N6945023R0007_0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N6945023R0007 Beaufort Custodial Services

See BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION on page 2.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-Apr-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6945023R0007

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

28-Feb-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-Apr-2023

CODE

NAVFAC ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND SE

FSC-BOS

BUILDING 903, PO BOX 30

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6945023R0007

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0003

This amendment is issued to make the following changes:

1. Section C – The Section C Performance Work Statement has been updated. Changes within the attachment are shown in red font strikethrough for deletions and blue for additions. The revised Section C attachment is provided via attachment under file name N6945023R0007_SectionC_0003.pdf. A summary of the revised spec item is as follows:

a. Annex 1503010 – Custodial

i. Updated Spec Item 3 Recurring Work COLS attachment to J-1503010-03.

2. Section J – The Table of Contents has been revised as follows (changes within the Table of Contents are indicated in red font):

a. Responses to Government Pre-award Inquiries (GPIs) have been added and are provided as file name: JL-8_N6945023R0007 GPI Responses_0003.pdf.

3. Section M – Update to M.4 Evaluation Factors, Relevant Projects (changes are indicated in red font):

a. Changes the recency of relevant projects from within five (5) years to within eight (8) years.

Note: Additional Amendment is forthcoming to provide responses to GPIs still pending Government response.

The proposal due date is changed to 2:00 PM EDT, Thursday, 20 April 2023.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 13-Apr-2023 02:00 PM to 20-Apr-2023 02:00 PM.

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

This is a performance-based contract which incorporates performance-based specifications.

The files for Section C are provided as the following attachment posted on the SAM website at https://sam.gov:

N6945023R0007_SectionC_0003.pdf

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section J - Table of Contents list the Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments for this Section are posted on the SAM website at https://sam.gov/ with the solicitation.

The ACQUISITION documents are posted as individual file names as indicated in the table. The TECHNICAL documents are posted as individual file names as indicated in the table or “all-inclusive” under filename:

N6945023R0007_SectionJ_0001.pdf.

Section J – Table of Contents

JL1 JL-1 Labor Hours. Provided as file name JL_N6945023R0007.xlsx JL-2 Government Pre-award Inquiry Form (GPIF). Provided as file name: JL-2_N6945023R0007 GPIF.xlsx.

JL-3 Site Visit Itinerary. Provided as file name: JL-3_N6945023R0007 SiteVisitItinerary.pdf.

JL-4 AMAG Form. Provided as file name: JL-4_N6945023R0007 AMAG.xlsx JL-5 SECNAV 5512/1 Form. Provided as file name JL-5_N6945023R0007 SECNAV5512.pdf JL-6 Site Visit Brief. Provided as file name JL-6 _N6945023R0007 SiteVisitBrief_0001.pdf.

JL-7 Site Visit Sign-In Sheet. Provided as file name JL-7 _N6945023R0007 SiteVisitSign-InSheet_0001.pdf.

JL-8 Responses to Government Pre-award Inquiries (GPIs). Provided as file name: JL-8_N6945023R0007

GPI Responses_0003.pdf.

JM-1 Corporate Experience Project Data Sheet. Provided as file name: JM-1_N6945023R0007 Corporate

Experience.doc JM-2 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ). Provided as file name: JM-2_N6945023R0007 PPQ.doc J-0200000-02 Wage Determinations are provided as follows:

2022-2025 Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) between KIRA Aviation Services, LLC and the International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Local #465 AFL-CIO, effective 10/1/2022 through 9/30/2025. Provided as file name: N6945023R0007_CBA465.pdf. Applies to all service employees who will perform identifiable bargaining unit work/functions. This WD requirement will apply under section 4(c) of the Service Contract Labor Standards statute regardless of whether workers are employed by the prime contractor or a subcontractor under this procurement. Service employees are defined in FAR 22.1001.

Service Contract Labor Standards Wage Determination 2015-5799 (Rev.-22). Provided as file name:

SCA WD 2015-5799.pdf. Applies to any non-bargaining unit service employees performing work on the contract.

J-0200000-07 Exhibit Line Item Numbers (ELINS). Provided as file name: N6945023R0007_J-0200000- 07ELINS.xlsx.

J-1503010-05 Floor Plans are provided as a separate attachment. Provided as file name: N6945023R0014_J-1503010- 05FloorPlans.pdf

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

M.4 EVALUATION FACTORS

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 –Technical Approach Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(i) Provide completed pricing for all Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) included in Section B of the solicitation.

(ii) Provide a completed Section J Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing Attachment.

There are multiple worksheets within this file that require completion.

(iii) Submit pricing data (Section B and Section J ELINs) in hard copy and in electronic (Microsoft Office Version 2016 compatible) format on CD-ROM. Offerors shall utilize the ELIN pricing attachment provided in Section J to submit the ELIN pricing data in the format provided. Because the pricing evaluation will concentrate on the electronic files submitted, in the event of a discrepancy between the proposal hard copies and the proposal electronic copies, the proposal electronic copies will take precedence.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

(i) The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

a. Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

b. Comparison of proposed prices with the IGE.

c. Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

d. Comparison of market survey results.

e. And/or any other methodology deemed appropriate by the Contracting

Officer and consistent with FAR 15.404-1.

(ii) Identification of unbalanced pricing including allocation to the ELIN/Sub-ELIN unit prices. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more prices at the functional (Annex/Sub-annex, Spec Item, etc.) level, ELIN/sub-ELIN unit prices, or contract line items is significantly overstated or understated. An offer may be rejected if the proposed price is materially unbalanced between line items or sub-line items within a pricing period, or between line items or sub-line items for the basic requirement and any option period.

(iii) Any suspected issues or concerns in the price proposal, including any inconsistent pricing submitted within Section B and the Section J ELIN attachment.

(b) Technical Factors:

The offeror’s response to factors that require submission of Corporate Experience and Past Performance shall be based on the following relevancy definition:

RELEVANT PROJECT: A relevant project is defined as a custodial services project that is similar in size, scope, and complexity to the requirements described in the performance work statement/specifications of the RFP with a contract value of $750,000.00 per year or greater that is either: 1) ongoing with at least 12 months of contract performance completed by the date of receipt of initial proposals, or 2) completed within the last eight (8) years from the date of receipt of initial proposals.

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall submit a minimum of one (1) to a maximum of five (5) examples of relevant projects to be documented only on Attachment JM-1, Corporate Experience Project Data Sheet. Offerors shall not submit any information under Factor 1 unless submitted on Attachment JM-1 (with the exception of the information required for any corporate affiliate or first-tier small business subcontractor(s) experience submitted, to include the one-page narrative, organization chart, and teaming agreement/letter of commitment referenced below, which may be submitted in addition to the Attachment JM-1).

The offeror shall clearly demonstrate recent, relevant experience as a prime contractor on projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to the requirements described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) of the RFP.

An offeror may rely on the prime contractor experience of corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, predecessor companies, and parent companies) to demonstrate experience, provided the offeror submits all of the following:

a. A one-page narrative clearly demonstrating that the corporate affiliates will have meaningful participation in the project by identifying the personnel or resources from the corporate affiliates that will be dedicated to the project;

b. An organization chart that demonstrates the corporate relationship of the affiliates; and

c. Teaming agreement/Letter of commitment.

An offeror may rely on the prime contractor experience of first-tier small business subcontractor(s) to demonstrate experience if the experience of the small business prime does not independently demonstrate the capabilities necessary for award, provided the offeror submits all of the following:

a. Specific identification of the proposed team of first-tier subcontractor(s); and

b. Teaming agreement/Letter of commitment.

For each project, the offeror shall complete Attachment JM-1 Corporate Experience Project Data Sheet. All information shall be provided as requested on the form. Attachment JM-1 may be expanded and is not limited to the two (2) pages provided with the solicitation.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Corporate Experience standard has been met when the offeror, its corporate affiliates, or team of first-tier subcontractor(s) demonstrates adequate experience in successfully performing at least one (1) relevant project as defined for this solicitation.

Projects must be submitted on the required Attachment JM-1. The Government will review only the first five (5) projects submitted on the JM-1 attachments. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) project limit will not be considered.

Projects completed by the offeror, its corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, predecessor companies, and parent companies) or first-tier small business subcontractor(s) in any capacity other than as prime contractor will be considered not relevant. The offeror, its corporate affiliates, or team of first-tier subcontractor(s) do not have to self-perform all the relevant work, but must have been the prime contractor on the relevant project.

For multiple award contracts (MACs) or indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (ID/IQ) contracts, the specific relevant task order(s) that constitute a single project on the same site, not the entire MAC or ID/IQ contract, will be considered a project for evaluation purposes.

(2) Factor 2, Technical Approach:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall provide the staffing levels for the entire contract effort. Provide labor hours by submitting a completed Attachment JL-1 Labor Hours worksheet (MS Excel, Microsoft Office Version 2016 compatible) for the total effort to include the prime contractor, affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies, and all subcontractors for the base period of performance. Provide the number of labor hours proposed for performing each technical specification item as provided on Attachment JL-1.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The minimum acceptability standard is met when the offeror demonstrates adequate staffing levels. The evaluation will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to identify adequate labor hours:

a. Comparison of proposed labor hours received in response to the RFP.

b. Comparison of proposed labor hours with the IGE.

c. Comparison of proposed labor hours with available historical information.

The factor will be considered unacceptable if the Attachment JL-1 is not submitted, is incomplete, or the proposed labor hours are 20% lower than what the Government anticipates.

(3) Factor 3, Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY) , as described further below. For a partnership or joint venture, the offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors

1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2018, CY2019, CY2020, CY2021, and CY2022] worth of data (not an overall average). If the offeror has no DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why.

a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

2. TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2018, CY2019, CY2020, CY2021, and CY2022] worth of data (not an overall average). If the offeror has no TCR Rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why.

a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

The Government is seeking to determine that the offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. To meet the minimum requirements, the offeror must demonstrate the following:

1. DART rates at or below 2.99

2. TCR Rates at or below 4.49

NOTE: If the offeror’s rates exceed the established levels above for any of the five years, it will result in a deficiency.

(4) Factor 4, Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE FOR EACH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN

RESPONSE TO FACTOR 1, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A

COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Corporate Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A

COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (provided as an attachment), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Darrien Thomas, via email at darrien.a.thomas.civ@us.navy.mil (with a copy to Cari Fiebach at cari.l.fiebach.civ@us.navy.mil) prior to the proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) using all CAGE/Entity Identifier numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information

System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.

The Government will evaluate how well the offeror performed on the recent, relevant projects submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience, and on other recent, relevant contracts documented in known sources. There are two aspects of the past performance evaluation: recency and relevancy. The first is to evaluate the recency of the offeror’s past performance. The second aspect is to determine the relevancy of the offeror’s past performance. For purposes of this evaluation, the criteria identified in Factor 1, Corporate Experience will be utilized in determining relevancy. The past performance evaluation does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed on those past contracts.

The Government will evaluate whether the past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., CPARS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

− A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

− A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

− A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and − Recency/relevancy (as defined for Factor 1) of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to − or related to the task at hand

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past contract performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable”.

(End of Summary of Changes)