Notice No 2.pdf
PDF 107 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N62478-20-R-5038
About this file
This document provides details for a federal indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract opportunity with the Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command Hawaii to provide architect-engineer services. The contract will have a one-year base period and four one-year options, not to exceed $30 million or five years. Services will include design for various structural projects such as piers, wharves, drydocks and buildings in tropical environments. The solicitation is open only to small businesses with average annual receipts less than $16.5 million. The deadline for Standard Form 330 responses is March 17, 2020. Firms will be evaluated on specialized experience, professional qualifications, past performance, program management and design quality control, among other factors. The awarded contract will be subject to organizational conflict of interest provisions.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Notice No 4.pdf | ||
| Notice No 3.pdf | ||
| Notice No 1.pdf | ||
| Attach A Map_to_BldgA13.pdf | ||
| Attach B PPQ.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND, HAWAII
400 MARSHALL ROAD
JBPHH, HAWAII 96860-3139
Notice No. 2 12 February 2020
N62478-20-R-5038
IDIQ CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR VARIOUS STRUCTURAL
PROJECTS AND OTHER PROJECTS PRIMARILY UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVAL
FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND, HAWAII
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
3. Criterion 4:
a. "SF330's will be evaluated on the firm's ability to plan for and to manage work..."
"SF330's will be evaluated on the firm's ability to provide timely on-site response..."
Is this the prime firm or is this question being asked of each key subconsultant firm or every subconsultant firm?
RESPONSE: This criterion seeks to assess the prime AE firm’s ability to manage the work, to include managing subconsultants in order to provide timely on-site to the Government. This criterion also seeks to assess the location of the offices for the prime AE firm and its subconsultants.
b. "1. Describe the...ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel..." This one reads as the firms associated with each of the key personnel, correct?
RESPONSE: This criterion seeks to assess the prime AE firm’s ability to have qualified backup staffing for the key personnel to ensure continuity of services.
c. "2. Describe the firm's present workload and the availability of the project team..." Is this the workload of the prime firm or each key firm or every firm listed?
RESPONSE: Yes, it is the workload of the prime AE firm and the availability of the prime AE firm’s key subconsultants.
4. Criterion 5: "Firms will be evaluated on the strength of the quality control program...ensuring quality services from their consultants..." This one reads as the prime firm, correct?
RESPONSE: Correct, the prime AE firm.
5. A separate question regarding a paragraph near the end that states "Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b)..." What would be acceptable proof that we are permitted to practice engineering? Certificate of Good Standing or Certificate of Vendor Compliance? And is this being asked of the Prime firm only?
RESPONSE: Certificate of Good Standing for the prime AE firm only.
End of Notice No. 2
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .