PCR_SOW.pdf

FACILITY SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (FSRM)

PLANNING CHARRETTE REPORT (PCR)

Convert T1 Hangar to T7 UMT, B995

Columbus AFB, MS

EEPZ244329

05 May 2025

Table of Contents

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ... 3

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Project Description

2.1 General Description

2.2 Current Situation

2.3 Impact if Not Provided

2.4 Cost Estimate

2.5 Concept Sketches

3.0 Scope Analysis

3.1 Cost and Scope Thresholds

3.2 User and Facility Requirements

3.3 User Equipment

APPENDICES

A. Meeting Minutes B. Site Exhibit C. B995 Concept Floor Plan D. Fire Sprinkler Calculations E. Updated DD Form 1391 Draft F. Parametric Cost Estimate G. Construction Schedule H. Hazmat Survey I. HPSB Checklist

AE Architecture – Engineering AETC Air Education and Training

Command AFB Air Force Base AFCEC Air Force Civil Engineer Center AFF Above Finished Floor AGET Aircrew Ground Egress Trainer AHJ Authority Having Jurisdiction AOC Air Operations Center APT Advanced Pilot Training ATD Aircrew Training Devices ATFP Anti-Terrorism / Force Protection

BAS Building Automated System BIM Building Information Modeling CAFB Columbus Air Force Base CAP Corrective Action Plans CATV Cable Television CCN Category Code CDRL Contract Data Requirements List CES Civil Engineer Squadron CF/CI Contractor Furnished/Contractor

Installed CF/GI Contractor Furnished/Government

Installed CID Comprehensive Interior Design CONUS Contiguous United States CO Contracting Officer COR Contracting Officer Representative Cx Commissioning DAFMAN Department of the Air Force

Manual DB Design Build DBB Design-Bid-Build DDC Direct Digital Control DOAS Dedicated Outside Air Supply DoD Department of Defense DOR Designer of Record EACS Electronic Access Control Systems EIAP Environmental Impact Analysis

Process EISA07 Energy Independence and

Security Act of 2007 EMCS Energy Management Control System EoR Engineer of Record

EST Ejection Seat Trainer ETL Engineer Technical Letter FF&E Finishes, Furnishings, and Equipment FIO For Information Only

ft. Foot or Feet FSD Fire Safety Deficiency FTU Formal Training Units FRD Facilities Requirements Document FRCS Facility Related Control System FSD Fire Safety Deficiency FSRM Facility Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization FTU Formal Training Units GB Gigabyte GBCI Green Business Certification Inc.

GBI Green Building Initiative GBTS Ground-Based Training System GF/CI Government Furnished/Contractor

Installed GF/GI Government Furnished/Government

Installed GP Guiding Principles GPM Gallons per Minute GSF Gross Square Foot GSM Gross Square Meters HEMP High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse HPSB High Performance and Sustainable Buildings HQ Headquarters HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning ICC International Code Council IFF Identification Friend or Foe IFS Installation Facilities Standards IOC Initial Operating Capability IP Internet Protocol ISD Instructional Systems Design JGSC Jacobs Government Services

Company K Thousands LED Light Emitting Diode LEED Leadership in Energy and

Environmental Design LPS Lightning Protection System

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

M Million MII Micro-Computer Aided Cost

Estimating System MNS Mass Notification System MOBMS Main Operating Base Management System MoP Manager of Projects NIPRNet Non-Classified Internet Protocol

Router Network NSF Net Square Feet NSM Net Square Meters OFT Operational Flight Trainer PCAS Post Construction Award Services PCR Planning Charrette Report PE Professional Engineer PM Project Manager PTT Part Task Trainer RF Radio Frequency RFI Request for Information ROM Rough Order of Magnitude RPIE Real Property Installed Equipment SAF/IE Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Installations, Environment and Energy

SATCOM Satellite Communications

SCIF Sensitive Compartmented

Information Facility SF Square Foot/Feet SIPRNet Secret Internet Protocol Router

Network SUPT Specialized Undergrad Pilot Training TEMPEST Telecommunications

Electronics Material Protected from Emanating Spurious Transmissions

TFR Trainer Facilities Report TO Task Order TPC Third Party Certification TSFPEWG Tri-Service Fire Protection

Engineering Working Group UFC Unified Facilities Criteria UFGS Unified Facility Guide Specifications UHMW Ultra-High Molecular Weight UL Underwriters Laboratories UMT Unit Maintenance Trainer UPS Uninterruptible Power Supply

US United States USACE United States Army Corps of

Engineers USAF United States Air Force USD User Requirements Document UTD Unit Training Device WST Weapons System Trainer

1.0 Introduction

This document provides the Facility Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (FSRM) Planning Charrette Report (PCR) for Convert T1 Hangar to T7 UMT, B995 at Columbus Air Force Base (CAFB).

The primary purpose of the PCR is to validate the project scope, site, and costs and to refine the programming documentation in preparation for possible submission for project approval; DD Form 1391. It also provides the designer with a basis for understanding the project requirements and establishes a framework for project execution.

The PCR development was accomplished by Jacobs Engineering Group. Key users included in developing this document included:

CAFB 14 CES/Project Manager Brian Smetzer, Brian.Smetzer.2@us.af.mil

Commander, 14th Mission Support Group Col. Scott D. Ryder

Jacobs Project Manager Erik Olness, erik.olness@jacobs.com

Jacobs Assistant Project Manager Garret Lawler, garret.lawler@jacobs.com

Jacobs Design Principal Jerry Perry, jerry.perry@jacobs.com

Document Preparer (lead) Heather Peninger, heather.peninger@jacobs.com

The project scope and costs are described below. The updated draft DD Form 1391 is provided in Appendix E. The following is a summary of the basic project information:

Project Name: Convert T1 Hangar to T7 UMT, B995 Project Number: EEPZ244329 Installation: Columbus Air Force Base (CAFB), MS Requiring Command: AETC Host Command: AETC Fiscal Year (FY) Planned: FY2027 Category Code(s): 171-625 High Bay Technical Training Requirements Proposed Acquisition Method: DB Status of Design: Pre-A&E acquisition Design Agent: 14 CONS, CAFB Construction Agent: 14 CES, CAFB

2.0 Project Description

2.1 General Description

The T-7A Unit Maintenance Training (UMT) Facility provides a new capability of maintenance training for the T-7A aircraft including maintenance simulators. The T-7A aircraft maintenance plan is to utilize the two-level maintenance concept (organizational and depot) for all aircraft, including aircraft engines. The UMT Facility should also provide intermediate level maintenance training for supporting sub-systems such as wheel and tire build, nondestructive inspection, and fabrication. The UMT Facility provides primary trade skills at a Craftsman proficiency level. Maintenance simulators are a part of this training environment. The UMT Facility is an element of the larger Maintenance Training System Acquisition and will provide prerequisite training for attendance at the Maintenance System Training Centralized Training Facility, Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph AFB TX, and will also support recurring and continuation training for all aircraft maintainers. Aircraft maintenance specialties to be supported by the UMT Facility include:

2A373 Crew Chiefs

2A374 Avionics

2A671 Propulsion

2A673 Egress

2A674 Fuels

2A676 Electrical and Environmental Systems

The UMT Facility provides space to house specialized maintainer equipment and classrooms for instructors and students to receive training on T-7A aircraft systems. Areas should include a single high bay for the maintenance simulators and aircraft systems, a tool crib, classrooms, administrative area, break room, restrooms, specialized computer equipment rooms that support the simulators and support rooms for mechanical, fire protection, electrical, and communication.

2.1a, Vicinity Map

Figure 2.1b, Project Site

2.2 Current Situation

Currently, there are no existing Unit Maintenance Training Facilities, CATCODE 171-625, on base at Columbus to accommodate training bays or classroom spaces to meet the new mission’s requirements, scheduled to begin in August 2027.

Maintaining status quo would result in negative impacts to the T-7A maintainer training mission.

Building 995 is adequate to fulfill the new mission’s flexibility needs or configuration requirements of the specialized equipment. Leased or contractor-owned/operated facilities will not meet the configuration requirements or permanent nature of the T-7A maintainer training mission and is a non-viable option. Renovation is determined to be the best method possible to accomplish the objective.

2.3 Impact if Not Provided

Without this project being funded and executed, the required T-7A maintenance training capabilities will not be available causing delays in the training pipeline. Workarounds do not allow the squadron to train together and would significantly impact the training mission required to support the Air Force T-7A Maintenance Training program.

2.4 Cost Estimate

The primary purpose of the PCR is to validate the project scope, site, and costs and to refine the programming documentation in preparation for possible submission for project approval using DD Form 1391. It also provides the designer with a basis for understanding the project requirements and establishes a framework for project execution. Micro-Computer Aided Cost Estimating System (MCASES), MII version 4.4.4.0 was used to develop the cost estimate. The current 2024 Cost Book was used as well as the current 2024 Equipment Library (region 3). A detailed cost report is provided as an Attachment. A Basis of Estimate is provided and includes markups used and general assumptions of the cost estimate.

Escalation to the midpoint of construction has been included based on FY27 funding for this project.

Contingency and SIOH have not been included in the MII cost estimate but applied in Block 9 of the DD1391.

Major Assumptions:

o This estimate should be evaluated for market changes after 90 days of the issue date.

o It is assumed that the work is performed under a 40-hour work week structure without shift work, overtime or under an accelerated execution schedule.

Additionally, it is assumed that all materials and labor are readily available, and that the contractor has reasonable and unlimited access to the work areas.

o All materials to be demolished will be “clean” and free from contamination.

o All building construction debris will be disposed in local landfill.

General Exclusions:

o Material Adjustment allowances above and beyond what is included at the time of the cost estimate.

o Liquidated damages associated with schedule delays or unforeseen conditions.

o Costs for Anti-Terrorism upgrades beyond what is included in the estimate.

o Costs increases/delays associated with natural disasters.

o State/Local license fees and/or permits.

o Costs associated with recycling of demolished debris.

o Owner’s Contingency.

o The owner furnished items.

The following is a list of the various cost resources used in the development of the cost estimate:

R.S. Means 2024 MII English Cost Book

Historical Data/Previous Projects

Budget quotes provided by Engineering

Internet websites

Estimator Judgment

2.5 Concept Sketches

Adjacency Planning Stakeholder and user group input was gathered to identify preferred space adjacencies and functional relationships in the facility.

The floor plan development involved discussions about the main entrance location, pedestrian connectivity to the main entrance, hierarchy of spaces from public to private, and access to training spaces. The buildings circulation is a main corridor that extends from the lobby, providing access to all occupied spaces.

Figure 2.5 – Floor Plan

Space Planning Diagrams The existing B995 building is utilized to house the UMT facility functions. The design is separated into two areas: the administrative area and support spaces and the training bays. The trainer area is the existing high-bay space. This space is provided as one large open volume for ease of configuration of the four (4) trainers that are planned for the facility. The existing hangar doors to be utilized for the maintenance of the trainers. The remainder of the facility should be low-bay spaces. The exterior envelope of the UMT facility is existing. The roof covering is existing. The fabric hangar Mega-door to be removed and infilled to match existing in the administration portion of the low bay space. The interior insulation to be replaced to meet ASHRAE 90.1 requirements in the portion of the building being renovated. The existing B995 administrative building is not being renovated or demolished as part of this project.

Most interior partitions to be metal stud framing with painted gypsum wallboard finish. Some spaces such as administrative areas, classrooms, restrooms, and utility spaces should be provided with sound attenuation measures such as sound insulation in the partitions and partitions finished to the roof deck above. Circulation areas, the trainer area, and tool crib should have impact-resistant gypsum board and corner guards at exposed wall corners. Interior doors, within most of the facility, should be solid core wood doors in metal frames. Interior doors in utility areas should be hollow metal doors in metal frames.

Ceilings within administrative areas (and associated circulation areas), classrooms, and support spaces should be acoustical, lay-in panel type. The trainer area should be painted exposed structure in the ceiling space. Sealed concrete flooring should be provided for utility areas. The trainer area and tool crib should have an epoxy-type flooring system. The communications room should have static dissipative floor coating. Administrative areas and classrooms should have carpet tile flooring. The remainder of the facility should have resilient tile flooring.

3.0 Scope Analysis

Program of Requirements The program validation sessions yielded proper sizing for the T-7A Unit Maintenance Trainer (UMT) Facility. Functional space requirements are defined in terms of net square feet (NSF), the dimension from inside face of wall to inside face of wall, and gross square feet (GSF), the total area of the facility calculated to the outside walls. The program tabulation quantities were used as the basis for developing the detailed parametric cost estimate.

The facility should provide the US Air Force (USAF) with an adequately sized and configured facility with space as required for the administrative function, academic and demonstration instruction, and equipment support rooms to fulfill this mission. The facility should be a standalone structure meeting the operational requirements and base design guidelines. Prior to the planning charrette, Air Education and Training Command (AETC) provided unit manning data for the project. The projected totals of instructors, administrative personnel and student loads are outlined in the table below.

APPENDICES

B. Site Exhibit C. B995 Concept Floor Plan D. Fire Sprinkler Calculations E. Updated DD Form 1391 Draft F. Parametric Cost Estimate G. Construction Schedule H. Hazmat Survey I. HPSB Checklist

Planning Charrette Meeting

MINUTES PREPARED BY: Jacobs

PROJECTS:

Convert T1 Hangar to T7 UMT, B995

MEETING DATE: 05 – 07 November

MEETING TIME: 0800 -1700 CDT

LOCATION: Columbus AFB, MS and MS Teams Video Teleconference

ATTENDEES: See attached Sign In sheet

A three-day Planning Charrette meeting was 05 – 07 November 2024, at Columbus Air Force Base (CAFB) to create a clear path forward for the and Renovate B995 for T-7 UMT, which will lead to successful project execution.

14th CES Chief, Portfolio Optimization, Brian Smetzer provided a brief project welcome. The attendees then introduced themselves.

Erik Olness, Jacobs, briefed the Columbus AFB and Renovate B995 for T-7 UMT Planning Charrette In-Brief presentation (see attached).

Day 1 – Tuesday, 05 November 2024 In-Brief

• B995 UMT

ο UMT devices are portions of the aircraft, still don’t know with certainty what these devices are (most likely will know in February once a contract is finalized).

ο Currently the existing hangar space is used as storm protection for aircraft.

ο Al Cherry does have the square footage for each of the UMT devices.

ο Electrical requirements should match electrical requirements for a full aircraft in the hangar (power service point).

ο Mini-split in tool room is an option to condition this space for human comfort.

• UMT Scope Discussion ο Need to discuss configuration of tool room, is this fully enclosed and conditioned or is it better to just be a wire cage area.

PCR will assume that the tool room is conditioned.

ο Current AFB understanding is that the hangar bay is not conditioned.

Need to discuss further based on SOW and contractor understanding.

PCR will assume hangar bay is conditioned for machinery, since UMT Training

Device requirements are not available for review.

ο Multi-purpose room is not included in this renovation.

• Initial Questions asked at end of In brief ο Brian Smetzer will provide a years’ worth of Power data for and B995. This was received during the charrette.

ο ο It was confirmed that temporary facilities are not needed for B995.

B995 Site Visit

• NOTE: During the course of the charrette – It was decided that the existing administrative building would be abandoned in place. New administrative functions will be programmed within the existing hangar building. The existing admin building will not be demolished as part of the scope of this project. Notes in the section below are from the site visit, prior to this decision being made.

• Use base proposed sketch as-builts for existing admin building walls.

• Admin space should be totally gutted and rebuilt.

• Need to evaluate restroom fixture counts.

• Building needs to be sprinklered.

• Currently VCT flooring, gypsum board walls, ACT ceiling.

• Insulation in hangar is partially damaged, evaluate if needs to be replaced totally or on an as needed basis.

• (6) fabric hangar doors and bays instead of the original (3) fabric hangar doors and bays from the as-builts.

• Current overhead coiling door from breezeway to hangar bay (not in as-built drawings).

• Floors in (3) hangar bay expansion need to be re-finished.

• Possibly use hangar bay expansion for entire UMT facility.

• Suppression system is in existing admin portion of building and supports the hangar bay.

• Could use a bid option to update all insulation in hangar bay for a 20-year building solution.

Day 2 – Wednesday, 06 November 2024

UMT Program Discussion & Space Requirements; Floor Plan Review

• Looking at restroom accessibility

• Arch team reviewed provided floor plan

• Tool room in corner of hangar bay

• UMT Requirements can fit in two bays

• Actual building has 6 bays.

ο Jacobs needs background showing 6 bays.

• Jacobs Preferred Option: COA #2 Floor Plan Review ο Put the admin building inside the existing hangar bay.

ο Keep existing restrooms ο Adding TR and tool room in hangar bay

• Discussion regarding a fire wall between UMT Training Bay and existing hangar bays ο Create wall or leave open to the other bays.

ο Electrical has two separate service entrances. Not allowed under current ufc. But if you built a 2 hour fire rating - it would allow the existing services to remain. NEC requires this. Or you can have the whole building on one service.

ο Wall could be used to help create a shelter.

ο Nfpa 409 requires 1 hour separation from hangar to other spaces.

ο Umt spaces would require a 1 hr fire barrier.

ο Electrical would require a 2 hr fire barrier.

• AFF system needs to be removed from the UMT training bay area.

ο Question: do we remove it completely from the scope?

ο Air force is supposed to be funding the demolition.

• AFF should be shut off - its acting like a wet pipe system. Water would go through the infrastructure. It is sprinklered currently.

• Admin area currently has no fire protection.

• Eddie: if piping had AFF inside of it - you would have to replace the piping. When they commissioned AFF they were required to test it.

• Brian: Preferred option is COA #2. get rid of old admin building. Put in new fire riser.

ο Old admin building will not be demolished as part of this project. It will get added to the Air Forces List to demolish in the future.

• Consider demoing and infilling third mega door.

• HVLS fans shouldn't be included in the project. They are going to be installed in a separate maintenance project.

CAFB Fire Protection and AT/FP

• UMT

ο Life Safety

Will need 1 hour fire wall between UMT and hangar space.

Wall might be 2 hours to meet electrical requirements.

ο Suppression (Fire Chief and Base PM agreed to all below).

Replace existing AFFF system with new wet pipe system throughout hangar/UMT area.

New pump will be needed.

Admin wing will be placed on demo list and therefore no sprinkler system needs to be added.

Fire Chief mentioned that current water supply for AFFF system is supplied by separate fire water tank. Information on this water supply needs to be requested. RFI has been submitted.

ο Fire Alarm Modify existing alarm system to accommodate renovation.

• Fire Chief requested we reuse panel from admin area but requested a fiber card be added for reporting to meet base standards.

Base PM and fire chief agreed we should not add mass notification unless 50% of the replacement cost is exceeded.

• We do not anticipate this.

CAFB DD1391/Community Planner Review

• Danielle to update the draft DD1391 based on the write up and decisions made during the week.

• and FY27 for UMT execution.

• Design build contract for execution.

• Current project numbers in DD1391 are accurate.

• Construction area cost factor is 0.84.

• Confirm that DD1391 has removed the plant replacement value requirement.

• Program requirement should match the original DD1391 for the new build and UMT, however the path forward is going to be less square footage due to these projects being renovations.

ο Square footage on the DD1391 will be based off the actual square footage that will be renovated in the existing building.

Possibly break down the cost based on system – entire electrical system upgrade vs half of the building being renovated.

CAFB preferers to break out the DD1391 cost by system.

Brian will send preferred break down example. This was received during charrette.

CAFB Structural Engineering

• B995: No direct structural effort given current planning.

• Consider adding cost under DD1391 for other studies (such as structural assessment).

CAFB Civil and Site Utilities

• B995: COA 2 requires a fire water connection to the building.

• B995: An exterior door will be added on the west side of the building with a sidewalk connection to the parking area.

CAFB Environmental

• If the project impacts 1 or more acres of land, than compliance with the Construction

General Permit for stormwater is required.

ο Small Projects (1 up to 5 acres).

ο Large projects (5 acres and greater).

• Columbus AFB currently operates under a Tier I minor source air permit. At the present time, the projects do not include the addition of any fuel combustion sources. If fuel combustion sources are added, then will need to notify the base to provide sufficient time to determine if a permit modification is required.

• Building 995 inspection was limited and should be re-done.

• Prior sampling of a concrete drain vault showed the presence of PFAS/PFOAs. The vault is planned on being removed as part of this project and will need to be managed following applicable rules and regulations.

CAFB Mechanical and Plumbing

• Common Mechanical and Plumbing ο Natural gas-fired heating is not prohibited for these projects for the purposes of this PCR EO 14057 electrification mandate only applies to major renovations, which are not currently defined.

These two projects are not considered major renovations as the renovation scope is less than half the value of the facility.

• Mechanical ο Common Mechanical HVAC controls systems will be DDC type with BACnet protocol and capability to interface with Johnson Controls Metasys EMCS .

ο Building 995 (UMT) The simulator bay and tool room will be conditioned to 85F in summer to accommodate anticipated maximum operating temperature of simulator equipment.

Telecom room requires dedicated air conditioning.

HVLS fans in hangar bays will be provided under separate contract.

COA1: Directed to reuse existing ground-mounted packaged HVAC units located in mech yard if this COA is pursued.

COA2: New HVAC Systems require a LCCA to determine system types.

COA2: Existing restroom air conditioning and exhaust fan have surpassed life expectancy.

• Plumbing ο Common Plumbing New flush valves and lavatory faucets must be manually activated fixtures Portable compressed air equipment will not be included as part of this project.

Flush tank water closets are preferred in lieu of water pressure booster pumps.

New metering, as applicable, must be Advanced Meter Reading System

(AMRS) compliant for future integration.

• AMRS does not currently exist at Columbus AFB.

• Specs will be sent by Chris Johnson – Energy Manager – 14 CE. RFI has been submitted.

• Metering is preferred at the building rather than at the water main connection.

Day 3 – Thursday, 07 November 2024 and UMT Floor Plan and Site Plan Review

• UMT Review ο COA 2 is approved

Leave the existing megadoor on east bay as is in case the base ever wants to convert the UMT facility back into a hangar.

ο PCR to note contractor to pay attention and relocate megadoor controls for functionality and accessibility.

ο Existing hangars are unclear what the scope of repairs to be.

ο Roof is of concern, needs further investigation of extent of repairs/leakage.

Scott to add cost of repair flashing and/or gutter repair.

CAFB to discuss with shops to track down major leak locatons for evaluation.

ο Rescope of big ass fans to use (2) smaller fans in the new UMT designated bays. This is not part of this PCR project and will be accomplished by the base.

FF&E/CID Discussion

• UMT Discussion ο Hangar flooring to be 3-coat epoxy, including tool room.

ο Follow UMT new build for Tool Room storage requirements. Adjust room size as needed to accommodate.

ο Majority of Furniture and finishes to align with design of new build facility.

ο Break room to be open layout – remove North wall.

ο Restrooms are existing – patch and repair to like new.

CAFB Telecommunication

• UMT Comm Building Discussion ο Admin building will be submitted for demolition. Not included in this project.

ο Exiting comm manholes are on front of building along Independence.

ο Contractor provided comm duct with 12-strand singlemode fiber routed to new comm room from HH1202.

ο The comm squadron will provide 6-strand singlemode fiber from new telecomm room to existing cabinet in hangar bay.

ο Drawings provided by Comm squadron for the contractor showing locations for new comm handholes are required.

ο Leave comm systems in old admin building as is.

ο Pathways will be provided for horizontal cabling in new admin area.

ο Horizontal cabling in the admin area will be provided by the comm squadron.

CAFB Cybersecurity

• Cybersecurity design will include the same systems between UMT and . Bullets below will apply to both facilities.

• 3 FRCS platforms requiring cybersecurity design:

ο Building Control System – including HVAC, DDC, Lighting ο Fire & Life Safety – including FA/MN, FSS, FPS ο Utility Control System – including AMRS

• CIA Impact ratings (anticipated):

ο BCS – L-L-L ο FLS – L-M-M ο UCS – L-L-L

• BCS and UCS intended to connect to basewide EMCS. Front end located in Bldg 385

• An RFI has been submitted to government to verify CIA ratings, provide System Owner, Information System Security Manager, and Authorizing Official POCs, and provide current ATO status for basewide EMCS and Fire Alarm system.

Construction Phasing Discussion

• Instructor and Pilots need to have access to second and third floor throughout construction in

PCR.

• This will be documented in the PCR report.

• The construction contractor will develop a construction phasing plan and coordinate with the contracting officer.

Cost & Schedule and Bid Item/Option Discussion

• Projects will be design build – include 4% design in Contractor General Conditions.

• Repair SIOH will be renamed Title II Services.

• Ceiling removed in simulator bays to do work. Doesn't have to be reinstalled during new work.

• FSRM 1391 rules.

• Contingency line items in 1391 - Brian will send – 5% Contingency in 1391 is removed for

Renovation projects – include in design contingency.

• Team is good with Scott's approach of estimate.

Jacobs Work Session/Follow-up Site Visits

• Jacobs team prepared for the charrette out brief. Disciplines visited buildings to gather information as needed.

Charrette Out-brief

• B995 UMT

ο Relocated telecom room to make space for fire pump room.

If fire riser is required, can share space in mech room.

If fire pump is required, code states dedicated room is required.

ο Minimal site work, aside from new sidewalk into new entry door.

ο Devices are planned to be on wheeled bases to move on either side of tool room in the event more storage is needed, existing (2) bays should fit (2) more T-7 planes for storm storage.

• 28 January – 18 February MILCON/AETC may not be available for the Draft PCR reviews.

• Jacobs to provide Excel form to CAFB (Brian) for PCR comments and review.

• Design-build does not get broken out in the DD1391 in FSRM (wrapped up in cost, not line item)

Attachments:

1) and UMT Planning Charrette_In-Brief

2) and UMT Planning Charrette Attendance

3) and UMT Planning Site Plans

4) and UMT Planning Charrette_Floor Plans

5) and UMT Planning Charrette_Out-Brief

Attachment 1 and UMT Planning

Charrette_In-Brief

Agenda

• Introductions

• Charrette Overview

• Goals

• Charrette Report

• Charrette Schedule

• Project Overview

• Scope

• Location

• Preliminary Concepts

• Planning Charrette Report (PCR) Project Schedule

• Questions/Discussion

Introductions

• AFCEC

• Columbus AFB

• 14 CONS

• 14 CES

• AFMC AFIMSC Det 7

• AFMC AFLCMC/WLZC (SPO)

• Other Stakeholders

• Jacobs

Charrette Overview

Project Overview

Preliminary Concepts

Discussion

Attachment #2

Charrette Attendance

IN-PERSON ATTENDEES

See attached sign in roster.

MS-TEAM ATTENDEES

Machelle Above, Jacobs Interior Designer

Matthew Bretthauer, Jacobs Structural Engineer

Danielle Dobsch, Jacobs Planner

Anthony Elg, Jacobs Cybersecurity Engineer

Don Kemp, Jacobs Plumbing Engineer

Mike Wirtz, Jacobs Environmental Engineer

Attachment #3

Charrette_Site Plans

Attachment #4

Charrette_Floor Plans

Attachment #5

Charrette_Out-Brief

Agenda

• Introductions

• Project Overview

• Scope

• Location

• Charrette Concepts

• Planning Charrette Report (PCR) Project Schedule

Introductions

• AFCEC

• Columbus AFB

• 14 CONS

• 14 CES

• AFMC AFIMSC Det 7

• AFMC AFLCMC/WLZC (SPO)

• Other Stakeholders

• Jacobs

Project Overview

Charrette Concepts

PCR Schedule

Discussion

Draft PCR Design Review Meeting

Convert T1 Hangar to T7 UMT, B995

MEETING DATE: 24 February 2025

MEETING TIME: 1330 -1430 CST

LOCATION: MS Teams Video Teleconference

ATTENDEES: Jacobs: Garret Lawler, Erik Olness, Kelsey Middelkamp, Matthew

Bretthauer; 14th CES: Brian Smetzer

A teleconference was held on 24 February 2025 to discuss the government review comments on the Draft Planning Charrette Report (PCR) submittal for projects and Renovate B995 for T-7 UMT. The intent of the meeting was to create a clear path forward for progression towards the Pre-Final PCR submittal.

B995 Government Review Comment Discussion

Comment ID #4: Demo and Infill Mega-door

• Since space occupancy is changing within the hangar, Jacobs recommends updating

B995 envelope insulation to meet the latest values per ASHRAE 90.1.

o This will provide increased comfort for personnel in administrative space.

• Removing the mega door will cause some exterior wall modifications.

• Jacobs: From a programming standpoint - is it acceptable to use the funds towards this?

o Brian mentioned this was acceptable from a programing standpoint.

o Jacobs confirmed no major code impacts associated with this modification.

• Jacobs presented a recommended floor plan change to the classrooms, to provide more space, since the mega door is being removed and infilled.

o Brian approved the presented sketch (See Attached).

• Brian asked to confirm that the insulation upgrades only apply to the new administrative area of the hangar?

o Jacobs: Yes, correct.

• Brian: Acceptable to upgrade insulation values for envelope if not touching the rest of hangar and not significantly impact cost. Jacobs to follow up with cost impact.

• Once B995 Mega door is demolished, cold-formed metal studs will be used to construct wall. Jacobs mentioned will be a heavier gauge (i.e., 12 gauge) due to location of building on site, wind loads, etc.

o Brian: Don't want to change construction of building. Want to infill and match existing.

o Understood there will be some exterior work associated with this - but minimize as much as possible.

Action Items

• B995 UMT:

o Jacobs to send Brian impact to cost estimate for infilling hangar door and upgrading exterior wall and roof insulation values for B995.

o B995: Jacobs to send revised comment response to comment ID #4.

Pre-Final PCR Design Review Meeting

Convert T1 Hangar to T7 UMT, B995

MEETING DATE: 28 April 2025

MEETING TIME: 0900 – 1100 Central

LOCATION: MS Teams Video Teleconference

ATTENDEES: 14 CES: Don Young and Brian Smetzer AETC: Christopher Garcia

AFMC: Robert Henkel and Zachary Lamb Jacobs: Erik Olness, Jerry Perry, Kelsey Middelkamp, and Jennifer Haynes

A teleconference was held on 28 April 2025 to discuss the government review comments on the Pre-Final Planning Charrette Report (PCR) submittal for projects and Renovate B995 for T-7 UMT. The intent of the meeting was to create a clear path forward for progression towards the Final PCR submittal.

B995 Government Review Comment Discussion Comment ID #1: CAFB not performing IO&T

Jacobs concurred; Final PCR has been revised to eliminate reference to IOT&E No other issues with this comment

Comment ID #2: 49th FTS and 50th FTS do not conduct maintenance training

Jacobs concurred; Final PCR has been revised to identify that the Maintenance Contractor will provide maintenance training

No other issues with this comment

Action Items

B995 UMT:

o No action items at this time.

B. Site Exhibit

C. B995 Concept Floor Plan

D. Fire Sprinkler Calculations

Hazard classification: Hangar to be protected by Air force sundown policy criteria Criteria: 0.2 gpm/sf over 5,000 SF Remote area size: 5,030 sf Sprinkler area of coverage: 100 sf

Fire pump size required: 1000 gpm @ 40 psi

Flow test information:

Static pressure: 64 psi

Residual pressure: 52 psi

Flow: 907 gpm

Note: Hydrant to left was used as static/residual hydrant and hydrant to right was used a flow hydrant

UMT hydraulic sprinkler calculations summary

SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 3

DATE: 1/2/2025SONAL FOLDERS\EPP\CAFB\CALCS\UMT SPRINKLER CALCULATIONS.SDF

JOB TITLE:

NFPA WATER SUPPLY DATA

SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. TOTAL REQ'D

NODE PRESS. PRESS. @ PRESS. @ DEMAND PRESS.

TAG (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI)

SOURCE 64.0 52.0 907.0 29.2 1612.8 52.0

AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS:

TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 1612.8 GPM

TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 0.0 GPM

OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 500.0 GPM

TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 1112.8 GPM

NODE ANALYSIS DATA

DENSITY

NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE AREA REQ. ACT.

(FT) (PSI) (GPM) (FT^2) (GPM/FT^2)

O 0.0 - - - - 37.4 - - - - - - - - - - - -

HYD 0.0 HOSE STREAM 51.9 500.0 - - - - - - - - -

BFPS 0.0 - - - - 50.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

BFPD 0.0 - - - - 38.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

PS 0.0 - - - - 36.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

PD 0.0 - - - - 36.6 - - - - - - - - - - - -

BR 0.0 - - - - 35.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

TR 10.0 - - - - 30.6 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A1 29.0 - - - - 15.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A2 29.0 - - - - 14.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A3 29.0 - - - - 14.3 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A4 29.0 - - - - 14.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A5 29.0 - - - - 13.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A6 29.0 - - - - 13.4 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A7 29.0 - - - - 13.2 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A8 29.0 - - - - 12.9 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A9 29.0 - - - - 12.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A10 29.0 - - - - 12.5 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A11 29.0 - - - - 12.4 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A12 29.0 - - - - 12.2 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A13 29.0 - - - - 12.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A14 29.0 - - - - 11.9 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A15 29.0 - - - - 11.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A16 29.0 - - - - 11.6 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A17 29.0 - - - - 11.4 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A18 29.0 - - - - 11.3 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A19 29.0 - - - - 11.2 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A20 29.0 - - - - 11.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A21 29.0 - - - - 10.9 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A22 29.0 - - - - 10.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -

A23 29.0 - - - - 10.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B1 29.0 - - - - 12.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B2 29.0 - - - - 12.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B3 29.0 - - - - 12.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B4 29.0 - - - - 12.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B5 29.0 - - - - 12.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 4

NODE ANALYSIS DATA

DENSITY

NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE AREA REQ. ACT.

(FT) (PSI) (GPM) (FT^2) (GPM/FT^2)

B6 29.0 - - - - 12.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B7 29.0 - - - - 12.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B8 29.0 - - - - 12.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B9 29.0 - - - - 12.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B10 29.0 - - - - 11.9 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B11 29.0 - - - - 11.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B12 29.0 - - - - 11.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B13 29.0 - - - - 11.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B14 29.0 - - - - 11.6 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B15 29.0 - - - - 11.5 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B16 29.0 - - - - 11.4 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B17 29.0 - - - - 11.3 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B18 29.0 - - - - 11.2 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B19 29.0 - - - - 11.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B20 29.0 - - - - 11.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B21 29.0 - - - - 10.9 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B22 29.0 - - - - 10.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

B23 29.0 - - - - 10.6 - - - - - - - - - - - -

10 29.0 - - - - 8.9 - - - - - - - - - - - -

11 29.0 - - - - 8.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

12 29.0 - - - - 8.4 - - - - - - - - - - - -

13 29.0 - - - - 8.3 - - - - - - - - - - - -

14 29.0 - - - - 8.3 - - - - - - - - - - - -

15 29.0 - - - - 8.3 - - - - - - - - - - - -

16 29.0 - - - - 8.5 - - - - - - - - - - - -

17 29.0 - - - - 8.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -

18 29.0 - - - - 8.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -

20 29.0 - - - - 9.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

21 29.0 - - - - 8.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

22 29.0 - - - - 8.5 - - - - - - - - - - - -

23 29.0 - - - - 8.3 - - - - - - - - - - - -

24 29.0 - - - - 8.3 - - - - - - - - - - - -

25 29.0 - - - - 8.4 - - - - - - - - - - - -

26 29.0 - - - - 8.5 - - - - - - - - - - - -

27 29.0 - - - - 8.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -

28 29.0 - - - - 8.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -

30 29.0 - - - - 9.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

31 29.0 - - - - 8.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -

32 29.0 - - - - 8.5 - - - - - - - - - - - -

33 29.0 - - - - 8.4 - - - - - - - - - - - -

34 29.0 - - - - 8.4 - - - - - - - - - - - -

35 29.0 - - - - 8.4 - - - - - - - - - - - -

36 29.0 - - - - 8.5 - - - - - - - - - - - -

37 29.0 - - - - 8.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -

38 29.0 - - - - 8.9 - - - - - - - - - - - -

40 29.0 - - - - 9.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

41 29.0 - - - - 8.9 - - - - - - - - - - - -

42 29.0 - - - - 8.6 - - - - - - - - - - - -

43 29.0 - - - - 8.5 - - - - - - - - - - - -

44 29.0 - - - - 8.5 - - - - - - - - - - - -

45 29.0 - - - - 8.5 - - - - - - - - - - - -

46 29.0 - - - - 8.6 - - - - - - - - - - - -

47 29.0 - - - - 8.9 - - - - - - - - - - - -

SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 5

NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE AREA REQ. ACT.

(FT) (PSI) (GPM) (FT^2) (GPM/FT^2)

48 29.0 - - - - 9.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

50 29.0 - - - - 9.2 - - - - - - - - - - - -

51 29.0 - - - - 9.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

52 29.0 - - - - 8.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

53 29.0 - - - - 8.6 - - - - - - - - - - - -

54 29.0 - - - - 8.6 - - - - - - - - - - - -

55 29.0 - - - - 8.6 - - - - - - - - - - - -

56 29.0 - - - - 8.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

57 29.0 - - - - 9.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

58 29.0 - - - - 9.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

60 29.0 - - - - 9.5 - - - - - - - - - - - -

61 29.0 - - - - 9.2 - - - - - - - - - - - -

62 29.0 - - - - 8.9 - - - - - - - - - - - -

63 29.0 - - - - 8.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -

64 29.0 - - - - 8.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -

65 29.0 - - - - 8.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -

66 29.0 - - - - 9.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

67 29.0 - - - - 9.3 - - - - - - - - - - - -

68 29.0 - - - - 9.4 - - - - - - - - - - - -

70 29.0 - - - - 9.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -

71 29.0 - - - - 9.6 - - - - - - - - - - - -

72 29.0 - - - - 9.3 - - - - - - - - - - - -

73 29.0 - - - - 9.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

74 29.0 - - - - 9.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

75 29.0 - - - - 9.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

76 29.0 - - - - 9.3 - - - - - - - - - - - -

77 29.0 - - - - 9.6 - - - - - - - - - - - -

78 29.0 - - - - 9.7 - - - - - - - - - - - -

80 29.0 - - - - 10.2 - - - - - - - - - - - -

81 29.0 - - - - 10.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

82 29.0 - - - - 10.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -

88 29.0 - - - - 10.1 - - - - - - - - - - - -

S11 30.0 K= 8.00 7.4 21.7 100.0 0.212 0.217

S12 30.0 K= 8.00 7.1 21.4 100.0 0.212 0.214

S13 30.0 K= 8.00 7.0 21.2 100.0 0.212 0.212

S14 30.0 K= 8.00 7.0 21.2 100.0 0.212 0.212

S15 30.0 K= 8.00 7.0 21.2 100.0 0.212 0.212

S16 30.0 K= 8.00 7.1 21.4 100.0 0.212 0.214

S17 30.0 K= 8.00 7.4 21.8 100.0 0.212 0.218

S21 30.0 K= 8.00 7.4 21.8 100.0 0.212 0.218

S22 30.0 K= 8.00 7.1 21.4 100.0 0.212 0.214

S23 30.0 K= 8.00 7.0 21.2 100.0 0.212 0.212

S24 30.0 K= 8.00 7.0 21.2 100.0 0.212 0.212

S25 30.0 K= 8.00 7.0 21.2 100.0 0.212 0.212

S26 30.0 K= 8.00 7.2 21.4 100.0 0.212 0.214

S27 30.0 K= 8.00 7.4 21.8 100.0 0.212 0.218

S31 30.0 K= 8.00 7.4 21.8 100.0 0.212 0.218

S32 30.0 K= 8.00 7.2 21.4 100.0 0.212 0.214

S33 30.0 K= 8.00 7.1 21.3 100.0 0.212 0.213

S34 30.0 K= 8.00 7.1 21.3 100.0 0.212 0.213

S35 30.0 K= 8.00 7.1 21.3 100.0 0.212 0.213

S36 30.0 K= 8.00 7.2 21.5 100.0 0.212 0.215

S37 30.0 K= 8.00 7.5 21.9 100.0 0.212 0.219

SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 6

NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE AREA REQ. ACT.

(FT) (PSI) (GPM) (FT^2) (GPM/FT^2)

S41 30.0 K= 8.00 7.5 21.9 100.0 0.212 0.219

S42 30.0 K= 8.00 7.3 21.5 100.0 0.212 0.215

S43 30.0 K= 8.00 7.2 21.4 100.0 0.212 0.214

S44 30.0 K= 8.00 7.1 21.4 100.0 0.212 0.214

S45 30.0 K= 8.00 7.2 21.4 100.0 0.212 0.214

S46 30.0 K= 8.00 7.3 21.6 100.0 0.212 0.216

S47 30.0 K= 8.00 7.5 22.0 100.0 0.212 0.220

S51 30.0 K= 8.00 7.6 22.1 100.0 0.212 0.221

S52 30.0 K= 8.00 7.4 21.7 100.0 0.212 0.217

S53 30.0 K= 8.00 7.3 21.6 100.0 0.212 0.216

S54 30.0 K= 8.00 7.3 21.6 100.0 0.212 0.216

S55 30.0 K= 8.00 7.3 21.6 100.0 0.212 0.216

S56 30.0 K= 8.00 7.4 21.8 100.0 0.212 0.218

S57 30.0 K= 8.00 7.7 22.2 100.0 0.212 0.222

S61 30.0 K= 8.00 7.8 22.4 100.0 0.212 0.224

S62 30.0 K= 8.00 7.6 22.0 100.0 0.212 0.220

S63 30.0 K= 8.00 7.5 21.9 100.0 0.212 0.219

S64 30.0 K= 8.00 7.5 21.9 100.0 0.212 0.219

S65 30.0 K= 8.00 7.5 21.9 100.0 0.212 0.219

S66 30.0 K= 8.00 7.6 22.1 100.0 0.212 0.221

S67 30.0 K= 8.00 7.9 22.5 100.0 0.212 0.225

S71 30.0 K= 8.00 8.1 22.8 100.0 0.212 0.228

S72 30.0 K= 8.00 7.9 22.4 100.0 0.212 0.224

S73 30.0 K= 8.00 7.8 22.3 100.0 0.212 0.223

S74 30.0 K= 8.00 7.7 22.3 100.0 0.212 0.223

S75 30.0 K= 8.00 7.8 22.3 100.0 0.212 0.223

S76 30.0 K= 8.00 7.9 22.5 100.0 0.212 0.225

S77 30.0 K= 8.00 8.2 22.9 100.0 0.212 0.229

S81 30.0 K= 8.00 8.5 23.4 100.0 0.212 0.234

S82 30.0 K= 8.00 8.5 23.4 100.0 0.212 0.234

SOURCE 0.0 SOURCE 52.0 1612.8 - - - - - - - - -

SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 7

NFPA PIPE DATA 5

Pipe Tag K-fac Add Fl Fl To Vel Fit: L C (Pt)

Frm Node El (ft) PT (q) Node/ Nom ID Eq.Ln. F (Pe)

To Node El (ft) PT Tot.(Q) Disch Act ID (ft.) T Pf/ft. (Pf)

Pipe: 1 Source 500.0 Disch 10.3 1.00 140 0.0

SOURCE 0.0 52.0 1112.7 BFPS 8.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

HYD 0.0 51.9 1612.8 7.981 1.00 0.017 0.0

Pipe: 1A 0.0 0.0 7.1 150.00 140 1.3

HYD 0.0 51.9 1112.7 BFPD 8.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

BFPS 0.0 50.7 1112.7 7.981 150.00 0.008 1.3

Pipe: 2 0.0 Fixed Pressure Loss Device

BFPS 0.0 50.7 1112.7 O 12.0 psi, 1112.7 gpm

BFPD 0.0 38.7 1112.7

Pipe: 3 0.0 0.0 7.1 150.00 140 1.3

BFPD 0.0 38.7 1112.7 PS 8.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

O 0.0 37.4 1112.7 7.981 150.00 0.008 1.3

Pipe: 4 0.0 0.0 7.1 E:18.0 5.00 120 0.7

O 0.0 37.4 1112.7 PD 8.000 T:35.0 57.00 -0.0

PS 0.0 36.7 1112.7 7.981 G: 4.0 62.00 0.011 0.7

Pipe: 5 0.0 Fixed Pressure Loss Device

PS 0.0 36.7 1112.7 BR 0.1 psi, 1112.7 gpm

PD 0.0 36.6 1112.7

Pipe: 6 0.0 0.0 7.1 2E:36.0 10.00 120 1.0

PD 0.0 36.6 1112.7 TR 8.000 T:35.0 75.00 -0.0

BR 0.0 35.7 1112.7 7.981 G: 4.0 85.00 0.011 1.0

Pipe: 7 0.0 0.0 7.1 E:18.0 10.00 120 5.1

BR 0.0 35.7 1112.7 A1 8.000 T:35.0 57.00 4.3

TR 10.0 30.6 1112.7 7.981 G: 4.0 67.00 0.011 0.8

Pipe: 8 0.0 57.8 B1 12.4 100.00 120 15.5

TR 10.0 30.6 1054.9 A2 6.000 5E:70.0 70.00 8.2

A1 29.0 15.0 1112.7 6.065 170.00 0.043 7.3

Pipe: 9 0.0 53.5 B2 11.7 10.00 120 0.4

A1 29.0 15.0 1001.4 A3 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A2 29.0 14.7 1054.9 6.065 10.00 0.039 0.4

Pipe: 10 0.0 49.4 B3 11.1 10.00 120 0.4

A2 29.0 14.7 952.0 A4 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A3 29.0 14.3 1001.4 6.065 10.00 0.035 0.4

Pipe: 11 0.0 45.4 B4 10.6 10.00 120 0.3

A3 29.0 14.3 906.6 A5 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A4 29.0 14.0 952.0 6.065 10.00 0.032 0.3

Pipe: 12 0.0 41.7 B5 10.1 10.00 120 0.3

A4 29.0 14.0 864.9 A6 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A5 29.0 13.7 906.6 6.065 10.00 0.029 0.3

SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 8

Frm Node El (ft) PT (q) Node/ Nom ID Eq.Ln. F (Pe)

To Node El (ft) PT Tot.(Q) Disch Act ID (ft.) T Pf/ft. (Pf)

Pipe: 13 0.0 38.1 B6 9.6 10.00 120 0.3

A5 29.0 13.7 826.8 A7 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A6 29.0 13.4 864.9 6.065 10.00 0.027 0.3

Pipe: 14 0.0 34.7 B7 9.2 10.00 120 0.2

A6 29.0 13.4 792.1 A8 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A7 29.0 13.2 826.8 6.065 10.00 0.025 0.2

Pipe: 15 0.0 31.5 B8 8.8 10.00 120 0.2

A7 29.0 13.2 760.6 A9 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A8 29.0 12.9 792.1 6.065 10.00 0.023 0.2

Pipe: 16 0.0 28.4 B9 8.4 10.00 120 0.2

A8 29.0 12.9 732.2 A10 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A9 29.0 12.7 760.6 6.065 10.00 0.021 0.2

Pipe: 17 0.0 25.6 B10 8.1 10.00 120 0.2

A9 29.0 12.7 706.6 A11 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A10 29.0 12.5 732.2 6.065 10.00 0.020 0.2

Pipe: 18 0.0 22.9 B11 7.8 10.00 120 0.2

A10 29.0 12.5 683.7 A12 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A11 29.0 12.4 706.6 6.065 10.00 0.018 0.2

Pipe: 19 0.0 20.4 B12 7.6 10.00 120 0.2

A11 29.0 12.4 663.3 A13 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A12 29.0 12.2 683.7 6.065 10.00 0.017 0.2

Pipe: 20 0.0 18.1 B13 7.4 10.00 120 0.2

A12 29.0 12.2 645.3 A14 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A13 29.0 12.0 663.3 6.065 10.00 0.016 0.2

Pipe: 21 0.0 15.9 B14 7.2 10.00 120 0.2

A13 29.0 12.0 629.3 A15 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A14 29.0 11.9 645.3 6.065 10.00 0.016 0.2

Pipe: 22 0.0 14.0 B15 7.0 10.00 120 0.1

A14 29.0 11.9 615.4 A16 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A15 29.0 11.7 629.3 6.065 10.00 0.015 0.1

Pipe: 23 0.0 12.2 B16 6.8 10.00 120 0.1

A15 29.0 11.7 603.2 A17 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A16 29.0 11.6 615.4 6.065 10.00 0.014 0.1

Pipe: 24 0.0 10.6 B17 6.7 10.00 120 0.1

A16 29.0 11.6 592.6 A18 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A17 29.0 11.4 603.2 6.065 10.00 0.014 0.1

Pipe: 25 0.0 9.2 B18 6.6 10.00 120 0.1

A17 29.0 11.4 583.3 A19 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A18 29.0 11.3 592.6 6.065 10.00 0.013 0.1

SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 9

To Node El (ft) PT Tot.(Q) Disch Act ID (ft.) T Pf/ft. (Pf)

Pipe: 26 0.0 8.1 B19 6.5 10.00 120 0.1

A18 29.0 11.3 575.3 A20 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A19 29.0 11.2 583.3 6.065 10.00 0.013 0.1

Pipe: 27 0.0 7.2 B20 6.4 10.00 120 0.1

A19 29.0 11.2 568.1 A21 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A20 29.0 11.0 575.3 6.065 10.00 0.013 0.1

Pipe: 28 0.0 6.5 B21 6.3 10.00 120 0.1

A20 29.0 11.0 561.6 A22 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A21 29.0 10.9 568.1 6.065 10.00 0.012 0.1

Pipe: 29 0.0 6.3 B22 6.2 10.00 120 0.1

A21 29.0 10.9 555.3 A23 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A22 29.0 10.8 561.6 6.065 10.00 0.012 0.1

Pipe: 30 0.0 549.0 80 6.2 10.00 120 0.1

A22 29.0 10.8 6.3 B23 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

A23 29.0 10.7 555.3 6.065 10.00 0.012 0.1

Pipe: 31 0.0 111.3 B3 0.6 10.00 120 0.0

B1 29.0 12.1 -53.5 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B2 29.0 12.1 57.8 6.065 10.00 0.000 0.0

Pipe: 32 0.0 160.7 B4 1.2 10.00 120 0.0

B2 29.0 12.1 -49.4 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B3 29.0 12.1 111.3 6.065 10.00 0.001 0.0

Pipe: 33 0.0 206.2 B5 1.8 10.00 120 0.0

B3 29.0 12.1 -45.4 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B4 29.0 12.1 160.7 6.065 10.00 0.001 0.0

Pipe: 34 0.0 247.8 B6 2.3 10.00 120 0.0

B4 29.0 12.1 -41.7 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B5 29.0 12.1 206.2 6.065 10.00 0.002 0.0

Pipe: 35 0.0 285.9 B7 2.8 10.00 120 0.0

B5 29.0 12.1 -38.1 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B6 29.0 12.1 247.8 6.065 10.00 0.003 0.0

Pipe: 36 0.0 320.6 B8 3.2 10.00 120 0.0

B6 29.0 12.1 -34.7 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B7 29.0 12.0 285.9 6.065 10.00 0.003 0.0

Pipe: 37 0.0 352.1 B9 3.6 10.00 120 0.0

B7 29.0 12.0 -31.5 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B8 29.0 12.0 320.6 6.065 10.00 0.004 0.0

Pipe: 38 0.0 380.5 B10 3.9 10.00 120 0.1

B8 29.0 12.0 -28.4 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B9 29.0 12.0 352.1 6.065 10.00 0.005 0.1

SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 10

To Node El (ft) PT Tot.(Q) Disch Act ID (ft.) T Pf/ft. (Pf)

Pipe: 39 0.0 406.1 B11 4.2 10.00 120 0.1

B9 29.0 12.0 -25.6 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B10 29.0 11.9 380.5 6.065 10.00 0.006 0.1

Pipe: 40 0.0 429.0 B12 4.5 10.00 120 0.1

B10 29.0 11.9 -22.9 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B11 29.0 11.8 406.1 6.065 10.00 0.007 0.1

Pipe: 41 0.0 449.4 B13 4.8 10.00 120 0.1

B11 29.0 11.8 -20.4 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B12 29.0 11.8 429.0 6.065 10.00 0.007 0.1

Pipe: 42 0.0 467.5 B14 5.0 10.00 120 0.1

B12 29.0 11.8 -18.1 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B13 29.0 11.7 449.4 6.065 10.00 0.008 0.1

Pipe: 43 0.0 483.4 B15 5.2 10.00 120 0.1

B13 29.0 11.7 -15.9 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B14 29.0 11.6 467.5 6.065 10.00 0.009 0.1

Pipe: 44 0.0 497.4 B16 5.4 10.00 120 0.1

B14 29.0 11.6 -14.0 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B15 29.0 11.5 483.4 6.065 10.00 0.009 0.1

Pipe: 45 0.0 509.6 B17 5.5 10.00 120 0.1

B15 29.0 11.5 -12.2 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B16 29.0 11.4 497.4 6.065 10.00 0.010 0.1

Pipe: 46 0.0 520.2 B18 5.7 10.00 120 0.1

B16 29.0 11.4 -10.6 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B17 29.0 11.3 509.6 6.065 10.00 0.010 0.1

Pipe: 47 0.0 529.4 B19 5.8 10.00 120 0.1

B17 29.0 11.3 -9.2 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B18 29.0 11.2 520.2 6.065 10.00 0.010 0.1

Pipe: 48 0.0 537.5 B20 5.9 10.00 120 0.1

B18 29.0 11.2 -8.1 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B19 29.0 11.1 529.4 6.065 10.00 0.011 0.1

Pipe: 49 0.0 544.6 B21 6.0 10.00 120 0.1

B19 29.0 11.1 -7.2 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B20 29.0 11.0 537.5 6.065 10.00 0.011 0.1

Pipe: 50 0.0 551.2 B22 6.0 10.00 120 0.1

B20 29.0 11.0 -6.5 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B21 29.0 10.9 544.6 6.065 10.00 0.011 0.1

Pipe: 51 0.0 557.4 B23 6.1 10.00 120 0.1

B21 29.0 10.9 -6.3 6.000 ---- 0.00 -0.0

B22 29.0 10.7 551.2 6.065 10.