Past_Performance_Questinnaire.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Impacted Soil Remediation at Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park
Solicitation number
P15PS00830
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_004.pdf PDF
Amendment__004_RFI_Questions.pdf PDF
Sol_P15PS00830_Amd_000004.pdf PDF
Sol_P15PS00830_Amd_000003.pdf PDF
Amendment_0003_RFP.pdf PDF
Amendment__003_RFI_Questions.pdf PDF
Bid_Schedule_REVISED_6.19.2015.pdf PDF
SAP_Template.pdf PDF
P15PS00830_Amend_02.pdf PDF
Sol_P15PS00830_Amd_000002.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Questions__2.pdf PDF
SF_30_Amendment_0001_-_P15PS00830.pdf PDF
SV_Sign_In_Sheet_Utility_Map.pdf PDF
Sol_P15PS00830_Amd_000001.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Questions.pdf PDF
SOW_FINAL.pdf PDF
A1_Bid_Schedule__Impacted_Soil_Remediation__-_Copy_(4).pdf PDF
A5_Bid_Bond_SF_24.pdf PDF
Lower_Keweah_Solicitation_FINAL_5-20-15_(1).pdf PDF
Key_Personnel_Qualifications.docx DOCX document
General_References.docx DOCX document
Submittal_Instructions.pdf PDF
A3_EECA_Report_FINAL.pdf PDF
Sol_P15PS00830.pdf PDF
A9_Wages_DB.pdf PDF
Subcontractor_Reference.docx DOCX document
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(COMPLETE SECTIONS I AND II AND SUBMIT WITH THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL)

I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

☐CONTRACTOR ☐SUBCONTRACTOR NAME:

CONTRACT NO:

☐CONTRACTOR ☐SUBCONTRACTOR ADDRESS:

CONTRACT TYPE:

|_| FIRM-FIXED-PRICE

|_| COST REIMBURSEMENT

|_| OTHER: (specify)

|_| ACTIVE |_| COMPLETED

|_| ROUTINE |_| COMPLEX

DATES OF PERFORMANCE:

AWARD AMOUNT: $

TOTAL WITH MODS $

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

II. AGENCY (CUSTOMER) IDENTIFICATION

AGENCY (CUSTOMER) NAME:

POC NAME/TITLE/PHONE:

III. PAST PERFORMANCE RATING

Rating Scale:E = Excellent. Considerably surpassed requirements/expectations.
G = Good. Surpassed requirements/expectations.
S = Satisfactory. Met requirements/expectations
M = Marginal. Met some requirements/expectations

U = Unsatisfactory. Did not meet requirements/expectations

1. QUALITY:
(Circle applicable rating)
a. Conformance with contract requirements
E G S M U
b. Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)
E G S M U
c. General oversight by project manager and superintendent
E G S M U
d. Coordination with and control of subcontractors
E G S M U
e. Compliance with Davis-Bacon wage rate and labor usage requirements
E G S M U
f. Avoidance of accidents/safety violations
E G S M U

2. TIMELINESS:

a. Adherence to project delivery schedules
E G S M U
b. Submission of change proposals
E G S M U
c. Response to technical direction and change orders
E G S M U
d. Response to correction of identified problems
E G S M U
e. Submission of timely/accurate/complete billings
E G S M U
f. Submission of materials/other submittals
E G S M U

3. BUSINESS RELATIONS:

a. Flexibility and cooperativeness in resolving problems
E G S M U
b. Tenacity and innovativeness in resolving problems
E G S M U
c. Relationships with subcontractors, including prompt payment
E G S M U
d. End user was satisfied with services performed
E G S M U

IV. COMMENTS

Required for ratings of C (Considerably Surpassed Requirements) or D (Did Not Meet Requirements)

Item No.
Comment
Technical Evaluation Panel Member:
Date:

P15PS00830

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .