19R1313-Note2.pdf
PDF 109 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6274219R1313
About this file
This notice provides questions and answers regarding solicitation number N6274219R1313, which seeks proposals for a multiple award construction contract for projects in Guam and other areas under the cognizance of Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific. The scope of work includes design-build and design-bid-build construction services for facilities such as administrative buildings, barracks, dining halls, ranges, schools, roads and utilities. Task order values are expected to range from $10-200 million. The contract has a base period of one year and four one-year options, with an estimated maximum value of $990 million across all awards. Proposals will be evaluated in two phases for technical approach, experience, past performance, safety, small business utilization and sample project management plans. The Navy intends to make three to five awards and hold a minimum of $25,000 in work for each awardee annually, with no minimum guarantees for option years. Work will be assigned through task order competitions among contract holders.
RFP N62742-19-R-1313, Notice No. 2, Questions and Answers
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 191313-Note4.pdf | ||
| 19R1313-AMD3.pdf | ||
| 191313-Note3.pdf | ||
| 19R1313-AMD2.pdf | ||
| 19R1313-AMD1.pdf | ||
| 191313-Note1.pdf | ||
| 19R1313_RFP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP N62742-19-R-1313
Notice No. 2
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND, PACIFIC
258 MAKALAPA DR., STE. 100
PEARL HARBOR, HI 96860-3134
29 October 2019
PRE-PROPOSAL QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR PRIMARILY GOVERNMENT
OF JAPAN FUNDED DEFENSE POLICY REVIEW INITIATIVE PROJECTS IN GUAM
AND OTHER AREAS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVFAC PACIFIC
NOTE: The following questions and answers are provided for INFORMATION ONLY. The RFP remains unchanged unless it is amended in writing on a Standard Form 30.
7. Construction and Design Experience. Under the Community Support Facility Criteria, will the Government consider a hotel/resort with dining facilities and fitness center compliant with the RFPs requirement?
ANSWER: See amendment no. 0002.
8. Construction and Design Experience. Under the Community Support Facility Criteria, will the Government consider a chapel as church?
ANSWER: Yes, contingent upon the primary function of the project submitted is a chapel or church vice a room within another primary function; e.g., a chapel in a hospital.
9. In the case when the DOR was working under a subcontract to a construction firm on a Design/Build contract is it acceptable for the DOR to obtain the PPQ from the Prime Construction Contractor since the DOR (as a subcontractor) has no means of obtaining evaluations directly from the Government
On our current submittal to NAVFAC Southwest we have received the following answer:
Q: If the proposed design firm was the designer of record for the Offeror on a design-build project, could the Offeror complete the PPQ for the design firm?
A: The construction prime contractor can complete an evaluation for the design firm only if the construction prime contractor is not the Offeror or any other member of the Offeror’s team proposing on the contract, as identified in Factor 1 Technical Approach. Since the Offeror and other members of the Offeror’s team are considered interested parties to this solicitation, they should not complete the evaluation; however, the design firm can request the client/owner to provide an evaluation. Past performance evaluations that are completed by the Offeror (or any other member of the Offeror’s team) for any member of the Offeror’s team will not be considered.
Can you please confirm if this is acceptable for NAVFAC Pacific
ANSWER: It is not acceptable to NAVFAC Pacific.
10. DOCUMENT 00202,EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD, 2.2 NON-PRICE
EVALUATION FACTORS, Factor 1 – Technical Approach. The Government has requested a detailed 6-Page narrative describing the technical approach for accomplishing the requirements of the contract. Due to the complexity of this MACC, will the Government allow an additional 1-page, 8 ½ X 11 Organizational Chart to graphically demonstrate the operational execution responsibilities between each team member and the government? This should help the Tech- Review Board evaluate the narrative’s flow of responsibilities.
ANSWER: No. Organizational chart is not required; however, if provided, shall be part of the 6-page limit.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .