NMID RFQ - Ridenbaugh Headworks Project (COMPLETE 2024-09-26) (00000002).pdf

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 1 of 16

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/GENERAL CONTRACTOR

RIDENBAUGH CANAL DIVERSION HEADWORKS MODERNIZATION PROJECT

Issued By:

NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Submit Qualification Statements to:

Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District

Board of Directors 1503 First St. South Nampa, ID 83651

Telephone: (208) 466-7861 headworks@nmid.org

Six printed copies of the Statement of Qualifications for the Ridenbaugh Canal Diversion Headworks Modernization Project, one USB drive containing a searchable PDF file of the complete submittal, and a cover letter including the email address of the primary contact for the submitting party must be received by:

3:00 p.m. on November 6, 2024.

Statement of Qualifications received after said time/date will be returned unopened.

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 2 of 16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF EXHIBITS

I. INTRODUCTION

II. CM/GC CONTRACT SERVICES – SCOPE OF WORK

A. CM/GC Services

1. Preconstruction

2. Procurement

3. Construction and Construction Management

4. CM/GC Compensation

B. Guaranteed Maximum Price

C. Non-Interference with NMID Operation and Maintenance

D. Bonds, Insurance, Contract Times and Liquidated Damages

III. RFQ RESPONSE AND SELECTION – SCHEDULE AND PROCEDURE

A. RFQ Schedule

1. RFQ Issuance

2. Questions/Clarifications

3. Addenda

4. Submission of Statements of Qualifications

5. Rank / Selection / Notice of Award

IV. SOQ RESPONSE, FORMAT, CONTENT, AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

A. Cover Letter

B. Overview of Firm

C. CM/GC Financial Report

D. List of Similar Projects/Experience

E. Customer Reference List

F. Proposed CM/GC’s Staff

G. Statement of Approach

H. Preconstruction and Procurement Fee

I. Evaluation Criteria

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 3 of 16

TABLE OF EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT A – RIDENBAUGH CANAL SYSTEM MAP

EXHIBIT B – PROJECT SITE

EXHIBIT C – PROJECT DESCRIPTION

EXHIBIT D – DESIGN DRAWINGS

EXHIBIT E – DRAFT CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/GENERAL CONTRACTOR (CM/GC) CONTRACT

EXHIBIT F – CM/GC PRICING INFORMATION FORMS

EXHIBIT G – CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND

VOLUNTARY EXLCUSION

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 4 of 16

I. INTRODUCTION

Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District (“NMID”) is issuing this Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”) to request Statements of Qualifications (“SOQ”) from firms that are licensed as Idaho Public Works Construction Managers and as Idaho Public Works Contractors, in good standing, to act as a Construction Manager/General Contractor (“CM/GC”) for the Ridenbaugh Canal Diversion Headworks Modernization Project (“Project”).

The Ridenbaugh Canal Diversion Headworks is located on the south bank of the Boise River near 3960 S. Eckert Road in Boise, Idaho (see Exhibit A and Exhibit B).

NMID owns, operates and maintains the Ridenbaugh Headworks to divert and deliver water from the Boise River through the Ridenbaugh Canal System to lands in Ada NMID and Canyon NMID, Idaho during the irrigation season, generally between April and October. The Ridenbaugh Headworks and Canal System, and the lands within NMID’s Service Area to which they deliver water, are generally depicted in Exhibit A.

The Project will modernize the Ridenbaugh Headworks as generally described in Exhibit C to replace aging structures and components to secure and improve NMID’s long-term operation and maintenance of the Headworks and Canal.

Project design prepared by HDR Engineering, Inc., included in Exhibit D, has progressed to the point that NMID is ready to retain a CM/GC to provide preconstruction and procurement services and to conduct and manage Project construction at a Guaranteed Maximum Price

(“GMP”).

Project construction is expected to commence during 2025 and to be completed during 2026 or 2027.

This project is being directed by:

Greg Curtis Water Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District Shop 5525 E. Greenhurst Rd.

Nampa Idaho 83686 Phone: 208-466-0663 Email: GCurtis@nmid.org

Experience in performing in-river construction on irrigation diversion structures comparable to the Ridenbaugh Headworks including dewatering activities is an essential qualification for this project. All construction work must be performed to prevent interference with NMID’s operation, maintenance and repair of the Ridenbaugh Headworks and Ridenbaugh Canal to divert and deliver water from the Boise River to lands within NMID’s service area.

Additional qualifications and selection criteria that NMID will consider in selecting a CM/GC are described in Section IV. SOQ RESPONSE, FORMAT, CONTENT, AND EVALUATION mailto:GCurtis@nmid.org

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 5 of 16

CRITERIA of this RFQ. Your statement of qualifications must contain complete and comprehensive responses to each part of this section.

Due to the importance of this project, time constraints and significant interest among potential

CM/GC’s, NMID will emphasize timely and complete responses to this RFQ.

II. CM/GC CONTRACT SERVICES – SCOPE OF WORK

CM/GC services will be provided pursuant to a contract between NMID and the prospective CM/GC that is selected pursuant to the procedure described in Section III of this RFQ. Exhibit E contains the draft form of contract that will be the basis of negotiations between NMID and the selected CM/GC. No work is authorized through this RFQ by NMID to any CM/GC until a final contract is approved by both NMID and the selected CM/GC. NMID reserves the right to change, modify or amend the form of contract in formulating the final contract to be entered with the selected CM/GC.

Certain elements of the contract are summarized below.

A. CM/GC Services

The selected CM/GC will perform, coordinate and manage Project preconstruction, procurement, construction, and related construction management services on behalf of NMID.

The CM/GC shall have the goal to provide the highest quality finished product and repairs that meet the project requirements, within the budget and timeframe for Project completion.

The selected CM/GC will be expected to work and coordinate Project services with the Owner, Owner’s Advisor and Engineer in all phases of the Project.

