Amendment__004_RFI_Questions.pdf
PDF 140 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- P15PS00830
About this file
RFI Questions Amendment 004
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_004.pdf | ||
| Sol_P15PS00830_Amd_000004.pdf | ||
| Sol_P15PS00830_Amd_000003.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0003_RFP.pdf | ||
| Amendment__003_RFI_Questions.pdf | ||
| Bid_Schedule_REVISED_6.19.2015.pdf | ||
| SAP_Template.pdf | ||
| P15PS00830_Amend_02.pdf | ||
| Sol_P15PS00830_Amd_000002.pdf | ||
| Site_Visit_Questions__2.pdf | ||
| SF_30_Amendment_0001_-_P15PS00830.pdf | ||
| SV_Sign_In_Sheet_Utility_Map.pdf | ||
| Sol_P15PS00830_Amd_000001.pdf | ||
| Site_Visit_Questions.pdf | ||
| SOW_FINAL.pdf | ||
| Past_Performance_Questinnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| A1_Bid_Schedule__Impacted_Soil_Remediation__-_Copy_(4).pdf | ||
| A5_Bid_Bond_SF_24.pdf | ||
| Lower_Keweah_Solicitation_FINAL_5-20-15_(1).pdf | ||
| Key_Personnel_Qualifications.docx | DOCX document | |
| General_References.docx | DOCX document | |
| Submittal_Instructions.pdf | ||
| A3_EECA_Report_FINAL.pdf | ||
| Sol_P15PS00830.pdf | ||
| A9_Wages_DB.pdf | ||
| Subcontractor_Reference.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
United States Department of the Interior
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area
401 West Hillcrest Drive
Thousand Oaks, California 91360
IN REPLY REFER TO:
S7215 (PWR)
June 24, 2015
Memorandum
To: Contractor(s)
From: Operations/Environmental Programs Branch Chief, PWR-San
San Francisco
Subject: Lowe Kaweah Soil Remediation- Solicitation Number P15PS00830;
RFI Response for Question Received, Through 6/24/2015
1. Will construction water be available?
A1. No, see SOW paragraph 6.13.3.
2. Are As-Built available for existing utilities within site?
A2. No.
3. Who is responsible for trimming of existing trees in conflict with site access? If contractor please establish guidelines.
A3. Contractor, see SOW paragraph 3.7.1
4. There appears to be a error within the estimate of earthwork quantities, please review and confirm.
A4. See revised bid schedule.
5. There appears to be an error within the estimate of engineer's estimate of project value, please review and confirm.
A5. Operations/Environmental Programs Branch Chief does not understand the question.
6. Existing trees within excavation will require removal, please establish guidelines for expectable removal and disposal.
A6. See SOW paragraph 3.7.1
7. Will the overflow parking area adjacent to work site be designated for staging? If so, how much?
A7. Yes. See amendment #002, question #10. Allocation can be made based on need/availability.
8. Past Performance Factor: Does offeror have to submit a past performance questionnaire to their clients in order to get a rating or will the NPS acquire that rating themselves? If offeror has to acquire a completed past performance questionnaire from the client, is it acceptable to submit an already completed past performance questionnaire from a previous submittal?
A8. Answered in previous amendment
9. Since a utility map is provided, does the contractor need to conduct underground utility locating?
A9. See SOW paragraph 5.5
10. In response to A9 and A31, do we apply the 1.5 tons/CY to the 2,220 CY or to the 594 tons? Which number is the correct basis?
A10. Apply the 1.5 tons/CY.
11. In Key Personnel, an "Environmental Engineer" is called out. Since California does not offer a PE license for Environmental Engineering, what engineering disciplines are acceptable?
A11. A discipline with commensurate approved training & qualifications
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .