RELEASED_AMD4_complete package.pdf

ACQR6051973

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N6274224R6708 D/B AT-6 Facility, Wing 41, Chiang Mai, Thailand

Amendment 0004 begins on the next page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 13

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 09-Jul-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N6274224R6708

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

21-May-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

08-Jul-2024

CODE

NAVFAC ROICC THAILAND (US EMBASSY)

7 SATHORN TAI ROAD

BANGKOK 10120

N62742 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6274224R6708

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMD4 ANSWERS TO PPIS & CHANGES

A. The purpose of this amendment is to modify the contract line item, CLIN 0005, as follows.

-Changed from: CLIN 0005: Option Item - 0002 Wash Rack (Alternate) -To: CLIN0005 Option Item 0002 Renovate Tie Downs

B. Section 2.3 Evaluation Factors and Proposal Submission Requirements, Item a., Volume 2, (2.1) Non-Cost Factor 1, Offeror Experience, is revised per the following:

-Changed from:

a. At least two (2) design-build projects must demonstrate construction of a single (or more) story reinforced concrete structure building with a minimum size of 500 SM.

b. At least one (1) design-build projects must demonstrate construction of a single (or more) story steel structure building with a minimum size of 1,000 SM.

-To:

a. Similar in Size: Design-build construction projects cost between $400,000 and $2,500,000 in final construction.

One project must be at least $1,000,000. Any project outside this range may not be considered.

b. Similar in Scope: Design-build construction of a single or more story reinforced concrete structure building with a minimum size of 700 SM.

c. Similar in Complexity: Design-build construction projects involving residential, commercial, institutional, or industrial construction performed in Southeast Asia, Nepal, the Maldives, or Timor Leste.

C. Section 002100 - Instructions, 2.2 Content of Proposal, a. Volume 1: Price Proposal, Item ii and Section 2.3 Evaluation Factors and Proposal Submission Requirements, Item c. Volume 1, (1.1) Price Factor, (a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements, item ii, is revised per the following:

-Changed from:

iv. A completed Bill of Quantities (BOQ, Exhibit D) showing price breakdown for CLINs;

-To:

iv. A completed Bill of Quantities (BOQ, Exhibit D) showing price breakdown for CLINs. Provide in both PDF and Excel formats;

D. The following attachments are hereby incorporated into the solicitation:

-Attachment 01: Answers to Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs) -Attachment 02: Summary of Changes (Parts 2, 3, and 6) -Attachment 03: Revised Bill of Quantities (BOQ) -Attachment 04: Additional Drawings, Part 6

E. The Liquidated Damages under 52.211-12 Liquidated Damages – Construction (SEP 2000) is revised per the following:

-Changed from:

CLIN0001 Renovation of the Revetments, $200 per day CLIN0002 Egress Building & Access Road, $115 per day CLIN0003 Maintenance Back-Shop MJ-1, $80 per day CLIN0004 Option Item 0001 Wash Rack (Revetments), $40 per day CLIN0005 Option Item 0002 Wash Rack (Alternate), $65 per day

-To:

CLIN0001 Renovation of the Revetments, $260 per day CLIN0002 Egress Building & Access Road, $115 per day CLIN0003 Maintenance Back-Shop MJ-1, $80 per day CLIN0004 Option Item 0001 Wash Rack (Revetments), $40 per day CLIN0005 Option Item 0002 Renovate Six Existing Tie Downs, $5 per day

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

CLIN 0005

The CLIN description has changed from Option Item 0002 Wash Rack (Alternate) to Option Item 0002 Renovate Tie Downs.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

This is a Design-Build project. The contractor shall provide required earthwork, civil, structural, and all other associated works for the complete design and construction of an aircraft wash rack at an alternate location, at Wing 41, Royal Thai Air Force (RTAF), Chiang Mai, Thailand, in accordance with the Statement of Work attached here within.

To:

This is a Design-Build project. The contractor shall provide required earthwork, civil, structural, and all other associated works for the complete design and renovation of six existing tie downs at the existing apron, at Wing 41, Royal Thai Air Force (RTAF), Chiang Mai, Thailand, in accordance with the Statement of Work attached here within.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1. Pre-Proposal Site Visit (PPSV)

a. The Contracting Office intends to host a Pre-Proposal Site Visit (PPSV). The date and time of the visit will be provided via email when site access is confirmed. Reference clause 52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) – ALTERNATE I in this solicitation.

b. Pre-Proposal Site Visit (PPSV) attendance is required in order to be considered for award to ensure full understanding of the logistical challenges involved with this project and decrease risk of unsuccessful completion or financial hardship for contractors.

c. No minutes from the PPSV will be issued. All prospective Offerors are advised that this solicitation will remain unchanged unless it is amended in writing; however, if an amendment is issued in accordance with FAR 15.206, Offerors shall return a completed acknowledgement on the SF-30 with their proposal submission.

d. The Contracting Officer may require proof of active SAM.gov registration or registration in progress to attend the

PPSV.

2. Proposal Submittal Requirements. The following instructions to offerors are to ensure offerors submit information necessary for the Government to fully understand and evaluate proposals. Offerors are cautioned to follow the detailed instructions carefully and provide technical information that clearly shows they have the background and expertise necessary to perform the requirements listed in Statement of Work (SOW) or Project Program as the Government reserves the right to make an award based on initial offers received without discussions of such offers. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Prior to the proposal due date, Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation; alternate proposals will not be accepted.

2.1 Proposal Format.

The price proposal and technical proposal shall be submitted separately and must be submitted via e-mail to the Contract Specialist and the Contracting Officer. A cover letter shall accompany the proposal.

The cover letter shall include —

a. The solicitation number;

b. The name, address, telephone, and e-mail addresses of the Offeror;

c. The Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number, CAGE/NCAGE Code, and Tax Identification Number (TIN) of the

Offeror (if applicable);

d. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;

e. Names, titles, phone numbers, and email addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation and;

f. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

i. Individuals. A contract with an individual shall be signed by that individual. A contract with an individual doing business as a firm shall be signed by that individual, and the signature shall be followed by the individual’s typed, stamped, or printed name and the words “an individual doing business as [insert name of firm].”

ii. Partnerships. A contract with a partnership shall be signed in the partnership name.

iii. Corporations. A contract with a corporation shall be signed in the corporate name, followed by the word “by” and the signature and title of the person authorized to sign.

iv. Joint Ventures. A contract with a joint venture may involve any combination of individuals, partnerships, or corporations. The contract shall be signed by each participant in the joint venture in the manner prescribed in paragraphs (a) through (c) above for each type of participant.

v. Agents. When an agent is to sign the contract, other than as stated in paragraphs (a) through (d) above, the agent’s authorization to bind the principal must be established by evidence satisfactory to the Contracting Officer.

g. Joint Venture Agreement or letter of commitment (if applicable). The cover letter or letter of commitment shall be signed by all proposed parties.

2.2 Content of Proposal. Offerors shall submit separate price and technical proposals in two volumes as follows:

a. Volume 1: Price Proposal.

i. The Standard Form 1442 with Blocks 14 through 20c completed, signed, and dated;

ii. A signed and dated Standard Form 30 for any solicitation amendments;

iii, A completed Price Schedule for all CLINs;

iv. A completed Bill of Quantities (BOQ, Exhibit D) showing price breakdown for CLINs.

Provide in both PDF and Excel formats;

v. Completed Representations and Certifications, to include a copy of the electronic annual representations and certifications thru System for Awards Management (SAM) at www.sam.gov;

vi. Responsibility Determination and Financial Capability, as specified in Paragraph 4;

vii. Evidence of active SAM.gov registration at www.sam.gov.

b. Volume 2: Technical Proposal

i. Factor 1, Offeror Experience Project Data Sheet specified in Section 002200 of this solicitation;

ii. Factor 2, Past Performance Data as specified in Section 002200 of this solicitation;

iii. Factor 3, Safety in Section 002200 of this solicitation;

iv. Factor 4, Technical Solution in Section 002200 of this solicitation;

3. Inquiries. Inquiries regarding the Request for Proposal (RFP) shall be submitted electronically using the Pre Proposal Inquiry Form (Exhibit A) provided in this solicitation. The Point of Contact (POC) for inquiries is the Contract Specialist. Inquiry submission details will be communicated during the Pre-Proposal Site Visit (PPSV).

4. Responsibility Determination and Financial Capability. FAR subpart 9.104-1 requires prospective contractors to demonstrate that they have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or the ability to obtain them;

capability to comply with the required performance schedule; a satisfactory performance record; the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, technical skills, production, construction and technical equipment and facilities or the ability to obtain them; and be otherwise eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations. This is notice that the Contracting Officer may request Offerors submit the following information for review and determination prior to award:

4.1 Proof of the Offeror’s ability to legitimately conduct business in the Country where the project is located.

This requirement may be satisfied by an Offeror (or one of a firm’s Joint Venture partners) having the appropriate registration.

4.2 A list of current, on-going projects. Include contract number, brief description of the project, dollar value, percent complete, whether your firm is performing as a prime contractor or a subcontractor and the percentage of the work that applies to your firm, customer point of contact, and customer phone number. The Government may contact the point of contacts listed for verification of information.

4.3 Company financial statements (balance sheets and income statements) for the past three years.

5. System for Award Management (SAM). A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor not registered in SAM.

Remember to review the NAICS codes listed in your SAM record and make sure that you have listed the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this procurement. Contractors shall be registered and active in the SAM database (https://www.sam.gov) at the time of offer submission. Contractors wanting to attend site visits shall be active in SAM.gov or provide proof that registration has been submitted to SAM.gov and is in progress. The Contract Specialist will provide an International Entity Registration Guide, if requested.

6. Contract Pricing. Offers must be made in United States Dollars.

7. Incurred Expenses. The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

8. Enforceability of Proposal. The proposal must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation. The Government will rely on such information in the award of the contract. Items offered in the contractor’s proposal (e.g., key personnel, subcontractors, materials, etc.) are binding on the contractor and shall be provided for the duration of the contract. Substitutions will require the Contracting Officer’s approval and shall be equal or better, in the judgment of the Contracting Officer, than the items originally proposed. The Contractor’s proposal becomes part of the contract award document.

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

PART I - GENERAL

1.1 SOURCE SELECTION

This competitive procurement uses source selection procedures to select the responsible Offeror whose proposal conforms to the requirements of the solicitation and is determined to provide the best value to the Government, price and other factors considered. The Government will use the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) method to evaluate proposals submitted in response to this solicitation. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with Offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the Offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable (LPTA) proposal.

PER NPGI 15.101-2 (DFARS) Lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) source selection process. (Business Rule), the number of proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability may be limited to the three lowest priced offers at the discretion of the Contracting Officer. If the number of proposals to be evaluated is limited, the technical proposal shall be provided to the evaluator(s) without any identification of price. If the lowest priced proposal is not found to be technically acceptable then the next lowest price proposal shall be evaluated. If that proposal is also not found to be technically acceptable, then the process described will be conducted again as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies a technically acceptable proposal. The source selection method must be included in the request for proposal. If the Contracting Officer later determines that discussions are necessary, the procedures in FAR 15.306 shall be followed.

1.2 INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT CONDUCTING DISCUSSIONS

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines it to be necessary.

1.3 BASIS OF AWARD

The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price. An overall non-price factor rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factor proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factor rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” make a proposal ineligible for award.

Definitions:

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings:

Acceptable: Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings:

Acceptable: Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. Note: In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on pastperformance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance.

In the context of acceptability/unacceptability “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”.

Unacceptable: Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

PART II - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

2.1 EVALUATION CRITIERIA

a. The contract resulting from this solicitation will be awarded to the responsible Offeror whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be the lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) proposal based on the evaluation factors set forth in the solicitation.

b. “Relevant” means similar to the acquisition in terms of size, scope, and complexity and nature of the work being solicited. The Government will only consider projects for construction services of the type described in non-cost factor 1 – Offeror Experience, below.

c. Past performance information on “relevant projects” meeting the definition in paragraph (b) will constitute the primary consideration in the Government’s evaluation under non-cost factor 2 – Past Performance. The Government may, however, review and consider past performance information on other projects as made available to the Government from other sources such as the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and inquiries with previous clients / owners. The Government will determine the relevance of the past performance information received on other projects, as well as consider the source, context and currency of such information in its evaluation.

d. Offerors who submit past performance and experience information of a parent, sister, predecessor or other affiliated company must describe what involvement such company will have on the acquisition. The proposal should clearly indicate how the resources of the parent, sister, predecessor or other affiliated company – its workforce, management, facilities, or other resources – will be provided or relied upon for contract performance.

e. The Contracting Officer may discount favorable past performance and experience of a subcontractor unless the prime contractor clearly provides, in its proposal, evidence of a binding teaming agreement or other contractual agreement which creates legal responsibility on the part of the subcontractors.

f. In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR

15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

g. The Government, in compliance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(ii), Offerors are authorized to provide information on problems encountered on the identified contracts and the Offeror’s corrective actions. The Government shall consider this information, as well as information obtained from any other sources, when evaluating the Offeror’s past performance.

2.2 PRICE EVALUATION

The price proposal will be evaluated to determine the reasonableness and completeness of the Offeror’s proposal.

The Contracting Officer may conduct price realism if the Contracting Officer determined that it is necessary.

Unrealistically low (or high) proposed price or unbalanced prices, may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that the Offeror does not understand the requirement or has made an unrealistic or unreasonable proposal.

2.3 EVALUATION FACTORS AND PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

a. The Offeror’s proposal shall contain a response to each of the following evaluation factors and shall be in the form prescribed by this solicitation. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and non-cost factors in two volumes listed below:

Volume 1: Price Factor Volume 2: Non-Cost Factor 1 – Offeror Experience

Non-Cost Factor 2 – Past Performance Non-Cost Factor 3 – Safety Non-Cost Factor 4 – Technical Solutions

b. The distinction between past performance and Offeror experience is experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance relates to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

c. The following describes each evaluation factor, submittal requirements and basis for assigning ratings:

Volume 1:

(1.1) Price Factor

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

i. The Standard Form 1442 of Blocks 14 through 20c completed, signed, and dated;

ii. A signed and dated Standard Form 30 for any solicitation amendments;

iii. A completed Price Schedule for all CLINs;

iv. A completed Bill of Quantities (BOQ, Exhibit D) showing price breakdown for CLINs.

Provide in both PDF and Excel formats;

v. Completed Representations and Certifications, to include a copy of the electronic annual representations and certifications thru System for Awards Management (SAM) at www.sam.gov;

vi. Responsibility Determination and Financial Capability, as specified in Paragraph 4;

vii. Evidence of active SAM.gov registration.

(b) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price of all priced CLINS. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair, reasonable and realistic price:

i. Comparison of proposed prices received in response to this RFP;

ii. Comparison of proposed prices with the Independent Government Estimate (IGE);

iii. Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

Volume 2:

(2.1) Non-Cost Factor 1 - Offeror Experience:

(a) Submittal Requirements: Submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates Offeror experience on relevant projects that are similar size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as similar design-build construction with the following relevant characteristics:

a. Similar in Size: Design-build construction projects cost between $400,000 and $2,500,000 in final construction. One project must be at least $1,000,000. Any project outside this range may not be considered.

b. Similar in Scope: Design-build construction of a single or more story reinforced concrete structure building with a minimum size of 700 SM.

c. Similar in Complexity: Design-build construction projects involving residential, commercial, institutional, or industrial construction performed in Southeast Asia, Nepal, the Maldives, or Timor Leste.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. If submitting an ongoing construction project, the project should be at least 80% complete at the time of proposal submission. A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single contract.

The Offeror Experience Project Data Sheet in the form of Exhibit B is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on the form may be expanded; however, total length for each Offeror Experience Project Data Sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) claimed for past performance. Data sheets for each project should not exceed two (2) pages.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity or the Joint Venture partners. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract in order for the past performance information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g., personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation: The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing similar design-build construction projects with the relevant characteristics defined in the solicitation submittal requirements for this non-cost factor above. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) projects. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Offeror experience will not be considered. The Government will not evaluate information exceeding the first two (2) pages for each Project Data Sheet.

i. Acceptable. The contractor has demonstrated construction experience in performing similar design-build construction projects with the relevant characteristics defined in the solicitation submittal requirements for this non-cost factor.

ii. Unacceptable. The contractor did not submit Offeror Experience Project Data Sheets, the submitted data sheets did not demonstrate relevant construction experience performing similar design-build construction projects with the relevant characteristics defined in the solicitation submittal requirements for this non-cost factor, or the Offeror submitted less than three (3) relevant projects.

(2.2) Non-Cost Factor 2 - Past Performance:

(a) If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1 Offeror Experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Exhibit C) for each project included in Factor 1. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs.

However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit the first page of the PPQ with the proposal, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Contract Specialist (CS).

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Offeror Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation: This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Offeror Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government.

Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval Systems (PPIRS) using all CAGE/UEI numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.

The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

i. Acceptable. The Offeror has satisfactory or better ratings in the Contractor Performance

Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or on Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Exhibit C) for at least three (3) projects rated acceptable in Factor 1. In the case of an Offeror without a record of recent and relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have “unknown” past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

ii. Unacceptable. The Offeror was not rated satisfactory or better in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or on Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Exhibit C) for at least three (3) of the projects determined to be relevant and acceptable under Factor 1 – Offeror Experience, or the Government has found less than satisfactory documentation for the contractor’s performance using Government databases. Additionally, Offerors will be rated unacceptable if they do not provide a CPARS if it exists for any project submitted under Factor 1 – Offeror Experience. Submitting a PPQ in place of a CPARS when a CPARS exists will result in unacceptable rating.

(2.3) Non-Cost Factor 3 - Safety:

(a) Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit a safety narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor (if utilized) performed work. The narrative should describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor (if utilized) performed work.

Additionally, the narrative should describe the methods Offeror will use to execute an effective safety program including mishap prevention techniques and processes, encouraging employee reporting of unsafe conditions, and preventing unsafe work activities that could lead to near-miss or injury mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to five (5) pages.

(b) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine how the Offeror will implement and oversee its safety program for protection of the prime contractor and subcontractor (if utilized) personnel. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s plan to monitor safety performance of the prime contractor and all subcontractors (if utilized) during contract performance, with a focus on specific management practices that will be utilized for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention. The Government will only evaluate up to the first five (5) pages submitted.

i. Acceptable. The Offeror demonstrates an understanding of the requirement to provide for the safety of prime and subcontractor (if utilized) personnel, the narrative describes the methods Offeror will use to execute an effective program that includes mishap prevention techniques and processes, encouraging employee reporting of unsafe conditions, and prevents unsafe work activities that could lead to near-miss or injury mishaps.

ii. Unacceptable. The Offeror’s narrative does not demonstrate an understanding of the requirement to provide for the safety of prime and subcontractor (if utilized) personnel, the narrative does not describe the methods Offeror will use to execute an effective program that includes mishap prevention techniques and processes, encouraging employee reporting of unsafe conditions, and does not prevent unsafe work activities that could lead to near-miss or injury mishaps, or the Offeror did not submit a sufficient narrative within the first five (5) pages.

(2.4) Non-Cost Factor 4, Technical Solution:

(a) Submittal Requirements:

i. Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. Include the following:

1. Design criteria for Egress building.

2. Foreign object damage (FOD) control methodologies during construction.

3. Exterior façade describing how the proposed construction integrates with the surrounding area and existing Base facilities design or architectural theme.

Narrative shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages.

ii. Provide the following conceptual design drawing details:

1. Site layout plan showing footprint of proposed building, perimeter fence, entrance gates and road.

2. Floor plan and roof plan of for proposed building. The drawings shall include dimensions, doors, windows, and fire exit, to illustrate understanding of the statement of requirements.

(b) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate the narrative, and conceptual drawings considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the RFP.

i. Acceptable. Narrative, and all required drawings, are submitted; the narrative accurately describes the requirements, the drawings address all key aspects of the project and are adequate to use for creating detailed design drawings, The Offeror illustrates understanding of the statement of the requirements.

ii. Unacceptable. The Offeror did not submit a narrative, all required drawings or the drawings submitted do not address all key aspects of the project or are not adequate to use for creating detailed design drawings. The Offeror did not illustrate understanding of the statement of the requirements.

2.4 FINAL SELECTION

All Offerors will be evaluated for each of the technical (non-cost) Factors and the responsible Offeror submitting the lowest priced technically acceptable offer will be selected for contract award. A responsibility determination shall be made for each presumed awardee. A presumed awardee may be determined to be non-responsible if it has an excessive amount of current awards or ongoing projects, is currently behind or has excessive rework issues on existing contracts, or is otherwise deemed an increased risk to the US Government for unsuccessful performance.

SECTION 00 70 00 - CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT

52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--CONSTRUCTION (SEP 2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.

CLIN0001 Renovation of the Revetments, $260 per day CLIN0002 Egress Building & Access Road, $115 per day CLIN0003 Maintenance Back-Shop MJ-1, $80 per day CLIN0004 Option Item 0001 Wash Rack (Revetments), $40 per day CLIN0005 Option Item 0002 Renovate Tie Downs, $5 per day

(b) If the Government terminates the Contractor's right to proceed, liquidated damages will continue to accrue until the work is completed. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.

(End of clause)

(End of Summary of Changes)

Attachment 01 – Answers to PPIs Amendment 0004 N6274224R6708

NO

Reference

(Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTIONS GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

Part 2.PROJECT

OBJECTIVES

Part 3Section 5.2

According to information received during the PPSV, the contractor understands the ejection seats are model *MK-16, and there could be up to 4 ejection seats at one time in the seat service area. It was explained that up to 60 cartridges might be in either the canopy service area or the seat service area at one time. Other design criteria, such as the energy content of a single cartridge or debris risk assessment, are not provided. These criteria can be examined after contract award. The bid is based on the CMU wall details provided.

The contractor understands the function of the "Blast-resistant" building is for the walls to be "hardened" and the roof to be "soft."

The "Blast-design" requirement is limited to the walls and doors: the insulated roof cover is assumed to be sacrificial with no consideration of debris. Is this the user's intent?

*There may be different versions of MK-

16. The version used at Wing 41 should be determined before the design commences.

Yes, there can be up to 4 ejection seats in the seat service area. However, there can also be up to 4 ejection seats in canopy maintenance room.

See ejection seat quantity and cartridge ignition pressure specifications in amendment 0004, Part 3, Section 5. WORK/ROOM

REQUIREMENTS, 5.2 CLIN 0002:

CONSTRUCTION OF EGRESS BUILDING

AND ACCESS ROAD. Amendment 0004 adds:

“Four ejection seats are in the Seat Central Service repair room, and four are in the Canopy maintenance room.

The AT-6 aircraft utilizes Martin-Baker Mk US16LA ejection seats with twin catapult, rocket-assisted propulsion system. The ejection seats have two classes of explosives installed.

The under-seat and parachute deployments are rocket motors (Class 1,3C explosives) and cartridge-activated devices (CADs), (Class 1AS explosives).”

Per Part 3, Section 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION, this is a design-build project to provide a complete design and construction.

The contractor shall design a usable functional Egress building that complies with the required codes and standards in the RFP.

Blast-resistant building is for the walls and doors to be hardened and the roof to be soft.

Per Part 3, Section 2. PROJECT OBJECTIVE:

Construct an Egress facility intended for a safe and efficient work environment for dismantling, examining, fixing, and reassembling ejection seats and their associated parts.

Be reminded that nothing said verbally at the PPSV changes what the Contractors are provided in writing. All Contractors shall propose on the written requirements.

Part 3 B1010 a.5

There is a reference to ACI 318-83. The contractor understands it’s OK to follow ACI 318-14 or ACI 318-19 because they are more recent concrete design standards.

Agreed?

Yes. See amendment 0004 Part 3, Section 6.

ENGINEERING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS,

B10 SUPER STRUCTURE, B1010 a. 5), change to:

“All concrete work (material, design, and construction procedure) shall comply with the latest revision of ACI Standard 318.”

Part 2

5. Design a, The Contractor understands that review periods by the NAVFAC and RTAF could be phased by CLINs. In other words, as the design is finished for one CLIN, it could be submitted to start the respective review cycle. It is not necessary to wait until all CLINs are 100% finished.

Agreed?

No. The review periods cannot be phased by CLINs.

Per part 3, Section 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Once the final design has been approved by the Contracting Officer, the design package as a whole, will be delivered to the Royal Thai Air Force (RTAF) for their review and acceptance. RTAF design review is scheduled for 210 calendar days and the baseline schedule shall reflect this.

The Contractor understands that not all the revetments will be available to work on at once. NAVFAC will coordinate the handover to accommodate the Contractor’s proposed schedule. Agreed?

Yes. See the work sequence in amendment 0004, Part 6, add: Attachment (5)

REVETMENT WORK SEQUENCE.

5 CLIN 0005

The Contractor understands CLIN 0005 will be deleted, and another CLIN regarding grounding points will be added to an amendment. The Contractor will not include any BOQ for CLIN 0005; is this correct?

Yes. See amendment 0004, Part 3, Section 1.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Section 4.

PROJECT REQUIREMENT and Section 5.

WORK/ROOM REQUIREMENTS: change CLIN 0005 OPTION 0002 to RENOVATE SIX

EXISTING TIE DOWNS AT THE EXISTING

APRON.

See the updated CLIN 0005 OPTION 0002 BOQ in amendment 0004, BOQ REVISION R1.

