Solicitation Amendment 0005.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DLQ-9 PODS and associated hardware
- Solicitation number
- N6893618R0030
About this file
This document contains an amendment to a solicitation and details regarding a related federal contract opportunity. Amendment 0005 to solicitation N6893618R0030 provides answers to two questions from industry, denying a requested material substitution and correcting two connector part numbers on associated drawings. The related federal contract opportunity is for DLQ-9 PODS and associated hardware from the Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command Naval Air Warfare Center. Interested offerors are provided time to review requirements and drawings prior to the final RFP's expected release on March 16, 2020. Questions regarding the draft RFP are due by March 11, 2020.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 18R0030 Amendment 6.docx | DOCX document | |
| 18R0030 Amendment 4.docx | DOCX document | |
| N6893618R0030 Solicitation Amendment 3.docx | DOCX document | |
| 18R0030 Solicitation Amendment 2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation Amendment.docx | DOCX document | |
| N6893618R0030 Solicitation.docx | DOCX document | |
| Draft RFP.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N6893618R0030
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM
The following have been added by full text:
AMENDMENT 5 Q&A
Q.1. There are quite a few formed parts with the package called out as 6061AL. We are requesting a deviation from this to allow for 5052 instead.
A.1. No, this request is denied. The Government cannot switch materials as this would void the airworthiness data.
Q.2. There is a typo for the connectors found on drawings 1611AS12898 & 1611AS12899. These drawings call out connector part numbers MS27475Y14T97P & MS27475Y10T35P. Should there be an “E” in both of these part numbers vice the “T”?
A.2. Yes, both part numbers should be an “E”. The drawings have been updated and are attached to this amendment.
(End of Summary of Changes) image1.wmf
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .