Exhibits_1-16.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
Range Operations Contract II
Solicitation number
NNG17611358R
Issued by

About this file

Exhibits 1-16

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
ROC_II_Source_Selection_Statement.pdf PDF
NNG17611358R_-_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
ROC_II_RFP_-_Questions_89_through_107.pdf PDF
ROC_II_DRFP_-_Questions_87_through_88.pdf PDF
Enclosure_4_-_Representative_Task_Order_2.pdf PDF
Attachment_O_-_IT_Security_Applicable_Documents_List.pdf PDF
Attachment_S_-_Key_Personnel_and_Qualifications.pdf PDF
Attachment_D_-_IAGP.pdf PDF
Attachment_I_-_Wage_Determinations.pdf PDF
Attachment_M_-_Contract_Historical_Data.pdf PDF
Attachment_A_-_Statement_of_Work.pdf PDF
SF33-14a.pdf PDF
Enclosure_5_-_Representative_Task_Order_3.pdf PDF
Attachment_Q_-_PIV_Card_Issuance_Procedures.pdf PDF
Enclosure_1_-_IT_Security_Management_Plan_Template.pdf PDF
Attachment_N_-_Risk_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_P_-_Contractor_Proposed_Enhancements.pdf PDF
Attachment_L_-_OCI_Avoidance_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_C_-_Direct_Labor_Rates,_Indirect_Rates_and_Fee_Profit_Matrices.pdf PDF
Enclosure_3_-_Representative_Task_Order_1.pdf PDF
Attachment_B_-_Program_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_K_-_DD254.pdf PDF
Enclosure_2_-_ROC_II_QA_Surveillance_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_E_-_Safety_and_Health_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_J_-_Quality_Assurance_Plan.pdf PDF
RFP_Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_H_-_Financial_Management_Reporting_Requirements.pdf PDF
Attachment_R_-_GFP.pdf PDF
Sections_B-M.pdf PDF
Attachment_F_-_Small_Business_Subcontracting_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_G_-_IT_Security_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
ROC_II_Site_Visit_Questions_20170828.pdf PDF
ROC_II_Site_Visit_Attendee_List_08282017.pdf PDF
ROC_II_DRFP_-_Questions_74_through_86.pdf PDF
ROC_II_-_Site_Visit_Itinerary_(20170822).pdf PDF
NNG17611358R_-_Site_Visit_Registration_and_Instructions.pdf PDF
NNG17611358R_DRFP_Q59-73.pdf PDF
NNG17611358R_DRFP_Q2-58.pdf PDF
NNG17611358R_DRFP_Q1.pdf PDF
Attachment_G_-_IT_Security_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_S_-_Key_Personnel_and_Qualifications.pdf PDF
Sections_B-M.pdf PDF
Attachment_B_-_Program_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_H_-_Financial_Management_Reporting_Requirements.pdf PDF
Enclosure_5_-_Representative_Task_Order_3.pdf PDF
Attachment_R_-_GFP.pdf PDF
DRFP_Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_N_-_Risk_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_J_-_Quality_Assurance_Plan.pdf PDF
Enclosure_2_-_ROC_II_QA_Surveillance_Plan.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 67 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP# NNG17611358R

Proposing Entity

Elements of Cost Month*** Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month TOTAL

Direct Labor (DL) Hours Prime Onsite DL Hours (Derived from Exhibit 2A ) Prime Offsite DL Hours (Derived from Exhibit 2A ) Total Prime Direct Labor Hours

Significant Subcontractor Onsite DL Hours*:

(List total hours separately by company) Subtotal Significant Subcontractors Onsite Direct Labor Hours

Significant Subcontractor Offsite DL Hours*:

(List total hours separately by company) Subtotal Significant Subcontractor Offsite Direct Labor Hours

Total Significant Subcontractors Direct Labor Hours

TOTAL PRIME AND SIGNIFICANT SUBCONTRACTORS

DIRECT LABOR HOURS

Direct Labor Costs Prime Onsite DL Costs (Derived from Exhibit 2A ) Prime Offsite DL Costs (Derived from Exhibit 2A )

TOTAL PRIME DIRECT LABOR COSTS

Overhead Onsite Offsite

TOTAL OVERHEAD COSTS

Other Direct Costs (ODCs) Significant Subcontracts (list separately by company)** Other Subcontracts Material Travel Other (Specify)

TOTAL ODCs

SUBTOTAL COST

G&A COSTS

TOTAL ESTIMATED COST

FIXED FEE PERCENTAGE

FIXED FEE AMOUNT

TOTAL COST PLUS FIXED FEE

*Significant Subcontractor (As defined in Provision L.15) - Insert Direct Labor Hours Only **List each significant subcontractor separately by company - Insert Total Cost and Fees ***Adjust the number of month columns to match RTO period of performance Offerors may adjust elements of cost to be consistent with your current accounting system.

This exhibit contains Source Selection Information. See FAR 3.104.

REPRESENTATIVE TASK ORDER (RTO) ELEMENTS OF COST SUMMARY

RTO No. , Contract Year , WBS Level

EXHIBIT 2

PRIME OFFEROR

Proposing Entity:

Elements of Cost Labor Type (E or NE) Month* Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month TOTAL

DIRECT LABOR (DL) HOURS

Onsite DL Hours:

(List by Individual DL Category)

Subtotal Onsite DL Hours

Offsite DL Hours:

(List by Individual DL Category)

Subtotal Offsite DL Hours

TOTAL DIRECT LABOR HOURS

DIRECT LABOR HOURLY RATES**

Onsite DL Rates:

(List by Individual DL Category)

Offsite DL Rates:

(List by Individual DL Category)

DIRECT LABOR COSTS

Onsite DL Costs:

(List by Individual DL Category)

Subtotal Onsite DLCosts

Offsite DL Costs:

(List by Individual DL Category)

Subtotal Offsite DL Costs

TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS

*Adjust the number of month columns to match RTO period of performance **Rates must match the DL Hourly Rates included in the Contract Attachment entitled, "IDIQ Direct Labor Rates, Indirect Rates, and Fee Matrices."

This exhibit contains Source Selection Information. See FAR 3.104.

DIRECT LABOR HOURS, DIRECT LABOR RATES AND DIRECT LABOR COSTS DETAIL

EXHIBIT 2A

RTO No. , Contract Year , and WBS Level

[ ] Prime Offeror OR [ ] Significant Subcontractor

Elements of Cost Month* Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month TOTAL

Direct Labor (DL) Hours:

Onsite DL Hours (Derived from Exhibit 2A ) Offsite DL Hours (Derived from Exhibit 2A )

TOTAL DIRECT LABOR HOURS

Direct Labor Costs:

Onsite DL Costs (Derived from Exhibit 2A ) Offsite DL Costs (Derived from Exhibit 2A )

TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS

Overhead:

Onsite Offsite

TOTAL OVERHEAD COSTS

Other Direct Costs (ODCs):

Other Subcontracts Material Travel Other (Specify)

TOTAL ODCs

SUBTOTAL COST

G&A COSTS

TOTAL ESTIMATED COST

[Sub Specify Type - FEE or PROFIT] PERCENTAGE

[Sub Specify Type - FEE or PROFIT] AMOUNT

TOTAL COST PLUS [Sub Specify Type - FEE or PROFIT]

*Adjust the number of month columns to match RTO period of performance Offerors may adjust elements of cost to be consistent with your current accounting system.

This exhibit contains Source Selection Information. See FAR 3.104.

EXHIBIT 2B

SIGNIFICANT SUBCONTRACTOR

RTO No. _____, Contract Year _____, and WBS Level _____

REPRESENTATIVE TASK ORDER (RTO) SUMMARY

DCMA Online Info http://www dcma mil

Company Name: DCMA Office

POC: POC:

Phone Number: Phone Number:

FAX Number: FAX Number:

E-Mail Address: E-Mail Address:

Street: Street:

P.O.Box: P.O.Box:

City: City:

State: State:

Zip Code: Zip Code:

Disclosures: Date Audit Report # Contractor Estimating System Review (CESR) Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR) Contractor Billing System Review Contractor Accounting System Review Contractor Disclosure Statement Accuracy Contractor Executive Compensa ion Review Contractor Property Management System Forward Pricing Rate Agreements Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Level of CAS applicability Determination of Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) applicability

This exhibit contains Source Selection Information. See FAR 3.104.

Cognizant Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Office Information

Submitting Entity: DCMA Cognizant Office:

[ ] Prime Offeror OR [ ] Significant Subcontractor

EXHIBIT 14B

Status:

Note: The submitting entity audit point of contact (POC) and address provided above must be at a location where auditable records supporting the proposed amounts physically reside.

This form contains Source Selection Information when completed. See FAR 3.104.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS

(Updated November, 2016)

Sections 1-3 provide for contract-related descriptive information and identification of the evaluator.

Section 4 lists the major work elements within our Statement of Work (SOW). Please provide your assessment of the “relevant experience” and “performance” associated with our SOW evidenced within the contract for which you are a reference. “Experience” means a contractor who has performed work in the specific SOW Element. “Did not Perform” means that the specific SOW element was not performed under the contract.

Section 5 evaluates the contractor’s technical, schedule, and cost performance and management. (Additional pages may be used for comments if desired). It is very important to keep in mind that only performance in the past 7 years is relevant. If you cannot answer any questions, please circle “N/R” for Not Rated.

The following definitions are offered for your use in assigning a performance rating for each of the factors in Sections 5 and 6:

Very High

(VH)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance is of exceptional merit;

indicating exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) problems with no adverse effect on overall performance.

High

(H)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates very effective performance that would be fully responsive to contract requirements with contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part with only minor problems with little identifiable effect on overall performance.

Moderate

(M)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable problems, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.

Low

(L)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.

Very Low

(VL)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; problems in one or more areas which, adversely affect overall performance.

N/R Not Rated

Section 6 provides for evaluation of the contractor’s management of cost and award/incentive fee history.

RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE TO NASA Goddard Space Flight Center BY Bruce Tsai. Attn: Bruce Tsai, Code 210.

Greenbelt, MD 20771 Phone: 240-684-0428 FAX: None e-mail: Bruce.B.Tsai@nasa.gov mailto:Bruce.B.Tsai@nasa.gov

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Contract Information

A. Name of Company/Division Being Evaluated:_____________________

B. Address:_____________________________________________

C. Contractor Cage Code and/or DUNS number

D. Contract Number:_______________________________________

E. Contract Type:_________________________________________

F. Period of Performance (including options): From:______ To:_______

G. Total Contract Value:_____________________________________

H. Award Information: Competitive: Yes___ No___ Basis of Selection: Technical___ Cost/Price___ Other (specify)_________________________

2. Description of Contract

Briefly describe the services provided under this contract:

During the contract performance being evaluated, this firm was the:

Prime Contractor____ Significant Subcontractor ____ Team Member ____ Other (describe)____________________________________________

Does a corporate or business relationship exist between the firm being evaluated and your organization?

Yes ___ No ___. If yes, please describe: ___________________________

3. Evaluator Information

Name: ____________________________________________________ Title: ____________________________________________________ Agency/Company: ____________________________________________ Address: __________________________________________________ Phone: ______________ Date Questionnaire Completed: _______________ Role in Program/Contract: _____________________________________ Length of Involvement in this Program/ Contract: _____________________

4. SOW Survey: Relevance Ratings: Please check the appropriate blocks for Relevance (Performed or Did Not Perform)

SOW ELEMENT

PERFORMED

DID NOT

PERFORM

Mission Preparation Products and Reviews -Instrumentation Support Review -Range Readiness Reviews -Launch Readiness Reviews -Post Mission Summary Report

Integrated Range Services Management -Operations Project Management

Range Services -Maintenance and Sustainment Services -Range Engineering and Technology Development -New Systems Transition to Operations -Telecommunications Engineering -Information Technology and Range Network Engineering Services

Ground Operations -Launch Site Support Plan -Launch Pad and Blockhouse -Aerospace Vehicle Processing -Payload Processing -Supplemental Ground Services

5. General Performance Survey

NO PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS PERFORMANCE RATING

(Please Circle)

QUALITY

1. Quality of services and support provided VH H M L VL N/R

2. Timely identification and mitigation of risks VH H M L VL N/R

3. Ability to identify and correct performance deficiencies in a timely manner VH H M L VL N/R

4. Demonstrated understanding and compliance with mission safety requirements VH H M L VL N/R

Comment:

SCHEDULE

5. Timeliness, quality, and accuracy of schedule estimates and reporting VH H M L VL N/R

6. Ability to meet/exceed schedule milestones VH H M L VL N/R

COST

7. Ability to establish realistic cost estimates and adhere to estimated costs VH H M L VL N/R

8. Ability to anticipate, identify and control cost growth. VH H M L VL N/R

BUSINESS/MANAGEMENT

9. Communicating/interfacing with Government and overall responsiveness to Government requests VH H M L VL N/R

10. Ability to effectively manage the contract including subcontractor performance, if applicable VH H M L VL N/R

11.

Ability to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, including ability to fill key vacancies in a timely manner.

VH H M L VL N/R

12. Adequacy of Contractor’s system(s) for processing task orders and/or changes. VH H M L VL N/R

13. Ability to meet Small Business Subcontracting Plan Goals VH H M L VL N/R

Section 6:

What is the Contract Value:

Initial Value Current Value Estimated Cost: $___________ $____________

Fee: $___________ $____________

Total Value: $___________ $_____________

What are the total contract expenditures to date (cost/fees to date based on invoices, reports, etc)?

What is the Annual Contract Value to Date (The current contract expenditures to date divided by the number of years of performance to date)?

For example (note, these example numbers may not relate to this specific procurement):

Assume your contract is a current five year contract, is still ongoing, and the latest cost report reflects a cost/fee of $43,500,000 through the first 2 years and 4 months (to date). In this example, current/total Contract Expenditures incurred to Date are $43,500,000 and associated period of performance for those expenditures, expressed in years, is 2.33 years.

Therefore, the Average Annual Cost/Fee Incurred to Date: $18,669,528 ($43,500,000/2.33 years)

Was there a cost overrun? ( ) Yes ( ) No If yes, please explain:

If this was an award fee contract, what are the individual and/or average ratings of performance by your organization? Please attach any available award fee letters or database entries

Please comment on particularly strong/weak points of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, and/or cost). If the Overall Contract Performance Rating below is less than Very High, please provide some explanation in this section on why a higher rating was not provided.

Overall Contract Performance Rating (circle one)

Very High High Moderate Low Very Low

Please add any other comments you may feel are pertinent.

Rater’s Signature Date

Exhibits 1-16 Final
Exhibit 16 - PP questionnaire (Nov 2016)
4. SOW Survey: Relevance Ratings: Please check the appropriate blocks for Relevance (Performed or Did Not Perform)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .