Q A 201 312 Amendment 06.pdf

PDF 89 KB Posted

Attached to
Connections II Solicitation
Solicitation number
QTA010ABA0023
Issued by

About this file

Amendment 06 Q A 201 312

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SF30Amendment 12.pdf PDF
SF 30- CNX II Amend 11.pdf PDF
SectionLAmend11.pdf PDF
SectionKAmend10.pdf PDF
SectionLAmend10.pdf PDF
SectionIAmend10.pdf PDF
SF 30- CNX II Amend 10.pdf PDF
SectionJAmend10.pdf PDF
SF 30- CNX II Amend 09.pdf PDF
SectionLAmend9.pdf PDF
SF 30 CNX II Amend 08 pg 2.pdf PDF
SectionLAmend8.pdf PDF
SF 30- CNX II Amend 08.pdf PDF
SectionIAmend8.pdf PDF
SF 30- CNX II Amend 07.pdf PDF
SectionGAmend7.pdf PDF
RFP Q A num_360-364_v1.pdf PDF
SF 30 CNX II Amend 07 pg 2.pdf PDF
SectionBAmend7.pdf PDF
SectionBAmend6.pdf PDF
SectionCAmend6.pdf PDF
SF 30- CNX II Amend 06.pdf PDF
SectionCAmend5.pdf PDF
Subcontracting Plan Attachment Amend 05.docx DOCX document
SectionBAmend5.pdf PDF
SectionGAmend5.pdf PDF
SectionFAmend5.pdf PDF
SectionDAmend5.pdf PDF
RFP QandA num_200-360_v1_1.pdf PDF
Connections II Past Performance Questionnaire Attachement Amend 05.docx DOCX document
SectionLAmend5.pdf PDF
SectionJAmend5.pdf PDF
SectionMAmend5.pdf PDF
SF 30- CNX II Amend 05.pdf PDF
SectionLAmend4.pdf PDF
SectionJAmend4.pdf PDF
SectionCAmend4.pdf PDF
SF 30- CNX II Amend 04.pdf PDF
RFP QandA num_82-199_v1_2.pdf PDF
SectionBAmend4.pdf PDF
SectionGAmend4.pdf PDF
SectionHAmend4.pdf PDF
SectionFAmend3.pdf PDF
SectionJAmend3.pdf PDF
SectionIAmend3.pdf PDF
SectionKAmend3.pdf PDF
RFP QandA num_1_v1_1.pdf PDF
SectionHAmend3.pdf PDF
SF30 Connections II Amendment 03.pdf PDF
SectionBAmend3.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 72 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Questions and Answers to Connections II RFP

Page 1 QTA010ABA0023 August 10, 2010

# RFP Section Redacted Question Redacted Answer

201 B.1.1 C.1.2 F.3

The Final RFP makes explicit reference to the Continental United States (CONUS) as the Place of Performance with respect to rates being submitted with proposal, with rates for Outside the Continental United States (OCONUS) to be proposed after contract award. It further states CONUS as the minimum geographic requirement, with services within foreign countries to be proposed on a task order basis based on contractor ability.

Sometimes there can be confusion about what constitutes CONUS and

OCONUS.

Question: Can the Government please confirm whether AK and HI are to be considered CONUS?

Question: Can the Government please clarify the status of American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, Guam, Puerto Rico, Saipan, and the remaining Northern Mariana Islands in terms of CONUS/OCONUS?

Alaska and Hawaii are not to be included in the minimum geographic scope (for the purpose of proposals). Sections B and C will be amended to reflect this.

American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, Guam, Puerto Rico, Saipan, and the remaining Northern Mariana Islands are not to be included in the minimum geographic scope (for the purpose of proposals).

312 Section F.3 The RFP provides that “The minimum geographic requirement is contractors shall provide services within the Continental United States.”

Please clarify whether “within Continental United States” only refers to the 48 contiguous states and does not include American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, Guam, Puerto Rico, Saipan, and the remaining Northern Mariana Islands.

The Continental United Stated does not include Alaska and Hawaii.

American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, Guam, Puerto Rico, Saipan, and the remaining Northern Mariana Islands are not to be included in the minimum geographic scope (for the purpose of proposals).

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .