Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 561 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Combined Underground Utilities and Storm Water Improvements, Moore Air Base, Edinburg, Texas
- Solicitation number
- 12639522R0041
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal contractor. It requests evaluations on management, quality, cost, and general performance for an unnamed contractor that provided combined underground utilities and storm water improvements at Moore Air Base in Edinburg, Texas. Specific areas of evaluation include communication, responsiveness, problem resolution, compliance, and ability to meet contractual terms. Respondents are asked to rate performance on a scale from unsatisfactory to exceptional and provide remarks for any exceptional or unsatisfactory ratings. The completed questionnaire is to be emailed to a specified USDA contact for solicitation number 12639522R0041 by the given deadline.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
12639522R0041 Attachment 7
N/A=NOT APPLICABLE U=UNSATISFACTORY M=MARGINAL S=SATISFACTORY VG=VERY GOOD E=EXCEPTIONAL
Page 1 of 2 Pages
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
For use in Solicitation # 12639522R0041, (This questionnaire, when completed, shall not be disclosed to anyone outside the Government)
Contractor: Contract#: ________________________________________
Prime or Sub? ________ Contract Value at Award: $ ____________ Final Contract Value: $ ______________________
Contract Type: _______________________ Description of Service: _
Period of Performance: _________________________________ Date Questionnaire Completed: ________________
PLEASE FILL IN THE FOLLOWING RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Evaluator: ___________________________________ Organization: __________________________________
Phone #: ____________________ Fax #: ____________________ Email: ____________________________________
Position Title: _____________________________ Dates of Involvement in Contract: _____________________________ When responding, circle/highlight the corresponding letter (using the key at the bottom of the page) which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
MANAGEMENT:
1. Management performance……………………………………………………….…. N/A U M S VG E
2. Effective Communication……………………………………………………………N/A U M S VG E
3. Working relationship ………………………….……..……… N/A U M S VG E
4. Responsiveness to requirements……….……………………………… N/A U M S VG E
5. Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority.…… N/A U M S VG E
6. Complied with gov’t or other regulations and industry standards…………….…… N/A U M S VG E
7. Willingness to resolve problems in:
(a) Scheduling Projects…………………………………………………….…….. N/A U M S VG E
(b) Quality Control……………………………………………………….…….… N/A U M S VG E
8. Ability to resolve problems in:
(a) Scheduling Projects………………………………………………….……..… N/A U M S VG E
(b) Quality Control………………………………………………………….….… N/A U M S VG E
9. To your knowledge, has contractor had any contracts terminated for default?
(If YES, please explain in “REMARKS”) ...…………………………………....… …….. ….. YES NO
10. Has your organization ever elected to not exercise an option due to contractor’s poor performance? (If YES, please explain in “REMARKS”) …………….. …..YES NO NA
QUALITY
11. Were modifications issued due to contractor failure to meet technical requirements and/or delivery/cost schedules? (If YES, explain in “REMARKS”) …….. ….... YES NO
12. Has a cure notice ever been issued? ...(If YES, explain in “REMARKS”)……… …….. ….... YES NO
13. Has a show-cause letter ever been issued? (If YES, explain in “REMARKS”)… …….. ….... YES NO
12639522R0041 Attachment 7
Page 2 of 2 Pages
COST
14. Ability to meet the terms of the contract within the contractually-agreed price(s).. N/A U M S VG E
15. Have contract concessions/changes ever been made due to contractor’s failure to accurately estimate costs? (If YES, explain in “REMARKS”)………………..…. …….. ….. YES NO
16. Were the proposed costs for new items and/or requests for equitable adjustments considered reasonable?............................................................................................. …….. ….. YES NO NA
17. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? (If YES, explain in
“REMARKS”)………………………………………………………………..…… …….. ….. YES NO
18. Was the Contractor able to provide current, accurate and complete billing?........... …….. ….. YES NO
GENERAL
19. Contractor’s Overall Cooperation...………………………………………………. N/A U M S VG E
20. Contractor’s Overall Performance…………………………….…………………... N/A U M S VG E
21. Did the Contractor meet contract performance time and/or delivery schedule?...... …….. ….. YES NO
22. Would you award similar contracts to this contractor? (If NO, explain in
“REMARKS”)………………………………………………………………….…. …….. ….. YES NO
23. What do you think was the Contractor’s strongest management attribute and why?
24. What was the Contractor’s weakest management attribute and why? Did the Contractor correct, or attempt to correct the weaknesses?
25. Remarks (areas having significance when considering this contractor for a similar contract; exceptional and unsatisfactory ratings):
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE
Please email to james.g.roloff@usda.gov (specifying 12639522R0041 in subject line) when completed.
N/A=NOT APPLICABLE U=UNSATISFACTORY M=MARGINAL S=SATISFACTORY VG=VERY GOOD E=EXCEPTIONAL mailto:Mary_Stefanos@nps.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .