PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation W50S70-22-R-5001

Fire Suppression & Fire Alarm Inspection, &Testing

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR

3.104

The 165th Airlift Wing is in the process of selecting a contractor for Fire Suppression, Fire Alarm, Fire Sprinkler System Inspection & Testing. The contractor shall be required to provide Inspecting, Testing, of installed facility fire sprinkler systems, fire alarm systems, kitchen fire suppression systems, clean agent suppression systems, fire pumps, fire pump monitoring devices, fire sprinkler monitoring devices.

Additional equipment includes foam systems, automatic fire alarms, Fire Control Alarm Panels (FACP), associated devices, (activation, warning and auxiliary), electrical/electronic components of the systems. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror’s performance on those contracts.

The past performance questionnaire will assess the offeror’s probability of meeting the Solicitation’s requirements, on an acceptable/unacceptable basis, as indicated by that offeror’s record of past performance.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Please complete this survey and return directly to contract specialist, Brittany Hopkins via email to brittany.hopkins.5@us.af.mil, by 3:30 PM EST, 22 June 2022. Thank you!

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor Name:

B. Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type:

E. Was This a Competitive Contract? Yes No F. Period of Performance:

G. Initial Contract Cost:

H. Current/Final Cost I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's Name:

B. Evaluators Title:

C. Evaluators Phone:

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

S SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

L LIMITED CONFIDENCE – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

N NO CONFIDENCE – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NA NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

Program Management S L N NA P1. Effectiveness of overall acquisition management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the program).

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements.

P5. Successfully responded to emergency service calls within allotted timelines.

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts.

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Materials).

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management (planning, execution and delivery of services scheduled and unscheduled).

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support (service delivery plan, scheduling in accordance with prescribed standards, realistic timelines etc.).

Transition S L N NA T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel within the allotted timeline

T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts

Employee Retention/Attraction S L N NA E1. Ability to hire, train, and apply a qualified workforce to this effort (experience with various makes and models of fire systems, certifications, licenses etc.).

E2. Ability to retain and maintain a qualified workforce on this effort

E3. Effective use of personnel with the appropriate qualifications and roles (staffing matrix, organizational chart).

E4. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

Price Performance S L N NA P1. Accuracy in forecasting contract costs.

P2. Ability to meet forecasted costs and performs within contract costs.

P3. Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting.

Technical Performance S L N NA T1. Quality and repeatability of technical system inspecting, testing, and maintenance services, scheduled and unscheduled repair.

T2. Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts and reports/ invoices/cost estimates submitted within specified timeline.

T3. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements.

T4. Ability to implement current Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-601-02, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards 10 through 25, 70, 72, 96, base requirements and the manufacturer’s instructions and local Government standard practices for operational procedures, maintenance repair and services, and computer software upgrades

T5. Quality of performance on various makes and models of fire suppression, fire alarm, fire sprinkler systems.

T6. Quality and repeatability of performance within scheduled and unscheduled timelines (facility and delivery schedule).

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated L (Limited Confidence) or N (No Confidence) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired (e.g. make and model of some of the equipment that was worked on, elaborate on the innovative ideals. recommendations etc.).

Evaluators Signature: