L. Haymans at dianne.haymans@navy.mil and copy to rebecca.m.jones@navy.mil. PPQ’s do not count towards the overall page limitation.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

This evaluation will consider how well the offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating. Past performance ratings of “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” hold more value than a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance.

(3) Factor 3, Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include three (3) previous complete calendar years’ (2019, 2018 and 2017) worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: Submit three (3) previous complete calendar years’ (2019, 2018 and 2017) worth of data. If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART and TRC rates, for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART, and TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work and the offeror’s method for qualifying, evaluating, selecting all tiers of sub-contractors. The offeror will describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels. Additionally, the contactor will describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) pages.

Safety narratives for joint ventures may be up to four (4) pages in length.

A copy of the Safety Data Sheet to be used for submission of safety information is included as Exhibit C.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case

(TRC) Rates

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three (3) previous complete calendar years’ (2019, 2018 and 2017) the offeror will submit EMR. If no EMR exists, the offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate explaining why not. If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of this selection factor. The board will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates: For the three (3) previous complete calendar years’ (2019, 2018 and 2017), the offeror will submit their OSHA DART and TRC, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA DART and TRC rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART and TRC rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety: The offeror will describe their plan to evaluate their safety performance and that of potential subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(4) Other Sources of Information Available to the Government: Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in

Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

(4) Factor 4, Small Business Utilization and Participation:

It is the policy of the Government to provide maximum practicable opportunities in its acquisitions to Small Business (SB) concerns, including Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZone SB), Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and other small business concerns. Further, it is the policy of the Government that such concerns will have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in contract performance consistent with its efficient performance.

This Factor assesses both the historical achievements in utilizing small business concerns and the proposed small business participation commitment for this requirement. The Offeror is required to demonstrate its previous commitment to SBs through its record of past utilization of SBs and its planned level of commitment to small business if awarded a contract under this solicitation.

1. All Offerors (both Other than Small Businesses (OTSB) AND SBs shall use Exhibit D (Historical Small Business Utilization) to demonstrate their historical utilization of SBs. Exhibit D shall be provided for each project submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience. Failure to submit Exhibit D for each project submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience, or the failure to fully complete Exhibit D may result in a deficiency.

2. All Offerors (both OTSBs and SBs) shall use Exhibit E (Small Business Participation Commitment

Document (SPCD)) to submit the following required information for evaluation of this factor:

To demonstrate commitment to use small business concerns in the performance of this contract, identify all planned subcontractors by name that will be used to support each specific small business category (i.e., SB, HUBZone SB, WOSB, SDB, VOSB, and SDVOSB). Identify the type and complexity of product/service to be subcontracted, the estimated subcontract value, and the type of commitment (i.e., teaming agreement, letter of commitment, etc.) with each subcontractor.

To demonstrate maximum practicable participation of small businesses, identify (in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total contract value) the Offeror’s proposed small business participation.

The minimum required small business participation (i.e. work to be performed by small business as the prime contractor and/or work to be performed by small business subcontractors) is 20%. All Offerors who are not able to meet the minimum total small business participation rate of 20% (of the total contract value) shall provide a detailed explanation why the minimum total small business participation rate cannot be achieved.

Large business Offerors may achieve the minimum total small business participation rate through subcontracting to small businesses.

Small business Offerors may achieve the minimum total small business participation rate through their own performance/participation as a prime and also through a joint venture, teaming arrangement, and/or subcontracting with other small business concerns.

Offerors are encouraged to exceed this percentage and seek meaningful levels of participation in each of the small business categories (i.e., SB, HUBZone SB, WOSB, SDB, VOSB, and SDVOSB) consistent with efficient contract performance. Offerors are required to provide a detailed explanation for the methods used to develop the small business participation rates. Offerors simply proposing a 20% total small business participation rate without describing the methods used may be rated lower.

If the Offeror does not intend to subcontract, provide a detailed explanation why subcontracting would not result in efficient contract performance.

The Government will evaluate the realism and likelihood of success in achieving the small business objectives of this acquisition based on the following:

The extent to which the Offeror is able to demonstrate a history of supporting

Government policies concerning the utilization of small business concerns (including all of the various socioeconomic categories of small business, HUBZone SB, WOSB, SDB, VOSB, SDVOSB) and the success in achieving goals established by subcontracting plans on prior contracts.

The extent to which the Offeror has demonstrated an achievable commitment to use small businesses (including HUBZone SB, WOSB, SDB, VOSB, SDVOSB) in the performance of this contract in the SBPCD. The SBPCD will be evaluated to determine the extent to which small business concerns are specifically identified by name and socioeconomic category in the document and the quantitative degree to which small business concerns (including HUBZone, WOSB, SDB, VOSB, and SDVOSB) will participate relative to the total contract value.