NC Factor 4 Technical Solution

As described in the PPSV, the Contractor understands part a (i) is intended only to relate to the Egress building, and part a(ii) is intended to relate to the Egress building and the Maintenance Back-Shop.

No, per Part 1, Section 2.3 EVALUATION

FACTORS AND PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

REQUIREMENTS, Volume (2.4)/(Non-Cost Factor 4, Technical Solution), item (a) i. is not only related to the Egress building, and item (a)

ii. is not only related to the Egress building and the Maintenance Back-Shop.

Part 3 G1030001 Grading

“Finish floor elevations for new facilities (measured at lobby internal area) shall be a minimum of 50 cm above the ground level.” Is this a remnant from another RFQ? Perhaps it is not strictly applicable to the two new buildings in this project, provided that the site can be graded to provide positive drainage. In other words, is it permissible to raise the floor a lower amount if proper drainage is provided?

No, per Part 3, Section 6. ENGINEERING

SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS, G10 SITE

PREPARATION, G1030001 GRADING, the finish floor elevations for new facilities shall be a minimum of 50 cm above the ground level.

Please specify and confirm the Egress Building and Maintenance Back-Shop level because the scope of work (Part 3, page 28) conflicts with the drawing provided in Part 6.

Comply with the scope of work and specifications in Part 3. Per part 2, Section 5.

Design, k. Design-Build Contract - Order of Precedence: Part 3 takes precedent over Part 6 in case of a conflict.

The concept drawings in PART 6 of this RFP package are for information only and are not intended to be final and complete.

Request pictures of furniture samples for commercial–grade workstations and explosive magazine storage.

The USG is not providing sample photos for the workstation and explosive magazine storage.

Per Part 3, Section 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION, this is a design-build project to provide a complete design and construction.

The contractor shall propose designs and material catalogs.

Please clarify and confirm the specs of roofing materials for Revetments, Egress Building, and Maintenance Back-Shop MJ-1. The scope of work in part 3 conflicts with the drawing provided in part 6.

See answer to question 8.

Page 9 of 29, Item q. Door: The blast-resistant doors: What is the type of blast-resistant doors? kPa or psi

Per Part 3, Section 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION, this is a design-build project to provide a complete design and construction.

The contractor shall design type of blast-resistant doors per the RFP and can provide either Kpa or psi.

12 5.1.f

The spec states that all existing steel bunkers between each revetment should be repaired and repainted. Are the long existing steel bunkers (along the east side of revetment) behind the Jet Blast Deflectors to be repaired and painted?

Yes. See amendment 0004 Part 3, Section

5.WORK/ROOM REQUIREMENTS, 5.1 CLIN

0001 RENOVATION OF THE EXISTING

REVETMENTS, f, change to:

“Repair and repaint all existing revetment roof steel structures. Repair and repaint all existing steel bunkers between the existing revetment and along the east and west sides of the existing revetments.”

13 Exhibit D Will a line item be added to the BOQ for Repair and Painting of the existing steel bunkers behind the Jet Blast Deflectors?

Yes. See a new line item in amendment 0004

BOQ REVISION R1.

Part 3 Project Program, Page 83

There are 18 existing Revetments to be renovated. How many Revetments will be available to be renovated at a time?

See answer to question 4.

2.3 Evaluation

factors and proposal submission requirements (2.4)/(Non-Cost Factor 4, Technical Solution)/ Page 21

Will the government waive the requirement for design drawings at the time of submission or accept them after the award?

No. However, the USG required only some drawings with the proposal submission as stated in Part 1, Section 2.3 EVALUATION

FACTORS AND PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

REQUIREMENTS, Volume (2.4)/(Non-Cost Factor 4, Technical Solution)

Part 3 (Project Program) Page No.

12 of 29, 5.3.1,Demolition Work (Point No. a, b, c & d)

Please provide the tentative location of all the structures to be demolished.

See tentative location of all the structures to be demolished in Part 6, attachment (3), maintenance back-shop MJ-1 concept drawings.

Part 3 (Project Program)Page No.

13 of29, CLIN 0003,

5.3.2 Civil work, Item No. g & h.

Please provide the location of 400 SM concrete pavement and fence with two vehicle gates.

See concrete pavement location in Part 6 attachment (3) maintenance back-shop MJ-1 concept drawings.

Part 3 Page No. 8 of

29, 5.2 CLIN 0002,

5.2.1 Civil work, item no. g, Please provide the location of the concrete access road with traffic markings…