P-2026-000096 ADD 1 Attachment 2.pdf
PDF 501 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- IFB 410 P-2026-000096 3
- Issued by
- Palm Beach County, Florida
About this file
This is a performance test report issued by Intertek Building & Construction on behalf of Clear Armor, documenting forced-entry resistance testing conducted on a 5/8-inch laminated glazing product in accordance with ASTM F1233 standards. The test specimen, measuring 24 inches wide by 24 inches high by 0.616 inches thick, was evaluated at Intertek's York, Pennsylvania facility on March 6, 2026, with the report issued on March 24, 2026. The testing involved subjecting the laminated glazing product to a series of physical attacks using various tools including ball peen hammers, pipes, sledges, and fire extinguishers to assess its resistance to forced entry. The test was completed by Senior Project Engineer Scott T. Gladfelter, P.E., and reviewed by Senior Staff Engineer V. Thomas Mickley, Jr., P.E., with official observation provided by Intertek B&C personnel.
The test specimen achieved a Forced Entry-Physical Attack Class rating of 1.2 (Contraband) and 1.3 (Body Passage), demonstrating its capability to resist unauthorized passage. Specifically, after one application of fire extinguisher and four sledge hammer impacts, a 1/8-inch diameter rod representing contraband was able to pass through the specimen, establishing the Class 1.2 rating. The Class 1.3 body passage rating was achieved after 20 sledge hammer impacts, allowing an 8-inch by 8-inch by 5-inch solid rectangular object to pass through the specimen. Temperature conditions during testing ranged from 75 degrees Fahrenheit to negative 29 degrees Fahrenheit. The report includes photographs documenting the specimen before testing, the forced entry tools utilized, and the specimen during contraband and body passage phases, with record retention mandated through March 6, 2030.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CLEAR ARMOR
PERFORMANCE
TEST REPORT
SCOPE OF WORK
ASTM F1233 FORCED-ENTRY TESTING OF A 5/8 IN LAMINATED GLAZING PRODUCT
REPORT NUMBER
T5621.01-119-12 R0
TEST DATE
03/06/26
ISSUE DATE
03/24/26
RECORD RETENTION END DATE
03/06/30
PAGES
DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER
RT-R-AMER-Test-2787 (05/05/22)
© 2017 INTERTEK
130 Derry Court York, Pennsylvania 17406
Telephone: 717-764-7700
Facsimile: 717-764-4129 www.intertek.com/building
TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR
Report No.: T5621.01-119-12 R0 Date: 03/24/26
This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client.
Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to permit copying or distribution of this report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results in this report are relevant only to the sample(s) tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product, or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program.
Version: 05/05/22 Page 2 of 7 RT-R-AMER-Test-2787
REPORT ISSUED TO
CLEAR ARMOR
32991 North Thorn Apple Grayslake, IL 60046
SECTION 1
SCOPE
Architectural Testing, Inc. (an Intertek company) dba Intertek Building & Construction (B&C) was contracted by Clear Armor to perform forced entry resistance testing in accordance with ASTM F1233 on a 5/8 in laminated glazing product. Results obtained are tested values and were secured by using the designated test method. Testing was conducted at the Intertek B&C test facility in York, Pennsylvania.
This report does not constitute certification of this product nor an opinion or endorsement by this laboratory. Unless differently required, Intertek reports apply the "Simple Acceptance" rule, also called "Shared Risk approach," of ILAC-G8:09/2019, Guidelines on Decision Rules and Statements of Conformity.
SECTION 2
SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
PRODUCT NAME FORCED ENTRY-PHYSICAL ATTACK
CLASS ACHIEVED
5/8 in Laminated Glazing Product Class 1.2 (Contraband) Class 1.3 (Body Passage)
For INTERTEK B&C:
COMPLETED BY: Scott T. Gladfelter, P.E. REVIEWED BY: V. Thomas Mickley, Jr., P.E.
TITLE: Senior Project Engineer TITLE: Senior Staff Engineer
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
DATE: 03/24/26 DATE: 03/24/26
STG:vtm/aas http://www.intertek.com/building www.intertek.com/building
TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR
Version: 05/05/22 Page 3 of 7 RT-R-AMER-Test-2787
SECTION 3
TEST METHOD
The test specimen was evaluated for Forced Entry-Physical Attack only in accordance with the following:
ASTM F1233-21, Standard Test Method for Security Glazing Materials and Systems
SECTION 4
MATERIAL SOURCE/INSTALLATION
Test sample was provided by the client.
Installation: Sample was installed into a test frame fabricated in accordance with Section 8.2 of
ASTM F1233.
SECTION 5
LIST OF OFFICIAL OBSERVERS
NAME COMPANY
Eric J. Beaudoin Intertek B&C Jeffrey C. Jones Intertek B&C Tyler Bard Intertek B&C
SECTION 6
TEST PROCEDURES
The sample was rigidly mounted for forced entry resistance testing. The resources (tools) for forced entry testing were provided to test personnel, in addition to a 1/8 in diameter rod (representing contraband) and an 8 in x 8 in x 5 in solid uncompressible rectangular object (representing body passage). Blunt impact, sharp impact, and thermal stress tools were utilized.
The surface temperature of the test specimen was recorded following each attack sequence.
Concentrated assault team members are listed in the following table.
Forced Entry Resistance Test Personnel
NAME AGE (yrs) WEIGHT (lbs) Jeffrey C. Jones 23 180 Tyler Bard 22 183 www.intertek.com/building
TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR
Version: 05/05/22 Page 4 of 7 RT-R-AMER-Test-2787
SECTION 7
TEST SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION
PRODUCT NAME 5/8 in Laminated Glazing Product PRODUCT TYPE Laminated Glazing OVERALL SIZE 24 in wide by 24 in high by 0.616 in thick
SECTION 8
TEST RESULTS
SEQUENCE CLASS
ACHIEVED
DESCRIPTION OF
ATTACK
TEMP.
(°F)
ACTUAL TIME
(min:sec)
NOTE
1 1.0 Ball Peen Hammer 75 00:14 -- 2 1.1 Ball Peen Hammer 72 00:16 -- 3 1.2 1-1/2" Pipe/Sledge 69 00:43 -- 4 1.3 Extinguisher -24 01:08 Note #1 5 1.4 Sledge Hammer -29 00:50 Note #2
Note #1: After one fire extinguisher and 4 impacts of the sledge hammer, the 1/8 in diameter rod was able to pass freely through the specimen.
Note #2: After 20 impacts of the sledge hammer, the 8 in x 8 in x 5 in solid uncompressible rectangular object (representing body passage) was able to pass freely through the specimen.
SECTION 9
CONCLUSION
The test specimen achieved a Forced Entry-Physical Attack Class of 1.2 (Contraband) and 1.3 (Body Passage).
www.intertek.com/building
TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR
Version: 05/05/22 Page 5 of 7 RT-R-AMER-Test-2787
SECTION 10
PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo No. 1
Specimen at the Beginning of Testing
Photo No. 2
Forced Entry Tools www.intertek.com/building
TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR
Version: 05/05/22 Page 6 of 7 RT-R-AMER-Test-2787
Photo No. 3
Contraband Passage (During Class 1.3)
Photo No. 4
Body Passage (During Class 1.4), Exterior www.intertek.com/building
TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR
Version: 05/05/22 Page 7 of 7 RT-R-AMER-Test-2787
Photo No. 5
Body Passage (During Class 1.4), Interior
SECTION 11
REVISION LOG
REVISION # DATE PAGES REVISION
0 03/24/26 N/A Original Report Issue
| clear armor |
| PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT |
For INTERTEK B&C:
| 2026-03-24T16:02:52-0400 | |
| Scott T. Gladfelter |
| 2026-03-25T07:25:44-0400 | |
| Virgal T. Mickley, Jr., P.E. |
| 2026-03-24T15:14:27-0400 | |
| Amanda Strine |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .