Mather Selection Criteria - Rev 2.pdf

W9128F-27-R-A045 AASF Mather Fueling System Repairs

- PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS,

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION

1. WHO MAY SUBMIT

This solicitation is restricted to the Contractors under Small Business Set-Aside, Solicitation W9128F-27-R-A045.

2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information sufficiently detailed to clearly indicate compliance with the proposal submission requirements.

3. SUBMISSION DEADLINE

Proposals shall be received by the USACE Contracting Activity no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442. Proposals shall be submitted electronically to the Contract Specialist per the instructions included in the RFP letter.

4. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

8.5 inch x 11 inch page size; font no smaller than 10 size. The requirements specified in the solicitation are considered minimum requirements. A proposal that fails to comply with the minimum technical requirements will not be eligible for award.

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

Para. 4.1 - Project Experience Example (Volume 1) Factor 1: Offeror’s Project Experience Factor 2: Project Schedule Para. 4.2 – Pricing (Volume 2)

a) Section 00 10 00, SF1442 Solicitation/Contract Form and Pricing Schedule

PLEASE BE SURE THAT YOUR TECHNICAL PROPOSAL AND PRICING ARE SUBMITTED IN A

SEVERABLE FORM SUCH AS SEPARATE FILES.

4.1 FACTOR 1: PROJECT EXPERIENCE EXAMPLES:

a. Offeror shall submit three (3) projects, each of which included following activities:

1. Fuel dispenser repairs

2. Small building demolition, construction, or repairs

3. Fuel tank appurtenance replacement or installation

4. Remote containment construction or other similar work

Projects that do not include each of these activities are unacceptable as project experience examples.

b. Project total cost, at completion, must total $1,000,000.00 or greater for each project. Projects below this threshold are unacceptable as project experience examples.

c. Projects shall have been completed within the past ten years (calculated from the date of this RFP). Projects completed more than ten years ago are unacceptable as project experience examples.

d. Projects submitted as evidence of required experience shall be accompanied by a Customer evaluation (CPARS/PPIPR/PPQ, etc.), signed by the Customer, which states that Offeror’s performance on the project was Satisfactory (or equivalent) or better. Projects that do not include this are unacceptable as project experience examples.

e. The submitted project experience should include:

o picture/photo of the project;

o a description of the project;

o location;

o construction contract award amount;

o final construction cost;

o date when the construction of the project was started;

o original contract finish date;

o actual finish date; and o the name, address, and telephone number of a representative of the owner as well as one alternate individual

(not affiliated with your firm) who is familiar with your firm’s experience on the project that can verify the experience cited.

f. Page limitations: Each project experience example is limited to two (2) pages. Anything beyond the first two pages will not be considered or evaluated. Accompanying project evaluations do not count against this page limitation. There is no page limitation to the project evaluations (CPARS/PPIPRs/PPQ) but the evaluations shall be submitted in their original form and shall not be added to, i.e., Offerors shall not append the evaluations to include explanations, comments, justifications of ratings, etc. Anything added to the original form will not be considered or evaluated.

4.2 FACTOR 2: PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY SCHEDULE:

• Based on your understanding of the RFTOP requirements, provide a schedule Gantt chart showing Phase 1

(Preconstruction Phase), Phase 2 (On-site Construction) and Phase 3 (Post Construction).

• The projected Period of Performance for this project is 365 calendar days after receiving the notice to proceed.

• The schedule should present the requirements to complete the required design and field work within the period of performance. It must include all milestones and durations, to include:

1. All necessary permits, licenses, and certificates

2. Site specific contractor management plans

3. Key Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) activities

4. Long lead procurements (i.e. Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Mix Design, etc.)

5. Critical path, starting with award and ending at project closeout

6. Simultaneous and concurrent activities

7. Construction sequence (if phasing is required)

• If there are no long lead procurements, state this on the project schedule.

• For scheduling purposes, assume the task order award is 07 Feb 2027 with NTP approximately 2 weeks later.

• Proposals that fail to provide any of the required information will be rated as Unacceptable.

4.3 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

Pricing data will not be part of the technical evaluation. Criteria for the technical evaluation as set forth in the solicitation will be the sole basis for determining the technical merit of proposals. Factor(s) listed above will be assigned a technical evaluation of “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”.

Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

4.4 PRICING

The pricing proposal shall contain the following information:

a. Section 00 10 00, Solicitation/Contract Form and Pricing Schedule: The total combined cost for the construction will be considered for award.

b. Financial:

i. Name, address, and fax number of Financial Institution

ii. Name and phone number of finance individual (primary and alternate) to be contacted for information.

c. Bonding Information: Provide the name, address, and regular phone number of your Surety Company.

d. In Accordance with FAR 36.204, the magnitude of this project is between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000. The price proposal submitted in response to this request will be evaluated IAW FAR 15.403.

5. EVALUATION FOR AWARD

Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) will be source selection method used for award. Uniformity of all proposals is essential to assure accurate evaluation. All proposals must comply with the instructions in the solicitation. Those proposals, which are properly submitted, will be evaluated to determine technically acceptable contractor(s). A proposal that fails to comply with any minimum technical requirements will not be eligible for award regardless that it may offer the lowest price. If the lowest priced proposal is determined to be technically acceptable, the Government intends not to evaluate the remaining proposals.

Any Factor evaluated as “Unacceptable” in any TAB will render the complete technical portion of the offer as “Unacceptable”. No further evaluation will be made on the Offeror’s proposal, including price.

6. SELECTION AND AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

It is the intent of the Government to make award based upon initial offers, without further discussions or additional information. Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms of price and technical requirements. Do not assume an opportunity will be afforded to clarify, discuss, or revise proposals. If award is not made on initial offers, discussions will be conducted as needed.

7. Site Visit

The Government will hold an organized site visit on 29 October 2026 at 08:00 AM, local time.

RSVP to the POCs below no later than 7 calendar days before the scheduled site visit:

USACE PM: Scott Matrangos, scott.e.matrangos@usace.army.mil Installation POC: CW2 Michael Gorham, michael.f.gorham.mil@army.mil

Participants will meet at the following location:

Flight Operations Classroom – Operations Building 10616 Superfortess Avenue (cross streets of Macready Ave & Femoyer St.)

Mather, CA