N6339420R0033 MEB HEB Amendment 7 - Summary of Changes.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

To provide responses to questions.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 14-Aug-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6339420R0033

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17-Jul-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Aug-2020

CODE

NSWC PHD 022

4363 MISSILE WAY

PORT HUENEME CA 93043

N63394 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6339420R0033

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been modified:

Amendment 1: The purpose of this amendment is to extend the RFP due date from 08/14/2020 to 08/17/2020.

Amendment 2: Due to its size exceeding DOD SAFE limits, TDP will be shared to Offerors via FedEx. Instructions have been updated in the description of this notice available in BETA.sam.gov. Section J of this solicitation has been updated accordingly.

Amendment 3:

Q&A

1. Question: Is Attachment J-3 required to be submitted at the time of proposal submission or at time of contract award?

Response: Attachment J-3 has been revised and is for informational purposes only. A revised version has been uploaded and is named “N6339420R0033 Attachment J-3 GFP rev 1.”

2. Question: If submission of J-3 is a requirement for proposal submission, does every tab in the excel spreadsheet need to be completed and should it be an attachment to the pricing volume?

Response: Not Applicable. Attachment J-3 is for informational purposes only.

3. Question: Could you provide instructions for completion of form if required?

Response: Not Applicable. Attachment J-3 is for informational purposes only.

4. Question: Would the Government consider a four week extension to the proposal due date?

Response: The revised proposal due date is 31 August 2020 and has been revised in the RFP and on beta.SAM.

5. Question: Section 4.2 of the SOW, First Article Inspection, calls out the FAI needs to be in accordance with

AS9102 Rev. A standards. If a subcontractor on the proposal can perform FAI in accordance with AS9102 standards, would the Prime Contractor be deemed as an acceptable bidder or does the Prime Contractor need to be able to perform the FAI? The proposal would clearly state that the subcontractor would be providing the FAI in accordance to AS9102 standards and provide pertinent information from the subcontractor.

Response: The Government does not dictate how the vendor conduct their business. FAI needs to be completed in accordance with AS9102 Rev A.

6. Question: The following drawings appear to be missing, along with any parts list and subcomponent drawings:

CCA CAGE ASSEMBLY, MEB 8660402

CCA CAGE ASSEMBLY, HEB 8660452-9

ANGLE, ISOLATOR, MEB/HEB ENCLOSURE 8660497-9

ASSY, HANDLE, GRAB, MEB/HEB 8660501-9

Response:

Name Part No. Response

CCA CAGE ASSEMBLY, MEB 8660402

This drawing is no longer applicable to the

MEB/HEB and was removed in subsequent revisions. Recommend vendor review all

Notice of Revision (NOR)’s to ensure latest information is included. The new equivalent drawing is 8660431-9, provided as a part of the drawing package.

CCA CAGE ASSEMBLY, HEB 8660452-9

This drawing is no longer applicable to the

MEB/HEB and was removed in subsequent revisions. Recommend vendor review all

NOR’s to ensure latest information is included. The new equivalent drawing is

8660436-9, provided as a part of the drawing package.

ANGLE, ISOLATOR, MEB/HEB ENCLOSURE 8660497-9

This drawing is applicable and was provided as a part of the original delivery.

ASSY, HANDLE, GRAB, MEB/HEB 8660501-9

This drawing is applicable and was provided as a part of the original delivery.

7. Question: Though the PL calls for 5223423-4, the drawing 5223423 itself has only -1 and -2. Requesting clarification.

Response: 5223423 NOR 004 adds the -4 configuration to the TDP. Recommend vendor review all NOR’s to ensure latest information is included.

8. Question: The following WSs are called out in the ATP for MEB/HEB; however, they are not included in the TDP. Requesting the following be provided:

WS20336

WS20339

WS20267

Response:

WS20336 - This WS will be provided via DOD Safe. Please send an email to the Contract Specialist requesting this to be sent.

WS20339 - This reference was an error in the original ATR and is not applicable. Recommend vendor review latest drawings which corrected this typo.

WS20267 - This WS will be provided via DOD Safe. Please send an email to the Contract Specialist requesting this to be sent.

9. Question: The SOW and ATP call out the first article requirement; however, there is no separate FA CLIN.

Instead, there is CLIN 0001 on the CDRLs listed as NSP. Is there supposed to be a separate CLIN for an

FAT unit? Requesting clarification as to whether a full FA is required, and whether it is to be NSP.

Response: First Article Test (FAT) is not a requirement on this solicitation.

10. Question: Para 4.2.6 calls out the Post-PET to be conducted after vibration and after final assembly into

LSEQ. Will an LSEQ be provided as part of GFE?

a. Question: Can the USG clarify and provide list of equipment and software packages that will be provided as GFE?

Response: All Test Equipment will be GFE’d. There will be not requirement to test with a LSEQ as a part of MEB/HEB production acceptance. Attachment J-3 has been revised and is for informational purposes only. A revised version has been uploaded and is named “N6339420R0033

Attachment J-3 GFP rev 1.”

11. Question: CLIN 6-29 spell out the options that may be exercised at any time within the 5 year period after award. Many CLINs call for the same item with same quantity. Clarification is requested as to whether these are to correspond to specific ordering periods.

Response: Option CLIN 6-29 are potential upcoming USN requirements. They can be exercised at any time within the 5 year period after award.

12. Question: Have these units been manufactured before, and if so, could you provide the manufacturer and unit price?

Response: These units have not been manufactured before.

13. Question: Will the Government consider a 21 day extension?

14. Question: What will the first delivery order be?

Response: Please refer to Section F delivery schedule of the RFP.

15. Question: Will the Government consider a two week extension?

Amendment 4:

1. Question: Which CLINs does the Government plan to execute on the first order?

Response: The Government intends to execute CLIN 0001-0005, with associated SLINs.

2. Question: Is there a current small business incumbent?

Response: There is no incumbent.

3. Question: Can you provide the previous contract awarded price?

Response: There is no previous contract for MEB and HEB.

4. Question: Can you provide a 30-day extension due to the size of the TDP?

Response: The solicitation was extended to 31 August 2020.

5. Question: Is there any GFM for this requirement?

Response: N6339420R0033 Attachment J-3 GFP rev 1 has a list of Government Furnished Property (GFP).

6. Question: Will the images for the firmware under DWGNo: 8660411 be available to the awardee?

Response: The Spectrum 9100 (test station), which will be provided as GFE, will program all required firmware on the Circuit Card Assemblies. The awardee does not need access to the firmware images.

7. Question: Can the Government provide DWGNo: 8660514 (BIOS/BOOTROM/OS PROCESS)?

Response: This drawing is Obsolete by Event (OBE). Ampro will install all the required software on the CCA prior to delivery to the manufacturer for installation at the next higher assembly. Additional drawing updates will be provided to document this approach.

8. Question: Can the Government provide the gerber files for the following Printed Circuit Boards (PCB)?

PN: 8660413-2 (PCB, Driver, MEB)

PN: 8660409-2 (PCB, Interface, MEB)

PN: 8660448-2 (PCB, Flex Harness, Backplane, MEB)

PN: 8660463-2 (PCB, Driver, HEB)

PN: 8660459-2 (PCB, Interface, HEB)

PN: 8660529-1 (PCB, FLEX HARNESS, BACKPLANE, HEB)

Response: All Gerber files will be provided via DoD Safe.

Amendment 5:

1. Question: We do not see any GFM components, just the complete assemblies in the list you point us to.

Where is the actual GFM list?

Response: Besides the test equipment, the Government does not intend to provide any other GFM.

2. Question: Is a 2 week extension possible?

Response: The Government does not plan on issuing another extension to the proposal due date.

Amendment 6:

1. Question: Can the Government provide the gerber files for PN: 8652314-1 (PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD, CCA, 1553)?

Response: This will be provided via DoD Safe.

2. Question: Can the Government provide Document No. WS 20130 (Production Environmental Test

Requirements for VLS)?

Response: This will be provided via DoD Safe.

Amendment 7:

1. Question: On the Bill of Material for drawings 8660408-9, Find number 35 has been end of life. The end of life notice stated 3-31-2018. Can you please provide an alternate or replacement for this find number?

Response: The part PZT2222A is obsolete and part PZT2222AT1G from manufacturer ON SEMI has been identified as an alternate part.

2. Question: Are ROHS versions of components listed on all bill of materials acceptable?

Response: Not unless the ROHS version is called out on the TDP.

3. Question: Does the Government have and are willing to provide 3D model files of the Mechanical items?

Response: This is build-to-print per TDP. 3D model files are available and can be provided to awardee.

4. Question: Please see the response from DDC below in reference to 8652315-9, Find #28, 1553 Chipset, Part number BU-67301B0T0L-102:

“Per DDC, they will need a LOA from the NAVY authorizing (vendor name removed) to procure on their behalf. Can you please request this information, and it must include the DDC part number, quantity, and the program name the supports the request. Once received, DDC will require President level approval before

DDC can quote.”

Would it be possible for the Government to provide a basic blanket LOA to allow for the sharing of pricing information (but not ordering as of yet) or, alternatively, does the Government have reasonable historical pricing data for this part?

Response: The Government had reached out to DDC and requested they provide quote as requested from by vendors. DDC had concurred.

Vendors are to send a request to DDC and reference N6339420R0033 on their request for quote.

5. Question: Requesting the following drawings and files be sent via DoDSAFE:

Requested

Drawings Government Response

WS20336 Delivered via DoD Safe on Amendment 3

WS20339

Responded on Amendment 3 as "This reference was an error in the original ATR and is not applicable. Recommend vendor review latest drawings which corrected this typo."

WS20267 Delivered via DoD Safe on Amendment 3

8660413-2

Gerber file Sent via DoD Safe on Amendment 4

8660409-2

Gerber file Sent via DoD Safe on Amendment 4

8660448-2

Gerber file Sent via DoD Safe on Amendment 4

8660463-2

Gerber file Sent via DoD Safe on Amendment 4

8660459-2

Gerber file Sent via DoD Safe on Amendment 4

8660529-1

Gerber file Sent via DoD Safe on Amendment 4

8652314-1

Gerber file Included in original TDP DVD delivery and sent via DoD Safe on Amendment 6

WS 20130 Included in original TDP DVD delivery and sent via DoD Safe on Amendment 6

6. Question: Do the MEB (8660400-9) and HEB (8660450-9) LRUs need to go through Production

Environmental Tet per WS20130 since the CCAs inside will have already gone through environmental testing per the CCA drawings? If so, what should the MEB and HEB top level assembly be classified as in

Table 1: PET ASSEMBLY ENVIRONMENTS on sheet 3 of WS20130? Are they Assemblies, Circuit

Card Assembly LRUs, Power Supply LRUs, Electromechanical LRUs, or Indicator Panel LRUs?

Response: The MEB and HEB are Electromechanical LRU’s. This requires Temperature Shock and

Random Vibration. Note 2 does apply to the MEB and HEBs. The MEB and HEB are not required to undergo Temperature Shock at the LRU level if the CCA’s have been environmentally stress screened to the temperature shock requirements of 3.1.1 of WS20130.

(End of Summary of Changes)