1. Preconstruction

The CM/GC will provide the following Preconstruction Services, described in the following provisions of the CM/GC Contract, Exhibit G, Article 1:

1.1 Manage Preconstruction Services

1.2, 1.3 Project Design review, consultation and report

1.4 Prepare and implement Construction Management Plan that incorporates the following elements:

1. Construction phase organization

2. Communication plan

3. Document management plan

4. Construction contract administration;

5. Cost management (described in Art. 1.5);

6. Time management (described in Art. 1.6;

7. Quality management (described in Art. 1.7);

8. Risk management (described in Art. 1.8);

9. Safety management (described in Art. 1.9);

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 6 of 16

10. Site management and environmental controls (described in Art. 1.10);

11. Regulatory requirements and permits (described in Art. 1.11);

12. Procurement Plan meeting Idaho state statutes (described in Art. 1.12);

13. Plan for non-interference with operation, maintenance and repair of the

Ridenbaugh Canal Headworks and Ridenbaugh Canal to divert and deliver water during

1.13 Subcontractor Outreach

1.14 Participate in Value Engineering/Constructability Studies

The CM/GC will review the 30% Project design milestone and prepare a Value Engineering/Constructability (VEC) report that includes cost, time, and risk management. The CM/GC will participate and review each subsequent design milestone and update their report as the design progresses. The CM/GC will prepare a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Proposal and other related tasks as identified in the scope of work.

2. Procurement

The CM/GC Contract identifies the following Procurement Services to be provided by the CM/GC in compliance with Idaho Code section 54-4511 (Exhibit E, Article 12, Exhibit G):

➢ Assemble bid documents in Work Packages for prospective bidders

➢ Advertise for bids for each Work Package

➢ Conduct pre-bid conferences with prospective bidders

➢ Receive and distribute Owner’s Addenda to prospective bidders

➢ Publicly open bids in the presence of the NMID Board or its authorized representative

The CM/GC may bid on Work Packages for the Project. Bids from the CM/GC and its subsidiaries or affiliated companies must be opened at the opening of any other bids. Once opened, bids shall be subject to the public record requirements outlined in title 74, Idaho Code.

3. Construction and Construction Management

The CM/GC’s Construction and Construction Management Services are described in Article 15 and Exhibit I of the CM/GC Contract.

4. CM/GC Compensation

Compensation for the CM/GC’s Preconstruction and Procurement Services is described in Article 14 of the CM/GC Contract.

Compensation for the CM/GC’s Construction and Construction Management Services is described in Exhibit I of the CM/GC Contract, including:

➢ Construction support costs

➢ Cost of the Work

➢ CM/GC Fee

➢ Contingency allowance

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 7 of 16

B. Guaranteed Maximum Price

The CM/GC’s development of a Guaranteed Maximum Price (“GMP”) for the Project is described in Article 5 of the CM/GC Contract. The GMP process includes the following:

➢ GMP Components

• Construction support costs

• Cost of the Work

• CM/GC Fee

• Contingency allowance

➢ CM/GC prepares estimated GMP at 60% design

➢ CM/GC prepares binding GMP either

• based on 90% design if all work packages authorized concurrently [or]

• incrementally if work packages authorized over time

➢ Owner’s Advisor prepares Owner’s Construction Budget

➢ GMP must not exceed Owner’s Construction Budget

➢ 4 options if GMP exceeds Budget

• Increase Owner’s Construction Budget

• Rebid or renegotiate some or all of Project

• Revise scope of project

• Abandon project

➢ Variances between GMP & actual costs of Work Authorizations

• Positive variance when actual cost is less than budgeted amount = savings to Owner

• Negative variance when actual cost is more than budgeted amount = CM/GC bears excess (CM/GC’s “at risk”)

C. Non-Interference with NMID Operation and Maintenance

Article 3 of the CM/GC Agreement requires that Project Construction and all other Project Services be scheduled, planned, provided and performed in a manner and at times to prevent interference with Owner’s operation, maintenance and repair of the Ridenbaugh Headworks and Ridenbaugh Canal.

D. Bonds, Insurance, Contract Times and Liquidated Damages

Required performance, payment and other bonds and insurance are described in the CM/GC Agreement, Exhibit F, General Conditions, Article 4, Bonds and insurance.

The CM/GC shall indemnify and hold harmless NMID from and against all liability, claims, loss, costs, and expenses arising out of, or resulting from, the services of the CM/GC. In the event NMID is alleged to be liable on account of alleged acts or omissions of the CM/GC, the CM/GC shall defend against such allegations. The selected CM/GC shall bear all costs, fees, and expenses of such defense; including, but not limited to, all attorney fees and expenses, court costs, and expert witness fees and expenses.

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 8 of 16

The coverages provided herein shall contain a policy clause or an endorsement providing thirty

(30) days’ notice to and prior approval of NMID prior to any cancellation or modification of coverage. The coverages shall be written by an insurer acceptable to NMID and shall be in a form acceptable to NMID. NMID shall be provided a copy of the policies upon written request.

The contractor awarded the bid shall provide NMID with certificates of insurance for all required coverages prior to the commencement of work on the Project.

Contract times, liquidated and special damages will be negotiated and described in CMGC Agreement, Exhibit I, CM/GC Construction Services, Article 2, Contract Times, liquidated and Special Damages.

III. RFQ RESPONSE AND SELECTION – SCHEDULE AND

PROCEDURE

A. RFQ Schedule

The following is the RFQ schedule, subject to modification at NMID’s discretion:

RFQ posted to BidNet 9/27/2024

Questions/Clarifications to RFQ Due 10/17/2024

Final RFQ Addendum 10/24/2024

RFQ Submittals Due 11/6/2024

Contractor Rank 11/14/2024

Interviews (Optional - Top Three Ranked) 11/20/2024

Preliminary Selection 11/22/2024

Complete Negotiation & Final Selection 12/20/2024

1. RFQ Issuance

Notice of this RFQ will be published in the Idaho Statesmen Idaho Press, Idaho World and

Mountain Home News. This RFQ is available on BidNet, and is accessible through NMID’s website https://nmid.org/.

2. Questions/Clarifications

Questions regarding this RFQ and requests for any clarification regarding its terms or the Project will be considered only if they are submitted in writing and received by no later than 5:00 p.m.

on October 17th, 2024. Written questions may be submitted via email to gcurtis@nmid.org.

3. Addenda

All questions and clarifications to the RFQ will be addressed in a written addenda to be issued by October 24th, 2024. No verbal answers or clarifications will be binding on NMID or the responding CM/GC. The addenda and RFQ will be made available in electronic and hard copy formats.

https://nmid.org/ mailto:gcurtis@nmid.org

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 9 of 16

4. Submission of Statements of Qualifications

Each Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) must be submitted to the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District Board of Directors at 1503 First St. South, Nampa, ID 83651 no later than 9:00 a.m. on November 6th, 2024. Late SOQs will not be accepted, opened or considered.

Submissions must include six (6) hard copies and one electronic copy on a portable storage device such as a thumb drive of the statement of qualifications pursuant to this solicitation.

Each SOQ must contain all the information described in Section IV. SOQ RESPONSE, FORMAT, CONTENT, AND EVALUATION CRITERIA.

Costs for developing and submitting SOQs are entirely the responsibility of the CM/GC and shall not be chargeable to NMID. By submitting a SOQ, the CM/GC applicant agrees that the contents of the submittals, suggested approaches contained therein, and any supporting analysis, will become the property of NMID.

The qualifications, except for financial information deemed confidential by the prospective CM/GC shall be available by request for public inspection after opening by NMID.

The CM/GC must separately seal any financial information the CM/GC deems confidential and must agree to indemnify and hold harmless NMID for barring this confidential material from public inspection.

5. Rank / Selection / Notice of Award

NMID will review statements of qualification to select a CM/GC that NMID determines is best qualified to provide the required services based on ranked preference according to the criteria contained in this RFQ. NMID’s selection criteria will include the prospective CM/GC’s ability to fully respond to each of the provisions of this RFQ and meet CM/GC contract requirements.

NMID reserves the following rights:

• To reject any or all submittals, or any part thereof;

• To waive any minor defects in the submittal if this is to the advantage of NMID; and

• To accept the submittal that is in the best interest of NMID.

• To modify the procurement schedule.

• To waive deficiencies, informalities, and irregularities in a Proposal and accept and review a nonconforming Proposal.

• To suspend and terminate the procurement process or terminate evaluations of

Proposals received.

• To permit corrections to data submitted with any Proposal.

• To hold meetings and interviews, and conduct discussions and correspondence, with one or more of the Proposers to seek an improved understanding of any information contained in a Proposal.

• To seek or obtain, from any source, data that has the potential to improve the understanding and evaluation of the Proposals.

• To seek clarification from any Proposer to fully understand the information provided in the Proposal and to help evaluate and rank the Proposers.

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 10 of 16

• To reject a Proposal containing exceptions, additions, qualifications, or conditions not called for in the RFQ or otherwise not acceptable to the Owner.

• To conduct an independent investigation of any information, including experience, included in a Proposal by contacting Project references, accessing public information, contacting independent parties, or any other means.

• To request additional information from a Proposer during the evaluation of its Proposal.

NMID’s selection decision shall be final. The waiver of a minor defect shall in no way modify the RFQ or excuse the CM/GC from full compliance with its specifications should the CM/GC be awarded the contract. NMID reserves the right to enter into separate contracts on any aspect of the work.

Qualifications that contain false or misleading statements or that provide references, that do not support an attribute or condition claimed by the CM/GC, may be rejected. If, in the opinion of NMID, such information was intended to mislead NMID in its evaluation of the CM/GC, the statement shall be rejected.

IV. SOQ RESPONSE, FORMAT, CONTENT, AND EVALUATION

CRITERIA

NMID seeks the CM/GC most qualified to provide the services stated in this RFQ. The various sections of this RFQ are intended to provide each potential CM/GC with the opportunity to demonstrate its qualifications.

Each SOQ must respond to each item of this section. Responses that do not adhere to the structure or provide the information described in this section may be disqualified from Consideration.

A. Cover Letter

1. The cover letter should be on the letterhead of the submitting CM/GC, addressed to:

Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District

Board of Directors

1503 First St. South

Nampa, ID 83651

2. Identify the proposing firm by name, main business office, field office conducting work

(if applicable), and contact person.

3. Identify the proposing firm’s parent corporation by name and business location. If the proposing firm has no parent corporation, state that this is the case.

4. Enclose copies of the submitting CM/GC’s current Idaho Construction Manager and

Public Works Contractor Licenses.

5. State that you have read the RFQ and are prepared to comply with contractual requirements.

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 11 of 16

6. Include a brief statement of the proposing firm’s understanding of the work to be accomplished.

7. Provide any additional explanatory information believed necessary or helpful.

8. State you reviewed the draft agreement.

9. Signature of Company Principal authorized to sign contracts.

B. Overview of Firm

1. Provide a summary history of the proposing firm. Locations of home office, number of employees, years in business, evidence of licenses, registrations and credentials required to construct the project including, but not limited to information on the revocation or suspension of any license, credential or registration.

2. Describe the management structure of proposing firm, including identification of all members of the board of directors and executive management team.

3. Disclose all claims or unresolved claims currently ongoing or pending, and/or any potential or anticipated litigation.

4. Project Office location. Identify where the respondent intends to maintain its Project Offices throughout the design and construction phases of the project.

5. Safety - Provide a summary description of the Respondent’s corporate safety program and include safety statistics or records indicating categories of accidents and their incidence or frequency rates for the past three years. The following safety records must be provided for the Respondent for the current and past three years: The experience modification rate (EMR) calculated by the National Council on Compensation Insurance or similar rating bureau. (The EMR is also referred to as the experience modification rating, experience modification factor, experience modifier or X-mod.) Where this value is greater than the industry average of 1.0, Respondent may provide mitigating information to explain the reasons for the EMR rating in Appendix D (Supporting Financial and Company Documentation). The days-away-from-work injury incidence rate.

A day-away-from-work injury is an injury that prevents an employee from returning to their next regularly scheduled shift. The incidence rate is calculated by multiplying the number of days-away-from-work injuries for the particular year by 200,000 and then dividing the product by the person-hours worked for that year.

C. CM/GC Financial Report

All proposing CM/GCs must provide a copy of the CM/GC’s most recent corporation annual report. If no annual report is available, the latest audited financial report prepared by a certified public accountant must be provided. In no case shall the selected CM/GC’s accounts payable be in arrears greater than thirty (30) days. All information the proposing CM/GC considers confidential must be clearly marked and provided to NMID in a separate sealed envelope with the RFQ response package. See Section II. B. (Disclosure of Professional Confidential Information) of this RFQ.

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 12 of 16

D. List of Similar Projects/Experience

Describe local, regional or national projects of a similar nature, size, and scope in which the proposing CM/GC has been involved. Describe the expertise your firm has to conduct this type of Project.

Describe your firm’s expertise, qualifications, experience and past performance for in-river work related to irrigation systems involving dewatering and diversion of water similar to the Ridenbaugh System including cofferdams, environmental permits, large hydraulic concrete structures, and working in similar winter conditions to Boise, Idaho.

Include experience of firm or firms and past performance, name and telephone number of contacts on similar projects, and any written references that are available for those projects.

Identify projects completed or ongoing that are similar in scope and size to the project under consideration; adherence to previous project guidelines or requirements; ability to stay within negotiated fees and schedules; quality of service; and personalized attention to the project.

E. Customer Reference List

Provide a list of current and former clients of the proposing CM/GC to contact for references.

NMID will inquire into multiple areas, which may include the ability, capability, and skill of the proposing CM/GC to perform the services required; the character, integrity, reputation, judgment and efficiency of the proposing CM/GC. The majority of the references must respond positively in order for the proposing CM/GC to be successful in this portion of the evaluation.

Please provide references, names, addresses and phone numbers of firms that have dealt with designated team individuals on at least three (3) other similar projects.

F. Proposed CM/GC’s Staff

Staff qualifications should be clear and to the point. Emphasis is on the specific qualifications of the specific staff who will actually perform the project and the firm’s ability to manage multiple projects simultaneously. All staff with professional licensure requirements must be licensed to practice in the State of Idaho or work under the direct supervision of a professional licensed in the State of Idaho.

Provide resumes of the specific team members expected to accomplish the work described in this RFQ. Delineate respective responsibilities, estimated associated hours, and discuss their qualifications relative to this request. Provide specific examples of team member experience relative to a minimum of three (3) similar projects, briefly illustrating the team’s ability to complete such projects. Notation of special training or particular experiences in similar operations will be helpful.

G. Statement of Approach

The Project will require a Master Schedule to address the major components of the project. In responding to this RFQ, the proposal shall contain a statement of approach to the generation of a Master Schedule that identifies and addresses potential phases of the Project. Consideration of a winter work contingency for the Project should be made.

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 13 of 16

After the selected CM/GC executes a contract with NMID, it will provide probable costs including subcontractor costs for each task as defined by the Master Schedule. Each Master Schedule task shall be defined in sufficient detail to be used by NMID to authorize the investigation to proceed. Authorization of each task will be provided by NMID before any work is conducted on such task. Master Schedule tasks will generally be authorized by NMID sequentially. The Master Schedule and individual task descriptions may be modified at any time during the conduct of the investigation to provide continuity with the objectives of the Project and to facilitate the completion of the Project.

H. Preconstruction and Procurement Fee

The proposer must complete the pricing information forms in Exhibit F with all the required cost information and include it in the SOQ package. Pricing Information includes the following:

1. CM/GC Fee (Profit), which will be applied to the cost of work during the construction phase of the project.

2. Rates for Key Personnel. These will be used as reference when reviewing subsequent cost proposals for future phases of work. Note that hourly rates will be effective January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025. Yearly escalation will be negotiated as the Project progresses.

3. Preconstruction & Procurement NTE Limit. Based on the scope of CM/GC services provide a NTE amount as defined in the CM/GC scope of services (Exhibit E, Article 12, Exhibit G) of the draft agreement.

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 14 of 16

I. Evaluation Criteria

Written Requirements for Responses to Request For Qualification

Rating Category

Description Possible Point

Value

A MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (Pass/Fail)

1 In-river work related to irrigation systems involving dewatering and diversion of water similar to Ridenbaugh System including cofferdams, environmental permits, large hydraulic concrete structures, and working in similar winter conditions to Boise, Idaho. (Past 8 Years):

Provide example projects as part of the below rating categories.

(Pass/Fail)

2 Experience with providing preconstruction, procurement, GMP development, construction and construction management services as described in the RFQ and draft agreement. (Past 8 Years):

Provide example projects as part of the below rating categories.

3 Capacity and availability to complete the work by 2027.

B RELEVANT EXPERIENCE/PAST PERFORMANCE (References):

The owner will consider the experience and past performance of the Proposer as a company, including, but not limited to:

1) Proposer’s current experience and performance on similar irrigation projects with In-river work related to irrigation systems involving dewatering and diversion of water similar to the Ridenbaugh System including cofferdams, environmental permits, large hydraulic concrete structures, and working in similar winter conditions to Boise, Idaho. Experience working in a suburban environment with the public. (Past 8 Years)

2) Qualifications of the offered management team;

3) Organization’s operating philosophy and approach to managing risk;

4) Approach to changes in project scope and change management;

5) Financial stability and approach to financial management of projects;

6) Safety programs and past safety performance; safety records indicating categories of accidents and their incidence or frequency rates for the past three years. EMR calculated by the National Council on Compensation Insurance or a similar rating bureau for the past three years

7) History and experience in prosecuting or defending claims and litigation;

8) Experience with providing preconstruction, procurement, GMP development, construction and construction management services as described in the RFQ and draft agreement; (Past 8 Years):

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 15 of 16

9) Experience with value engineering that has resulted in benefits;

10) Provide 3 project references

Companies that cannot meet the requirements for similar projects defined in the Statement of Qualifications will be deemed unqualified.

C ABILITY TO SELF PERFORM WORK.

Describe the areas of work that can and cannot be self-performed.

D Relevant Experience and Qualification of Proposer Team:

The owner will consider the experience and qualifications of the proposed Project Manager, CM/GC Services Manager, Project Superintendent, Scheduler, Estimator, Safety Manager, and Quality Control Manager (Key Personnel) for this Project (clearly indicate personnel that have multiple roles), including:

1) Education, training, and personal experience in delivering CM/GC and irrigation -in river dewatering dam projects while serving in the capacity for which they are being proposed;

2) Demonstrated ability to complete quality projects on time and within budget as demonstrated by proposal information and reference checks for the offered individuals;

3) Demonstrated leadership, character, and capability of proposed individuals; and

4) Have staff worked together before? How many years they have worked together on projects represented in the key project examples submitted as part of this RFQ .

5) Availability to commit to this project

E PROPOSER’s PROJECT APPROACH:

Owner will consider the Proposer’s approach to constructing this project and completing it within the allowed schedule and budget. Proposer should describe in detail their approach to all aspects of the project including but not limited to the following:

1) Approach to Preconstruction and Procurement Services;

2) Approach to completing this project within the Contract Budget with the Contract schedule; Consider how to handle the winter season, dewatering the project site, placement of concrete and What are considered the critical work items and how would they be handled.

3) Capacity and availability to complete the work by 2027.

4) Describe the acquisition of tools, equipment, materials, and supplies.

5) Approach to construction site safety and quality management;

6) Approach to management of Subcontractors and Suppliers;

7) Approach to construction contract administration including but not limited to resolving construction issues and resolving disputes and claims; and

8) Identification of two or more risks of this project and your approach to the mitigation strategy.

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: CM/GC SERVICES - Page 16 of 16

F SCHEDULING & TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET CONTROL:

Schedule: Describe the primary scheduling techniques you use and the software you will employ to produce an effective construction schedule.

Provide examples of successful construction management and scheduling services provided on complex, multi-phase projects. Discuss in detail how you intend to enforce contract schedule compliance.

Budget: Submit a detailed description of how your firm provides and periodically updates construction cost estimates and participation in Value Management during project design, and successfully tracks and reports construction costs, including line-item costs for each bid package, fee, permits, reimbursable costs, CM/GC fees, and all other project costs.

G PRECONSTRUCTION & PROCUREMENT COMPENSATION, CM/GC FEE:

Submit (1) billing rates for personnel and not-to-exceed price to provide Preconstruction and Procurement Services described in the Contract Articles 11 and 12 and Exhibit G Articles 1 and 3, and (2) proposed CM/GC fee for construction services as a percentage of the Cost of the Work described in Exhibit I, Article 12.

Total Possible Points = 100

Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A

RIDENBAUGH CANAL SYSTEM MAP

Exhibit B

PROJECT SITE

Ex. B - Page 1 of 3

Ex. B - Page 2 of 3

Ex. B - Page 3 of 3

Exhibit C

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Ex. C - Page 1 of 4

Introduction The Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District (NMID) is modernizing its Boise River diversion headworks for the Ridenbaugh Canal.

The Ridenbaugh headworks, originally constructed in the 1800’s, consists of a low-head concrete diversion structure, a sediment control sill wall, wing walls, trash rack, and a headworks with radial intake gates (shown in Existing Conditions/Site Pictures Attachment). The diversion structure extends from the concrete walls of the inlet channel on the west bank of the river to an abutment on the east bank. NMID staff divert water during the irrigation season (April

- October) by manually installing stop logs in the diversion structure from a wooden walkway.

The headworks is showing signs of aging and nearing the end of its useful life:

• Concrete, metal, and wooden components of the diversion structure, sediment wall sill, and original headgate’s structure have deteriorated are displaying the effects of freeze/thaw cycles and general deterioration from over 100 years of operation.

• Seepage undermines the integrity of the original headgate wing walls

• Scour at the downstream edge of the diversion structure and around the right abutment places the reliability of the diversion structure in question.

• The deteriorating condition of the headworks facility is causing continually increasing maintenance effort and more dangerous working conditions.

This Project will replace aging components of the Ridenbaugh headworks and utilize modern technology to secure the long-term delivery of water through the Ridenbaugh Canal, improve operation and maintenance, and minimize safety risks to NMID staff.

Project Scope The Project Area on the west side of the Boise River is located on NMID property. The Project Area on the east side is located on City of Boise Parks and Recreation property (Ex. B, Project Site), where the future City of Boise Alta Harris Park is proposed.

The Project will consist of the following permanent and temporary construction actions.

Permanent

• Demolish and remove the existing diversion structure stop log piers while leaving the concrete sill in place, sediment wall maintenance walkway, ~215 feet of the sediment wall next to the intake gates (remainder of the sediment wall to remain in place), trash rack, original headgates and wing walls, partial east and west side (right and left bank) abutments, and other infrastructure.

• Remove rock and concrete debris at the existing diversion structure and along the banks of the Boise River as needed to construct the Project.

• Clear a limited amount of vegetation along the river banks within the Project area.

• Construct access route (2 options) to the Boise River from the staging area in coordination with the proposed City of Boise Alta Harris Park.

Ex. C - Page 2 of 4

• Install new diversion structures consisting of the following (Ex. B, Project Site):

o Concrete diversion structure upstream of the existing diversion structure (~40 feet east side and ~185 feet west side);

o Sheet pile foundation and cutoff walls below the primary river structure and beyond the east abutment.

o Automated overpour gates on the west half and a fixed crest concrete ogee weir on the east half of the diversion structure.

o Stop log structure at entrance to inlet channel.

o Sediment basin in the inlet channel.

o Sediment bypass gates to discharge natural sediment load back to the Boise River.

o Automated self-cleaning trash rack between the sediment basin and the canal inlet.

o Modifying the headworks structure to allow radial gates to be lifted out of the canal.

o Headworks facility mechanical control building in the upland on the west side.

o Access ramp on the west side into the sediment basin.

o Reroute of existing access road on the east side.

