19R1313-AMD1.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

RFP N62742-19-R-1313, MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR PRIMARILY GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN FUNDED DEFENSE POLICY REVIEW INITIATIVE PROJECTS IN GUAM AND OTHER AREAS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVFAC PACIFIC

Amendment no. 0001 is continued on page 2.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 02-Oct-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6274219R1313

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11-Sep-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

02-Oct-2019

CODE

NAVFAC PACIFIC

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS BR (CODE ACQ33)

258 MAKALAPA DR STE 100

PEARL HARBOR HI 96860-3134

N62742 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

RFP No. N6274219R1313 Amendment No. 0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

DOCUMENT 00202 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Delete Document 00202 Evaluation Factors for Award page 5 and insert the attached Document 00202 Evaluation Factors for Award page 5.

MACC FOR PRIMARILY GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN FUNDED DEFENSE POLICY REVIEW INITIATIVE

PROJECTS IN GUAM AND OTHER AREAS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVFAC PACIFIC

RFP N62742-19-R-1313

Amendment No. 0001

Document 00202

7. There is a clear distinction between “experience” and “past performance.” Experience is related to the types and amounts of projects previously accomplished. Past performance relates to how well a contractor has performed.

8. The “Offeror” is defined as the exact name in Block 14 of the Solicitation, Offer and Award (SF1442). If the Offeror is utilizing experience and past performance information of any entity other than (1) the Offeror; (2) if the Offeror is a joint venture, its joint venture partners jointly and severally liable for the contract; or (3) a firm that has been acquired by the Offeror and is now part of the Offeror (separate legal entities are not considered part of the Offeror), the Offeror shall provide in its proposal a fully-executed teaming agreement or other contractual agreement. The teaming agreement or other contractual agreement shall, at a minimum, (1) be signed by the Offeror and the other entity, (2) specifically reference this solicitation/contract, and (3) specify the work to be performed by the other entity such that it is clear that the other entity will be meaningfully involved in this contract in a role that is consistent with that entity’s role in the project submitted. For item (3), clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the other entity in terms of the work it will specifically perform or manage, or the key personnel it will provide in the performance or management of the contract. Note that generalized statements concerning commitment of resources are not sufficient to demonstrate that an entity will be meaningfully involved in the performance of the contract. Examples of “generalized statements” include a commitment of resources merely based on an entity’s “access” to resources and other generalized statements such as an entity will “provide support and expertise on the project.” The government will only consider information provided in the teaming agreement for the purpose of determining whether the Offeror has clearly demonstrated that any entity (other than the Offeror and, if the offeror is a joint venture, its joint venture partners jointly and severally liable for the contract) will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract. For experience and past performance information of a firm that has been acquired by the Offeror and is no longer a separate legal entity, the Offeror shall provide an explanation of the acquisition sufficient to demonstrate that the predecessor firm is now part of the Offeror in Block 1 of Attachment A.

(2) Design Experience

Submit a maximum of ten (10) design projects that best demonstrates design experience that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the types of projects described below. If the offeror submits more than ten (10) projects for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first ten (10) projects and disregard any other project information after the first ten (10). For purposes of this evaluation, the types of relevant design projects are further defined as the design of:

(1) New construction of multi-story administrative facilities (specifically headquarters and administration/office buildings) consisting of concrete building structure approximately $30M or more.

(2) New construction of industrial facilities (specifically warehouses and maintenance buildings) consisting of concrete building structure approximately $10M or more.

(3) New construction of educational facilities (specifically schools and training buildings) consisting of concrete building structure approximately $20M or more.

(4) New construction of community support facilities (specifically fire station, police station, dining facility, fitness center, church, and recreation center) consisting of concrete building structure approximately $20M or more.

NOTES:

1. Construction of the relevant design projects shall have been completed or substantially completed within the last ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. “Substantially complete” is defined as at least 90% physically complete.

2. Failure to demonstrate experience in ALL four (4) types of relevant design projects shall be considered a deficiency.

3. A project with multiple functions correlated to the types indicated above shall be considered as one relevant construction project based upon its primary function. For example, a headquarters building which also includes training and cafeteria/dining shall be identified by its primary function as an “headquarters building” under the multi-story administrative facilities type of relevant construction project and shall not be also considered as