RFP N6449823R40040002 CONFORMED THROUGH AMENDMENT 0002.pdf

CODE

(Hour)

PAGE(S)

until 12:00 PM local time 06 Mar 2023

X

A X B X C X D

EX

X

G F 188 - 207

208 - 227 X H 228 - 232 craig.wright@navy.mil

RATING PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUED BY

(Date)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

DO-A3 1 232

(If other than Item 7)

15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

AND

ADDRESS

SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

OF

OFFEROR

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS

IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER

SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

18. OFFER DATE

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

2. CONTRACT NO.

N64498 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

See Item 7

9. Sealed offers in original and 1 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and

N/A - DoD Safe conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)

CRAIG T. WRIGHT 215-897-8275

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS

1 - 10 11 - 17

X I CONTRACT CLAUSES

DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X

PACKAGING AND MARKING

18 - 70 71 - 72

J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

73 - 76 77 - 78

X K

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA 79 - 91 X

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) 92 - 99 X M

L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

FACILITY

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

X

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE

EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)

CODE CODE

B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

100 - 185

PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER PHILA

CODE 02222, CRAIG WRIGHT

215-897-8275, CRAIG.WRIGHT@NAVY.MIL

5001 SOUTH BROAD STREET

PHILADELPHIA PA 19112

215-897-8275

FAX:

TEL:

FAX:

TEL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

186 - 187

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.5. DATE ISSUED

19 Jan 2023

4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

[ X ]

3. SOLICITATION NO.

N6449823R4004

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

AMENDMENT 0002

The purpose of the subject Amendment 0002 is to perform the following:

1. Revise Section C, SOW Section 12.5 Non-Key Personnel, to replace asterisk removed under Amendment 0001 as follows: “Computer Engineer Level III* (EC3).” In regards to the asterisk, this category specifies within the same section the following: “*CSWF position, see Section 12.6.”

2. Revise Section L.2.1 PAGE NUMBERS AND LIMITS to delete the “Quality Assurance Acceptance Letter” bullet point on RFP page 201.

3. Revise Section L.3.2.1 SUBFACTOR A – FACILITIES first paragraph sentence from, “Offerors must demonstrate that they possess or have the ability to obtain facilities and equipment requirements of as specified in Paragraph 14.4 of the Statement of Work.” To “Offerors must demonstrate that they possess or have the ability to obtain facilities and equipment requirements of as specified in Paragraph 14.3 of the Statement of Work.”

4. Revise L.3.2.4 SUBFACTOR D – CORPORATE EXPERIENCE to remove all instances of the word “Modernization.”

5. Section L, Section L.3.2.4 SUBFACTOR D – CORPORATE EXPERIENCE has been updated to replace the requirement for examples to have been performed within the past three (3) years to within the past five (5) years.

6. Section L, Section L.3.3.2 SMALL BUSINESS COMMITMENT PAST PERFORMANCE has been revised to update references of three (3) years to five (5) years.

7. Section L, Section L.3.4 VOLUME IV: FACTOR 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE has been updated to replace the requirement for examples to have been performed within the past

8. Revise Section M.2, EVALUATION APPROACH, FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL, SUBFACTOR A – FACILITIES, to remove repetition of items already listed under Section L L.3.2.1 SUBFACTOR A – FACILITIES.

9. Update SAM.GOV Notice ID N6449823R4004 for the following:

a. Attachment 4 - DD254

b. Conformed copy of solicitation N6449823R4004.

10. Answer potential Offeror questions received in regards to solicitation N6449823R4004.

The answers to questions received are below:

59. Section L3.2.4 Subfactor D – Corporate Experience (page 205) states that examples of corporate experience should be within the past three years. Will the Government consider extending this period to five years in order for non-incumbents to equally compete?

ANSWER: Section L, Section L.3.2.4 SUBFACTOR D – CORPORATE EXPERIENCE has been updated to replace the requirement for examples to have been performed within the past

60. L.3.4 Volume IV: Factor 3 – Past Performance (page 207) states that past performance contracts must have been performed within the last 3 years. Will the Government consider extending this period to five years in order for non-incumbents equally compete?

ANSWER: Section L, Section L.3.4 VOLUME IV: FACTOR 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE has been updated to replace the requirement for examples to have been performed within the past three (3) years to within the past five (5) years.

61. For requirements of RFP paragraph L-227-H001, SPD please confirm that the requirement for SDP development, paragraphs (a) and (b) applies only at the TO level and not required in proposal response. Also please confirm the paragraph (c) does not apply to our proposal response page limitation.

ANSWER: Confirmed, these SDP development requirements shall be determined and required at the Task Order (TO) level, and are not required for this proposal.

62. On pages 47 and 48 under C-227-H007 Software Development Plan paragraph (b). ISO/IEC/IEEE 15289:2017 has been replaced by ISO/IEC/IEEE 15289:2019. Should ISO/IEC/IEEE 15289:2017 or ISO/IEC/IEEE 15289:2019 be used for development of the

SDP?

ANSWER: The Contractor shall refer to the latest version of this standard when submitting their SDP, which is only required at the Task Order level per the response to Question 12.

63. Page 205 of 224, paragraph L.3.2.4, Section L Paragraph L.3.2.4 of Section L (on page 205 of 224) includes the following sentence, "Offerors shall not provide more than five (5) contract examples to address all of the referenced Modernization Programs." The RFP SOW (Section C) does not reference any specific Modernization Programs. Would the Government provide a list of Modernization Programs that Offerors are to provide corporate experience?

ANSWER: RFP Section L.3.2.4 SUBFACTOR D – CORPORATE EXPERIENCE has been revised to remove “Modernization.” Please refer to the systems and equipment listed in RFP Section C, SOW Section 1.1.

64. Page 218 of 224, Section L-227-H001 - On page 218 of the RFP, section L-227-H001

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND CMMI OR EQUIVALENT EXPERIENCE

(NAVSEA) (OCT 2018), the RFP asks for: "A description of previous relevant experience, within the past TBD at the Task Order Level months in developing software of the similar size and complexity as that required under the statement of work." Describe any previous relevant CMMI® or equivalent model-based process maturity appraisals performed within the past 24 months."

Are the above required for this proposal, or will they be required at the task order competition level? If they are required for this proposal, SOW paragraph 3.2.5 Computer Programming, Software Engineering and Network Support does not define in any detail software development tasking that can be used as a measure of size or complexity. Can the Government provide an example of a software development task?

ANSWER: Software Development plans, as they apply to provision L-227-H001, are not required as part of the base contract solicitation. Software Development Plans will be evaluated at the Task Order Level as required.

65. Page 219 of 224, Section L-227-HOO2 - On page 219 of the RFP, section L-227-H002 SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018), the RFP asks for an SDP rationale. This rationale is subject to the page limitations of the technical proposal. Will the government allow this rationale to be submitted as an appendix to the proposal, and not subject to the page limitations?

ANSWER: Provision L-227-H002 is intended for use at the Task Order level when a specific software development requirement exists.

66. Section L.3.2.1: Subfactor A – Facilities (page 203) refers the offeror to Paragraph 14.4, however, there does not appear to be a Paragraph 14.4. Will the Government please clarify?

ANSWER: Reference has been corrected to state Section 14.3 Contractor Facilities.

67. Section L.3.2.4: Subfactor D – Corporate Experience (page 205) states “Offerors should provide specific accomplishment experience in the Programs listed in SOW paragraph 2.”

Paragraph 2 appears to be a list of applicable documents/reference. Will the Government please clarify?

ANSWER: This has been revised to state SOW paragraph 1.1, which lists the programs/systems that are covered under this contract.

68. Section L3.2.4 Subfactor D – Corporate Experience (page 205) states “Offerors shall not provide more than five (5) contract examples to address all of the referenced Modernization Programs”. Will the Government consider increasing the number of contract examples given the large number of systems and programs cover in this solicitation?

ANSWER: The Government will not increase the number of contract examples.

69. Section L.3.2.4 Subfactor D – Corporate Experience instructions 10 And 11 (Page 205) require the contractor to provide all completed task orders for each cited contract and provide their proposed value versus total cost value and their proposed completion date vs. actual completion date. This list could be quite lengthy. Would the Government consider omitting this list of Task Order information from the page limit for Factor 1: Technical?

ANSWER: The list of Task Order information will remain as part of the stated page limit.

70. May the QMS Level 1 and Level II procedures (Page 204) be provided as a separate .pdf attachment to Volume II?

ANSWER: The QMS Level 1 and Level II procedures may be provided as a separate attachment, and this attachment may be omitted from the page count limit.

71. RFP L.3.2.4 Subfactor D Corporate Experience includes a detailed discussion regarding experience in systems listed in SOW 1.1, experience in programs listed in SOW paragraph 2, and eight technical areas of SOW paragraph 3. This Corporate Experience discussion is included in the Technical volume page allocation of 35 pages while the Past Performance page allocation is unlimited. Would the government please consider removing the Corporate Experience discussion from Volume II page allocation?

ANSWER: Under RFP Amendment 0001, the page limit for Volume II has been increased to 50 pages. Therefore, the Government will not remove Corporate Experience from the Volume II page limit.

72. RFP L.3.2.4 Subfactor D Corporate Experience includes a discussion regarding programs listed in SOW paragraph 2, however SOW paragraph 2 is a listing of Applicable Documents.

Would the government please clarify.

ANSWER: Please see the response to Question #67.

73. RFP L.3.2.4 Subfactor D Corporate Experience includes a detailed discussion regarding experience including information for each DO executed. The requirement to detail each DO will require multiple pages for each citation. Would the government please consider removing the Corporate Experience discussion from Volume II page allocation?

ANSWER: Please see the response to Question #69.

74. Paragraph 1.3.2.1 on page 203 SUBFACTOR A – FACILITIES on page 220 refer to paragraph 14.4 of the Statement of Work. Paragraph 14.4 does not exist. Please confirm these sections should refer to paragraph 14.3 on page 34.

ANSWER: Please see the response to Question #66.

75. RFP N6449823R4004 - 41-43 MAC FOLLOW-ON 203 of 224 L.3.2.1 SUBFACTOR A – FACILITIES The Government states "must demonstrate that they possess or have the ability to obtain facilities and equipment requirements of as specified in Paragraph 14.4 of the Statement of Work." Does the Government intend to state that “Offerors must demonstrate that they possess or have the ability to obtain facilities and equipment requirements as specified in Paragraph 14.3 of the Statement of Work."?

ANSWER: Please see the response to Question #66.

76. RFP N6449823R4004 - 41-43 MAC FOLLOW-ON Page 220 of 224 M.2 EVALUATION APPROACH SUBFACTOR A - FACILITIES The Government states "Proposals will be evaluated based upon its possession or the ability to obtain facilities and equipment as specified in Paragraph 14.4 of the Statement of Work." Does the Government intend to state that "Proposals will be evaluated based upon its possession or the ability to obtain facilities and equipment as specified in Paragraph 14.3 of the Statement of Work."?

ANSWER: All references to Section C, SOW Section 14.4 have been revised to state Section 14.3.

77. RFP N6449823R4004 - 41-43 MAC FOLLOW-ON Pages 211-214 of 224 L.2. PROPOSAL

FORMAT 252.204-7019 NOTICE OF NIST SP 800-171 DOD ASSESSMENT

REQUIREMENTS (MAR 2022) (b) Requirement. (1) RFP states (in Section L) 252.204- 7019 (c) (1) the Offeror shall verify that summary level scores of a current NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment (...) are posted in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) (...)

Would the Government like the inclusion of pages 211-214 in Section K - Reps and Certs?

ANSWER: The inclusion of these pages is not required per the solicitation.

78. RFP N6449823R4004 - 41-43 MAC FOLLOW-ON Page 204 of 224 L.3.2.1 SUBFACTOR

A – FACILITIES The Government states "The above information may be submitted as an attachment to the Offerors’ proposal, and the attachment is excluded from the page limit described above.” Does the Government intend those responses to ALL numbered items 1 -3 are to be submitted as attachments and excluded from page count?

ANSWER: Yes, items 1-3 in RFP Section L.3.2.1 Facilities are to be submitted as Attachments and are excluded from the page count.

79. RFP N6449823R4004 - 41-43 MAC FOLLOW-ON Page 219 of 224 L-227-H002 SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Submission of SDP L-227-H002 (b) states Offerors shall also submit an SDP rationale (...) and that the SDP rationale is subject to the technical proposal page limitation of the solicitation and shall not exceed 20 pages. Would the Government allow BOTH the SDP and the SDP Rationale to be outside the page limitation of Volume II?

ANSWER: Please see the response to Question #61.

80. Would the government please consider adding an Administrative Assistant to the approved labor category list?

ANSWER: The Government will not add to the approved labor category list.

81. SOW Section 12.5 Non-Key Personnel - Computer Engineers, Page 30, Why are Computer Engineers asterisked?

ANSWER: The asterisk in Sow Section 12.5 Non-Key Personnel was removed under Solicitation Amendment 0001. However, upon further review, the asterisk has been put back in its original position, with an explanation that these are Cybersecurity Workforce (CSWF) labor categories.

82. L.3.2.4 Corporate Experience, Experience examples, Page 205, five (5) Contract examples are required. No page limit for each is given. What is the page limit per contract example and are these pages part of the technical proposal 35 page limit? Can the contract examples be placed in an appendix?

ANSWER: Please see response to Question #71.

83. How does the Agency plan to evaluate Subfactor A, considering that no manufacturing/shop capability is defined in the SOW or elsewhere in RFP?

ANSWER: The evaluation criteria for Subfactor A, Facilities, are detailed in Sections L.3.2.1 Subfactor A – Facilities, and M.2 Evaluation Approach, Factor 1 – Technical, Subfactor A – Facilities. The latter has been revised.

84. L.3.2.4, 2nd paragraph says what "should" be indicated. Considering evaluation is acceptable/non-acceptable based on minimum requirements, can the Agency confirm it meant to use FAR 2.101 definition of "should" instead of "shall"?

ANSWER: The Government confirms that it meant to use “should.”

85. What is the purpose of Major Subcontractors (L.1, pg 200), considering that they are defined based on total proposed contract value that is not required?

ANSWER: Please use the program ceiling amount of $496,122,347 of which ODCs total $227,784,120.

86. Since no cost proposal is required, is there any requirement in the RFP to support how the offeror will demonstrate capability to meet 52.219-14 (Deviation 2021-O0008), beyond the general representation that one will comply?

ANSWER: No, there is no such requirement.

87. M.2 Subfactor A - Facilities evaluates physical facilities, all of which provide an off-ship/shop work capability. Does Agency require capability to accomplish shipboard work (C.3.3.2.3) be described, and if so, where in Section L is it to be done?

ANSWER: Please see response to Question #83.

88. How will Agency evaluate risk of obtaining resources, facilities and processes for M.2 Subfactor E - Technical and Management Approach, Start-up Plan?

ANSWER: Subfactor E, Technical and Management Approach, item e., Start-up Plan, will be evaluated per the evaluation criteria provided in Section M.2 Evaluation Approach, Factor 1 – Technical, Subfactor E – Technical and Management Approach, item e., Start-up Plan.

89. L.3.2.5 Subfactor E - Technical and Management Approach, c. Subcontractor Management requires Offeror to discuss "...the extent of the subcontractor's involvement in the performance of the contract", but there nothing on how the extent will be evaluated in M.2 Subfactor E - Technical and Management Approach. Will extent of subcontractor involvement be evaluated and if so, in what terms are its size or scale to be described?

ANSWER: Yes, subcontractor involvement will be evaluated as required by the solicitation.

90. L.3.2.4 Subfactor D - Corporate Experience, 3rd para, item 9 requires Offeror to note reference to SOW paragraph number. At the 3rd level are 23 paragraphs and at the lowest level, which varies to 3rd, 4th and 5th levels, are 111 paragraphs. Is it acceptable to Agency to reference at 3rd level (i.e. 3.6.1, 3.2.5, etc.)?

ANSWER: Yes, this is acceptable.

91. Would the Government confirm that L.3.3.2 Small Business Commitment Past Performance requirement does not apply to small business Offerors?

ANSWER: L.3.3.2, Small Business Commitment Past Performance does indeed apply to small business Offerors.

92. RFP Document Page 74 of 224, 2 (g) - Does the Small Business Subcontracting Goal of 20% apply to small business prime Offerors?

ANSWER: Small businesses are exempt from submitting subcontracting plans per FAR 19.702(b)(1).

93. RFP N6449823R4004 - 41-43 MAC FOLLOW-ON and Attachment 1 - Pre Award Survey of

Prospective Contractor Accounting System Checklist Page 178 of 224 Section J, Attachment

1. Would the Government please clarify if Attachment 1 is due at proposal submission and, if so, should it be included in Volume I or is Attachment 1 to be submitted post award?

ANSWER: Attachment 1, Pre-Award Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System Checklist, is provided in the event that your company does not have an approved accounting system, as is required for cost reimbursable type contracts. If required, Attachment 1 is due at time of proposal submission, and should be submitted as part of your cover letter.

94. Would the government provide a conformed copy of the RFP with the most recent

Amendment changes?

ANSWER: A conformed copy of the RFP with the most recent Amendment changes has been added to SAM.GOV.

95. Section L: 14.1.4 (page 33) states “The Contractor shall maintain Quality Management

System (QMS) acceptance from NAVSEA 09MP in accordance with NAVSEA Technical Specification 9090-310 (series) (Modernization work only).” Tech Spec 9090-310G (latest) does not require submission or acceptance by NAVSEA 09MP. Will the Government please clarify that should read acceptance by NAVSEA 04RP?

ANSWER: The latest revision of TS 9090-310 is rev H, which now requires QMS approval by NAVSEA 09MP, and generates the QA Acceptance Letter.

96. The RFP states that “QA acceptance letter” is exempt from the page count (Page 201).

However, Section L does not contain a requirement for QA acceptance letters. Are they required? If so, where should they be included?

ANSWER: A Quality Assurance Acceptance letter is not required. The list on page 201 has been updated to remove this reference.

97. RFP N6449823R4004 - 41-43 MAC FOLLOW-ON Page 200 of 224 L.2.1. PAGE NUMBERS AND LIMITS The bulleted list references a Quality Assurance Acceptance Letter as excluded from the page limitations; yet we are unable to locate any reference in the instructions as to where this Quality Assurance Acceptance Letter is to be included. Would the Government clarify in which Volume the Quality Assurance Letter is to be included?

ANSWER: Please see the response to Question #96.

98. L.2.1 (pg 201) excludes Quality Assurance Acceptance Letter, but nowhere in RFP is it requested. Is the letter required and who must acceptance be by? For reference, NAVSEA 04RP (now 09MP) has historically reviewed and approved contractor Quality Assurance systems/manuals.

ANSWER: Please see response to Question #96.

99. L.3.2.2 requires submittal of QMS meeting ASQ/ANSI/ISo 9001:2015 and C14.1.4 (pg 33) lists acceptance from NAVSEA 09MP in accordance with NSTS 9090-310 (series) for modernization work. Is acceptance of QMS required?

ANSWER: Please see response to Question #96.

100. How does the Agency plan to evaluate risk from reliance on experience of subcontractors to demonstrate M.2, Subfactor D - Corporate Experience?

ANSWER: The Government will evaluate Subfactor D – Corporate Experience in accordance with solicitation Section M.2. Subfactor D – Corporate Experience.

NOTES

1. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.304(c)(1)(ii), the Naval Surface Warfare Center Philadelphia Division (NSWCPD) proposes to award an Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Contract (MAC) to each and all qualifying Offerors. A qualifying Offeror is defined as a responsible Offeror whose offer/proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is considered to be technically acceptable in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in Section M and the Contracting Officer has no reason to believe would be likely to offer other than fair and reasonable pricing. Price or Cost will not be a factor in award of the IDIQ, however, price or cost will be considered as one of the factors in the selection decision for each task or delivery order under the

IDIQ.

2. This Multiple Award Contract (MAC) will expire either when the ordering term expires, or the cumulative total of all Task Orders (TOs) issued to all awardees equals the Government’s total program estimate of $496,122,347.

3. This procurement is being solicited unrestricted, with set-aside decisions to be made at the task order level.

4. The minimum contract award amount will be $500.00 of Hull, Mechanical, and Electrical Services (HM&E).

5. The Government Furnished Property will be provided at the Task Order level.

6. This is a competitive procurement. If the solicitation should result in a single offer, the Government reserves the right to re-solicit this procurement in order to enhance competition.

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0001 2,638,692 Hours Engineering and Technical Services

CPFF

In support of the Navy Modernizations of Hull, Mechanical and Electrical (HM&E) systems with an ordering period from date of contract award through 60 months after date of award. Technical services are further described in the Statement of Work (SOW).RESERVED FOR COST-PLUS-FIXED-FEE

(CPFF) LEVEL OF EFFORT (LOE) TYPE TASK ORDERS. NO PRICING

REQUIRED AT THIS TIME.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: R425

MAX COST

FIXED FEE

TOTAL MAX COST + FEE

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0002 53,127 Hours Engineering and Technical Services

FFP

In support of the Navy Modernizations of Hull, Mechanical and Electrical (HM&E) systems with an ordering period from date of contract award through 60 months after date of award. Technical services are further described in the Statement of Work (SOW). RESERVED FOR FIRM-FIXED-PRICE TYPE

TASK ORDERS WHEN APPLICABLE. NO PRICING REQUIRED AT THIS

TIME.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

MAX

NET AMT

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0003 1 Lot Technical Data - CDRLs

CPFF

In accordance with Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) A001-B001.

NOT SEPARATELY PRICED (NSP)

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0004 1 Lot Support Costs (Other Direct Costs)

COST

Includes material, travel, incidental subcontracting and other direct costs (ODCs) in support of Item 0001 in accordance with the Statement of Work. The estimated costs that will be incurred over the entire period of performance is $227,784,120. This cost is a Not to Exceed (NTE) amount. All support costs are non-fee bearing costs. NO PRICING REQUIRED AT THIS TIME.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0005 159,381 Hours Engineering and Technical Services

CPFF

In support of the Navy Modernizations of Hull, Mechanical and Electrical (HM&E) systems with an ordering period from date of contract award through 60 months after date of award. Technical services are further described in the Statement of Work (SOW). RESERVED FOR CPFF COMPLETION TYPE

TASK ORDERS WHEN APPLICABLE. NO PRICING REQUIRED AT THIS

TIME.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0006 1 Lot Contractor Acquired Property (CAP)

FFP

Contract Acquired Property (CAP) IAW clause 52.245-1, Delivery of all property acquired by the contractor under this contract (NSP).

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

MAX

NET AMT

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

The below shall be determined at the task order level:

The following is applicable to CLIN 0001 and 0005:

B-215-H001 MAXIMUM RATES (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) Maximum Pass Through Rates – Applicable to all Task Orders Types. The pass through rate is defined as the cumulative amount of the two elements listed below divided by the price paid to the subcontractor or the vendor:

(1) any and all prime contractor indirect costs including, but not limited to: overhead, material handling charges, G&A, burdens and mark-ups; and

(2) any and all prime contractor profit or fee*

*For purposes of this contract, “fee” means “target fee” in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, “base fee” in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, or “fixed fee” in cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts.

(b) The Contractor agrees that the maximum pass-through rate that shall be charged against any non- ODC CLIN where labor is proposed under this contract shall not exceed 8%. For purposes of the maximum pass-through, any effort provided by a division, subsidiary or any other entity of the prime contractor shall not be considered subcontracted effort and all fee/profit must be provided at the prime level subject to the limitations specified in this contract.

(c) Maximum Profit/Fee Rate – Applicable to Cost Plus Fixed Fee CLINs Only. Contractor compliance with the maximum fee rate on CPFF CLINs is applicable at the time of task order award and is based on the ratio of fixed fee to the estimated cost. A proposed fee at the task order level that is higher than the maximum fee rate stated in the offeror’s base contract shall render the contractor’s proposal unacceptable. The Contractor agrees that the maximum fixed fee rate shall not exceed 8 %. Fee becomes a fixed dollar amount at the time of task order award and is subject to the provisions of the Level of Effort clause of the task order. The maximum fee rate being proposed at the task order level by the prime contractor shall flow down to all subcontractors/consultants included as part of your (the Prime) proposal.

(d) Other Direct Costs and Travel. No fee is allowed on Other Direct Costs or Travel. Indirect cost elements such as G&A and material handling may be applied to ODCs but may not include fee.

(End of text)

B-216-H006 FEE TABLE (NAVSEA) (MAR 2019)

The following is applicable to CLIN 0001 and CLIN 0005:

Labor CLIN Labor Hours Cost Per Hour*

Fee Rate Per Hour*

Loaded Hourly Rate

TBD AT

TASK

ORDER

LEVEL

*The offeror shall divide the proposed fee for each CLIN by the quantity of labor hours indicated to complete the table. Fee is calculated based on cost less FCCOM; if FCCOM is proposed, necessary columns may be added. Note the proposed fee per hour for this task order shall not exceed the maximum fee percentage established in the basic contract award.

In the event of any inconsistency between the above table and the CLIN pricing, the CLIN pricing shall take precedence.

B-231-H001 TRAVEL COSTS (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) Except as otherwise provided herein, the Contractor shall be reimbursed for its actual travel costs in accordance with FAR 31.205-46. The travel costs to be reimbursed shall be those costs for which the Contractor has maintained appropriate documentation and which have been determined to be allowable, allocable, and reasonable by the Procuring Contracting Officer, Administrative Contracting Officer, or their duly authorized representative.

(b) Reimbursable travel costs include only that travel performed from the Contractor's facility to the worksite, in and around the worksite, and from the worksite to the Contractor's facility.

(c) Relocation costs and travel costs incidental to relocation are allowable to the extent provided in FAR 31.205-35;

however, Procuring Contracting Officer approval shall be required prior to incurring relocation expenses and travel costs incidental to relocation.

(d) The Contractor shall not be reimbursed for the following daily local travel costs:

(i) travel at U.S. Military Installations where Government transportation is available,

(ii) travel performed for personal convenience/errands, including commuting to and from work, and

(iii) travel costs incurred in the replacement of personnel when such replacement is accomplished for the Contractor's or employee's convenience.

B-231-H002 WORKSITE TRAVEL COSTS (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) The contractor shall not charge, and the Government shall not pay, as an allowable cost under this contract, any manhour costs (whether straight-time or overtime) for contractor personnel or subcontractor personnel traveling to or from worksites, including travel to worksites other than the contractor's facility for performance of contract work.

(b) Workers being paid under this contract, as prime contractor personnel or subcontractor personnel, will complete a full shift at the worksite, and no compensation will be paid for travel time before or after the shift.

(c) This requirement pertains only to payments for travel time before or after these workers' regular shifts (commuting costs), and does not apply to legitimate travel costs incurred during normal working hours, provided that those costs are otherwise reasonable, allocable and allowable and approved in writing by the Government. This requirement does not apply to manufacturer's representatives or Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) representatives when specifically required by the Government work specifications.

(d) Additionally, the contractor shall not charge, and the Government shall not pay, any transportation costs under this contract associated with transporting contractor or subcontractor personnel between the contractor's facility (or subcontractor's facility), and any other worksite to perform ship repair, maintenance or modernization.

Transportation costs include, but are not limited to, bus fare, car fare, train fare, or boat fare, paid by the work force, or paid by the contractor on behalf of the work force.

B-232-H003 PAYMENTS OF FEE (S) (COMPLETION) (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

The following is applicable to CLIN 0005:

(a) For purposes of this contract, "fee" means "target fee" in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, "base fee" in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, or "fixed fee" in cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts.

(b) The Government shall make payments to the Contractor, subject to and per the clause in this contract entitled "Fixed Fee" (FAR 52.216-8) or "Incentive Fee", (FAR 52.216-10), as applicable. Such payments shall be equal to TBD percent (TBD) of the allowable cost of each invoice submitted by and payable to the Contractor pursuant to the clause of this contract entitled "Allowable Cost And Payment" (FAR 52.216-7), subject to the withholding terms and conditions of the "Fixed Fee" or "Incentive Fee" clause, as applicable (percentage of fee payable is based on fee dollars divided by estimated cost dollars including facilities capital cost of money). Fee shall not be applied on Facilities Capital Cost of

Money per FAR 15.404-4(c)(3) and DFARS 215-404-71-4. Total fee(s) paid to the Contractor shall not exceed the fee amount(s) set forth in this contract.

(c) In the event of discontinuance of the work under this contract, or any specified phase of the contract, per the clause of this contract entitled "Limitation of Funds" (FAR 52.232-22) or "Limitation of Cost" (FAR 52.232-20), as applicable, the fee shall be equitably adjusted by mutual agreement to reflect the diminution of work. If the adjusted fee is less than the sum of all fee payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall repay the excess amount to the Government. If the adjusted fee exceeds all payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall be paid the additional amount, subject to the availability of funds. In no event shall the Government be required to pay the Contractor any amount in excess of the funds obligated under this contract at the time of the discontinuance of work.

(d) Fee(s) withheld pursuant to the terms and conditions of this contract shall not be paid until the contract has been modified to reduce the fee(s) per paragraph (c) above, or until the Procuring Contracting Officer has advised the paying office in writing that no fee adjustment is required.

B-232-H005 PAYMENTS OF FEE(S) (LEVEL OF EFFORT)--ALTERNATE I (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) For purposes of this contract, "fee" means "target fee" in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, "base fee" in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, or "fixed fee" in cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts.

(b) The Government shall make payments to the Contractor, subject to and per the clause in this contract entitled "Fixed Fee" (FAR 52.216-8) or "Incentive Fee", (FAR 52.216-10), as applicable. Such payments shall be submitted by and payable to the Contractor pursuant to the clause of this contract entitled "Allowable Cost and Payment" (FAR 52.216-7), subject to the withholding terms and conditions of the "Fixed Fee" or "Incentive Fee" clause, as applicable. Fee paid per hour shall be based on total fee dollars divided by total hours to be provided. Total fee(s) paid to the Contractor shall not exceed the fee amount(s) set forth in this contract. In no event shall the Government be required to pay the Contractor any amount in excess of the funds obligated under this contract.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

B-232-H006 LIMITATION OF COST OR LIMITATION OF FUNDS CLARIFICATION (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

The clause entitled "Limitation of Cost" (FAR 52.232-20) or "Limitation of Funds" (FAR 52.232-22), as appropriate, shall apply separately and independently to each separately identified estimated cost.

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

STATEMENT OF WORK

Statement of Work (SOW) for Hull, Mechanical and Electrical (HM&E) Machinery and Systems Services

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.0.1 The Naval Surface Warfare Center Philadelphia Division (NSWCPD) is a Department of Defense entity responsible for research and development, test and evaluation, engineering and fleet support organization for the Navy’s ships, submarines, military watercraft and unmanned vehicles. This requirement is for NSWCPD Divisions 41, 43, and 45, which are responsible for Auxiliary Machinery Systems, and Hull, Sail, and Machinery Systems, respectively.

1.0.2 This contract is for non-personal services. It does not create employment rights with the U.S. Government whether actual, inherent, or implied

1.0.3 Government/Contractor Relationship

1.0.3.1 The services to be delivered under this Contract are non-personal services and the parties recognize and agree that no employer-employee relationship exists or will exist under the Contract between the Government and the Contractor's personnel. Therefore, it is in the best interest of the Government to provide both parties a full understanding of their respective obligations.

1.0.3.2 The Contractor employees shall identify themselves as Contractor personnel by introducing themselves or being introduced as Contractor personnel and displaying distinguishable badges or other visible identification for meetings with Government personnel. In addition, Contractor personnel shall appropriately identify themselves as Contractor employees in telephone conversations and in formal and informal written correspondence.

1.0.3.3 Contractor personnel under this Contract shall not engage in any of the inherently Governmental functions listed at FAR Subpart 7.5 or DFARS Subpart 207.5.

1.0.4 Employee Relationship:

1.0.4.1 The services to be performed under this Contract do not require the Contractor or its personnel to exercise personal judgment and discretion on behalf of the Government. Rather the Contractor's personnel will act and exercise personal judgment and discretion on behalf of the Contractor.

1.0.4.2 Rules, regulations, directives, and requirements that are issued by the U. S. Navy and NSWCPD under its responsibility for good order, administration, and security are applicable to all personnel who enter a Government installation or who travel on Government transportation. This is not to be construed or interpreted to establish any degree of Government control that is inconsistent with a non-personal services contract.

1.0.4.3 Inapplicability of Employee Benefits: This Contract does not create an employer-employee relationship.

Accordingly, entitlements and benefits applicable to such relationships do not apply.

1.0.4.4 It is the Contractor's, as well as the Government's, responsibility to monitor Contract activities and notify the Contracting Officer if the Contractor believes that the intent of this Section has been or may be violated.

1.0.4.4.1 The Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing via letter or email within three (3) calendar days from the date of any incident that the Contractor considers to constitute a violation of this Section. The notice should include the date, nature, and circumstances of the conduct; the name, function, and activity of each Government employee or Contractor official or employee involved or knowledgeable about such conduct; identify any documents or substance of any oral communication involved in the conduct; and the Contractor's estimated date when, absent a response, cost, schedule or performance will be impacted.

1.0.4.4.2 The Contracting Officer will, within five (5) calendar days after receipt of notice, respond to the notice in writing. In responding, the Contracting Officer will either:

(i) Confirm the conduct is in violation and when necessary direct the mode of further performance,

(ii) Countermand any communication regarded as a violation,

(iii) Deny that the conduct constitutes a violation and when necessary direct the mode of further performance, or

(iv) In the event the notice is inadequate to make a decision, advise the Contractor what additional information is required, and establish the date by which it should be furnished by the Contractor.

1.1 BACKGROUND

Naval Surface Warfare Center, Philadelphia Division (NSWCPD), as the Division's Machinery Engineering Directorate, is the Navy’s agent for the coordination and planning of all the engineering and technical support services for Hull, Mechanical and Electrical (HM&E) machinery and systems. To accomplish this mission, NSWCPD utilizes extensive resources to conduct its business to the best advantage of the Navy, Fleet and other Federal Agency maritime assets. The engineering and technical support services are accomplished in all areas where Foreign Military, U.S.

Navy, and Military Sealift Command (MSC) ships operate and are homeported. These services are accomplished in whole or in phases that minimize interruption in ship operating schedules while maximizing the capacity of Type Commander and NAVSEA agencies to upgrade and modernize systems.

Examples of the HM&E machinery and systems that are supported by the engineering and technical services described under this SOW are provided below.

AUXILIARY SYSTEMS

Auxiliary Machinery & Fluid Systems Auxiliary Machinery Silencing Systems Climate Control & Refrigeration Systems Compressed Air & Gas Systems Fluid Systems Automation Seawater, Chill Water & Combat Support Systems Sonar Systems Steam Systems Submarine Fluid Systems Submarine Life Support Systems Submarine Sail Systems Vertical Launching Systems (VLS)

ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

400 Hertz and DC Electrical Power Systems Advanced Electrical Power Systems Energy Conversion Systems Gas Turbine Electrical Power Systems Steam and Diesel Electrical Power Systems

HULL & DECK MACHINERY & HABITABILITY SYSTEMS

Amphibious Assault Systems Anchor, Mooring and Towing Systems Aviation & Material Handling and Stowage Boat and Towed Body Handling & Stowage Hull Outfitting & Shipboard Habitability Systems Hydraulics and Steering Systems Shipboard Cranes Underway Replenishment Systems Weapons/Cargo Handling and Stowage Systems

PROPULSION SYSTEMS

Diesel Engine Systems Power Transmission Systems Propulsion Steam Plant Automation Systems Surface Combatant Gas Turbines

1.2 SCOPE OF WORK

The Statement of Work establishes the requirement for non-commercial engineering and technical services to include: design, development, build, and testing support; prototype engineering; technology insertion; development and revision of test specifications and technical documentation; performance and data analysis; system safety and fault analysis; system integration; installation support; computer programming and software engineering; software verification and validation; Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) document preparation and system training development; program management and presentation support; and on-site technical support, alteration services, Integrated logistics, system certification support and staging in support of surface fleet, submarine, and shore-based installations in support of HM&E machinery and systems, other Federal Agency vessels, federally contracted vessels and platforms, selected maritime agency vessels, and select land-based sites.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.1. ASTM-1166, Human Systems Interface for Marine Systems

2.2. NAVSEA S9AA0-AB-GSO-010, General Specification for Overhaul of Surface Navy Ships

2.3. NAVSEA 0902-018 2010 Rev B, General Overhaul Specifications for Deep Diving SSBN/SSN

Submarines (DDGOS), dated 1-Aug-2018

2.4. NAVSEA S9AA0-AA-SPN-010/GEN SPEC, General Specifications for Ships

2.5. NAVSEA SL720-AAMAN_010/FMP, Fleet Modernization Program (FMP) Management & Operations

Manual, dated 15-Apr-2016

2.6. MIL-HDBK-454B, Standard General Guidelines for Electronic Equipment

2.7. NAVSEA Technical Publication S9074-AQ-GIB-010/248, Requirements for Welding and Brazing

Procedure and Performance Qualification (Amend 002)

2.8. NAVSEA S9300-AW-EDG-010, Electrical Plant Installation Standard Methods

2.9. Electrical Workmanship Standards, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Standard 4855.1 through 4855.6

2.10. MIL-DTL-81927C, Manuals, Technical: General Style and Format of Work Package Concept, dated 26

Nov 1997

2.11. MIL-STD-38784(1), Standard Practice for Manuals, Technical: General Style and Format, dated 1 Dec

2.12. MIL-PRF-87269A, Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals, dated 15 Aug 2000, Data Base, Revisable

2.13. MIL-DTL-24784 06, Manuals, Technical: General Acquisition and Development Requirements, dated

June 2017

2.14. MIL-STD-1689A, Fabrication, Welding and Inspection of Ship Structures (Amend 002)

2.15. MIL-STD-0022, Welded Joint Design

2.16. MIL-STD-882E, System Safety

2.17. MIL-P-24534A (Navy); Planned Maintenance System: Development of Maintenance Requirement Cards, Maintenance Index Pages, and Associated Documentation, dated 7 May 1985

2.18. S0005-AA-GYD-030, Guide for User Maintenance of NAVSEA Technical Manuals, dated 30 Sep 1988

2.19. S0005-AA-GYD-070, Guide for Quality Assurance of NAVSEA Technical Manuals, dated 01 Feb 1991

2.20. OPNAV Instruction 5100.23B, Navy Safety and Occupational Health Manual

2.21. NAVSEA T9074-AS-GIB-010/271, Requirements for Nondestructive Testing Methods

2.22. AWS B4.0, Standard Methods of Mechanical Testing of Weld

2.23. AWS Z49.1, Safety Welding and Cutting

2.24. Standards and Interpretations, Occupational Safety and Health Chapters 1915.14, 1915.15 and 1915.16

2.25. NAVSEA Technical Publication S9074-AR-GIB-010/278, Requirements for Fabrication Welding

2.26. NAVSEA Standard Items

2.27. NAVSEA TS9090-310 (Latest Revision) Alterations to Ships Accomplished by Alteration Installation

Teams

2.28. NAVSEA TS9090-600 Ship Alteration Drawing Preparation

2.29. NAVSEA TS9090-400 Ship Change Document

2.30. IEEE Std 610.12-1990, Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology (ANSI)

2.31. IEEE Std 12207.0-1996, Software Life Cycle Process

2.32. IEEE Std 12207.1-1997, Software Life Cycle Process-Life Cycle Data

2.33. IEEE Std 12207.2-1997, Software Life Cycle Process-Implementation Considerations

2.34. NAVSEA Information Technology Standard Guidance

2.35. ASQ/ANSI/ISO 9001:2015, “Quality Management Systems — Requirements”

2.36. ISO-9002 Quality Systems - Model for Quality Assurance in Production, Installation and Servicing

2.37. COMFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3, Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual at www.submepp.navy.mil/jfmm/index.htm

2.38. NIST SP-800-37, Risk Management Framework for IT and Organizations

2.39. NIST SP-800-53, Security and Privacy Controls for Federal IS and Org.

2.40. DoD 5220.22-M National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual

2.41. DoD 8510.01 Risk Management Framework for Information Technology

2.42. DoD 8570.01-M Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program

2.43. DoD 8140.01 Cyberspace Workforce Management Requirement

2.44. DoD Cyber Exchange Public, DoD Approved 8570 Baseline Certifications, available https://public.cyber.mil/cwmp/dod-approved-5870-baseline-certifications/

2.45. NAVSEAINST 4720.14E, Temporary Alterations to Fleet Submarines

2.46. NAVSEAINST 4350.2D, Contract Work Onboard Nuclear-Powered Ships, dated 5 Jun 2013

2.47. NAVSEAINST C9210.4A, Changes, Repairs and Maintenance to Nuclear Powered Ships

2.48. NAVSEAINST 4120.8A, NAVSEA Policy for Commonality of Systems, Subsystems, and Components, 22 Sep 2016.

These documents can be referenced at: https://mercury.tdmis.navy.mil unless otherwise noted. The Contractor shall reference and utilize the latest version available unless otherwise noted.

Additional reference documents and applicable standards may be listed on individual Task Orders.

3.0 REQUIREMENTS

The specific services to be provided and required deliverables shall be detailed in the individual Task Orders…