• Plant native trees, shrubs, and herbaceous species along the river in disturbed areas.

• Stabilize the Project Area post-construction utilizing Best Management Practices.

• Install safety signage and warning buoys on the river upstream from the project

Temporary

• Install cofferdams to dewater approximately half of the Boise River to protect ongoing construction from inundation.

• Construct staging area on City of Boise property, to be restored upon construction completion in coordination with the proposed City of Boise Alta Harris Park.

• Provide traffic control in and around the construction site

Project Permits & Approvals Permit Issuing Agency Status NEPA – EA Bureau of Reclamation In Progress Section 106 SHPO In Progress Section 7 USFWS In Progress Section 404 Exemption USACE Initiated Letter of Map Revision FEMA Initiated Section 401 Exemption IDEQ Initiated Stream Channel Alt.

Exemption

IDWR Initiated

Design Review ACHD Not Initiated Design Review Water District 63 Not Initiated Boise River System City of Boise Not Initiated Floodplain Develop. City of Boise Initiated Building Permit City of Boise Not Initiated Grading Permit City of Boise Not Initiated Erosion & Sediment City of Boise Not Initiated

Ex. C - Page 3 of 4

EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PICTURES (2023)

Diversion structure from west bank

Sediment wall, trash rack, and intake gates

Ex. C - Page 4 of 4

Canal intake gates looking southeast from Eckert Road

Ridenbaugh Canal looking downstream from Eckert Road

Exhibit D

PRELIMINARY

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

12" = 1'-0"Au tod es k D oc s:/ /10

_R ide nb au gh

_M od er niz ati on

_2

4/1

5-

-U .rv t 9/2

5/2

4 5 :03

:49 P

M

00C-108 10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 3D VIEW (1)

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SEDIMENT DISCHARGE

GATES W/ CATWALK

ACCESS

NEW TRASH RACK MOUNTED

ON SEDIMENT SILL WALL

SEDIMENT BASIN

CREST GATES (TYP.)

EAST SIDE WING

WALL ABUTMENT

EXISTING SEDIMENT

WALL/PIERS TO REMAIN

CONVEYOR TO TRANSPORT

DEBRIS BACK TO RIVERPROPOSED

CONTROL BUILDING

STOP LOG GUIDES TO

ISOLATE INTAKE CHANNEL

FOR MAINTENANCE

CATWALK ABOVE

100 YEAR FLOW

EVENT

OGEE FIXED CREST

WEIR W/ FRONT

RAMP

0 TBD ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION

12" = 1'-0"

UPSTREAM VIEW FROM SW LOOKING NE1

EXISTING

DIVERSION

STRUCTURE SILL

SLAB

Exhibit D - Page 1 of 14

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

12" = 1'-0"Au tod es k D oc s:/ /10

_R ide nb au gh

_M od er niz ati on

_2

4/1

5-

-U .rv t 9/2

5/2

4 5 :03

:49 P

M

00C-109 10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 3D VIEW (2)

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

EXISTING

HEADWORKS

SEDIMENT

DISCHARGE GATES

W/ CATWALK

ACCESS

NEW TRASH RACK MOUNTED

ON SEDIMENT SILL WALL

CATWALK TO CLEAN AND

MAINTAIN TRASH RACK

SEDIMENT BASIN

CREST GATES (TYP.)

EAST SIDE WING

WALL ABUTMENT

REMOVE EXISTING

CATWALK. EXISTING

SEDIMENT

WALL/PIERS TO

REMAIN

CONVEYOR TO TRANSPORT

DEBRIS BACK TO RIVER

PROPOSED

CONTROL BUILDING

ACCESS RAMP TO

INTAKESTOP LOG GUIDES TO

ISOLATE INTAKE

CHANNEL FOR

MAINTENANCE

CATWALK ABOVE

100 YEAR FLOW

EVENT

OGEE FIXED CREST

WEIR W/ FRONT

RAMP

EXISTING HOME

TO REMAIN

0 TBD ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION

EXISTING

DIVERSION

STRUCTURE SILL

SLAB

12" = 1'-0"

View from East Abutment1

Exhibit D - Page 2 of 14

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

12" = 1'-0"Au tod es k D oc s:/ /10

_R ide nb au gh

_M od er niz ati on

_2

4/1

5-

-U .rv t 9/2

5/2

4 5 :03

:49 P

M

00C-110 10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 3D VIEW (3)

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

EXISTING HEADWORKS

NEW TRASH RACK MOUNTED

ON SEDIMENT SILL WALL

SEDIMENT BASIN

REMOVE EXISTING

CATWALK. EXISTING

SEDIMENT WALL/PIERS TO

REMAIN

PROPOSED CONTROL BUILDING

ACCESS RAMP TO

INTAKE

STOP LOG GUIDES TO

ISOLATE INTAKE CHANNEL

FOR MAINTENANCE NEW SILL WALL SECTION TO

ATTACH TO EXISTING SILL

WALL

CATWALK ABOVE

100 YEAR FLOW

EVENT

EXISTING HOME

TO REMAIN

0 TBD ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION

12" = 1'-0"

UPSTREAM VIEW OF INLET CHANNEL1

Exhibit D - Page 3 of 14

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

12" = 1'-0"Au tod es k D oc s:/ /10

_R ide nb au gh

_M od er niz ati on

_2

4/1

5-

-U .rv t 9/2

5/2

4 5 :03

:49 P

M

00C-111 10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 3D VIEW (4)

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

EXISTING

HEADWORKS

SEDIMENT DISCHARGE

GATES W/ CATWALK

ACCESS

NEW TRASH RACK MOUNTED

ON SEDIMENT SILL WALL

CATWALK TO CLEAN AND

MAINTAIN TRASH RACK

SEDIMENT

BASIN

CREST GATES

(TYP.)

EAST SIDE WING

WALL

ABUTMENT

REMOVE EXISTING CATWALK.

EXISTING SEDIMENT

WALL/PIERS TO REMAIN

CONVEYOR TO TRANSPORT

DEBRIS BACK TO RIVER

PROPOSED

CONTROL BUILDING

CATWALK ABOVE

100 YEAR FLOW

EVENT (TYP.)OGEE FIXED CREST

WEIR W/ FRONT

RAMP

EXISTING HOME

TO REMAIN

0 TBD ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION

12" = 1'-0"

DOWNSTREAM VIEW LOOKING TOWARD PROJECT UPSTREAM1

EXISTING DIVERSION

STRUCTURE SILL SLAB

Exhibit D - Page 4 of 14

03S-301

03S-302

04S-301

04S-302

04S-303

05S-301

03S-201

##03S-304

03S-101

02S-102

03S-103

04S-102

05S-101

05S-102

TOP PLAN

PRELIMINARY

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

1/16" = 1'-0"Au tod es k D oc s:/ /10

_R ide nb au gh

_M od er niz ati on

_2

4/1

5-

-U .rv t 9/2

5/2

4 5 :03

:50 P

M

00S-101 10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

STRUCTURAL KEY PLAN

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

1/16" = 1'-0"

STRUCTURAL KEY PLAN1

HEADWORKS W/

RADIAL GATES

TRASH RACK

SLUICE GATES

ACCESS RAMP

SEDIMENT

BASIN

CANAL INTAKE

CREST GATES

OGEE WEIR

EAST

ABUTMENT

TRASH CONVEYOR TO RIVER

TRASH RACK ACCESS CATWALK

SLUICE GATE ACCESS CATWALK

ACCESS CATWALK

Exhibit D - Page 5 of 14

03S-302

03S-201

CREST GATES OGEE WIER

PRELIMINARY

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

As indicated 02S-102

10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

DIVERSION DAM CREST GATE PLAN

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

FL

OW

FL

OW

CATWALK OVER

CREST GATES

PIER

HYDRAULIC TRAINING WALL

PIER

EAST BANK

ABUTMENT

CATWALK OVER

CREST GATESPIER

HYDRAULIC TRAINING WALL

PIER

EAST BANK

ABUTMENT

OGEE WEIR

CREST GATES FL

OWEXISTING SEDIMENT SILL

WALL TO REMAIN

CANAL INTAKE

1/8" = 1'-0"

DIVERSION DAM CREST GATE PLAN1

12" = 1'-0"

DIVERSION RENDERING LOOKING NORTH_12

Exhibit D - Page 6 of 14

100-YR FLOOD @ 16,600 CFS

GATE OPEN

2761.70

03S-302

TOP OF DIVERSION SILL

2751.20

EXISTING

GRADE

EAST SIDE

ABUTMENT

TOP OF CREST GATE

PILE FOUNDATION

ALL CATWALK STRUCTURES

ABOVE 100 YEAR FLOOD

ELEVATION

GUARD RAILING

INTAKE

30' - 0"

CONC. PIER

10' - 0"

CREST GATES

80' - 0"

CONC. PIER

3' - 0"

OGEE WEIR

80' - 0"

203' - 0"

WEST BANK

ACCESS RAMP

2:12SEDIMENT BASIN

HYDRAULIC

TRAINING WALL

OGEE WEIR PIER CATWALK

CREST GATES

HYDRAULIC

TRAINING WALL

SEDIMENT BASIN

PILE FOUNDATION

EAST SIDE

ABUTMENT

PRELIMINARY

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

As indicated 03S-201

10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

DIVERSION DAM ELEVATION

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

1/8" = 1'-0"

DIVERSION DAM1

12" = 1'-0"

DIVERSION ELEVATION VIEW FROM DOWNSTREAM2

Exhibit D - Page 7 of 14

100-YR FLOOD @ 16,600 CFS

GATE OPEN

2761.70

USUAL WSEL @ 900 CFS GATE

CLOSED

2756' - 0"

TOP OF DIVERSION SILL

2751.20

WEIR HEIGHT/ TOP OF GATE

2755.00

5' - 0" 17' - 6" 2' - 6"

CLCL

10' - 0"

17' - 6" 2' - 6"

6" 2'

- 0

4'

- 0

FLOW EXISTING GRADE

CL SHEET PILE (TYP.)

ALL CATWALK STRUCTURES

ABOVE AVERAGE 100 YEAR

FLOOD ELEVAITON

SUPPORT BEAM FOR CREST

GATE MAINTENANCE

GUARD RAILING

5'

- 0

FILTER SAND PER CIVIL

0'

- 8

1'

- 8

3/ 8"

6'

- 0

1' - 4"

13' - 6" 6' - 6"

CL1' - 6"

CL

5' - 0"

UPSTREAM PILEDOWNSTREAM PILE

BOT OF SAND

2742.50

2'

- 0

CONCRETE SLAB

BOT OF SLAB

2747.50

RIPRAP PER CIVIL

RIPRAP PER CIVIL

BULL NOISE RADIUS ON PEIR

IS 1/2 PIER THICKNESS

4' - 0"

METAL BAR GRATING

ACCESS CATWALK

TOP OF CATWALK

2763.70

1'

- 2

PROPOSED TORQUE-TUBE

STYLE CREST GATE

PRELIMINARY

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

1/4" = 1'-0" 03S-301

10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

DIVERSION DAM SECTIONS 1

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

1/4" = 1'-0"

DIVERSION STRUCTURE GATED SECTION1

Exhibit D - Page 8 of 14

WEIR HEIGHT/ TOP OF GATE

2755.00

5' - 0" 17' - 6"

FLOW

SHEET PILE FOUNDATION (TYP.)

SAND PACK

OGEE WEIR CREST

RAMPED INTAKE TO OGEE WEIR

0'

- 8

BOT OF SAND

2742.50

BOT OF SLAB

2747.50

0'

- 6

TOP OF CATWALK

2763.70

TOC

EL 2749' - 8"

TOC

EL 2749' - 2"

RIPRAP PER CIVIL

RIPRAP PER CIVIL

PRELIMINARY

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

1/4" = 1'-0" 03S-302

10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

DIVERSION DAM SECTIONS 2

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

1/4" = 1'-0"

OGEE SPILLWAY1

Exhibit D - Page 9 of 14

04S-301

04S-302

04S-303

CATWALK ACCESS TO

INTAKE ENTRANCE

STOPLOG CONTROL

CATWALK ACCESS

TO DIVERSION

STRUCTURE

6"

CATWALK

ACCESS TO

SLUICE GATES

4' - 0"

6" 4'

- 0

1'-6" SEDIMENT

WALL

TOC

EL 2752' - 4"

CONTROL BUILDING

SEDIMENT BASIN

ACCESS RAMP

CANAL INTAKE

SLUICE

GATES

CATWALK TO

CLEAN AND

MAINTAIN TRASH

RACK

PRELIMINARY

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

1/8" = 1'-0" 04S-102

10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

INLET CHANNEL TOP PLAN

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

1/8" = 1'-0"

INLET CHANNEL TOP PLAN1

CONVEYOR TO

TRANSPORT DEBRIS

BACK TO RIVER

TRASH RACK

HYDRAULIC

TRAINING

WALL

Exhibit D - Page 10 of 14

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

12" = 1'-0" 04S-300

10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

INLET CHANNEL INTAKE

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

12" = 1'-0"

ENTRANCE TO CANAL INTAKE WITH FLOW1

12" = 1'-0"

ENTRANCE TO CANAL INTAKE2

EXISTING SEDIMENT SILL

WALL AND PIERS TO

REMAIN WHERE POSSIBLE

DIVERSION CREST

GATES

PIER WITH STOP LOG GUIDES

PIER

CATWALK ACCESS

EXISTING HOME TO

REMAIN

PROPOSED CONTROL BUILDING

Exhibit D - Page 11 of 14

2761.70

USUAL WSEL @ 900 CFS GATE

CLOSED

2756' - 0"

TOP OF INLET SILL

2750.80

EXISTING GRADE

1' - 6" 30' - 0" 1' - 6"

HYDRAULIC

TRAINING WALL

BOT OF SLAB

2747.50

TOP OF CATWALK

2763.70

EXISTING

HOME TO

REMAIN

PROPOSED

CONTROL BUILDING

EXISTING

HEADWORKS

ACCESS CATWALK

PROPOSED

TRASH RACK

SEDIMENT

SILL LEDGE

BULK HEAD TO

KEEP WATER

OUT OF ACCESS

RAMP

EXISTING DIVERSION

STRUCTURE SILL TO

REMAIN

HYDRAULIC

TRAINING

WALL

PRELIMINARY

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

As indicated 04S-301

10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

INLET CHANNEL SECTIONS 1

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

1/4" = 1'-0"

INLET CHANNEL @ SEDIMENT BASIN1

12" = 1'-0"

CANAL INTAKE W/ FLOW2

12" = 1'-0"

CANAL INTAKE3

Exhibit D - Page 12 of 14

2761.70

USUAL WSEL @ 900 CFS GATE

CLOSED

2756' - 0"

TOP OF INLET SILL

2750.80

WEIR HEIGHT/ TOP OF GATE

2755.00

EXISTING GRADE

SEDIMENT WALL/

ELEVATED FLOOR

SLUICE GATES

CATWALK ACCESS TO SLUICE GATES

1'

- 6

1' - 6" 30' - 0" 1' - 6"

BOT OF SLAB

2747.50

TOP OF CATWALK

2763.70

PROPOSED

CONTROL BUILDING

EXISTING

HEADWORKS ACCESS CATWALK

PROPOSED TRASH RACK

SEDIMENT

SILL LEDGE

EXISTING DIVERSION

STRUCTURE SILL TO

REMAIN

SEDIMENT

CONTROL

SLUICE GATES

PRELIMINARY

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

As indicated 04S-302

10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

INLET CHANNEL SECTIONS 2

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

1/4" = 1'-0"

INLET CHANNEL @ SLUICE GATES1

12" = 1'-0"

CANAL INTAKE SECTION 2 WITH FLOW2

12" = 1'-0"

CANAL INTAKE 23

NOTES:

1. TRASH RACK WILL BE AUTOMATED

WITH TRAVELING SCREEN OR RAKE.

2. TRASH RACK WILL INCLUDE CONVEYOR

RETURN DEBRIS TO RIVER.

Exhibit D - Page 13 of 14

2761.70

TOP OF INLET SILL

2750.80

WEIR HEIGHT/ TOP OF GATE

2755.00

BOT OF SLAB

2747.50

EXISTING GRADE

EXISTING HEADGATE STRUCTURE

AND RADIAL GATES TO REMAIN

TOP OF CATWALK

2763.70

EXISTING

RADIAL GATES

TO REMAIN

TIE IN INTAKE CANAL

WALL TO EXISTING

HEADWORKS

STRUCTURE

PRELIMINARY

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR

RECORDING

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT NUMBER

0 1" 2"

SCALE

FILENAME

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

TEAM 4

TEAM 5

TEAM 6

TEAM 7

ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

D

C

B

A

SHEET

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

F. M. LAST

As indicated 04S-303

10383385

J. ROLDAN

10383385-00-U

INLET CHANNEL SECTIONS 3

RIDENBAUGH DIVERSION

MODERNIZATION

NAMPA & MERIDIAN

IRRIGATION DISTRICT

1/4" = 1'-0"

CANAL INTAKE BEFORE HEADWORKS1

12" = 1'-0"

CANAL INTAKE BEFORE HEADWORKS W/ FLOW2

12" = 1'-0"

CANAL INTAKE BEFORE HEADWORKS3

NOTES:

1. NMID TO REMOVE DEFUNCT SLIDE

GATES AND MODIFY EXISTING

HEADWORKS CATWALK BEFORE

CONSTRUCTION BEGINS.

Exhibit D - Page 14 of 14

Exhibit E

CM/GC Contract - Page 1 of 17

RIDENBAUGH CANAL…