Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

Past performance must be within three years

Fort Stevens National Cemetery – Grounds Maintenance Services

Section 1 – Basic Information

Contractor Name: __________________________ Project / Contract: _________________________ Period of Performance: _____________________ Customer / Agency: ________________________ Your Name / Title: _________________________

Section 2 – Current Requirement Snapshot

The Fort Stevens National Cemetery requirement involves a small, highly developed cemetery site with approximately:

· Total developed cemetery: 0.03 acres

· Turf burial section area: 0.02 acres

· Irrigated turf: 0.02 acres

· Perimeter landscape areas: 0.01 acres

· Concrete paving: 20 square feet

· Paved roads: 100 square feet

· Gravel beds: 100 square feet

· Fence and gates: 250 linear feet

The work includes services such as:

· Interment and disinterment support

· Headstone services

· Gravesite maintenance and restoration

· Turf and grass maintenance

· Irrigation system services

· Trash and debris removal

· Pavement sweeping and cleaning

· Ice prevention / snow and ice removal

· Structure cleaning and light maintenance

· Ceremonial support

Important: Because this is a very small cemetery, relevance is based more on precision, coordination, burial-related work, restoration, and appearance standards than on acreage alone.

Section 3 – Relevance

Based on the description above, how similar was the contractor’s work?

☐ Very Relevant – Work involved cemetery, memorial, or similarly sensitive grounds maintenance with multiple comparable services, such as burial support, gravesite restoration, headstone work, recurring grounds maintenance, and high-visibility appearance standards.

☐ Relevant – Work involved many similar services and required coordination, precision, and appearance standards, but did not include the full range of cemetery-related services.

☐ Somewhat Relevant – Work involved only limited similar services, such as routine mowing, edging, debris removal, or general landscaping.

☐ Not Relevant – Work did not involve similar services, precision requirements, or performance standards.

Brief explanation:

Section 4 – Performance Quality

How did the contractor perform overall?

☐ Excellent ☐ Good ☐ Acceptable ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsatisfactory

Did the contractor have any issues? Check all that apply:

☐ Missed schedules ☐ Quality problems ☐ Safety concerns ☐ Poor supervision ☐ Failure to meet requirements ☐ None

Comments:

Section 5 – Confidence

Based on your experience, what is your confidence in this contractor’s ability to successfully perform a requirement like the one described above?

☐ High Confidence – Strong performance with minimal issues ☐ Some Confidence – Generally successful performance with minor issues ☐ Low Confidence – Performance issues reduce confidence ☐ No Basis – No basis to evaluate

Would you hire this contractor again?

☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unsure

Additional comments:

Section 6 – Signature

Name: __________________________ Title: ___________________________ Date: ___________________________