N6274225R0004_AE_SIOP_FINAL Synopsis 250627.pdf

N62742-25-R-0004 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR VARIOUS STRUCTURAL AND

WATERFRONT PROJECTS IN SUPPORT OF THE SHIPYARD INFRASTRUCTURE

OPTIMIZATION PROGRAM (SIOP) AND OTHER PROJECTS AT LOCATIONS UNDER

THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND,

PACIFIC

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD

FORM SF 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED HEREIN.

THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PACKAGE TO

DOWNLOAD.

This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Architect-Engineer (A-E) services for various structural and waterfront projects in support of the Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Program (SIOP) and other projects at locations under the cognizance of Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Pacific, but may also include work worldwide. These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $450,000,000. The minimum guarantee for the contract term (including option years) is $50,000. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. Estimated start date is June 2026.

This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 541330, Engineering Services, with a small business size standard of $25.5M. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the selection criteria.

Design and engineering services for structural and waterfront projects expected to be performed under this contract include, but are not limited to, the execution and delivery of Military Construction (MILCON) project documentation (DD Form 1391); 1391 Charrettes; Design Charrettes, Design-Build (DB) Request for Proposal (RFP); Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Design contract documents; technical surveys and reports including concept and engineering studies, engineering modeling, site engineering investigations, topographic surveys, geotechnical investigations, hazardous material surveys, munitions of explosive concern (MEC) surveys, hydrographic surveys, and others; construction cost estimates; Collateral Equipment (CEQ) Buy Packages; Comprehensive Interior Design (CID) including Structural Interior Design (SID) and Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E); and Post Construction Award Services (PCAS).

Interested firms are advised to ensure System of Award Management (SAM) registration is current at the time of offer submission and at the time of contract award. For instructions on registering with SAM, see the SAM website at https://www.sam.gov/. Failure to register in SAM may render interested firms to be ineligible for award.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that provide design or engineering services for a project under this contract cannot provide design or engineering services for the same project under a separate construction contract. The prime firm and subconsultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firms to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions, or provide complete information may affect the firm’s evaluation or disqualify the firm from further consideration. The following selection criteria are listed in descending order of importance:

1. Firm’s Specialized Experience

2. Key Personnel Professional Qualifications and Specialized Experience

3. Past Performance

4. Quality Control

5. Program Management and Capacity

6. Sustainable Design

7. Firm Location

8. Commitment to Small Business

9. Volume of Work

Evaluation and selection of the most highly qualified firm will be based on the following selection criteria, listed in descending order of importance:

Selection Criterion (1) - Firm’s Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I, Section F):

Firms will be evaluated on specialized experience in performance of relevant projects through evaluation of experience in:

1. Execution of DD1391 or similar project programming document

2. 1391/design charrettes

3. Development of DB Request for Proposal solicitation documentation

4. Development of DBB design contract documents

5. Structural engineering studies.

Relevant projects include new construction/repair/alteration of waterfront facilities such as drydocks, piers, and wharves; and buildings such as industrial facilities, maintenance and/or repair facilities, warehouses, headquarters/administration buildings, utility buildings, classrooms, aircraft hangars, and armories. New construction projects shall be $100 million or more in construction value per project and completed within the past 15 years preceding the date of issuance of this notice. Repair/alteration projects shall be $40 million or more in construction value per project and completed within the past 15 years preceding the date of issuance of this notice.

Firms may be evaluated as more favorable by submitting projects that demonstrate the following:

a) Relevant projects that contain several of the specialized experience may be given more favorable consideration than projects that contain only one of these services.

b) More variety in the types of relevant projects

c) Projects located within Hawaii, Guam, Tinian, Diego Garcia, Australia, Japan, Korea, Papua New Guinea, and other Pacific Ocean areas

d) Large projects (for either new construction or repair) with construction value greater than $300 million.

Selection Criterion (1) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section F. Provide a maximum of six (6) projects with the design completed within the past 15 years preceding the date of issuance of this notice that best demonstrate specialized experience of the proposed team in the areas outlined above. Sufficient information to determine the date of design completion of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered. Of the six (6) projects, a minimum of two (2) projects shall be for waterfront facilities, such as drydocks, piers, or wharves, and a minimum of one (1) project shall be for an industrial or repair and/or maintenance facility. If more than the maximum number of projects are submitted, the Government will only evaluate projects up to the maximum number authorized in the order submitted.

All projects provided in the SF330 must be completed by the actual office/branch/regional office/individual team member proposed to manage and perform work under this contract.

Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation.

To enable verification, firms should include the Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) number along with each firm name in the SF330 Part 1, Section F, block 25, “Firm Name”. Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). In block 24, include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. For projects performed as a subcontractor or a joint venture involving different partners, specifically indicate the value of the work performed as a subcontractor or by those firms proposed for this contract, and identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration. If a project does not provide the requested data, an accessible point of contact, or a valid phone number, that project may be eliminated from consideration.

NOTE: If the firm is a joint venture, projects performed by the joint venture should be submitted;

however, if there are no projects performed by the joint venture, submit projects for each joint venture partner, not to exceed a total of four (4) projects for each partner. Failure to provide projects to demonstrate experience for all joint venture partners may be considered less favorable.

A subcontractor's or sub-consultant's specialized experience on a design-bid-build project will not be given the same level of consideration as either the prime contractor or the joint venture partner(s)/LLC member company.

Projects shall be submitted on the SF330 at Part I, Section F and shall be completed projects.

Projects not completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. Instead, list relevant task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated.

All information for Selection Criterion (1) should be submitted in the SF330, Part I, Section F. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluation of Selection Criterion 1.

Selection Criterion (2) - Key Personnel Professional Qualifications and Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I, Sections E & G):

Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications, competence, and experience of the proposed key personnel in providing services to accomplish the tasks required under this contract, including participation in example projects as outlined in the SF330, Part 1, Section G.

Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise.

Selection Criterion (2) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section G. Provide a list of key personnel for three (3) design teams that shall be limited to the following: Principal-In-Charge (PIC) of the Prime AE firm, Project Manager (PM), Structural Project Engineer, Project Architect, Mechanical Project Engineer, Electrical Project Engineer, Civil Project Engineer, Fire Protection Project Engineer, Environmental Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, Land Surveyor, and Cost Estimator. The PIC of the Prime AE firm may be the same person on multiple teams.

SF330, Part I, Section E. Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate experience in the work proposed under this contract. Resumes should indicate: active U.S.

professional registration (include State and discipline), number of years of experience in work relevant to the services required under this contract, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. For Cost Estimator, indicate years of experience in work relevant to the services required under this contract, role in this contract (identify the primary cost estimator if more than one cost estimator is submitted), firm name and location, and education. Professional registration for Cost Estimator is not required. Professional qualifications of personnel of the design teams other than the key personnel (e.g., PM, Structural Project Engineer, Project Architect, Mechanical Project Engineer, Electrical Project Engineer, Civil Project Engineer, Fire Protection Project Engineer, etc.) shall not be submitted, and if submitted, will not be considered in the evaluation. Do not use other company titles such as “Type I Engineer” where the discipline and role are unidentifiable. Indicate participation of key personnel in the Selection Criterion (1) projects in the SF330, Part 1, Section G.

Specialized Experience and Technical Competence: Specialized experience and technical competence in relevant projects that involved the execution of DD1391 or similar project programming documents, 1391/Design Charrettes, DB RFP solicitation documents, DBB design contract documents, and structural engineering studies.

Firms may be evaluated as more favorably by demonstrating specialized experience and technical competence for the project manager (PM) in the following:

1) Experience as a PM in Selection Criterion (1) relevant projects

2) Specialized experience as the prime contractor’s PM vice as part of a subcontractor’s key personnel

3) Submission of more variety of specialized experience and types of facilities for relevant projects

SF330, Part I, Section E. Specialized experience and technical competence shall be limited to the three (3) PMs. Relevant project information for other key personnel is not required and if submitted, will not be considered in the evaluation. For these other key personnel, complete Blocks 12 through 18; and leave Block 19, Relevant Projects, blank. Complete one Section E for each PM, providing all requested information. Submit a maximum of four (4) relevant projects for each PM, demonstrating specialized experience and technical competence in relevant projects.

A project is defined as either a stand-alone contract or a single task order in an IDIQ contract having the features described above. If more than four (4) projects for each PM are submitted, the Government will evaluate the first four (4) projects listed in Part I, Section E and disregard any other project information.

Each project shall include project title and location, month and year “professional services” (not including PCAS) completed, details of specialized experience, point-of-contact name, e-mail address, phone number, contract number or project identification number, contract period of performance, contract award amount, estimated construction cost and the role and experience the PM had in performing the project. Experience in a role other than PM for project submittal will not qualify as specialized experience and technical competence. If a project description does not clearly define the work performed by the PM (including the specialized design and engineering service) or if a project does not provide the requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers, that project may be evaluated less favorably or as not qualified.

Selection Criterion (3) - Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluation of past performance and experience will include information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) for Selection Criterion (1) relevant projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government including contacts with points of contact in other criteria. NOTE: Past performance information for projects listed under Selection Criterion (1) may have a greater impact on the evaluation.

Selection Criterion (3) Submission Requirements:

SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION FOR EACH PROJECT UNDER

SELECTION CRITERION (1). IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT

AVAILABLE, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) included in this notice is provided for the firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project included under Selection Criterion (1), Specialized Experience. DO NOT SUBMIT A PPQ

WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

If a completed CPARS or AE Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the SF330 for each project included in Criterion (1). If there is not a completed CPARS or ACASS evaluation, then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ - Attachment A) for each project included in Criterion (1). PPQs will not be accepted from the designer on a design-build project or from a prime contractor for work performed by a subcontractor. PPQs shall be completed and signed by the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for construction contract administration. The Offeror shall provide completed PPQs in the proposal. Offeror’s may submit PPQs previously submitted for other solicitations as long as complete, required information is included.

Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion (1). Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) 8.5” x 11”, 1” margin left/right/top/bottom, and 10-point font or larger in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

Selection Criterion (4) - Quality Control Program (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the processes and procedures of their proposed internal design quality control programs that ensure quality products and services under this contract, and means of ensuring quality services from their subconsultants/subcontractors.

Selection Criterion (4) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Describe the quality control program that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:

1. Explain the quality control plan including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components.

3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract including checking documents for errors, omissions, inconsistencies, and quality;

tracking and incorporating review comments; and implementing the latest criteria and lessons learned.

4. Describe how the prime AE will ensure quality consistently across the entire team and how quality of subcontractor’s work is assured.

5. Describe internal quality assurance procedures and indicate the level of effectiveness.

6. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

7. Describe how the firm’s quality control organization structure extends to management of subcontractors.

Selection Criterion (5) - Program Management and Capacity (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the firm’s ability to plan for and manage work under the contract, and the firm’s capacity to accomplish multiple large projects concurrently within the required timeframe. Each task order issued under the prospective contract may be approximately $100M.

Selection Criterion (5) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part 1, Section H.

1. Provide an organizational chart for the three (3) design teams proposed per Selection Criterion (2). Identify composition for these three (3) teams, including design firms prime AE, subcontractors/subconsultants of major design disciplines (architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, fire protection, cost estimates), other required design and engineering services and design personnel.

2. Discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization.

Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable.

Address how the firm's organizational construct is most efficient and effective in the execution of work. For all key personnel identified in Selection Criterion (2), explain their roles and responsibilities in the proposed organization. If the same key personnel is proposed for more than one (1) design team, provide explanation substantiating such designation and ability to accomplish multiple projects concurrently.

3. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project teams (including subconsultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.

Selection Criterion (6) - Sustainable Design (SF330, Part I, Section H)

Firms will be evaluated in terms of their knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts through an integral design approach and designing in accordance with recognized sustainability rating systems such as Green Globe, LEED, etc.

Selection Criterion (6) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section H.

Provide a maximum of three (3) projects that have attained or been submitted for sustainable design third party certification (LEED, Green Globes, Guiding Principles Compliance, or other equivalent certification). For projects certified, submit a copy of the certificate (certificates are not included toward the overall page count). For projects not yet certified, identify the date the project was submitted. For all projects, identify the team’s major contribution(s) (design elements, features, equipment, etc.) in attainment of the certification. If more than three projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first three projects and disregard any other project information after the first three projects. Certified projects will be considered more favorably than projects not yet certified. Discuss key sustainable design personnel experience and qualifications.

Selection Criterion (7) - Firm Location (SF330, Part I, Section H)

Provided that the application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the contract, firms will be evaluated on the locations of their office or offices that will be performing the work under this contract and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographic areas in which projects could be located. Evaluation of firms will include consideration of their location within the general geographic area of the anticipated projects, primarily NAVFAC Pacific AOR.

Selection Criterion (7) Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section H.

1. Indicate the location of the office(s) that will be performing the work, including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members and include description of staffing and functions for each office.

2. Provide a narrative describing the team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas to be covered by this contract. Address the ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on-site support.

Selection Criterion (8) - Commitment to Small Business (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated in terms of the extent to which they have identified and committed to Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZone SB), Veteran- Owned Small Business (VOSB), and Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on: (A) Past performance in utilization of small business concerns, and (B) Participation of small business concerns for this requirement. In support of (A), all firms shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone SB, VOSB, and SDVOSB. Large Businesses shall submit “final” or “most recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for contracts associated with each project cited under Selection Criterion (1), Specialized Experience. If ISRs are not FINAL or MOST RECENT, they will not be considered. If subcontracting goals were not met, provide an explanation. If Individual Subcontracting Reports were not applicable to the Section F projects, large businesses shall submit other documentation, which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for the contracts. Small Businesses shall also submit documentation, which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of relative size. In support of (B), large businesses shall submit a draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in which they will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify, commit to and demonstrate in the plan to meet the following goals:

Small Business – 40% HUBZone – 3% Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business – 5% Small Disadvantaged Business – 5% Women-Owned Small Business – 9%

Selection Criterion (8) Submission Requirements:

If a large business firm is selected for award, a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in accordance with FAR 19.7 and DFAR 219.7, will be required and incorporated into the contract award. A draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required from small businesses;

however, small businesses shall submit similar information on the extent to which they identify and commit to subcontracting to large business (LB), SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone SB, VOSB, and SDVOSB if applicable in the performance of this contract.

The Small Business size standard classification is NAICS 541330, Engineering Services, size standard $25.5 million.

The attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template (Attachment (B)) shall be used by large businesses to complete the draft subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their “draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plans utilizing this template, and ONLY this template.

All firms shall submit small business subcontracting information associated with each project cited under Selection Criterion (1), Specialized Experience, in the format provided in Attachment C, Small Business Subcontracting Record.

All firms shall submit a small business participation and commitment strategy including all data elements shown in Attachment D, Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy.

Submission requirements:

1. Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total acquisition the extent of work the firm will self-perform as the prime contractor. If submitting an offer as a joint venture, identify the percentage of work each member will be responsible for and indicate the size status of each member (e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, other than small business).

2. Include supplemental narratives (shall not exceed five single-sided pages) to address other elements of the firm’s strategy such as binding agreements covering post award roles for execution of the contract and specific initiatives and tools that will be employed under the contract to enhance small businesses opportunities to both participate in this acquisition and build capabilities to support future NAVFAC acquisitions.

3. The anticipated prime and first tier overall small business participation rate for this acquisition (i.e. work to be performed by small businesses as the prime and/or subcontractors) is 10% of the contract value. Firms are encouraged to exceed this percentage and seek meaningful levels of participation in each of the small business socioeconomic programs listed in Attachment D consistent with efficient contract performance. Firms shall explain in their participation and commitment strategies how proposed participation rates were established. The small business participation and commitment strategy must be in agreement with any required small business subcontracting plan and will be made a part of the contract upon award.

NOTE: The Government reserves the right to consider achievements information on other recent, relevant projects from all available sources. If the firm is a new joint venture, partnership or other entity consisting of more than one company, provide achievements information for each individual business entity(ies) that will be responsible for managing the subcontracting program and clearly describe those responsibilities.

Failure to provide ISRs or any other requested information must be fully explained and may negatively impact your evaluation.

Selection Criterion (9) - Volume of Work (SF330, Part 1, Section H)

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified architect-engineer firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD architect-engineer contracts.

Selection Criterion (9) Submission Requirements:

Firms do not submit data for this selection criterion.

SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed Standard Form (SF) 330 package, Architect Engineer Qualifications. The SF330 printed format shall be in an 8-1/2 x 11 paper format, bound in a 3-ring binder, typed with a minimum 11-point font size or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables), and one-sided.

Except for the Organization Chart, sheets larger than 8-1/2” X 11” including fold-out sheets will not be accepted. Part II, shall be submitted for each firm identified in Part I, Section C. Please include your UEI and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330. Any other information submitted such as company brochures, leaflets, etc., will not be considered. If submitting as a Joint Venture, and you do not yet have UEI, CAGE, and TIN for the Joint Venture, then UEI, CAGE and TIN should be submitted for each firm. UEI, CAGE, and TIN for the Joint Venture, if selected, would be required prior to the award of any contract.

**In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b) contracts for architect-engineer services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering.

Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture should include with their submission a copy of the joint venture agreement. Firms who are offering as a limited liability company (LLC) should include with their submission a copy of the operating agreement. Failure to include the joint venture agreement or operating agreement may result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture or LLC shall include with their submission a copy of the joint venture or operating agreement along with a detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate:

a. The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing.

b. The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control.

c. The structure and decision making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

d. Identify by name and title the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents)

A list of partners/parties, to include company name, UEI and CAGE numbers, address, point of contact, Email address, and phone number.

Architect-Engineer firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit an SF 330 package that addresses each requirement within the selection criteria. The SF330 package submitted in response to this announcement must include:

one (1) original and three (3) paper copies (total of four (4) paper copies) and one (1) CD of the completed SF330 are required.

The delivery addresses for SF 330s are as follows:

(1) For SF 330s being sent via United States Postal Services (USPS):

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific Code CON32 (N62742-25-R-0004) Attn: AT 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100

JBPHH, HI 96860-3134

(2) For SF 330s being sent via courier service or hand-delivered:

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific Code CON32 (N62742-25-R-0004) Attn: AT 4256 Radford Drive, Building 62 Honolulu, HI 96818-3296

Firms responding to this announcement by:

2:00 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time (HST) on Tuesday, 19 August 2025 will be considered.

THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The main point of contact is Ms. Annette Tijerina, Contracting Officer at annette.t.tijerina@navy.mil. The alternative point of contact is Mr. Shaun Chow, Contracting Officer, at shaun.m.chow.civ@us.navy.mil.

If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized

Completion of electronic annual representations and certifications are also mandatory prior to award of a contract. Refer to FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications.

The contract will require that the selected A-E firm have e-mail and Internet on-line access for routine exchange of correspondence. Fee proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency.

Notifications will be sent via email to the email address identified in Part I, Section B, Block 8.

Modifications pertaining to this announcement will be posted to the SAM web site https://sam.gov.

All potential offerors are advised to check the SAM web site https://sam.gov for modifications to this announcement. It is the offerors responsibility to check the SAM website periodically for any modifications to the announcement.

All questions concerning this procurement should be submitted in writing to include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via e-mail to annette.t.tijerina@us.navy.mil and shaun.m.chow.civ@us.navy.mil, no later than 20 days of the closing date. Questions submitted after this date may not be addressed by the Government due to time constraints.