Amendment_06.pdf

ACQR5147356

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

A. Extend the PPI due date from 5:00p.m EST. 21 June 2018 to 5:00p.m. EST 28 June 2018.

B. Extend the Proposal due date from 2:00p.m. 28 June 2018 to 12 July 2018.

C. Add Attachment 19 and 20.

D. Revise Factor 4, Technical Solution, paragraph (i) E. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 19-Jun-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6945018R0902

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

18-May-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

19-Jun-2018

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

SOUTH ATLANTIC

BLDG 135, PO BOX 30

NAS JACKSONVILLE

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6945018R0902

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMEND 06 CONTINUATION PAGE

A. Extend the PPI due date from 5:00p.m EST. 21 June 2018 to 5:00p.m. EST 28 June 2018.

B. Extend the Proposal due date from 2:00p.m. 28 June 2018 to 12 July 2018.

C. Add Attachment 19 and 20:

Attachment_19_JOC Preproposal Site Visit Sign In Sheet Attachment_20_Seed_Project_Drawings with As-Builts D. Revise Factor 4, Technical Solution, paragraph (i) From:

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution for the seed project that meets the requirements of the RFP and that demonstrates the Offeror’s ability to successfully carry out construction projects in NSB Kings Bay, GA.

Include the following:

To:

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution that meets the requirements of the RFP and that demonstrates the Offeror's ability to successfully carry out construction projects in NSB Kings Bay, GA. Include the following:

E. All other terms and condistion remain unchanged.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION FACTORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Experience Factor 2 – Past Performance Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Technical Solution

2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide one (1) original, two (2) copy, and one (1) electronic copy (CD) of the solicitation submittal requirements below.

(i) Executed SF 1442. Offerors shall insert their company name, address, DUNS number and CAGE code in Block #14, telephone number in Block #15, acknowledge all amendments in Block #19 (if applicable), name and title of person authorized to sign in Block #20A, signature in Block #20B, and offer date in Block #20C of the SF1442

(ii) Prices (Coefficients) for Contract CLIN 0001 Base Item shall be considered available for award for 90 days from the proposal due date. The below table illustrates how perspective contractors will be expected to submit pricing.

*For Evaluation purposes only CLIN 0001 Submarine Base Kings Bay JOC $45,000,000.00 NTE

Est. Workload Anticipated

FFP‐Coefficient Factor for Work Within the Upper

Base and Shellman Bluff $6,000,000 (13%) COEF EVAL PRICE

SLIN 000101 FFP‐Coefficient Factor for Pre‐Priced (RS Means)

Labor, Materials & Equipment Line Items $5,000,000 ‐$

SLIN 000102 FFP‐Coefficient Factor for Non‐Pre‐Priced

Labor, Materials & Equipment Line Items $1,000,000 ‐$

FFP‐Coefficient Factor for Work within the LA $12,000,000 (27%) COEF EVAL PRICE

SLIN 000103 FFP‐Coefficient Factor for Pre‐Priced (RS Means)

Labor, Materials & Equipment Line Items $9,000,000.00 ‐$

SLIN 000104 FFP‐Coefficient Factor for Non‐Pre‐Priced

Labor, Materials & Equipment Line Items $3,000,000.00 ‐$

FFP‐Coefficient Factor for Work within the CA $12,000,000 (27%) COEF EVAL PRICE

SLIN 000105 FFP‐Coefficient Factor for Pre‐Priced (RS Means)

Labor, Materials & Equipment Line Items $9,000,000 ‐$

SLIN 000106 FFP‐Coefficient Factor for Non‐Pre‐Priced

Labor, Materials & Equipment Line Items $3,000,000 ‐$

FFP‐Coefficient Factor for Work within the Waterfront $15,000,000 (33%) COEF EVAL PRICE

SLIN 000107 FFP‐Coefficient Factor for Pre‐Priced (RS Means)

Labor, Materials & Equipment Line Items $11,000,000 ‐$

SLIN 000108 FFP‐Coefficient Factor for Non‐Pre‐Priced

Labor, Materials & Equipment Line Items $4,000,000 ‐$

$ (Subtotal)

DD1155 SEED PROJECT:

Price** $ (Subtotal)

TOTAL EVALUATED PRICE ‐$ (TOTAL)

*Although the total evaluated price may exceed $45M, the maximum contract value SHALL NOT exceed $45M over the life of the contract**Total Price of Seed project. In addition, RS Means breakdown required IAW Solicitation Section F.3.(a)(1) Submission

Requirements

BLFH9K REPLACE SIDING, RBC PUMP HOUSE, BUILDING 3046, Kings Bay, GA

Evaluated Coefficient Price

(iii) Price for CLIN 0001, on DD1155 page 3 and Price for Seed Project on page 129. Unit pricing information shall be derived from R.S. Means.

(iv) Bonding Letter. Offeror shall submit a letter from its Bonding Company indicating that it has a single award bonding capacity of at least $2,000,000 and the ability to bond multiple projects.

(v) Copy of current registration and completed/updated Annual Representations and Certifications on the SAM website, www.sam.gov.

(vi) Verification of VETS 4212 Reporting

(vii) Clearly identify names, address and email address of those authorized to make decisions on behalf of your company for this project and where correspondence for this project should be sent.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of applying perspective coefficient rate for each SLIN and calculating an evaluation price for each area. The Total amount for SLINS 000101 through 000108 will be added to the Total amount of the seed project. These estimates will be used to calculate a Total Evaluated Price. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.”

(b) Technical Factors:

(1) Factor 1, Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

Construction Experience: Submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP.

RELEVANT PROJECT: For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as new construction or repair/renovation completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP with a construction value of approximately $10,000 to $2,000,000, and shall demonstrate experience on multi-trade (two (2) or more of the following, but not limited to: electrical, mechanical, roofing, paving, painting, plumbing, etc.) construction or repair of facilities. While the relevant construction value is $10,000 to $2,000,000 as shown above, at least two (2) of the submitted projects must be valued at $500,000 or higher to demonstrate experience working projects of differing magnitudes.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole should not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors should submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered.

Offerors who submit relevant projects that demonstrate experience self-performing relevant features of work may receive a higher rating than those who do not demonstrate self-performance.

(2) Factor 2 – Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements

If a completed Contractor Performance Appraisal Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1 for construction experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment

10) for each project included in Factor 1 for construction experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Daniel Hinsley, Contract Specialist, daniel.hinsley@navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.

In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors who do not have relevant past performance history will receive an ACCEPTABLE rating.

(3) Factor 3, Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required.

EMR, DART and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data. If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART and TRC rates, for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA, DART, and TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work. The offeror will describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels. Additionally, the contactor will describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two pages.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable

Case (TRC) Rates

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three previous complete calendar years the offeror will submit EMR. If no EMR exists, the offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate explaining why not. If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of this selection factor. The board will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA DART and TRC, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA DART and TRC rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART and TRC rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety: The offeror will describe their plan to evaluate their safety performance and that of potential subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(4) Other Sources of Information Available to the Government: Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

(4) Factor 4, Technical Solution:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution that meets the requirements of the RFP and that demonstrates the Offeror's ability to successfully carry out construction projects in NSB Kings Bay, GA. Include the following:

Technical solution to construction sequencing and scheduling

Technical solution to performing construction work at Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay, Georgia, including consideration for logistics, local policies and procedures, permitting, and any other aspects of work that the Offeror feels are critical to a successful project. Address the following in the technical solution:

Access to Strategic Weapons Facility Atlantic (SWFLANT) (Controlled, Limited Areas) Access to Waterfront Restricted Area SWFLANT Special Security Procedures

Technical solution to the phase-in plan shall include the following:

Identify a plan of action and timeline for planning, execution, personnel, corporate resources, communication, procuring material, scheduling of accomplishments, training, etc., for the specified work upon issuance of the contract.

A personnel plan, including a plan of action and timeline to ensure all personnel requirements (certifications, permits, and security requirements, training) are met.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation

The Government will evaluate the narrative considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the requirements of the JOC and the ability to carry out construction projects in this project location. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the RFP.

(End of Summary of Changes)