Questions and Responses 1.pdf
PDF 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cultural Resources Assessment Services
- Solicitation number
- RFP-09937
- Issued by
- Walton County, Clewiston City, Florida
About this file
The document is a memorandum containing questions and responses related to a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Cultural Resources Assessment Services issued by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). The RFP is for a contract to provide cultural resources assessment services for projects in Walton County and Clewiston City, Florida. The RFP states that subcontractors may appear in more than one proposal, and that consulting firms are permitted to pursue as a Prime and also as a subcontractor for another Prime firm. The memorandum also addresses a liquidated damages clause in the RFP, stating that submittal of a proposal constitutes acknowledgement and willingness to abide by all terms and conditions outlined in the RFP documents, and that no conditions may be applied to any aspect of the RFP by the proposer.
The RFP does not appear to have any restrictions on key personnel belonging to the prime or subconsultant firm, and the proposed Project Manager will be evaluated based on the requirements in the RFP and Scope of Services documents. The contract term and any renewal options are not specified in the provided information.
View the file
Other files
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Florida Department of Transportation
RON DESANTIS
GOVERNOR
605 Suwannee Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450
JARED W. PERDUE, P.E.
SECRETARY
www.fdot.gov
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: August 22, 2024 To: All Proposers RE: Questions and Answers 1 Proposal ID: DOT-RFP-25-3002-CS Description: Cultural Recourses Assessment Services
1. There appears to be no restrictions in the RFP about key personnel belonging to the prime or subconsultant firm. Is this accurate? For example, in a true teaming situation, could the Project Manager come from either firm?
Response: Yes, typically the Project Manager would be employed by the Prime. In either case, the proposed Project Manager will be evaluated based upon the requirements in the Request for Proposal and Scope of Services documents.
2. The RFP specifies that subcontractors may appear in more than one proposal
(21.2). But it is not clear whether a company can submit as both a prime contractor as well as join a team as a subcontractor. Is this allowable?
Response: Yes.
3. Are consulting firms permitted to pursue as a Prime and also as a sub from another Prime firm?
Response: Yes.
4. In section 37 on page 25 of the RFP, there is a statement that contains a liquidated damages clause of $100/per day for each calendar day that we are late in delivery.
Because it's against our company policy, which would prevent us from submitting a proposal on this contract - if we request to waive Liquidated Damages, would this disqualify us from winning this work?
Response: Per the Price Proposal Form, submittal of a proposal for this procurement constitutes acknowledgement and willingness to abide by all terms and conditions outlined in the Request for Proposal documents. In addition, Section 20, Additional Terms and Conditions, of the RFP states, “No conditions may be applied to any aspect of the RFP by the proposer. Any conditions placed on any aspect of the proposal documents by the proposer may result in the proposal being rejected as a conditional proposal (see
“RESPONSIVENESS OF PROPOSALS”).”
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .