N65236-17-R-0007_ESSS_Industry Day Presentation.pdf

Space and Naval Warfare Systems

Center Atlantic

Pre-Acquisition Planning Industry Day

Emergent and Special Security Solutions (ESSS)

RFP N65236-17-R-0007

May 22, 2018

Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release (22 May 2018)

Agenda

0700 Check-in

0800 Opening Remarks

0805 ESSS (N65236-17-R-0007) Overview – Background / Scope of Work

0900 ESSS Acquisition Strategy Overview – Contracts

0915 Break

1000 Question and Answer Session

1030 Adjourn

Contents

▼ Purpose

▼ Introduction and Administrative Notes

▼ Contract Strategy General Overview

▼ Part I – Technical Overview C2ISR and Integration - Force Protection Solutions Division Overview

Performance Work Statement Overview

− PWS 2.0 Places of Performance

− PWS 3.1 Systems Environment

− PWS 3.2 Relevant Experience

− PWS 3.2.2 Emergent Response Use Cases

− PWS 3.2.3 & 3.2.4 Vendor Experience

− PWS 3.3 Integrated Solutions

Contents (Contd)

▼ Part II – Solicitation Overview Anticipated Acquisition Strategy

Draft Evaluation Factors − Factor A Gate Criteria

− Factor B Technical Capability

− Factor C Vendor Certifications

− Factor D Small Business Participation

− Factor E Past Performance

− Factor F Cost/Price

Basis for Award

DoD Source Selection Procedures

Purpose

▼ The purpose of this event is to provide interested offerors with:

An introduction to key players involved in this acquisition

Insight into the SPAWARSYSCEN Atlantic’s Emergent and Special Security Solutions requirements

Specific information on the anticipated contract requirements

An advanced look at the solicitation’s anticipated submission requirements and draft evaluation criteria

An opportunity to network with the Government’s contracts and technical team

An opportunity to ask questions and provide feedback to the Government

Introduction and Administrative Notes

▼ This is an Unclassified briefing

▼ Questions are encouraged…please use the 3x5 cards provided to record all questions. This will help ensure non-attribution and also provide us with accurate minutes of the event.

▼ The last portion of the agenda will address questions and answers.

We will attempt to answer as many questions as possible during the allotted question and answer period at the end of the event. This is not a forum for open discussions.

▼ A written copy of questions and answers (along with copies of the slides and any other info) will be posted on the SPAWAR e- Commerce website (https://e-commerce.sscno.nmci.navy.mil) as soon as possible.

REMINDER: Government’s final position on this requirement will always be in WRITING https://e-commerce.sscno.nmci.navy.mil/

Contract Strategy General Overview

▼ Recent developments:

Market Research conducted via e-commerce website/FBO: Posted 17 Nov closed on 11 Dec 17.

Based on Market Research, procurement will be solicited as full and open competition.

Pre-solicitation draft RFP in process.

Part I – Technical Overview

SPAWARSYSCEN Atlantic

Emergent and Special Security Solutions (ESSS)

C2ISR and Integration Department Force Protection Solutions Division

Provide state-of-the-art electronic security and emergency management solutions that protect our military and government critical infrastructure, personnel, assets, and resources. Our products provide enhanced force protection at Navy and Marine Corps bases worldwide. Primary Information Management, Information Technology and Command & Control services and solutions provider for CNIC N6 and NAVFAC CIO, increasing efficiency and security of Information Technology services across the entire Navy Shore enterprise.

CNIC/NAVFAC/USMC/EURAFSWA/WHCA/USSS/NGA/PSEAG/MISC NAVY TENNANT COMMANDS

Division Head

Naval Enterprise Solutions IPT

Presidential/Joint Solutions and

Applications IPT

USMC ESS IPTNaval AT/FP IPT

Cybersecurity

Lead

Acronyms:

CNIC – Commander Naval Installation Command NAVFAC – Naval Facilities Engineering Command USMC – United States Marine Corps EURAFSWA – Europe Africa Southwest Asia WHCA – White Douse Communications Agency USSS – United States Secret Service NGA – National Geospatial Agency PSAEG – Physical Security Enterprise Action Group

Chief Engineer

ESS & EMS

▼ PWS 2.0 Places of Performance

This work will be performed at Government installations worldwide and may include Iraq and Afghanistan

Contractor offices within 30 miles of Charleston and the Washington Navy Yard

Contractor facility requires Top Secret facility clearance

Facilities must be able to produce and store SECRET / Not Releasable to Foreign Nationals (NOFORN)

Lab space for mock-ups and testing within a SECRET space

Performance Work Statement (PWS) Overview

PWS 3.1 Systems Environment

Orders placed under this contract may require support in one or more of the complex environments or requirements listed in this section. This is a minimum list of unique environments and other conditions that illustrate the complexity of systems support:

▼ Intelligence Community Directive 705 (ICD 705) Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) Requirements

▼ Special Access Programs/Special Access Areas (SAP/SAA) Special Access Privilege Requirements

▼ OCONUS-Logistics Experience with delivering and tracking secure products overseas

▼ OCONUS-Resource Management Experience with deploying workforce overseas

▼ High Risk Targets Ability to quickly deploy systems in support of critical requirements subject to terrorist attack

▼ Resource Escalation Ability to provide surge support during emergent requirements

PWS 3.2 Relevant Experience

The work to be performed requires the Contractor to have a broad technical understanding of Electronic Security Systems (ESS) and Emergency Management Systems (EMS) to provide turn-key solutions and/or related support services.

Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) – including perimeter protection

Access Control Systems (ACS)

Video Surveillance Systems (VSS) and/or Video Management Systems (VMS)

Physical Security Information Management Systems (PSIMS)

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosive (CBRNE) Systems

Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD)

E9-1-1/NG 9-1-1

Mass Notification Systems (MNS)

Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (CUAS)

PWS 3.2.2 Emergent Response Use Cases

▼ Security Management System Head End Replacement at an Intelligence Community Facility Due to unplanned disaster Requires emergent, TS/SCI response to restore security operations

▼ Emerging Classified Mission at DoD Base In response to emerging threats to the US or its allies ESS protection of spaces established to accommodate classified IT (Intel/Ops) solutions is required Requires emergent, TS/SCI response to develop and deploy a security solution to protect IT space

▼ Perimeter Intrusion Detection System (PIDS) Restoration PIDS functionality destroyed due to unplanned natural disaster Scope of required repairs far exceeds that of the maintenance contract Requires emergent response to restore the integrity of the secure base perimeter in high threat environment

▼ Perimeter Vulnerability at Critical National Security Facility Vulnerability in perimeter protection system was exposed as a result of a physical security breach that drew the attention of media Requires emergent, TS/SCI response to develop and deploy a security solution to reduce threat exposure

▼ Biological Threat Emerging chemical threat agent found at another DoD facility Due to concern relative to proliferation of attack at other DoD facilities, sponsor requires an upgrade to their system/sensors to detect, scan, and protect packages delivered to their remote delivery site.

▼ Functional and technical expertise as well as approved dealer status or team member with the vendors listed in the PWS for the following technologies

ESS / EMS Equipment

CBRNE Equipment

Information Technology

PWS 3.2.3 & 3.2.4 Vendor Experience

▼ This contract will allow an integrated solutions approach across the entire life cycle of ESS/EMS/CBRNE implementation

▼ Task Orders awarded under this contract could include any one and / or all of the following tasks:

Design

Identification & Procurement of Hardware / Software required for Integration

Installation

Testing

Sustainment

▼ Task Orders could include small stand alone solutions as well as fully integrated enterprise type requirements

▼ 3.3.1 Supplies and Material / Equipment Support

▼ 3.3.2 Services

PWS 3.3 Integrated Solutions

Part II – Solicitation Overview

ESSS Anticipated Acquisition Strategy and Draft Evaluation Criteria Summary

Anticipated Acquisition Strategy

Contract Type: • Services & Solutions

• Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)

All services, supplies, and solutions authorized and funded by placement of delivery/task orders

• Single Award Contract (SAC)

Pricing Arrangement: • Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) Contractors must have approved accounting system.

• Firm Fixed Price (FFP)

Period of Performance: • 5 Year Ordering Period

Target Solicitation/Award Dates: • Solicitation Issued - 4th QTR FY18

• Proposals Received - 1st QTR FY19

• Contract Award - 4th QTR FY19

Competitive Environment: • Full and Open Competition

NAICS • 541330, Size Standard: $38.5M

Security Access Requirements • TS with SCI access

Draft Evaluation Factors

▼ The Government plans to evaluate the following factors as a part of this source selection:

Factor A (Gate Criteria) − Subfactor A1: Top Secret (TS) Facility Clearance (FCL)

− Subfactor A2: TS/Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) Access Contract

Reference Verification

− Subfactor A3: Prime SECRET Level of Safeguarding Contract Reference Verification

Factor B (Technical Capability)

− Subfactor C1: Systems Planning and Engineering Support

− Subfactor C2: Systems Installation, Integration, and Implementation Support

− Subfactor C3: Cybersecurity/Risk Management Framework Support

Factor C - Vendor Certifications

Factor D (Small Business Participation)

Factor E (Past Performance)

Factor F (Cost/Price Proposal)

NOTE: A proposal that receives a rating of “Unacceptable” in any non-cost factor will result in the entire proposal being determined "Unacceptable" and ineligible for award.

▼ Factor A – Gate Criteria

▼ Subfactor A1: TS Facility Clearance Level (FCL)

All Prime offerors shall possess a current, active TS facility clearance level at the time the solicitation closes and at time of contract award for the facilities to be utilized in performance of the basic contract PWS requirements. All offerors shall therefore propose the specific facilities to be utilized to perform the basic contract

PWS requirements on a one page Facilities Summary document identifying the TS facility by name, location, and CAGE code registered with the Defense Security

Services (DSS). Offerors shall also provide the signed and approved Department of

Defense Security Agreement Forms (DD441-1) associated with the specific facilities proposed.

▼ Factor A – Gate Criteria (Contd)

▼ Subfactor A2: TS/Sensitive Compartmented Information (TS/SCI) Access

As identified under Factor B (Technical Capability), offerors shall submit up to five (5) relevant contract references meeting both the TS/SCI Access security classification level and invoiced value criteria identified under Factor B. Of the maximum five (5) contract references to be submitted, all contract references from the Prime and all contract references for each team member proposed and identified in RFP Team Member Summary (Attachment #TBD) shall be for contracts which required access to TS/SCI security classification level data for performance of the contract reference requirements.

To verify compliance with the Subfactor A2 requirement, offerors shall submit the TS/SCI Access Contract Reference Verification Form (Attachment #TBD) for each contract reference proposed under Factor B and shall provide a copy of the signed Department of Defense Security Classification Specification (DD254) for each submitted contract reference. NOTE: the official DD254 must be marked Top Secret in Block 1A of Facility Clearance required.

▼ Factor A – Gate Criteria (Contd)

▼ Subfactor A3: Prime SECRET Level of Safe Guarding Contract Reference Verification

All Prime submitted contract reference DD254s shall have Block 1B of the DD254 identify a Level of Safeguarding at the SECRET level with Blocks 11. c “Receive and Generate Classified Material, and 11d. Fabricate, Modify, or Store Classified Hardware checked Yes.

NOTE: In the event a contract reference submitted does not meet the TS/SCI Access security classification level criteria, or meet the Prime SECRET Level of Safe Guarding criteria, the contract reference will not be considered or evaluated and its associated invoice value shall be deducted from the cumulative invoice total.

If an offeror receives a rating of Unacceptable under any Factor A subfactor, the offeror shall have failed the Factor A Gate Criteria and will be eliminated from consideration for award without further evaluation.

▼ Factor B – Technical Capability ▼ Offerors shall submit the RFP Team Summary (Attachment #TBD) which identifies the

Prime contractor and up to two (2) team members proposed to perform the Factor B Subfactors (i.e. B1-B3) with a maximum total of three team members including the Prime. The Team Summary attachment shall identify which of the Factor B Subfactors (may be more than one Subfactor) the proposed team member(s) is proposed to perform.

▼ In order to evaluate the proposed team’s technical capability to perform the Factor B requirements, offerors shall submit a maximum of five (5) current and relevant contract references for contract efforts performed which are similar in scope to the Factor B subfactor requirements.

Current is defined as a contract performed within the last three years from the date of issuance of the solicitation.

Relevant is defined as no more than five (5) contract references in total with a cumulative invoiced value equal to or exceeding $25M. At least one of the Prime’s contract references shall have an invoiced value equal to or exceeding $8M.

▼ Factor B – Technical Capability The Government will evaluate each offeror’s (prime and each team member)

Technical Capability based upon the degree to which the submitted experiential contract references identify current, relevant work to Subfactors B1-B3. The more relevant the demonstrated experience is to the requirements, the more valuable the experience is to the Government.

▼ The Government will evaluate the following Subfactors:

Subfactor B1: Systems Planning and Engineering Support (PWS Paragraph

3.3.2.1, 3.3.2.2, and 3.3.2.3)

Subfactor B2: Systems Installation, Integration, and Implementation Support

PWS Paragraphs 3.3.1, 3.3.2.4 through 3.3.2.11)

Subfactor B3: Cybersecurity/Risk Management Framework Support (PWS Paragraph 3.3.2.12)

▼ Factor C – Vendor Certifications

Offerors shall identify their status as a Value Added Reseller (VAR), certified integrator, or other manufacturer approved dealer certification, of each of the Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) listed in PWS Paragraph 3.2.3.

Offerors shall possess certifications in at least six (6) of the ten (10) COTS OEMs listed in PWS Paragraph 3.2.3 to receive a rating of Acceptable. Failure to possess certifications in at least 6 of the systems will result in an assigned deficiency for Factor B.

▼ Factor C - Vendor Certifications

AMAG Intrusion Detection, Access Control, and Video Management Solutions

Lenel Intrusion Detection, Access Control, and Video Management Solutions

Software House Intrusion Detection, Access Control, and Video Management Solutions

Honeywell Intrusion Detection, Access Control, and Video Management Solutions

Monitor Dynamics Intrusion Detection, Access Control, and Video Management Solutions

Axis Cameras, Encoders/Decoders

Bosch Encoders/Decoders, Controllers, Recorders, and Video Management Solutions

Verint Encoders/Decoders, Controllers, Recorders, and Video Management Solutions

Genetec Encoders/Decoders, Controllers, Recorders, and Video Management Solutions

Milestone System xProtect Controllers, Recorders, and Video Management System

▼ Factor D - Small Business Participation

All prime offerors (Large AND Small businesses) shall submit a Small Business Participation Plan. Offerors will be evaluated on the extent they commit to small business participation in the contract. Small business primes are to include their own planned effort.

▼ Factor E: Past Performance

▼ Factor F: Cost/Price

Draft Factors’ Order of Relative Importance

▼ Factors’ Order of Relative Importance Factor B (Technical Capability): Subfactor B1 (Systems Planning and

Engineering Support) is more important than Subfactor B2 (Systems Installation, Integration, and Implementation Support). Subfactors B1 and B2 are each more important than B3 (Cybersecurity/Risk Management Framework Support).

Technical Factors: Factor B (Technical Capability) is more important than Factor C (Vendor Certifications)

NOTE: A proposal that receives a rating of “Unacceptable” in any non-cost factor will result in the entire proposal being determined "Unacceptable" and ineligible for award.

Basis for Award

▼ “Best Value” utilizing tradeoff source selection process among cost and non-cost factors Evaluation factors other than cost, when combined, are significantly more important than cost/price; however, cost/price is an important factor and should be considered by offerors when preparing proposals

DoD Source Selection Procedures

▼ The objective of the evaluation is to make a source selection decision based on any strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, and deficiencies identified in the offeror’s proposal. See the DoD source selection procedures guide at:

http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USA004370-14-DPAP.pdf http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USA004370-14-DPAP.pdf

Break

▼ Reminder - Please submit your questions if you have not already done so.

▼ We will break until 9:45.

▼ The Question and Answer Session will commence at that time.

Please note that all questions and the official answers will be posted on ecommerce

Closing Remarks

▼ Thank you for attending!

▼ A compilation of all questions and answers discussed today and any questions we may have been unable to address along with copies of the slides and any other information will be posted on the SPAWAR e-Commerce website: https://e-commerce.sscno.nmci.navy.mil.

▼ For questions, please forward to: elizabeth.norris@navy.mil.

REMINDER: Government’s final position on this requirement will be in WRITING

Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release (22 May 2018) https://e-commerce.sscno.nmci.navy.mil/ mailto:Elizabeth.Norris@navy.mil