RFP Evaluation Form Meisner 3.docx
DOCX document 292 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-C05004-00002810
- Issued by
- Coos County, Oregon
About this file
This document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) Evaluation Form for the Columbia 9-1-1 Communications District Construction project located in Columbia County and Shaniko City, Oregon. The form is used to evaluate bids received for the construction project, which includes tasks such as equipment relocation, site demolition, and construction within an active communications site. The evaluation form covers key criteria such as the completeness of the bid package, the proposed construction schedule, the bidder's experience with similar projects, and their ability to address known project challenges and risks. The evaluation also assesses the bidder's acceptance of contract terms, including liquidated damages, and their attendance at the pre-bid meeting.
The second part of the form focuses on the technical review of the bidder's proposed approach, including the similarity of their example projects to the current scope, their experience constructing public safety communication sites, and their ability to address challenges and communicate with the project owners. The evaluation form provides a structured process to ensure all bids are assessed equally based on the RFP requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Report Meissner CCE BMC 200015 SRT.pdf | ||
| Columbia911 ITB Meissner.docx | DOCX document | |
| Report Meissner CCE BMC 200015 GEO.pdf | ||
| Intent to Award~16.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Meissner Pricing Schedule 2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Columbia 911 Agreement Final 04_2022.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4. Meissner Final Construction Drawings 4-7-2021.pdf | ||
| Pumpkin Center Building Drawing~1.pdf | ||
| Meissner SA 6 22 21.pdf | ||
| Wireless Construction SOW Meissner 04_2022.docx | DOCX document | |
| Pumpkin Center Building Drawing~2.pdf | ||
| Special Inspection Short form 2016 Signed.PDF | ||
| Meisner R 1 For Construction.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Columbia 9-1-1 Communications District Construction RFP Evaluation Site Name: Meissner
Request for Proposal Evaluation Form Enter Project Bid Title This form is to be used to review bids received in response to the request for proposal (RFP) for the project noted above to ensure all bids are evaluated equally. Section 1 of this form is for the review of the submitted bid packages, Section 2 is for interviews if performed.
In all cases where a rated response is required, the following categories shall be applied.
Exceeds, Acceptable, Does not meet, Not submitted/answered. Any section that does not meet the RFP requirements required comments as to why.
Section 1: PROPOSAL REVIEW
| Yes |
| No |
Bid Package Complete including all the requested bid documents?
Comments: Select box to add comments
| |_| |
| |_| |
Does the proposed construction schedule achieve the major milestones?
Comments: Select box to add comments
| |_| |
| |_| |
Are the five example projects of comparable value?
Comments: Select box to add comments
| |_| |
| |_| |
Are the five example projects of comparable scope including equipment relocation, construction, and site demolition?
Comments: Select box to add comments
| |_| |
| |_| |
| Yes |
| No |
Were certified tower climber records provided?
Comments: Select box to add comments
| |_| |
| |_| |
Does the bidder accept the Liquidated Damages? (When applicable) Comments: Select box to add comments
| |_| |
| |_| |
Did the proposing Company exclude any contract terms, scope items, or critical project delivery items? (if yes, add details in the comments) Comments: Select box to add comments
| |_| |
| |_| |
| Did the Contractor attend the pre-bid meeting? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
Section 2: Technical Review Questions
| E |
| A |
| D |
| N |
When reviewing the technical delivery of the example projects, how similar are they to this project scope?
Comments: Select box to add comments
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
Did they include construction in the same compound as an operating communication site?
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
Based on the engineering design and site conditions does the proposed project delivery plan address the known project challenges, design, and defined delivery limitations?
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
If included, do any of the exclusions, assumptions, or clarifications in the proposal increase the risk to the Owner?
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
Does the proposing Company have experience constructing public safety communication sites?
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
How do you address challenges and communication with project owners if the challenges are going to have an impact on the project delivery?
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .