RFP_Attachment_B_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 275 KB Posted

Attached to
DEICER Trucks Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8534-21-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Robins Air Force Base

About this file

This solicitation requests proposals for Class A truck mounted and Class B extended reach deicing trucks for the United States Air Force. The Air Force requires 34 Class A trucks capable of reaching 42 feet with 1,600 gallon minimum tanks from fiscal years 2022 through 2027. Additionally, 23 Class B extended reach trucks capable of reaching 75 feet with 2,600 gallon minimum tanks are required for the same period. The contract will have a two year basic ordering period with four optional ordering years and will be awarded on a firm fixed price basis. Recent funding has allocated 14, 5, 5, 5, 5 Class A trucks and 7, 4, 4, 4, 4 Class B trucks annually from fiscal years 2022 through 2027. The solicitation is open to all responsible sources and proposals will be evaluated by the Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center located at Robins Air Force Base.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to DEICER Trucks, newest first.
File Type Posted
Section_M_18MAR21.pdf PDF
SECTION_L_25FEB2021.pdf PDF
SOWDeicers-2021_02_11.pdf PDF
FA8534-21-R-0002-0004.pdf PDF
CID_A-A-59145D_04MAR2021.pdf PDF
FA8534_21_R0002_Special_Notice_9_March2021.pdf PDF
FA8534-21-R-0002-0003.pdf PDF
Solicitation Questions and Answers 2.pdf PDF
FA8534-21-R-0002-0002.pdf PDF
FA853421R0002-0001.pdf PDF
Solicitation Questions and Answers 1.pdf PDF
SECTION_L_Proposal_Requirements.pdf PDF
RFP_Attachment_D_Transmittal_Letter.pdf PDF
2 CID A-A-59145D 2020.06.08.pdf PDF
FORM 158 Packaging.pdf PDF
IUID - CLASS B - 2020.05.21.pdf PDF
RFP_Attachment_E_Consent_Form.pdf PDF
CDRL_ExhibitB_DEICER_TM_86_01_FORM1423.pdf PDF
DD Form 1653 Transportation.pdf PDF
2a CID A-A-59145D Revision Page 1_2020.07.10.pdf PDF
RFP_Attachment_A_FACTS_Sheet_and_Past_Performance_Relevancy_Table.pdf PDF
3 SOW - Deicers - 2020.05.27.pdf PDF
TMCR_TM_86_01Q_Deicers.pdf PDF
FA853421R0002.pdf PDF
SECTION_M_Evaluation_Factors_for_Award.pdf PDF
RFP_Attachment_C_Client_Authorization_Letter.pdf PDF
CDRLs_ExhibitA_DEICER_FORM1423.pdf PDF
IUID - CLASS A - 2020.05.21.pdf PDF
EDL - CLASS A - 2020.02.27.pdf PDF
EDL - CLASS B - 2020.02.27.pdf PDF
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP Attachment B: Past Performance Questionnaire

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided.

Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

E V S M U N/A

1. Extent to which the company’s products and/or services met the requirements of the customer’s contract or project?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Configuration Management (first product delivered same as last product delivered):

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

3. Quality of Completed Product:

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

4. Overall management of Subcontracting efforts:

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

5. Quality of Technical Manuals or Commercial Manuals:

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

6. Customer’s Satisfaction with warranty response times and corrective actions:

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

7. Adequate Number of dedicated resources for your program:

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

8. Company performed independently without significant customer direction/oversight:

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

9. Timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production problems affecting the program:

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

10. Monitoring of Program Schedules and Critical Milestones:

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

11. Completed work on time:

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

12. Extent to which small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses and other socio-economic business sectors were utilized in the performance of the contract:

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

13. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.

14. Describe the contractor’s or company’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract.

15. Additional Remarks.

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I [type one selection from note list here] award to him today given that I had a choice.

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Type in One of Below Choices Selection Items definitely would probably would might or might not probably would not definitely would not

RFP Attachment B: Past Performance Questionnaire

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .