RFP Attachment 7 - Relevancy Assessment.pdf
PDF 137 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA857526RB004
About this file
This document is RFP Attachment 7, a Present/Past Performance Relevancy Assessment form that offerors, joint venture members, and critical subcontractors must complete for RFP FA8575-26-R-B004. The form requires separate completion for each effort identified in the PPI Tool and serves to assist the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) in evaluating the relevancy of proposed efforts to the instant contract requirements. Offerors are instructed to complete only column three of the relevancy table, with their answers applicable solely to efforts identified in the PPI Tool, not to proposed solutions for the current opportunity.
The form establishes four relevancy categories with specific evaluation criteria. "Very Relevant" efforts must involve all listed services including management of repair sources, DMSMS, TAT at various SORs, prime contractor responsibility on Foreign Military Sales efforts, customization and maintenance of web-based Management Information Systems, management of five or more subcontractors simultaneously, supply chain management, and repair services, with contracts or task orders of $50 million or greater annually over more than three years. "Relevant" efforts require at least two of the specified services with contract values between $34 million and $49.9 million and performance duration between two and three years. "Somewhat Relevant" efforts involve at least one service with contract values between $14 million and $33.9 million and performance of one to two years. "Not Relevant" efforts lack the specified services and involve contracts under $14 million with less than one year duration. The form concludes with a question requiring offerors to disclose whether the contract effort was previously submitted as past performance data for another Robins Air Force Base procurement, with requirements to identify the contracting officer, phone number, office symbol, and solicitation number if applicable.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP FA8575-26-R-B004
RFP Attachment 7
PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY ASSESSMENT
(To be Completed by Offeror/Joint Venture Member/ and Critical Subcontractor) (Complete one for each effort identified for evaluation in the PPI Tool)
Request the offeror/joint venture member/and Critical Subcontractor (if applicable) complete a separate Relevancy Table for each effort identified for evaluation in the PPI Tool. This table, in addition to the information provided by the offeror in the PPI Tool, will assist the PCO in evaluating the relevancy of the proposed effort to the instant requirements. Offerors/joint venture members shall only complete column three. Offerors’/joint venture members’ answers are applicable only to the efforts identified in the PPI Tool, not the offeror’s proposed solutions to the instant effort.
Please be as specific as possible with the fill-in information provided.
Contractor:
Cage Code:
Contract Number:
Program Title:
Contr Agency/Customer:
Category Relevancy Requirements
(GOVT has completed this column)
(DO NOT CHANGE)
Fill-in for the Effort Identified in para. B Above (Offeror/joint venture member/critical subcontractor completes)
Very Relevant past performance effort involved all of the following services/technical aspects:
Management of Repair Sources, Management of DMSMS, Management of (TAT) at various SORs, Prime Contractor on Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Effort, Customize and Manage and Maintain a web-based Management Information System (MIS), Management of 5 or more Subcontractors at the same time, Supply Chain Management, and Repair Services
Present/past performance efforts involved contracts or task orders $50M or greater annually, with a period of performance of greater than three (3) years
Relevant past performance effort involved at least two
(2) of the following services/technical aspects:
Management of Repair Sources, Management of DMSMS, Management of (TAT) at various SORs Prime Contractor on Direct Commercial Sales (DCS), Customize and Manage a web-based Management Information System (MIS), Management of 3 or more Subcontractors at the same time or Supply Chain Management, and Repair Services
Present/past performance efforts involved contracts or task orders between $34M and $49.9M of performance between two (2) and three (3) years.
Somewhat Relevant past performance effort involved at least one (1) of the following services / technical aspects:
Management of Repair Sources, Management of DMSMS, Management of (TAT) at various SORs, Prime or Subcontractor on DOD Effort, Manage a web-based Management Information System (MIS), Management of more than one Subcontractors at the same time or Supply Chain Management, and Repair Service
Present/past performance efforts involved contracts or task orders between $14M and $33.9M annually, with a period of performance between one (1) and two (2) years.
Not Relevant past performance effort involved none of the following services/technical aspects:
Management of Repair Sources, Management of DMSMS, Management of (TAT) at various SORs, Prime or Subcontractor on
Present/past performance efforts involved contracts or task orders of less than $14M annually and work performance was less than one (1) year in duration.
Effort, FMS contract, Manage a web-based Management Information System (MIS), Management of more than one Subcontractors at the same time or Supply Chain Management, and Repair Services
Was this contract effort (as identified above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous Robins AFB procurement. Yes No . If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .