Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 259 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Y1DA--Project # 596-19-102 Construction to Renovate Building 39 for Transportation and Grounds.
- Solicitation number
- 36C24921R0056
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a construction renovation project. The Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 9 is soliciting proposals for Project #596-19-102 to renovate Building 39 for transportation and grounds at the Lexington VA Healthcare System in Lexington, Kentucky. Offerors are required to provide past performance references who will complete the questionnaire, rating the offeror's quality, schedule, and business relations on previous contracts. References must submit completed questionnaires directly to the contracting officer by March 19, 2021. The questionnaire requests ratings and rationale in the areas of quality of service, schedule, business relations, and an overall performance rating. It also asks the probability of awarding the offeror another contract.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 09 3013 TILING.pdf | ||
| A-401 Revised.pdf | ||
| CU 001 CU 002 CU 003.pdf | ||
| A-601 Revised.pdf | ||
| 07 7200 ROOF ACCESSORIES.pdf | ||
| 36C24921R0056 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Roof Pictures.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| 36C24921R0056 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Site Visit Sign-In Sheet.pdf | ||
| Project Drawings 3 of 3.pdf | ||
| Project Specifications.pdf | ||
| Project Drawings 1 of 3.pdf | ||
| Pricing Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Project Drawings 2 of 3.pdf | ||
| Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| 36C24921R0056_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Wage Determination KY20210090 01-15-2021.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Procurement Sensitive Do Not Disclose --- See FAR Subparts 2.101 and 3.104-4 FOR
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Project # 596-19-102, Renovate Building 39 for Transportation & Grounds 1A at the Lexington Health Care System, Sousley Campus.
PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS
The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity has issued a solicitation for Project 596-19-102, Renovate Building 39 for Transportation & Grounds.
Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity.
The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Assessor shall only submit past performance questionnaires directly to the Contracting Officer-Matthew Whisman by way of email at matthew.whisman@va.gov.
Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.
Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than March 19, 2021 at 4:00 PM EST. Assessor is requested to send electronically to (matthew.whisman@va.gov). Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
Solicitation Number 36C24921R0056 Project/Requirement Project 596-19-102 Customer/Agency Lexington VA Healthcare System
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s __________________________________________________
Name and Address __________________________________________________
2. Contractor Point of Contact: __________________________________________________
3. Phone Number (with area code): __________________________________________________
4. Assessor Contract Award Number: __________________________________________________
5. Description of Services: __________________________________________________
6. Contract Award Date: _______________ Contract Amount: Initial ___________ Final___________
7. Period of Performance: __________________________________________________
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name Title Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to
NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee.
Signature
Name and Title of Authorizing Official Date
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors).
RATING SCALE Definitions
Past performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description ACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the
Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
UNACCEPTABLE
Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements.
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
3. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements.
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
4. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.
Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
BUSINESS RELATIONS
5. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems, etc.)
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
6. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
7. Rate the contractor’s ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner.
8. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution.
9. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations.
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?
__________ Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.
__________ Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.
__________ Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor but would do so if no better alternative existed.
__________ Do not wish to award another contact to this contractor.
__________ Would not award another contract to this contractor.
Overall rating of contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
ROLE
PERIOD OF INVOLVEMENT
Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
(Signature) (Date)
(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)
(Phone Number)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .