Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 76 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair Storm Damage to Hangar B at Floyd Bennett Field, Floyd Bennett Field, Brooklyn, NY PMIS GATE 195021
- Solicitation number
- P15PS00421
About this file
Proposal Submission Package Form 5 of 7
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| P15PS00421_amendment_6.pdf | ||
| P15PS00421.pdf | ||
| Amendment_No._005.docx | DOCX document | |
| General_Decision_Numbe1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_No._004_to_P15PS00421.pdf | ||
| P15PS00421_Amendment_No._003.pdf | ||
| P15PS00421_Amendment_No._002.pdf | ||
| Amendment_No._001.pdf | ||
| General_Decision_1-30-15.docx | DOCX document | |
| P15PS00421.pdf | ||
| GeneralReferences.doc | DOC document | |
| HazmatForm.doc | DOC document | |
| Final_Construction_Drawings.pdf | ||
| ProposedEquals.doc | DOC document | |
| KeyPers.doc | DOC document | |
| Gateway_Hangar_B_Specs.pdf | ||
| SubcontractorReference.doc | DOC document | |
| Hangar_B_Asbestos_Survey_Report.pdf | ||
| Experience_Form.doc | DOC document |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
(COMPLETE SECTIONS I AND II AND SUBMIT WITH THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL)
I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
| CONTRACTOR NAME: |
| CONTRACT NO: |
CONTRACTOR ADDRESS:
CONTRACT TYPE:
FORMCHECKBOX
FIRM-FIXED-PRICE
FORMCHECKBOX
COST REIMBURSEMENT
FORMCHECKBOX
OTHER: (specify)
FORMCHECKBOX
ACTIVE
FORMCHECKBOX
COMPLETED
FORMCHECKBOX
ROUTINE
FORMCHECKBOX
COMPLEX
DATES OF PERFORMANCE:
AWARD AMOUNT: $
TOTAL WITH MODS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
II. AGENCY (CUSTOMER) IDENTIFICATION
AGENCY (CUSTOMER) NAME:
POC NAME/TITLE/PHONE:
III. PAST PERFORMANCE RATING
Rating Scale:
E = Excellent. Considerably surpassed requirements/expectations.
G = Good. Surpassed requirements/expectations.
S = Satisfactory. Met requirements/expectations
M = Marginal. Met some requirements/expectations
U = Unsatisfactory. Did not meet requirements/expectations
| 1. QUALITY: |
| (Circle applicable rating) |
| a. Conformance with contract requirements |
| E G S M U |
| b. Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors) |
| E G S M U |
| c. General oversight by project manager and superintendent |
| E G S M U |
| d. Coordination with and control of subcontractors |
| E G S M U |
| e. Compliance with Davis-Bacon wage rate and labor usage requirements |
| E G S M U |
| f. Avoidance of accidents/safety violations |
| E G S M U |
2. TIMELINESS:
| a. Adherence to project delivery schedules |
| E G S M U |
| b. Submission of change proposals |
| E G S M U |
| c. Response to technical direction and change orders |
| E G S M U |
| d. Response to correction of identified problems |
| E G S M U |
| e. Submission of timely/accurate/complete billings |
| E G S M U |
| f. Submission of materials/other submittals |
| E G S M U |
3. BUSINESS RELATIONS:
| a. Flexibility and cooperativeness in resolving problems |
| E G S M U |
| b. Tenacity and innovativeness in resolving problems |
| E G S M U |
| c. Relationships with subcontractors, including prompt payment |
| E G S M U |
| d. End user was satisfied with services performed |
| E G S M U |
IV. COMMENTS
Required for ratings of E (Considerably Surpassed Requirements) or U (Did Not Meet Requirements)
| Item No. |
| Comment |
| Technical Evaluation Panel Member: |
| Date: |
Page 1 of 2 Park-PMIS Past Performance Questionnaire
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .