PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 36 KB Posted

Attached to
Z1DZ--FY26: NRM (PROJ: 673-26-111) DB - Replace Locate Chilled Water Piping SCI
Solicitation number
36C24826Q0005
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past and Present Performance Questionnaire for a Department of Veterans Affairs contract opportunity. The solicitation (No. 36C24826Q0005) is for a design-build project to replace and relocate chilled water piping at the James A. Haley VA Hospital in Tampa, Florida. The project (No. 673-26-111) requires a contractor to provide professional services, equipment, labor, materials, supervision, tools, testing, and design-build services for installing new chilled water piping in Building 38's parking garage level. The quote is due on 11/03/2025 at 10:00 AM EST, with the contracting officer David Hernandez serving as the point of contact. The performance questionnaire is designed to gather detailed feedback from previous references about the contractor's performance across 23 specific evaluation criteria, including management effectiveness, problem-solving abilities, schedule adherence, and overall performance quality.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
251117_RFI_Responses.docx DOCX document
36C24826Q0005 0003.docx DOCX document
251117_RFI_Responses.docx DOCX document
36C24826Q0005 0002.docx DOCX document
36C24826Q0005 0001.docx DOCX document
site visit for chilled water piping.pdf PDF
10a_230511 HVAC.docx DOCX document
WD FL20250208 05232025.pdf PDF
Experience information Sheet.pdf PDF
9_013323 Shop Drawings.docx DOCX document
10_220711 Plumbing Insulation.docx DOCX document
4_ TIL 001121.docx DOCX document
5 TIL General Specification - Tampa Specific.docx DOCX document
EMR 1 page.pdf PDF
36C24826Q0005_1.docx DOCX document
6 Safety Requirements 2024 TAMPA Safety TIL.rtf RTF text file
Base Offer Price Breakdown - 1 page.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR

Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section below in light blue shaded boxes. Send to the point of contact listed requesting they please complete the form and submit it according to the instructions below.

INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT

The contractor named below is submitting an offer for a United States Department of Veterans Affairs contract requirement, and has sent this form to you, in your role as a past performance reference contact. Please complete this form in full (all areas shaded in light yellow, below). Once completed, please send the form to the Contracting Officer only by email:

Department of Veterans Affairs NCO 8 Contracting Office TO: David Hernandez Contracting Officer, Email: david.hernandez1@va.gov

REF SOLICITATION NUMBER: 36C24826Q0005

Please return before required due date of 11/03/ 2025 at 10:00 AM EST.

If you are unable to provide this information, please inform the Contractor listed below.

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION [completed by Contractor] Contractor Company Name

Street Address

Contractor Point of Contact Name

City

Point of Contact Phone Number

State

Reference Project Title

Zip Code

Contract POP (start to finish):

Email

Contract Number

Contract Dollar Value

Description of Work

Role of Contractor on This Project (check appropriate box)

· Prime Contractor ☐ Sub-contractor ☐ Key Personnel

RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact] Company Name

Street Address

POC Name

City

Phone Number

State

Fax Number

Zip Code

Email

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2 in the applicable text box OR in the Remarks section, below (text box will expand to whatever extent is necessary).

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACT ORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
NEUTRAL
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.

There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

Performance met contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor are satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit.

Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.

No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive

The Contractor …
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

Narrative:

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

Narrative:

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

Narrative:

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems. Narrative:
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
5.
Followed approved quality control plan. Narrative:
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

Narrative:

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

Narrative:

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies Narrative:
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
9.
Identified problems as they occurred. Narrative:
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

Narrative:

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems. Narrative
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules. Narrative:
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
13.
Met established project schedules. Narrative:
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. Narrative:
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
15.
Was responsive to contract changes. Narrative:
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
16.
Provided adequate project supervision. Narrative:
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

Narrative:

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. Narrative:
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

Narrative:

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award. Narrative:
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? Narrative:
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
22.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
☐
YES
☐
NO
23
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.”
☐
YES
☐
NO
24
To the best of your knowledge, is the contractor rated in CPARS?
☐
YES
☐
NO

REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).

Printed Name/ Title Signature

Source Selection Information--See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .