24Q0020 ANNEX B EVAL FACTORS -0001.docx

NAS Key West TDM-VoIP Site Survey

FAR 12.602

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FACTORS

Contractor’s technical offer will be assessed based on the RFQ PWS/SOW identified technical requirements. The following will be applied for determination of acceptability:

Contractor: _________________________________

Pass: The vendor’s proposal demonstrates how they can develop a comprehensive site survey report (or equivalent report) in both Microsoft Word and/or Adobe PDF formats, and address all required documentation (layout drawings, ISP cabling, power drawings/specifications, floor plans, engineering specifications, and OSP drawings).

Fail: The vendor’s proposal doesn’t demonstrate they can develop a site survey report (or equivalent) that meets the definition requirements in PWS guidelines and doesn’t demonstrate that they can deliver the report in required formats, and/or is missing any necessary documentation (ISP or OSP drawings, etc).

Pass: The vendor’s proposal shows they can deliver documentation providing the VoIP non-recurring/recurring costs and Installation/Implementation Timeline reports in both Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF formats to the government within 30 days of the completion of the survey.

Fail: The vendor’s proposal doesn’t explain that they can deliver the documentation providing VoIP non-recurring/recurring costs and Installation/Implementation Timeline reports in both required formats and/or cannot deliver them within 30 days of the completion of the survey.

Pass: The vendor’s proposal confirms they can produce all documentation and records, with unlimited rights and when delivered to the U.S. Government, ensure full access and control over publication and distribution.

Fail: The vendor’s proposal confirms they cannot relinquish rights to any documentation or limits the U.S. Government’s access and control over the deliverables.

Pass: The vendor’s proposal defines at a high-level their practical and cost-effective VoIP solution and their plan for OSP infrastructure (or alternative OSP) to reach/support required TDM telephony users. The proposal shows that the vendor can deliver the required comprehensive documentation: drawings that clearly depict the overall system configuration, network topology, and logical network diagrams within 30 days of the completion of the survey report.

Fail: The vendor’s proposal doesn’t define at a high-level a practical and cost-effective VoIP solution and/or their plan for OSP infrastructure (or alternative OSP) to reach/support required TDM telephony users. The proposal doesn’t show how they would meet providing the comprehensive documentation within 30 days of survey report.