Att 04 Addendum 52.212-2 Evaluation.pdf
PDF 252 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Construction Site Security Services
- Solicitation number
- N6264926QH006
About this file
This document is an addendum to FAR 52.212-2 that establishes the evaluation criteria and award methodology for a firm-fixed-price commercial products and commercial services acquisition conducted under FAR Part 12.
The Government will award a single FFP contract to the responsible offeror providing the best value through a tradeoff source selection process, with the intent to award without discussions unless the Contracting Officer determines discussions necessary. A critical eligibility requirement mandates that offerors must be certified Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSB); proposals from non-certified SDVOSBs will not be evaluated. Evaluation will occur in three factors with technical capability and past performance combined being weighted more significantly than price. Factor 1 (Technical Capability) assesses the offeror's understanding of and approach to meeting Performance Work Statement requirements, with proposals requiring a minimum rating of "Acceptable" using DoD source selection adjectival ratings (Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, and Unacceptable). Subcontractor compliance with FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting is mandatory; non-compliant proposals are deemed unacceptable. Factor 2 (Past Performance) evaluates confidence in the offeror's ability to perform successfully, considering recency and relevancy of similar service contracts using ratings of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, and Neutral Confidence, with evaluation data sourced from CPARS, PPIRS, and other Government sources. Past performance of major proposed subcontractors and teaming partners is permitted and will be evaluated, requiring clear description of each entity's role and percentage/scope of work. Factor 3 (Price) evaluates price reasonableness based on the sum of all contract line items for the base period and all option periods; the Government reserves the right to award to a higher-priced offeror if technical and past performance advantages justify the additional cost. Options, if included, will be evaluated for award purposes by adding option prices to base requirement prices, though evaluation does not obligate option exercise. A written notice of award to the successful offeror within the specified acceptance timeframe creates a binding contract without further action.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Addendum to 52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services
(a) The Government will award a single firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract to the responsible offeror providing the best value, utilizing a tradeoff source selection process. This acquisition is conducted in accordance with FAR Part 12.
The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with quoters. Accordingly, each quoter should submit its most favorable terms from a price and non-price standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. The Government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest priced proposal if it is in the best interest of the Government.
The Government will first verify that the offeror is a certified Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB). If the offeror is confirmed as a certified SDVOSB, the Government will then evaluate the proposal based on the factors outlined below. Proposals from offerors not certified as an SDVOSB will not be evaluated.
Technical and past performance, when combined, are more important than price.
The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
Factor 1: Technical Capability
The offeror's technical proposal will be evaluated to assess its understanding of and approach to meeting the requirements outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The Government will evaluate technical based on how well the proposed products or services meet the Government’s requirements.
A single, combined technical/risk rating will be assigned for the Technical Capability factor using the adjectival ratings (Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, and Unacceptable) and associated risk assessments as defined in the DoD Source Selection Procedures. To be considered for award, a proposal must receive an overall rating of "Acceptable" or higher for the Technical Capability factor.
The Government will evaluated each offeror’s proposed use of subcontractors for compliance with FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting. Proposals failing to comply with this clause will be deemed unacceptable.
Factor 2: Past Performance
The Government will evaluate the offeror's past performance to assess the Government's confidence in the offeror's ability to successfully perform the required effort. This evaluation will consider the recency and relevancy of the offeror's past contracts for similar services.
The Government will consider information from various sources, including the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), and other sources available to the Government.
A Performance Confidence Assessment rating will be assigned based on the offeror's demonstrated record of contract compliance, quality of service, and adherence to cost and schedule. The ratings are:
Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, and Neutral Confidence.
The past performance of proposed major subcontractors and teaming partners is permitted and will be evaluated. The offeror must clearly describe the role and the percentage/scope of work performed by each entity (prime, subcontractor, or team member) for each past performance reference submitted.
Factor 3: Price
The quoted price will be evaluated on the basis of price reasonableness. The total evaluated price will be the sum of the proposed prices for all contract line items (CLINs) for the base period and all option periods. Although the Technical Capability and Past Performance factors are more significant, price remains a key consideration. The Government reserves the right to award to a higher-priced offeror if the technical and/or past performance advantages are deemed to be worth the additional cost.
(b) Options (if applicable). The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. The evaluation of options does not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
(c) Notice of award. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
(End of provision)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .