THRB_420_D11_VII_ id80356 .pdf

HAZMAT SURVEY VOLUME II

LEADBASEDPAINT SURVEY

Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace

National Historic Site

28 East 20h Street

New York City New York

Contract C2000041400

Task Order No T20000414B5

THRB016068

PREPARED FOR

HDR Engineering Inc

One Blue Hill Plaza

Pearl River New York 10965

FOR SUBMITTAL TO

National Park Service

Denver Service Center

12795 West Alameda Parkway

Lakewood CO 80228

PREPARED BY

ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING MANAGEMENT INC

1983 Marcus Ave Suite 109

Lake Success NY 11042

A Socrates Program Manager

John Rutledge Certified EPA Lead Risk Assessor NYR122561

9a0 D va

TABLE OF CONTENTS

10 BACKGROUND1

20 SAMPLING DETAILS2

30 SCOPE OF WORK3

40 PREVIOUS INSPECTIONS FOR THE PRESENCE OF LEAD BASED PAINT 3

50 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE4

60 SUMMARY OF INSPECTION RESULTS4

70 REPORT CERTIFICATIONS5

APPENDICES

80 APPENDIX A XRF Inspection Results Table 10

90 APPENDIX B Personnel Firm Licenses

100 APPENDIX C XRF Performance Characteristic Sheet

110 APPENDIX D XRF Sampling Location Drawings

TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER

DENVER SERVICE CENTER

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

Lead Based Paint Survey for

Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace National Historic Site

10 BACKGROUND

Environmental Planning and Management Inc EPM has conducted a survey for the presence of LeadBased Paint LBP at the following location

Investigation Site

Borough

Address

Built in

Additions Contract

Task Order

Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace National Historic Site

Manhattan

28 East 201h Street New York New York

None

C2000041400

T20000414135 THRB016068

The project manager responsible for this project was

Aphrodite Socrates

The lead inspector responsible for this project was

John Rutledge USEPA Lead Inspector Risk Assessor

Certification NYR122561 Exp 0832008

Site visits November 13`h 28 1h 2006

Report date March 28 2007

Environmental Planning and Management Inc National Park Service

I

20 SAMPLING DETAILS

Testing Procedures usin the Niton XLp 300A XRF Analyzer

Guidelines used for the inspection were a modified protocol established by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD in the Guidelines for the

Evaluation and Control of LeadBased Paint Hazards in Housing The Guidelines are issued pursuant to section 1017 of the Residential LeadBased Paint Hazard Reduction

Act of 1992 which is otherwise referred to as Title X

HUD has established a threshold of 05 by weight andor 10 mgcm2 at and above which a paint is considered to be leadbased

The Niton XLp 300A Series LeadBased Paint Analyzer is a complete leadbased paint

LBP analysis system which quickly accurately and nondestructively measures the concentration of LBP on tested surfaces The XLp 300A relies on the measurement of the Kshell and Lshell Xrays to determine the amount of lead present in a painted surface The measurement of both Kshell and Lshell Xrays allows for the penetration of many layers of paint thereby providing an increased level of accuracy for the measurement of lead without being significantly affected by the thickness or number of layers of paint on the surface of the sample

The Niton XLp 300A simultaneously detects Kshell and Lshell Xrays analyzes them with an automatic positive negative decision and correction for substrate bias and age of source All negative readings in all paint test modes are verified by negative KShell

Xray readings Patentpending TrueDepthTM Technology identifies and locates deeply buried lead and provides exact depth of leaded paint in inches

The Niton XLp 300A analyzer has two modes of operation the Standard Mode and the

K L Mode In the Standard Mode the instrument will measure only until a 95 confidence reading of Positive or Negative has been attained Measurement time can vary on this mode In the K L Mode the analyzer displays the complete test information continuously from the beginning of each reading including the KShell reading with twosigma confidence intervals the Lshell reading with twosigma confidence intervals and the combined reading with twosigma confidence intervals The depth index value which correlates directly with the depth of measurement in inches is available with both modes of operation There are no inconclusive ranges or results measured with the XLp 300A EPM utilized the Niton XLp 300A serial number 7797 in the K and L mode for the testing performed

Verification of proper XRF reading capabilities is performed before and after each inspection A calibration check consists of three consecutive readings of a NIST 104 mgcm22 Paint Film Standard SRM No 2573 as required by the instruments

Performance Characteristic Sheet PCS The individual readings and an average of three readings were recorded and compared to the standards In all cases the instrument was functioning within the standard deviation as defined by the manufacturer and the

PCS All validation readings were recorded on the field inspection logs If for any reason the XRF does not pass the quality control procedures it is EPMs policy to replace that instrument with an XRF that passes the above criteria for calibration The Results of

Calibration Verification is included in Table I in Appendix A

The parameters used to interpret XRF results are outlined in the HUD Guidelines and the

PCS in Appendix D According to the PCS each XRF result is classified as positive or negative as follows

Positive A positive classification indicates that lead is present on the testing combination at or above the HUDIEPA standard of 10 mgcm`

Negative A negative classification indicates that lead is not present on the testing combination at or above the HUDEPA standard

30 SCOPE OF WORK

Review pertinent available reports building plans and previous studies to understand the current building conditions and investigation of hazardous materials including leadbased paint

Conduct a reconnaissance of visible and accessible areas to identify potential lead based paint material

Perform XRF testing on all painted surfaces according to a modified HUD protocol and conduct verification sampling by testing of paint chip samples

Discuss alternatives for controlling lead based paint

Provide recommendations and available options for controlling or eliminating potential exposures to this material

40 PREVIOUS INSPECTIONS FOR THE PRESENCE OF LEAD

BASED PAINT

No record of a previous inspection for the presence of leadbased paint was available

50 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE

EPM inspected and tested painted surfaces and components which were observable and accessible to the survey team It is possible however that additional suspect LBP may exist inside other concealed spaces which were not accessible without the use of destructive means

60 SUMMARY OF INSPECTION RESULTS

61 XRF Testing

A representative sampling method was used to determine the presence of lead based paint on the exterior and interior surfaces of the Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace National

Historic Site This method consisted of assessing building components of similar type color and substrate once per room All other components of similar type color and substrate were then considered to have similar levels of leadbased paint in that particular room

Table 10 lists all tested components and their respective locations substrates color condition XRF result classification and whether or not a detectable level of lead is present regardless of the HUDEPA level of 10 mgcm2

Components that were identified as containing lead in concentrations at or above the

HUDEPA threshold limit of 10 mgcm` are listed in red Components that were identified as containing lead in concentrations below the HUDEPA threshold limit of 10 mgcm2 are listed in black

XRF readings listed as NULL are a result of the Niton XLp 300A proximity sensor loosing contact with the testing substrate Building components were retested in this case

XRF readings listed as Verification Shot are a result of pre and post inspection testing shots of a known NIST standard

XRF readings listed as Shutter Cal are a result of the XRF device performing an internal calibration check

62 Bulk Sampling

No bulk sampling was required during this inspection All surfaces included in the scope of work were tested for the presence of lead based paint by means of XRF analysis

63 Sampling Locations

Sampling locations are identified on drawings of each of the EIGHT levelssubbasementbasement first floor second floor third floor fourth floor roof and bulkhead roof labeled on the floor plans Sheets LBP1 LBP2 LBP3 LBP4 LBP5 LBP6 LBP7 and LBP8 respectively Wall assignments are laid out in a clockwise fashion

Environmental Planning and Maragement Inc National Park Service with the main entrance to 20th Street as Wall A the eastern walls as Wall B the southern walls as Wall C and the western walls as Wall D 64 Conclusions

The results of this inspection indicate that approximately half of the components tested at the Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace National Historic Site contained lead based paint based on the EPAHUD standard of 10 mgcm2 Although many components have been found to contain paint below the EPAHUD standard of 10 mgcm2 the majority of surfaces nevertheless contain a detectable level of lead based paint

65 Recommendations Alterations and Available Options

New construction alteration repair or renovation of structures substrates or portions thereof with any detectable level of lead based paint are governed by the OSHA construction standard for Lead 29 CFR 192662 All building components with a detectable level of lead based paint should therefore be considered a potential source of lead emissions if disturbed

The proposed HVAC repairs will likely impact lead containing surfaces including but not limited to walls radiators baseboards painted pipes etc As manual demolition is an

OSHA Lead in Construction Standard regulated activity work must proceed in accordance with the Standard or a negative exposure assessment will be required for workers performing HVAC related repairs If there is a negative exposure assessment worker protection requirements would minimally include hand washing facilities and lead awareness training

70 REPORT CERTIFICATIONS

EPM Inc certifies that the information contained herein is based on the physical and visual inspections conducted by EPM and data collected during the inspection survey

John Rutledge Aphrodite Socrates

EPA Lead Inspector Risk Assessor QAQC Project Manager

APPENDIX A

80 XRF Inspection Results

Table 10

Lead Based Paint Inspection for Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace National Historic Site

Verification Shot strate Color Condition

N4 t`A NA

A NA NA

LL

A T NA NA

3 Verification Shot NA NA 4 Nl

5 Verification Shot NA NA I`

6 Mechanical Room 1 B Door M

7 1Mechanical Room A Door M

8 Mechanical Room 1 C Railing M

9 Mechanical Room 1 D Wall Con

10 N U

11 Mechanical Room 6 B Wall B

12 N U

13 Mechanical Room 6 D Wall nCo

14 Mechanical Room 6 B Ceiling Con

15 Mechanical Room 3 B Wall h4

16 Mechanical Room 4 A Door M 17 Mechanical Room 2 D Door M

18 Mechanical Room 7 A Pipe M

19 Mechanical Room 7 A Door M

20 Mechanical Room 7 C Door 1

21 Mechanical Room 7 C Ladder 1

22 N

23 N

24 Corridor 1 A Door M

25 Corridor 1 C Door M

26 Bathroom 1 D Door m 27 Bathroom 1 D Door Frame h f

28 Bathroom 1 B Wall Ph

29 Nt

30 Bathroom 1 B Ceiling

31 Bathroom 1 D Baseboard Cor

32 Nt cinr r on

34 Stairwell 2 8 Door

Stairwell 2 B Door Frame

36 Stairwell 2 B Stair Tread

5t<awrll 2 B Stair Rise

A Stair Rail

39 Stairwell 2 A Wall

40 Stairwell 1 D Wall

42 Stairwell I D Stair Treac

1 StiinvvIl 1 D Stair Riser

44 Stairwe D Stair Stringer

45 Stairwc D Newel Post

46 Stairwell 1 Wall

47 Lobby B Ceiling

48 Lobby A Window Frame

49 I obby Windo•ro 01

50 Lobby B Crown Molding

51 Reception Ceiling

54 Exhibit Hall 1 Ceiling

55 Exhibit Hall 1 Crown Molding

58 Corridor 2 B Ceiling

59 Corridor 2 B Crown Molding

60 Bathroom 2 A Door

61 Bathroom 2 Door Frame

63 Bathroom 2 A Ceilin

64 Bathroom 3 C Door

65 Bathroom 3 C Door Frame

66 Bathroom 3 C Ceiling

67 Corridor 3 C Ceiling

Table 10

Results of XRF Testing

Component SuSub ctal Red Good

Brown PoorE to crete Green Fair

LL

rick White Good j

LL

crete White Good

White Goodetecr

Greer Goodetal etal etal etal etal elal

Red

Red

White

Green

Green

Green

Good

Poor

Good eta

ULL

ULL

etal etal etal etal star White Poor

LL

ster White Poor

Crete Red Poor

ILL

Red

Red

Red

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good crete Red Poor

Metal Red Good

GoodMetal Red

Metal

Red

Red

Fair

GoodF1• dal

Plaster

Plaster

NULL

Metal

Metal

Metal

Metal

Concrete

Plaster

Wood Wood

Plaster

Plaster

NULL

NULL

Red Fair

Red Good

Red Good

Red GoodRed Good

White Good

Brown Good

Brown

White Good

Plaster White

NULL

NULL

Plaster White Good

Plaster White Good

Wood White Good

Wood White Good

NULL

Plaster

Wood Wood

Plaster

Plaster

NULL

White Good

White Good

White Good

White Good

White Poor

Detectable

XRF Result Classification Lead Level

Present

11 Positive NA

11 Positive NA

12 Positive NA

189 Positive

1 47 Positive Yes

55 Positive Yes

07 Negative Yes

002 Negative Yes

005 Negative Yes

0 Negative No

136 10 Yes

135 Positive Yes

132 Positive Yes

83 Positive Yes

151 Positive Yes

68 Positive Yes

68 Positive Yes

148 Positive Yes

17 Positive Yes

46 Posii e Yes

78 Pn Yes

005 Negative Yes

005 Negative No

007 Negative Yes

001 Negative Yes

Positive Yes

Positive Yes

Negative Yes

Positive Yes

Positive Yes

Negative Yes

Negative

No

021 Negative Yes

26 Positive Yes

22 Positive Yes

28 Posytrae Yes

04 Negative Yes

006 Negative Yes

001 Negative Yes

Pe Yes

002 Negative Yes

018 Negative Yes

001 Negative I Yes

001 Negative I Yes

008 Negative Yes

002 Negative Yes

028 Negative Yes

018 Negative Yes

I Negative Yes

016 Negative Yes

Negative I Yes

009 Negative Yes

006 Negative Yes

National Park ServiceEnvironmental Planning and Management Inc 1

Lead Based Paint Inspection for Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace National Historic Site

Table 10

Results of XRF Testing

Shot Room Location Component Sub

69 Corndor 3 C Crown Molding Pb

A

U71 N a72 Closet 1 C Wall PI

73 K•trhenl D Door W 74 Kitchenl D Door Frame W 75 Kitchenl D Wall PI a

76 Kitchenl C Cabinet W

77 Kitchenl C Ceiling Pla

78 Kitchenl 8 Locker W

79 Kdvnii 1 B Dumbwaiter M

80 Office 1 A Door W 81 Office 1 A Door Frame W

82 Office 1 B Wall Ph

83 Office 1 B Baseboard N

84 Office 1 B Ceiling PI

85 Office 1 B SktH nt M

86 Office 1 B Radritor M 87 Bathroom 4 A Door W 88 Bathroom 4 A Door Frame W

89 Bathroom 4 B Wall Ph

90 NI

91 NV

92 NI

93 Bathroom 4 B Skylight Frame ti

94 Closet 2 A Door W

95 Closet 2 A Door Frame V 96 N

97 N

98 Closet 2 B Wall PI

99 N

100 Closet 2 B Ceiling Pl oset Pipe

1 Office 2 Door Frame

104 Office 2 Wall

105 Office 2 A Baseboar

106 Office 2 A Ceiling

107 Office 2 A Crown Molding

108 Office 2 A Skylight Frame

109 Closet 3 A Door

110 Closet 3 Door Frame

113 Closet 3 Wall

114 Closet 3 C Shelf

115 A Door

116 Closet 4 Door Frame

117 Closet 4 C Wall

118 Closet 4 C Shelf

119 Entrance Corridor C Door

120 •yurr or C Door Frame

121 Entrance Corridor Wall

24 Entrance Corridor B Baseboard

126 Entrance Corridor B Floor

129 1 Entrance Corridor B Ceiling

130 Closet 1A BDuo131 Closet 1A 8 Door Farne

133 Closet IA Wall

136 Closet 1A c 1 Cabinet strate Color l ester White

LL

ster cod ood ster nod ster ood etal ood

White

0 t

While

White n White

P•ite

Cc Vhite

White

White ood aster White etal etal d h rc ood White ocx aster

JLL

JLL

JLL

oOd ood

White

White

White

Whiteood

ULL

ULL

aster White

ULL

aster White etal Whitel

NULL

NULL

Wood

Wood Wood Plaster

Wood

Metal

Plaster

White

V h

White

White

White

White n a

Vdrr

Whit

White

NULL

Concrete Brown

NULL

Concrete Brown

NULL

NULL

Plaster White

11e1a1 Beige

Mtal Bei t

NULL

Plaster Beige

NULL

Wood Beige

Condition

Detectable

XRF Result Classification Lead LevelPresent Poor 002 Negative Yes

Yes

Good 05 Negative Yes

Good 56 Positive Yes

Good 05 Negative Yes

Good 04 Ne ative Yes

88 Posdw Yes

Good 04 Negative Yes

Good 76 Positive Yes

Good 222 Positive Yes

Good 94 Positive Yes

Good 69 1 Positive Yes

Poor 04 Negative Yes

Good 59 Positive Yes

Poor 0 Negative No

Good 11 3 Positive i

Yes

Good 10 Positive Yes

Good 86 Positive Yes

Good 13 Pcyitiye Yes

Good 021 Negative Yes

Good 111 Positive Yes

Good 178 Positive Yes

Good 101 Positive Yes

Fair 05 Negative

Fair 05 Negative Yes

Fair 57 Positive Yes

Good 60 Positive Yes

Good Negative No

Good 6 Positive Yes

Good 025Negative Yes

Goo 67 Positive Yes

Good 18 Positive Yes

Good 11 5 Positive Yes

Good 75 Positive Yes

Fair 001 Negative

Yes

Good 10 2 Positive Yes

Good 9 4 Positive Yes

Good 57 Positive Yes

Fair 002 Ne ative Yes

Good 12 8 Positive Yes

Good 292 Positive Yes

126 Positive Yes

Good 04 N alive Yes

Good 16 Positive Yes

Good 08 Negative Yes

Good 04 Negative Yes

Good 7 5 Positive Yes

Good 2 2 Positive Yes

Good

05 Negative

Good 12 Positive Yes

National Park ServiceEnvironmental Planning and Management Inc 2

Results of XRF Testing

Shot

Stairwell 3

Stairwell 3

B

Component

Exhibit Hall 7

Exhibit Hall 7

Exhibit Hall 7

Exhibit Kill 7

Stair Riser

Stair Strinaer

139 Stairwell D Molding V1

140 Corridor 4 A Dons Vt

141 Shutter Verification Shot NA NA142Corridor 4 A Doe F ire

143 Corridor 4 A Ceiling PI

144 Corridor 4 A Crown Molding PI

145 rndor 4 B Baseboard

146 N

147 N

148 Foyer 3 A Door

149 Foyer 3 A Door Frame

150 Foyer 3 B Wood Panel N

152 Foyer 3 A Ceilin

Molding

Crown Molding

CeilinR Baseboard beer

Door Frame

154 Foyer 3 B Crown Molding PI

155 Foyer 3 B Basib N

156 Exhibit Hall 3 D D W

157 Exhibit Hall 3 D Door Fcrne N1

158 Exhibit Hall 3 A Window Frame V

159 Exhibit Hall 3 B Crown Molding Pl

160 Exhibit Hall 3 A Ceiling Pl

161 ExIbit Hall 3 B Baseboard

162 Erl dt Hall 4 D Door

163 Fxhlt Hall 1 D Door Frame P

164 F•tnt iu D Besebuart il

165 Exhibit Hall 4 D Crown Molding PI

166 Exhibit Hall 4 D Ceiling Pl

167 Exhibit Hall 4 8 Mantle

168 Exhibit Hall 7 A MDoor Frame lo

Closet 5

Closet 5

Closet 5

Closet 6

Exhibit Hall8

Exhibit Hall 8

Stairwell 5

Stairwell 5

Corridor 9

Corridor 9

Corridor 9

Corridor 9

Corridor 9

Exhibit Hall

Exhibit Hall

Exhibit Hall 9

Exhibit Hall 9 c r hhil Hr

Exhibit h

Corridor 9

D

B

B

B

D

C

C

B

C

C A

A

B ood White ood White roc v^hCc

Whitood

IA NA

eod White aster White aster White ood White

JILL

JILL

Greenood ood White ood White

W W

NULL

Plaster 7White

NULL

aster White ood While ood White ood Whit e in I White aster White aster White ivid Nitta etal ood ood

Plaster aster White aster White oil While ood aster

Plaster

Plaster

Aood

ViViod

Wood

NULL

Ceiling

Door wall

Ceiling

Ceiling

Crown Molding

Stair Riser

Stair Stringer

Door Frame

Baseboard

Plaster

NULL

White

White I

Ill 11

White

White

White yiae White

Plaster J White

Plaster White

Plaster White

WW•

Wood

White Wood White

Wood White

NULL

Ceiling Plaster White

Crown Molding Plaster White

NULL

Door 1 White

Wall Metal

Door Frame Wood While laster tcBasi Ceilin pi g aster White

Crown Moldia Wood White

Windy mu tnJ Sh •cc A iCo

Door Frame Wood

Condition XRF Result Classification

Detectable

Lead Level

Pr sent

Good 014 Negative Yes

Good 015 Negative Yes rd 116 Pos4rve Yes

Good 154 Posuve Yes

NA 384 NAPositive

Good 129 Positive Yes

Good 0 Negative No

Good 002 Negative Yes

Good 13 7 Positive Yes

Good 26 Positive Yes

Good 162 Positive Yes

Good 135 Positive Yes

Good 001 N alive YesI

Good 02 Negative

Yes0 I

Good 107 Pos ve YesitiGood227 Posi tive t Yes

Good 152 Positive Yes

Good 73 Positive Yes

Good 001 Negative Yes

Good 0 Negative No

Good 115 Positive Yes

Good 268 Positive Yes

Good 12 Positive Yes

Good 155 Positive Yes

Good 004 Negative Yes

Good 001 Negative Yes iI 16 Ps nc Yes

12 c • Yes

Good 0 Negative No

Good 0 Negative

No

Good 0 Negative No

Good 128 Positive Yes

Good 186 Positive Yes

Good 154 Positive Yes

Good 1 016 Neoative Yes

Good 0 Negative No

Good 163 Positive Yes

Good 115 Positive Yes

Good 027 Negative Yes

Good 028 Negative Yes

Good 03 Ne ative Yes

Good 001 Negative Yes

87 Yes

Good 121 Positive Yes

Good 211 Positive Yes

Good 142 Positive Yes

Good 151 Positive Yes

Good 0 08 Negative No

Good 0 02 Negative Yes

Good 004 Negative Yes

Goo 107 Prive Yes

98 Psvrve Yes

Good 105 FoSaive Yes

Good 0 Negative No

Good 0 Negative No rn 94 Pc Yes

123 1 Yes

Good 138 Positive Yes

Good 101 Positive Yes

National Park Service3Environmental Planning and Management Inc

Lead Based Paint Inspection for Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace National Historic Site

Table 10

Results of XRF Testing

Shot Room

2ci

Location Component Sub o

201 Ex r ri t Hall 10 D Fs•isr tr and w

208 Exhibit Hall 10 D Ceiling Pl

209 NI

210 Exhibit Hall 10 D Crown Molding A 211 Exhibit Hall 10 A Window Frame W

212 Exhibit Hall 10 A Window Sash w

213 Corridor 5 A Door w

214 Corridor 5 A Door Frame

215 Corridor 5 B Baseboard W

216 Corridor 5 B Ceiling Pl

217 Corridor 5 D Cabinet W

218 Exhibit Hall 11 0 Door 6

219 •rna t 11 D Door Frame w

220 Exrnt Hail 11 A Baseboard V

221 Exhibit Hall 11 A Ceiling PI

222 Exhtn Hall 11 C Window Frame iA

223 Exhot Hall 11 C Window Sash A

224 Nt

225 Exhibit Hall 11 A Crown Molding N

22F Closet 8 C Door

227 Closet 8 C Door Frame

228 N

229 N

230 Closet 8 A Wall PI

231 Closet 8 A Ceiling P E

232 Library B Door Frame W

233 Libra B Ceiling PI

234 Library B Crown Molding Pl

235 Library 2 A CeilingPI

236 Library 2 A Crown Molding Pl

Stairwell 6

Lobby 2

Lobby 2

Office 3

247 Bathroom 5

Bathroom 5

Bathroom 6

Bathroom 6

Bathroom 6

Office 5

Office 5

Corridor 7

Storage Room 2

Storage Room 2

Storage Room 2

Stara t

Rcua

Sorigc Icon

Storage Room 1

Storage Room 1

Storg •oDm 1

Storage Room 1

Stairwell 7

Auditorium 1

Auditorium 1

Kitchen 2

Kitchen 2

D ood aster

JLL

ood ood ood ood ood ood aster ood etal ood ood aster ood ood

JLL

ood etal ood

JILL

JLL

aster aster ood aster aster aster aster

Stair Stringer Vvood

Ceiling Plaster

Crown Moldin Plaster

Ceiling Plaster

Window Frame Wood

Window Sash i and

Ceilin Plaster

Window Frame Wood

Door Wood Door Frame Metal

NULL

Ceiling Plaster

Door Wood Door Frame Wood

NULL

Ceiling Plaster

Ceiling Plaster

Crown Molding Plaster

Wall Plaster

Ceiling a Plaster

Crown Moldin Plaster ddl Plaster

Ceiling

Crown Mold aJsil vi

Ceiling

Baseboard

Cabinet

Ceiling

Ceiling

Ceiling Crown Molding

Ce

Door Frame

Plaster

Plaster

Plaster

Plaster

Plaster

Plaster

Plaster

Plaster

Wood Wood

Color Condition XRF Result Classification

Detectable

Lead Level

Present

`ihte Good 166

Yes

Positive Yes

White Good 002 Null Yes

White T Good 001 Negative Yes

White Good 79 Positive Yes

White Good 113 Positive Yes

White Good 178 Positive Yes

While Good 137 Positive Yes

White Good 10 Positive Yes

White Good 0 Negative No

White Good 128 Positive Yes

White Good 163 Positive Yes

White Good 151 Positive Yes

White Good 108 Positive Yes

White Good Negative No

Vdite Good 138 Positive Yes

White Good 8 Positive Yes

White Good 01 Negative Yes

White I Good 25 1 Pos tee Yes

White Good 18 1 P• Yes

White Good 005 Negative Yes

White Good 05 Negative Yes ib nod 142 Posilvc Yes

White Good 0 Negative No

White Good 001 Ne alive Yes

White Good 0 Negative No

White Good 016 Negative Yes

White Good 75 Positive Yes

White Good 7 8 Posnve Yes

White Good 001 Negative

White Good 05 Negative Yes

White Good 0 Negative No

Brown Fair 01 Negative Yes

Brown Fair 79 Positive Yes

White Fair 0 Negative No

Brown Fair 91 Por tc Yes

White Good 02 Negative Yes

White Good 03 Negative Yes

White Good 018 Negative

White Good 019 Negative Yes

White Good 013 Negative Yes

White Good 002 Negative i

Yes

White Good 0 Ne ative No White Good 0 Negative No

White Fair 0 Null No

White Good 0 Negative No

White Good 0 Negative No

White Fair 15 cs Yes

White Fair 0 Negative No

White Fair 0 Negative No

White Fair 89 Positive Yes

Good 158 Positive Yes

White Fair 0 Negative No

Gray Fair 001 Negative Yes

Fair 11 Positive Yes

White Poor 0 Negative No

White Fair 001 Negative Yes

White Good 0 Negative No

White Good 03 Negative Yes tih•tGood 14 Positive Yes

10 1Good 92 Positive Yes

National Park ServiceEnvironmental Planning and Management Inc 4

275 Kitchen 2 C Baseboard Plt

276 Nt

277 Kitchen 2 C Ceiling Plt

278 K then 2 C Window F rame Vv

279 Kitchen 2 C Window Sash W 280 Kitchen 2 D Cabinet W 281 Closet 15 A Door W 282 Closet 15 A Door Frame W

283 Closet 15 C Wall Pl

284 Bathroom 8 B Door W

285 Bathroom 8 B Door Frame W

286 Bathroom 8 D Ceilin Ph

287 Storage Room 6 C Door Frame W 288 Storage Room h B Wall PI

289 Storage Ronm 6 B Basetoard W 290 Storage Room 6 A Ceiling Pl

291 Storage Room 6 A Window Frame W 292 Corridor 8 D Door W

293 Corridor 8 D Door Frame

294 Corridor 8 A Wall

295 Corridor 8 A Baseboard

296 NI

297 Corridor 8 A Ceiling PI

298 Condor 8 A Window Frame IS

299 Storage Room 5 D Door W

300 Stora e Room 5 D Door Frame W

301 Storage Ro n C PI

302 Stora e Rrr n i C t nco W 303 Storage Room 5 C Ceiling PI

304 Storage Room S A Wmdo i tgyn N

Shot Room

274 Kitchen 2

Results of XRF Testing

Location Component Substrata Color ConditionL1

NULL

PlasterC Wall

Plaster

Plaster

Wood

Metal

Metal

Plaster

Table 10

Environmental Planning and Management Inc 5

Lead Based Paint Inspection for Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace National Historic Site aster

1LL

ester ood ood ood ood nod ester ood nod later ood aster ood ester ood ood ood aster ood

Brown

White

White

White

White

White

Pink

White

White

White

Yellow

White

Yellow

White

Yellow

Yellow

Yellow

White

Good 028 Negative

White Good 026 Negative Yes

Good

Good

Good

Good

Fair

Fair

Good

Fair

Fair

Fair

Good

Good

Good

12 7

Good

Fair

Fair

Good

Yellow I Good 1

Positive

Positive

Positive

Positive

Positive

Negative

Positive

Positive

Negative

L Yes J Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Positive Yes

Positive Yes Positive Yes

Negative Yes

Positive Yes

Positive Yes

Positive Yes

Positive Yes

JLL

aster

Jud ood ood aster ood later trod etal od rd

NULL

Plaster

Metal

NULL

NULL

Plaster

Wood Wood Brown

Plaster White

M I Brown Fair

Metal Brown Fair

Plaster White Poor

NULL

NULL

NULL

NULL

NULL

NULL

NULL

NULL

NULL

Plaster

Metal

Metal

White

White Good

White

Yellow

Yellow

White

Yellow

White

Yellow

Yellow

Yellow

Yellow

White

Gray

Brown

White

Brown

Brown

White

White

Brown

Brown

White

Good

Fair

Good

Good

Poor

Good

Poor

Good

Good

Goo

Good

Good

Fair

Fair

Good

XRF Result Classification

8 1

Fair

Good

0 Negative

0 Negative

Fair u a

Negative

Positive Yes

Negative

Positive

Positive

Positive

Positive

Positive

Negative

Posrtle

Negative

Positive

Positive

Positive

Positive

Positive

Detectable

Lead Level

Present

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Positive Yes

Negative Yes

193 Posae Yes

6 Pos w= Yes

04 Negative Yes

Fair 05 Negative Yes

Poor 005 Negative Yes

Far 135 Positive Yes

Good 05 Negative Yes

Good 108 Positive Yes

Negative Yes

National Park Service t orage Room ectncal Panel

Bah rr 7 A Door

Bathroom 7 A Door Frrre

309 Bathroom 7 C Ceilin

310 Stairwell 8 C Floor

311 B Riu

314 Stairwell 8 Stringer

315 Stairwell 8 8 Wall

316 Stairwell 8 A Window Frame

317 Stairwell 8 A Window Sash

318 Stairwell 8 B Ceiling

319 Crr r 11 A Door

320 10 A Door Frame

321 Corridor 10 D Wall

323 Corridor 10 D Baseboard

324 Corridor 10 D Ceiling

Corrro Cabinet

326 Corridor 11 A Door

77 Cxucor A Door Frame

328 Corridor 10 Wall

337 Corridor 10 C Ceiling

338 Corridor 10 C Window Frame

Corridor 10 C Window Sash

340 Corridor 10 C Radiator

White Fair 007 Negative Yes

Brown Good 141 Positive Yes

Bvuvn Gooo 13 Positive Yes

Brown Good 03 Negative Yes

Shot Room Location

Corridor 12

Corridor 12

A

A

Table

Results of XRF Testing

Component

Door

Door Frame

343 Corridor 12 A Wall PI

344 Corridor 12 A Baseboard Ph

345 Corridor 12 A Ceiling PI

346 Corridor 12 C Window Frame M

347 Corridor 12 C Window Sash M

348 HVAC Room B Coor

349 HVA Rom B =rame

350 HVAC Room B Wall B

351 HVAC Room i

B Ceiling Co

352 HVAC Room C Window Frame V

353 HVAC Room C Window Sash N

354 Rear Fire Escape C Stair Tread N

355 Rear Fire Escape C Stair Stringer N

356 Rear Fire Escape C Newel Post

357 Ni

358 Ni

359 Roof Upper Walkway B Door N

360 Roof Upper Walkway C Vent Cap N

361 o r Walkway C Parapet Cap

362 Verification Shot NA NA

363 Verification Shot NA NA

364 Verification Shot NA NA

365 Shutter Verification Shot NA NA

366 Verification Shot NA NA

367 Ni

368 Verification Shot NA NA

369 Verification Shot NA NA

370 lI8 B Door ti

371 icull8 B Door Frame M

1 Stairwell 8 C Wall

375 Stairwell 8 C Baseboard

376 Stairwell 8 D Floor

377 Stairwell 8 B Stair Stringer

378 Stairwell 8 B Newel Post

379 Stairwell 8 Window Frame

382 Stairwell 8 Ceiling

383 Projection Hoorn 1 B Door

Projection Room 1 Door Frame

386 Projection Room 1 A Wall

388 Projection Room 1 C Baseboard

Projection

Room I D Floor

390 Pro ec t o C Winoo Poona

391 Poger•n •1 •on+ 1 C Wind =h 392 Projection Room 1 C Ceiling

393 Projection Room 1 C Pipe

394 Prnjec io+ R ccm 1 D Elects

395 Projection Room 1 A Project +

396 Projection Room 1 A Projector Table

397 Storage Room 48 B Ca

839 Storage Room 4B B Door France

401 Storage Room 4B Wall

402 Storage Room 4B D Baseboard

403 Storage Room 46 C Floor

404 Storage Room 46 C Winch Frame

406 Storage Room 4B Ceiling

407 Storage Room 4 Wall

Substrate

Wood

Plaster rick acrete etas etal etal etal rtal

JLL

JLL

etal fetal ral

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

JLL

NA

NA

fetal fetal

ILL

aster aster aster alai etal etal etal

NULL

Plaster

Plaster

Concrete

Metal

Metal

Metal

NULL

NULL

Metal

Metal

NULL

Plaster

NULL

Plaster

Concrete

VA1i

Itel

Plaster

Metal a

Wood

Jana

NULL

NULL

Plaster

Plaster

Concrete rdAel

NULL

Color Condition XRF Result Classification

Detectable

Lead Level

Present

Brown Good 07 Negative Yes

4Brown Good 64 Negative Yes

White Good 2O02 Negative Yes

Brown Good 06 Negative Yes

White Good 03 Negative Yes

Brown Good 8 Positive Yes

Brcn Good 66 Positive Yes

Brcvr Good 173 Positive Yes

Brown Good 12 Poi Yes

Black Fair 003 Negative Yes

Black Fair 0 Negative No Black Good 56 Posit Yes

Black Good 08 Negative Yes

Black Poor 86 i Pose Yes

Black Poor 27 Positive Yes

Black Poor 43 Positive Yes

Black Poor 006 Negative Yes

Black 01 Negative Yes

Black Poor 34 Posite Yes

NA 1 NA Yes

NA 11 NA Yes

NA 12 NA Yes

NA Good 451 NA Yes

NA Good 11 NA Yes

NA Good 12 NA Yes

NA Good 12 NA Yes

White Fair 20 3 Positive Yes

White 109 Positive Yes

White 06 Negative Yes

Brown 003 Negative Yes

Brown Fair 009 Negative Yes

B Good 43 Positive Yes

Blacr Good 72 Positive Yes

Brown Good 112 Positive Yes

Negative Yes

Positive Yes

Brown Good 46 Positive Yes

White Good 07 Negative Yes

Brown Good 003 Negative Yes

Brown Good 012 Negative Yes

Good5 nn 38 PosesYes Bown Good 42 PoYes White Good 06 Negative Yes

White Good 07 Negative Yes

White Good 93 Pc e Yes

Brown Good 34 PosO 0e Yes

Brown Good 003 Negative Yes

Brown Good 179 Positive Yes

Brown Good 4 5 Positive Yes

White Good 03 Negative Yes

Brown Good 004 Negative Yes

Brown Fair 004 Negative Yes

Brown Good 26 Postre Yes

White I Good 07 Negative

Yes

White Good 0 Negative No

Environmental Planning and Management Inc 6

Results of XRF Testing

Shot 0 Room Location Component Sub

409 Storage Room 4 A Ceiling

PI

411 Storaa Room 4A C Wall PI

412 Elevator Mechanical Room D Dour f

413 Elevator Mechanical Room B Wall M

414 Roof Patio C Door M

415 Roof Patio B Door M

416 Sou h Fac i In floor Window Lame

417 Sou I Faace 1st floor Dccr 1

418 Soutr Fapce 1st floor Dor Fr3i• f

419 South Facade 1st floor Exhibit Hall 1 Skylight M

420 South Fa de 1st floor Exhibit Hall 1 Skylight Rail M

421 N

422 2nd Fioor Terrace 2nd floor Window Frame

423 2nd Floor Terrace 2nd floor Wood Post

424 2nd Floor Terrace 2nd floor Wood Lattice H 425 2nd Floor Terrace 2nd floor 3rd Floor Decking Underside W 426 North Facade 1st floor Front Door W 427 North Facade 1st floor Door Frame IN

428 North Facade 1st floor Window Shutter W 429 North Facade 1st floor Wincow Frarne f•^

430 North Facade 3rd floor Window Shutter W 431 North Facade 3rd floor Window Frame f

432 North Facade Basement Window Sash `f

433 Foyer 1 C Door W 434 Foyer 1 C Sore F• •• f

435 Foyer 1 A Wall Co

436 Foyer Closet A Door W 437 Foyer Closet

A Door Frame W 438 Szald 1 4 A Door M143`r ell 4A Door Frame ML

Stairwell440 A Wall P1

441 Floor

442 C Stair Tread

Spm tr oiiJer

Stair Riser

446 Stairwell 4 Ceiling

448 Stairwell 4 D

Baseboard

449 Verification Shot NA NA

450 Verification Shot NA NA

451 Verification Shot NA NA strate aster etal etal etal etal I vial etal etal etal

ULL

eta ood ood ood ood ood ood ood ood ood ood ood ood mete ood ood

•od ood aster oncrete

Metal

Metal

Metal

Metal

Plaster

NULL

Wood

NA

NA

NA

Detectable

Color Conditii Classification Lead Level

Present ie Good 0 Negative No

Yes

White Good 05 Negative Yes

61 ri anom 1 3 Pc Yes

Black Poor 001 Negative Yes

Black Good 019 Negative Yes

Black Good 006 Negative Yes air 79 Positive Yes uod 36 Positive Yes

Black I Good 94 Positive Yes

Black Fair 001 Negative Yes

Black Fair 0 Negative No

Black Good 64 Positive

Pink Good 17 Positive Yes

Pink Good 157 Positive Yes

Blue Good 91 Positive Yes

Green Good 87 Positive Yes

Grer Good 101 Positive Yes

Beige Good 0 Negative No

Scs Good 118 Positive Yes

Bei a Good 0 Negative No

Good 137 Positive Yes

Good 147 Positive Yes

Beige Fair 016 Negative Yes

Poor 49 Positive Yes

Beige Good 03 Negative Yes

Green Good 006 Negative Yes

Green Good 003 Negative Yes

8 3 Pnsiiu Yes

43 sui Yes

White Fair 0 Ne alive N o

Grp Good Negative Yes014

Gray Good 019 Negative Yes

Black Good 35 Positive Yes

Black Good 24 Positive Yes

Black Good 64

White Fair 0 Negative No

Negative Yes

NA NA 12 Positive NA

NA NA 12 Positive NA

NA NA 13 Positive NA

Environmental Planning and Management Inc 7

APPENDIX B

90 Personnel and Firm Licenses

Uiiiti1i 4at•s TEnuixonmenttl Protation Agrnr

TItis is to rertifg tltttt

Environmental Planrging Management Inc

1983 Marcus Ave has fulfilled the requirements of the Tokl•Substances Co leadbased paint activi e Su cc s New Yoi c 11042

New York

Section 402al and has received certification to conduct

40 CFR Part 74226

This certification is valid from the date of issuance and expires April 9 2009

NY20031

Certification

JAN 9 2006

Kenneth S Stoller PE QEP DEE Chief

Pesticides Toxic Substances Branch

Issued On

Certificate ofAchievement John Rutledge

EPM Inc Has successfully completed the

Thermo NITON Analyzers LLC Manufacturer s Training Course and is now certified in radiation safety and monitoring device operation and machine maintenance of the NI TON XRF Analyzer

Certificate issued by Thermo NITON Analyzers LLC CIHs The ABIl1 Awards I CM point approval 061579

Thermo

ELECTRON CORPORATION

Mr John Rutledge

EPM Inc

1983 Marcus Ave Ste 109

Lake Success NY 10042

Dear Mr Rutledge

November 3 2006

Congratulations on successfully completing the Manufacturers Training Course for Thermo Electron

Corporations portable NITON XRF Spectrum Analyzers We admire your effort in completing this course and are enclosing your Certificate This certifies you in radiation safety and monitoring measurement technology and machine maintenance of the NITON XRF Spectrum Analyzer

Now you can join the professionals who are turning to onsite technologies for the measurement of metals in leadbased paint soil air and coatings as well as alloy identification These technologies offer huge savings in measurement time and cost over conventional methods At the same time they have become widely accepted for regulatory accreditation and support

EPA lead program accepts XRF for lead paint testing and verifies performance via `Performance Characteristics Sheets

The EPA lead program had implemented a fill accreditation program for onsite lead analysis in soil dust and paint

EPAHUD Method 6200 is published for analysis of contaminants in soils and sediment using field portable XRay Fluorescence XRF NIOSH Method 7702 is published for onsite analysis of filters used for the measurement of airborne lead levels for worker exposure using portable XRF

Thermo Electrons NITON Analyzers unit is the leading manufacturer of portable XRF analyzers for contaminant analysis Instruments can be configured for nearly any application including lead paint analysis RCRA metal analysis for soils coatings and contaminants in air and detection of prohibited materials in electronic components for RoHS and WEEE compliance Readings take as little as a few seconds For most applications results meet laboratorylevel accuracy standards For project oriented companies Thermo even offers an attractive rental program Every NITON XRF Analyzer can be upgraded to keep pace with the changes in your business

Please call us today to discuss your measurement needs Our trained technical staff will help you identify onsite testing methods that will save you time and money Onsite analysis also greatly speeds the inspection and clearance process for remediation projects Give us a call today

Please call us for further information or to schedule an onsite demonstration at your convenience Visit our web site at wwwthermocompiton We are committed to solving your analysis needs

Best regards

Victoria Grzybinski

Training Coordinator

Thermo Electron Corporation

NITON Analyzers

TMmm NITON Anslynrs LLC 900 Middlesex Turnpike Billerica MA 01821 $1978 6707460 800 8751578 toll free

Building 8 USA ♦1 978 6707430 fax wwwthermo cornpiton

Unit6 tate inuirintmeuti1 1rutrrtinii Agnq O

Ott is tv ratif q that

L•

J tt Ia has fulfilled the requirements of the Toxic Substances Co Section 402at and has received certification to conduct

CPR Part 745226 as a o• wd

Risk Assessor`

L3Jn t uri iirthni nf

New York

This certification is valid from the date of issuance and expires August 3 2008

NYR122561

Certification Kenneth S Stoller PE QEP DEE Chief jUi 2 5 2005 Pesticides Toxic Substances Branch

Issued On

APPENDIX C

100 XRF Performance Characterization Sheet

Performance Characteristic Sheet

EFFECTIVE DATE September 24 2004

EDITION NO 1

MANUFACTURER AND MODEL

MakeNiton LLC

Tested Model XLp 300

Source

Cd

Note This PCS is also applicable to the equivalent model variations indicated below for the LeadinPaint K+L variable reading time mode in the XLi and XLp series

XLi 300A XLi 301 A XLi 302A and XLi 303A XLp 300A XLp 301 A XLp 302A and XLp 303A XLi 700A XLi 701 A XLi 702A and XLi 703A XLp 700A XLp 701A XLp 702A and XLp 703A

Note The XLi and XLp versions refer to the shape of the handle part of the instrument The differences in the model numbers reflect other modes available in addition to

LeadinPaintmodes The manufacturer states that specifications for these instruments are identical for the source detector and detector electronics relative to theLeadinPaintmode

FIELD OPERATION GUIDANCE

OPERATING PARAMETERS LeadinPaint K+L variable reading time mode

XRF CALIBRATION CHECK LIMITS

The calibration of the XRF instrument should be checked using the paint film nearest 10 mgcm2 in the NIST Standard Reference Material SRM used eg for NIST SRM 2579 use the 102 mgcm2 film

If readings are outside the acceptable calibration check range follow the manufacturers instructions to bring the instruments into control before XRF testing proceeds

SUBSTRATE CORRECTION

For XRF results using LeadinPaint K+L variable reading time mode substrate correction is not needed for Brick Concrete Drywall Metal Plaster and Wood

INCONCLUSIVE RANGE OR THRESHOLD

K+L MODE SUBSTRATE THRESHOLD

mgcm` ReadingDescription

Brick 10

Concrete 10

Drywall 10

Metal 10

Plaster 10

Wood 10

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

EVALUATION DATA SOURCE AND DATE

This sheet is supplemental information to be used in conjunction with Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of LeadBased Paint Hazards in Housing HUD Guidelines Performance parameters shown on this sheet are calculated from the EPAHUD evaluation using archived building components

Testing was conducted in August 2004 on 133 testing combinations The instruments that were used to perform the testing had new sources one instruments was installed in November 2001 with 40 mCi initial strength and the

SUBSTRATE CORRECTION VALUE COMPUTATION

Substrate correction is not needed for brick concrete drywall metal plaster or wood when using LeadinPaint K+L variable reading time mode the normal operating mode for these instruments If substrate correction is desired refer to

Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for guidance on correcting XRF results for substrate bias

EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF XRF TESTING

Randomly select ten testing combinations for retesting from each house or from two randomly selected units in multifamily housing Use the K+L variable time mode readings

Conduct XRF retesting at the ten testing combinations selected for retesting

Determine if the XRF testing in the units or house passed or failed the test by applying the steps below

Compute the Retest Tolerance Limit by the following steps

Determine XRF results for the original and retest XRF readings Do not correct the original or retest results for substrate bias In singlefamily housing a result is defined as the average of three readings In multifamily housing a result is a single reading

Therefore there will be ten original and ten retest XRF results for each house or for the two selected units

Calculate the average of the original XRF result and retest XRF result for each testing combination

Square the average for each testing combination

Add the ten squared averages together Call this quantity C

Multiply the number C by 00072 Call this quantity D

Add the number 0032 to D Call this quantity E

Take the snnare rnnt of F all this nnantity F

Find the absolute difference of the two averages

If the difference is less than the Retest Tolerance Limit the inspection has passed the retest If the difference of the overall averages equals or exceeds the Retest

Tolerance Limit this procedure should be repeated with ten new testing combinations If the difference of the overall averages is equal to or greater than the Retest Tolerance Limit a second time then the inspection should be considered deficient

Use of this procedure is estimated to produce a spurious result approximately 1 of the time That is results of this procedure will call for further examination when no examination is warranted in approximately I out of 100 dwelling units tested

TESTING TIMES

For the LeadinPaint K+L variable reading time mode the instrument continues to read until it is moved away from the testing surface terminated by the user or the instrument software indicates the reading is complete The following table provides testing time information for this testing mode The times have been adjusted for source decay normalized to the initial source strengths as noted above Source strength and type of substrate will affect actual testing times At the time of testing the instruments had source strengths of 266 and 366 mCi

Testing Times Using K+L Reading Mode Seconds

All Data Median for Lab Measured Lead

Levels

Substrate 25` Median Pb<025 025<Pb<10 10<Pb

Percentie Percentile mgcm z jmgcm z figcm

WoodDrywal1 4 11 19 11 15 11

Metal 4 12 18 9 12 14

Brick

Concrete 8 16 22 15 18 16

Plaster

CLASSIFICATION RESULTS

XRF results are classified as nositive if they are greater than or equal to the inconclusive ranges or thresholds for specific XRF instruments For a copy of this document call the National Lead Information Center Clearinghouse at1800424LEAD This XRF Performance Characteristic Sheet was developed by the Midwest

Research Institute MR and QuanTech Inc under a contract between MRI and the XRF manufacturer HUD has determined that the information provided here is acceptable when used as guidance in conjunction with Chapter 7 LeadBased

Paint Inspection of HUDs Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control ofLeadBased Paint Hazards in Housing

APPENDIX D

110 Sample Location Drawings

BULKE4DROOFPLAN

ROOF

PATIO

EAST BULKHEAD

ROOF

ocr

SKYLI

FS

I I

L

SOUTH BULKHEAD

ROOF

EM ast I oLuioi

THEODORE ROOSKLT BIRTHPLACE

NEW YOM CITY

if

LEGEND

BTRBATHROOM

C CORRIODR

CLCLOSET

EELEVATOR

MRMECHANICAL ROOM

SWSTAIR WELL

MRt to oor C

KfAA

Dacr

BSI

01Y•0 b

00000

EM

16011 Ru0

Ot1S07 MEDDW ROOSra1T BR HPLMX

REM MONK Cay XI

•A iI yL t <•

LAL

r7 I r LFj a ul

BASEMENTPLAN

SCALE NT S

•CUML

I

EC

C

BTR2

to A n1 r1

W1

I

Locker fCf

EM

AkL r

011301 fC•• yv cM

QA

LEGENC

BTRBATHROOM

CLCLOSET

C CORRIDOR

EELEVATOR

ECENTRANCE CORRIDOR

EHEXHIBIT HALL

FCFRONT CLOSET

FFOYER

KKITCHEN

LLOBBY

OOFFICE

RRECPTION

SWSTAIR WELL

THUMCK 01095VELT BwINRAC

00000 4I

Hx•u oml b <•jtre• tJ••

V

CL5

SURE E

CL6

LEGEND

BTRBATHROOM

CLCLOSET

C CORRIODR

EELEVATOR

ECENTRANCE CORRIDOR

EHEXHIBIT HALL

SWSTAIR WELL

Q tcr0` fiJ

1•fJ 1i •<nI

Ow 00000

MWDONE NOOSiELt ■fNKXX

NEW YORK C

I c $tit c < i4IllM2

C2

G••tf••c

THIRDFLOOR AN

OTRSB

L2

LA

C I•D CL1

EM

hAc

OtU07

LEGEND

BTRBATHROOM

CLCLOSET

C CORRIDOR

EELEVATOR

ECENTRANCE CORRIDOR

EHEXHIBIT HALL

OOFFICE

LLOBBY

RRECPTION

SWSTAIR WELL

STSTORAGE ROOM

QQ

00000

TIEDOORE ROOSWLT BPnWL wrohhrm

AR •n Tt1 W •au••4 n ti•OS000d•

44A ••ar+r y E

1•trGM ri m

L

OGc• r111•a1 i ••c

7LFsw 6 T

BTR

EE

yJNcn

LEGEND

AUDAUDITORIUM

BTRBATHROOM

CLCLOSET

C CORRIODR

EELEVATOR

ECENTRANCE CORRIDOR

EHEXHIBIT HALL

KKITCHEN

PRPROJECTION ROOM

STSTORAGE ROOM

SWSTAIR WELL

FEi

••E7ocr• r n wall

••LiI ir• eQh

I •fl

Acor I k

Cp ip o t rlQ r CFT 4THF00RPLANOUR7rLG04PLAN

• Tu

N i $SGVINTS

00000

1ml RL•

011507 nEWORE ROOSELT 8WTWVLA E

NEW YORK air

Q