About this file

This document is Notice No. 5 for RFP N62742-24-R-1321, which is a solicitation for a Pacific Deterrence Initiative Multiple Award Construction Contract (PDI MACC) in various locations in the Indo-Pacific region. The RFP remains unchanged despite a request to modify the airfield construction project relevancy criteria. The notice clarifies that the "long spans and column-free areas" requirement refers to the clear span width, not the overall structure width. There are no specific security requirements for hand-delivering proposals to the specified location. The government will not consider including wholly-owned affiliates in the definition of "Offeror" or provide the interested vendors list. The PDI MACC will award task orders for a variety of design-build and design-bid-build construction projects, including new facilities, repairs/renovations, and upgrades to wharves, piers, runways, fuel storage, roads, and other infrastructure. The contract term is anticipated to be 96 months or $15 billion, whichever occurs first, with a $25,000 minimum guarantee per awardee.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to PACIFIC DETERRENCE INITIATIVE MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, INDO-PACIFIC, newest first.
File Type Posted
24R1321 Note 8.pdf PDF
N6274224R1321_AMD02.pdf PDF
24R1321 Note 7.pdf PDF
24R1321_Doc 002200-Attachment A_AMD02.docx DOCX document
24R1321 Note 6.pdf PDF
24R1321 Note 4.pdf PDF
24R1321 Note 3.pdf PDF
24R1321 Note 2.pdf PDF
N6274224R1321_AMD01.pdf PDF
24R1321 Note 1.pdf PDF
RFPN6274224R1321_PH1.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP N62742-24-R-1321

Notice No. 5

12 August 2024

PRE-PROPOSAL QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

PACIFIC DETERRENCE INITIATIVE MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION

CONTRACT, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, INDO-PACIFIC

NOTE: The following questions and answers are provided for INFORMATION ONLY. The

RFP remains unchanged unless it is amended in writing on a Standard Form 30.

50. Factor 3 – Experience (1) Construction Experience a. and (b) Basis of Evaluation, page 3 of

10 (Construction Experience) and 5 of 10 (Basis of Evaluation):

Would the USG consider modifying the airfield construction project relevancy to the following:

“New construction or repair of an existing airfield involving at least 3 of the following elements:

PCC Pavements, Asphalt (Flexible) Pavement, Airfield Lighting Systems, Airfield markings, and/or navigation aids.”

If relevancy change is accepted, also recommend adding the following elements to the more favorable consideration to relevant CONSTRUCTION projects that:

- Installed or repaired 5,000 SM of 300mm thick PCC.

- Installed or repaired 10,000 SM of Flexible Pavements.

- Work performed on a US Military Airfield.

ANSWER: The Government has considered your request; however, the RFP remains unchanged.

51. Document 00 22 00, Factor 3 - Experience [Part II, 2.2 (2), (b)]

Regarding the Basis of Evaluation for Designs, the RFP states more favorable consideration will be given to “structures containing long spans and column-free areas, approximately 90 meters or more in width.” Does the structure need to be 90 meters in width, or the open span 90 meters in clear space?

ANSWER: To clarify, long spans and column-free areas is also considered open span clear space.

52. Document 00 21 16, 1.2, Number of Copies/Time of Receipt, (e) (2)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND, PACIFIC

258 MAKALAPA DRIVE, SUITE 100

JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR HICKAM, HAWAII 96860-3134

Are there any specific security requirements for the hand delivery of proposals to 4256 Radford

Drive, Building 62?

ANSWER: No, there are no security requirements as building is located off base.

53. PART II. EVALUATION FACTORS AND BASIS OF AWARD/ 2.2 NON-PRICE

EVALUATION FACTORS/ PHASE-ONE/ NOTES/ 5

For the definition of “Offeror” in the first sentence of Note 5, will the Government consider including wholly owned affiliates of the proposing entity in Block 14, meaning affiliates that are wholly owned by the proposing entity or are in common ownership with the proposing entity under a single parent company?

ANSWER: No, the RFP remains unchanged.

54. I am trying to find/access the planholders/interested vendors list for the subject referenced proposal as it is not visible on SAM.gov. Can you please provide the interested vendors list or allow it to be viewed on SAM?

ANSWER: No, this will not be provided.

End of Notice

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .