191313-Note4.pdf
PDF 95 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6274219R1313
About this file
This document provides questions and answers related to solicitation number N62742-19-R-1313 for multiple award construction contracts. The solicitation seeks proposals for firm-fixed-price indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity multiple award construction contracts for design-build and design-bid-build construction projects in Guam and other areas under the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific. Projects will primarily be funded by the Government of Japan. The work involves a wide variety of renovation, upgrade, and new construction tasks for facilities such as administrative buildings, barracks, dining halls, ranges, schools, and utilities. Task order values are expected to range from $10-200 million. The period of performance for contracts is a one-year base period plus four optional one-year periods, for a total of five years. The maximum total value of all contracts is $990 million. The solicitation is open to both small and large businesses and proposals are due on November 13, 2019.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 19R1313-AMD3.pdf | ||
| 191313-Note3.pdf | ||
| 19R1313-AMD2.pdf | ||
| 19R1313-Note2.pdf | ||
| 19R1313-AMD1.pdf | ||
| 191313-Note1.pdf | ||
| 19R1313_RFP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND, PACIFIC
258 MAKALAPA DR., STE. 100
PEARL HARBOR, HI 96860-3134
RFP N62742-19-R-1313
Notice No. 4
13 November 2019
PRE-PROPOSAL QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR PRIMARILY GOVERNMENT
OF JAPAN FUNDED DEFENSE POLICY REVIEW INITIATIVE PROJECTS IN GUAM
AND OTHER AREAS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVFAC PACIFIC
NOTE: The following questions and answers are provided for INFORMATION ONLY. The RFP remains unchanged unless it is amended in writing on a Standard Form 30.
12. With respect to the RFI answered in Notice 3, please clarify if this is limited to Designers of Record or also includes any supporting engineering firms that may have worked as a subcontractor to a Designer of Record on an AE MACC with the Government.
ANSWER: The prime contractor and DOR, including subconsultants/subcontractors, should review the Federal Acquisition Regulation 9.5. See also Document 00801, paragraph 1.18, Organizational Conflicts of Interest which states in part “[t]he restrictions described herein shall apply to the Contractor and its affiliates, consultants and subcontracts under this contract. If the Contractor under this contract prepares or assists in preparing a statement of work, specifications and plans, the Contractor and its affiliates and any subcontractors/subconsultants shall be ineligible to bid or participate, in any capacity, in any contractual effort which is based on such statement of work or specifications and plans as a prime contractor, subcontractor, consultant or in any similar capacity.”
13. Document 00100, Page 1 of 13 – Proposal Due Date. Request for a 2-3 week extension
ANSWER: The proposal due date remains unchanged.
14. PHASE ONE, Factor 2 Experience
(1) Construction Experience “Submit a maximum of ten (10) construction projects that best demonstrates the offeror’s experience that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the types of projects described below.”
(4) New construction of community support facilities (specifically fire station, police station, dining facility, fitness center, church and recreation center) consisting of concrete building structure approximately $20M or more.
The types of community support facilities specified above are difficult to find at $20M or more.
Would the Government allow Court Houses to be included in the definition of community support facilities for Construction Experience?
ANSWER: Courthouse project would not qualify as community support facility. Amendment to follow reducing “approximately $20M or more” to “approximately $5M or more”.
15. PHASE ONE, Factor 2 Experience
(2) Design Experience “Submit a maximum of ten (10) design projects that best demonstrates the offeror’s experience that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the types of projects described below.”
(4) New construction of community support facilities (specifically fire station, police station, dining facility, fitness center, church and recreation center) consisting of concrete building structure approximately $20M or more.
The types of community support facilities specified above are difficult to find at $20M or more.
Would the Government allow Court Houses to be included in the definition of community support facilities for Design Experience?
ANSWER: Courthouse project would not qualify as community support facility. Amendment to follow reducing “approximately $20M or more” to “approximately $5M or more”.
16. Reference: RFP N62742-19-R-1313, Document 00202, page 6, Factor 3 – Past Performance: (a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: “If there is not a completed CPARS, CCASS or ACASS evaluation, then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ - Attachment B) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience.”
Question: Will the government accept a PPQ that had been submitted for a previous NAVFAC Pacific Proposal? (The PPQ form is identical and the project was 100% complete at the time the PPQ was completed.)
ANSWER: Yes. As stated on Attachment B, Note, “The offeror will submit the completed questionnaire to NAVFAC with their proposal, and may duplicate this questionnaire for future submission on NAVFAC solicitations.”
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .