RFP_2025-16_Addendum_01_Pre-Bid.pdf
PDF 125 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- RFP No. 2025-16
- Issued by
- Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington
About this file
This is an Addendum document (Addendum 01) for RFP No. 2025-16 from the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI), capturing questions and answers from a Pre-Bid Conference held on December 16, 2024. The RFP relates to creating educational materials for American Chinese History Month. The document addresses three key questions from the pre-bid conference, clarifying that the materials should be suitable for all K-12 grade levels, with the implementation process including an initial meeting with the selected bidder, followed by three weeks of design drafting and 2-3 weeks for OSPI's internal approval process.
The document indicates that no additional educational resources beyond the posters are required by the legislative proviso, and implementers will determine how to integrate the posters with other materials. Project management will be handled by Robin Howe, who will be accessible throughout the process. All communications must be directed to contracts@K12.wa.us, with communications to other parties considered unofficial and potentially resulting in disqualification. The document specifies that no changes to the original solicitation document are required based on these questions and answers.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Exhibit_A_Assurances_2025-16.docx | DOCX document | |
| Contract_Intake_Form_01.24.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP_2025-16_Amendment_01.pdf | ||
| RFP_2025-16_History_Materials_FINAL.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_B_Qualification_Affirmations_2025-16.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP_2025-16_Addendum_02.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_E_Contract_Issues_2025-16.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP_2025-16_Amendment_02.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OSPI RFP No. 2025-16 | Addendum 01 Page 1 of 1
This document is posted to capture the questions received, and agency answers provided, during the Pre-Bid Conference, which was held on December 16, 2024.
All amendments, addenda, and notifications related to this procurement will be posted on the
OSPI website (if this was an open procurement) and on the Washington Electronic Business
Solution (WEBS) website. Additional questions concerning this procurement must be submitted to contracts@K12.wa.us. Communication directed to other parties will be considered unofficial and non-binding on OSPI, and may result in disqualification of the Consultant.
1. Question: Is the expectation for a one-size-fits-all approach, or should the content be modified for different age groups?
Answer: Yes, this is meant to be able to be put up in any grade, K-12.
2. Question: Will there be additional educational materials to support educators to implement culturally responsive discussions about these posters as part of this RFP?
Answer: There is currently no directive from the legislature through this proviso to provide additional resources outside of the posters. It is currently the assumption that those who choose to use the posters will determine to what level of complexity the posters will be integrated with other educational materials.
3. Question: Will you please provide what the communication and review process will be during the implementation process? How long does it take for drafts to be reviewed and approved, typically?
Answer: An initial meeting will be set up with the selected Apparent Successful Bidder to go over timeline and enter into negotiations, if applicable. Then, there is an expected three weeks of design drafting with communication via email or meetings. Once the contract is drafted, it will route through OSPI’s internal approval process which can last
2-3 weeks. Robin Howe, the project manager for this proviso, will be accessible to the
Apparent Successful Bidder through the whole process.
No questions or responses included in this document require any changes to the solicitation document; this document stands alone.
Request for Proposals No. 2025-16
Addendum 01 – Pre-Bid Conference Q&A https://www.k12.wa.us/about-ospi/contracting-ospi/competitive-procurements https://pr-webs-customer.des.wa.gov/ mailto:contracts@K12.wa.us
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .