N62478-19-R-4040_RFP.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND, HAWAII

400 MARSHALL ROAD

JBPHH, HAWAII 96860-3139

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL N62478-19-R-4040

INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY FOR

PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL RELATED WORK AT

VARIOUS LOCATIONS, STATE OF HAWAII

PART 1

PROPOSAL FORMS AND DOCUMENTS

DOCUMENT

00010 STANDARD FORM 1442

00100 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

00110 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

00600 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

00700 CONTRACT CLAUSES

00800 SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

00830 WAGE DECISION

Request for Proposals No. N62478-19-R-4040, Indef inite Delivery Indef inite Quantity for Plumbing and Mechanical Related Work at Various Locations, State of Haw aii.

The contract term w ill be a base period of one year plus four option years. The total maximum dollar value of this acquisition is $48,000,000 over the life of the contracts or 60 months, w hichever occurs first. The task order minimum and maximum w ill be established as $5,000 and $1,000,000, respectively. The Government w ill aw ard a minimum guarantee of $5,000 to the successful offeror for the base period only.

The North American Industry Classif ication System (NAICS) Code is 238220, Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning Contractors. The Small Business Size Standard is $15,000,000.

The proposed contract listed here is 100 percent limited to small businesses.

This procurement consists of one solicitation w ith the intent to aw ard one Indef inite Delivery Indef inite Quantity (IDIQ) contract.

SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM): Offerors shall comply w ith FAR 52.204-7, System for Aw ard Management (July 2013) to receive an aw ard. Lack of registration in the SAM database w ill make an Offeror ineligible for aw ard

SHARI N. LILLIE (808) 471-2289

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

15-Aug-2019

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________ calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, X negotiable. (See _________________________task orders

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________2 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________16 Sep 2019 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All of fers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC HAWAII

CONSTRUCTION ACQUISITION DIV (OPHA2)

400 MARSHALL ROAD

JBPHH HI 96860-3139

N62478

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

10:00 AM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N6247819R4040 55

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specified below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N6247819R4040

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 48,000,000 Each IDIQ Plumbing and Mechanical Work

FFP

This is a Small Business (SB) set-aside, Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity for Plumbing and Mechanical Related Work at Various Locations, State of Hawaii.

The scope will be on the individual task orders.

The resultant contract will consist of a base year plus four one-year option periods, or a maximum of $48,000,000, whichever occurs first.

Once the value of the task orders placed exceeds the minimum guarantee amount, the minimum guarantee task order shall be modified to deobligate the funds from the task order.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

Document 00100

DOCUMENT 00100

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

DOCUMENT 00100

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.1 NUMBER OF COPIES/TIME OF RECEIPT

1.2 INSTRUCTION FOR OBTAINING THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

1.3 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING QUESTIONS REGARDING SOLICITATION

1.4 AMENDMENTS

1.5 PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

1.6 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (LP), ETC.

1.7 NAVFAC SPECIFICATION

See the prescription for the following provisions/clauses in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) & Naval Facilities Acquisition Supplement (NFAS) for each individual task order. The prescription in effect at the time the task order proposals are due will be binding. The websites for FAR, DFARS and NFAS are https://www.acquisition.gov/far/, http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/tochtml.htm and http://www.navfac.navy.mil/products_and_services/sb/opportunities/guidelines/navfac.html, respectively.

1.1 NUMBER OF COPIES/TIME OF RECEIPT

a. PRICE PROPOSAL: Paper Copies - An original, labeled “Original” and one copy, labeled “Copy” and one electronic copy of the price proposal, submitted in .pdf format on a CD-ROM and shall be Microsoft Office Version 2010 compatible, for the price proposal submitted on SEE SF 1442, BLOCK 13A AND AS AMENDED in a sealed envelope and marked in the bottom right corner "PRICE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED UNDER RFP N62478-19-R-4040- DO NOT OPEN IN MAILROOM." Should there by a discrepancy between the paper and electronic versions, the paper copy shall govern. The Price proposal shall include the following:

(1) Information listed in Document 00110 for price proposal submittal requirements

(2) Information required by Paragraph 1.5, Preaward Survey/Responsibility Determination

(3) Information required by Paragraph 1.6, Joint Ventures (JV), Limited Liability Companies (LLC), Limited Partnerships (LP), Etc.

b. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (FACTORS 1, 2, and 3): Paper Copies - An original, labeled “Original” and one copy, labeled “Copy” and one electronic copy of the technical proposal, submitted in .pdf format on a CD-ROM and shall be Microsoft Office Version 2010 compatible, for the technical proposal submitted on SEE SF 1442, BLOCK 13A AND AS AMENDED in a sealed envelope and marked in the bottom right corner "TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMITTED UNDER RFP N62478-19-R-4040 - DO NOT OPEN IN MAILROOM." Should there by a discrepancy between the paper and electronic versions, the paper copy shall govern. The TECHNICAL PROPOSAL shall include the following:

(1) Information listed in Document 00110 for technical proposal submittal requirements

(2) All information required by FAR 52.215-1

(3) All information required by Factor 1, Corporate Experience

(4) All information required by Factor 2, Safety

(5) All information required by Factor 3, Past Performance

c. Proposals shall be submitted as follows:

(1) If sent via U. S. Postal Mail/Private Courier:

NAVFAC Hawaii Construction Acquisition Div (OPHA2) Attn: Shari Lillie 400 Marshall Road, Building A-13

JBPHH HI 96860-3139

(2) If hand-carried:

NAVFAC Hawaii Construction Acquisition Div (OPHA2) 400 Marshall Road, Building A-13

JBPHH HI 96860-3139

Please call 471-2289, 474-3783, 471-0318, or 471-9197 or ring the doorbell for access to A13.

1.2 INSTRUCTION FOR OBTAINING THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

The RFP, excluding large files, will be available through the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website https://www.fbo.gov/. Printed copies of the RFP will not be issued.

1.3 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING QUESTIONS REGARDING SOLICITATION

Questions regarding the solicitation shall be submitted in writing in WORD format via electronic mail to Ms. Shari Lillie, shari.lillie@navy.mil. Questions shall reference the drawing/detail and/or the specification section including paragraph number. Verbal queries will not be entertained. The Government may not respond to questions submitted less than 15 days before the proposal receipt due date.

1.4 AMENDMENTS

Amendments will normally be posted to the web site https://www.fbo.gov/. It is highly recommended that firms register on the FBO as a planholder as this will be the only planholder’s list available. It is the offeror's responsibility to check the web site periodically for any amendments to the solicitation.

1.5 PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

FAR 9.104 requires prospective contractors to demonstrate, among other things, that they have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or ability to obtain them, capability to comply with the required performance schedule, a satisfactory performance record, and be otherwise eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations. The pre-award survey is not a part of the technical evaluation. Please include, at a minimum, the following information as a part of your price proposal under a separate tab, entitled “Pre-Award Survey Information.” Other information may be requested as directed by the Contracting Officer and the information shall be submitted within three working days of the request.

a. Company financial statements (balance sheets and income statements) for past three years.

b. Financial resources available to perform the contract. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital that will be used for the performance of the contract. If the offeror plans to rely on financial support from other sources, identify the maximum lines of credit that will be available to include documentation to support the amounts. The maximum lines of credit should be based upon the inclusion of this contract effort. For joint ventures discuss the financial responsibilities among companies and provide same information for each partner.

c. Newly-formed entities (e.g. limited liability companies (“LLC’s”), limited partnerships (“LPs”) and newly created corporate subsidiaries) that is the entity liable on the contract ordinarily have no record–or an insufficient record–of relevant experience, past performance, and financial capability to support a responsibility determination.

In such cases, the offeror may rely on the resources of the LLC member, parent, limited partner, or other entities related to the offeror for responsibility purposes where the offer submits a guaranty from the entity providing the resources.

1.6 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (LP), ETC.

The Government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor team arrangements; provided, the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in the Offer (see FAR 9.603).

Partnerships, JVs, LLCs, LPs and Mentor-Protégé arrangements shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities:

a. A copy of the Partnership Agreement, JV Agreement, LP Agreement, and/or Mentor-Protégé Agreement.

Contractor shall provide an updated copy whenever any change is made to the agreement.

b. A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate:

(1) The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing.

(2) The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control.

(3) The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

(4) Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents and bonds).

c. A list of partners/parties, to include company name, DUNS and CAGE Numbers, Address, Point of Contact, Email address, phone number and facsimile number.

1.7 NAVFAC SPECIFICATION

Technical specifications will be provided separately for each individual task order.

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 52.211-6 Brand Name or Equal AUG 1999 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.216-27 Single or Multiple Awards OCT 1995 52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the

Work

MAY 2014

52.225-12 Notice of Buy American Requirement - Construction Materials Under Trade Agreements

MAY 2014

52.228-1 Bid Guarantee SEP 1996 52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals--Construction OCT 1997

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.211-14 NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, AND ENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008)

Any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation will be DX rated order; [ X ] DO rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) (15 CFR 700), and the Contractor will be required to follow all of the requirements of this regulation. [Contracting Officer check appropriate box.]

(End of provision)

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract resulting from this solicitation.

52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)

(a) The offeror's attention is called to the Equal Opportunity clause and the Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction clause of this solicitation.

(b) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Contractor's aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:

Goals for minority Goals for female participation for each trade participation for each trade

69.1% 6.9%

These goals are applicable to all the Contractor's construction work performed in the covered area. If the Contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, the Contractor shall apply the goals established for the geographical area where the work is actually performed. Goals are published periodically in the Federal Register in notice form, and these notices may be obtained from any Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs office.

(c) The Contractor's compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4 shall be based on (1) its implementation of the Equal Opportunity clause, (2) specific affirmative action obligations required by the clause entitled "Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction,'' and (3) its efforts to meet the goals. The hours of minority and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in each trade. The Contractor shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer of minority or female employees or trainees from Contractor to Contractor, or from project to project, for the sole purpose of meeting the Contractor's goals shall be a violation of the contract, Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours performed.

(d) The Contractor shall provide written notification to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract Compliance, U.S. Department of Labor, within 10 working days following award of any construction subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction work under the contract resulting from this solicitation. The notification shall list the --

(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the subcontractor;

(2) Employer's identification number of the subcontractor;

(3) Estimated dollar amount of the subcontract;

(4) Estimated starting and completion dates of the subcontract; and

(5) Geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed.

(e) As used in this Notice, and in any contract resulting from this solicitation, the "covered area" is the State of Hawaii.

(End of provision)

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from

NAVFAC Hawaii Construction Acquisition Division (OPHA2) 400 Marshall Road

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

(End of provision)

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

https://www.acquisition.gov/browsefar http://farsite.hill.af.mil/

Document 00110

DOCUMENT 00110

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Document 00110

DOCUMENT 00110

EVALUATION FACTORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. GENERAL

1.1 CONTRACT SCOPE

1.2 PREFERENCE FOR MAKING MULTIPLE AWARDS

1.3 MAGNITUDE OF THE ACQUISITION

1.4 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

1.5 ENFORCEABILITY OF THE PROPOSAL

PART II. EVALUATION CRITERIA

2.1 BASIS OF AWARD

2.2 EVALUATION FACTORS

ATTACHMENTS

(C1) – CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

(C2) – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(C3) – COEFFICIENT BREAKDOWN (sample and excel fill in) (C4) – PROJECT WORKSHEET (excel fill in)

Document No. 00110

EVALUATION FACTORS

PART I – GENERAL

1.1 CONTRACT SCOPE

The work includes, but is not limited to labor, supervision, tools, materials and equipment necessary to provide alteration, repairs, and construction services with no design requirements for plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning, and associated electrical work for new minor construction, facility repair, rehabilitation, and alterations. The awarded contract is intended to provide rapid response for construction, maintenance, rehabilitation and repair of real property in a cost effective manner. Task orders for design only shall not be placed against the contract. Firm-fixed-price task orders for construction will be placed against the contract. The areas of consideration will include, but not be limited to, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force and miscellaneous Federal and other facilities in the NAVFAC Hawaii area of responsibility.

1.2 PREFERENCE FOR MAKING MULTIPLE AWARDS

This acquisition is being advertised as a competitive, Small Business procurement. This source selection procurement requires both technical and price proposals. This procurement consists of one solicitation with the intent to award one IDIQ contract.

1.3 MAGNITUDE OF THE ACQUISITION

The total maximum dollar value of this acquisition is $48,000,000 for all contracts over the life of the contracts or 60 months, whichever occurs first. The minimum guarantee is $5,000 for the base period only. The minimum guarantee may be met by the issuance of a task order during the base period or option period(s). The task order minimum and maximum will be stated as $5,000 to $1,000,000, respectively.

1.4 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

a. The Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror with the lowest price technically acceptable proposal based on the evaluation factors in the solicitation.

b. The number of proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability may be limited to the lowest priced offer at the discretion of the contracting officer. If the number of proposals to be evaluated is limited, the technical proposal shall be provided to the evaluator(s) without any identification of price. If the lowest priced proposal is not found to be technically acceptable then the next lowest price proposal shall be evaluated. If that proposal is also not found to be technically acceptable, then the process described will be conducted again as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies a technically acceptable proposal. If the contracting officer later determines that discussions are necessary, the procedures in FAR 15.306 shall be followed.

c. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract.

1.5 ENFORCEABILITY OF THE PROPOSAL

The proposals must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation. The Government will rely on such information in the award of the contracts. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed (e.g., key personnel, designers, subcontractors, etc.) will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions will be equal or better than as proposed and accepted for contract award and shall require prior Contracting Officer's approval.

PART II – EVALUATION CRITERIA

2.1 BASIS OF AWARD

a. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award one contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

b. The number of proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability may be limited to the lowest priced offer at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

c. An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award.

An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.

2.2 EVALUATION FACTORS

The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience

Factor 2 – Safety

Factor 3 - Past Performance

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

a. Price Evaluation:

1. Price.

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements.

(1) Signed and completed Standard Form 1442;

(2) Acknowledgment of all amendments issued for this RFP;

(3) Bid guarantee of $5,000 for the minimum guarantee;

(4) A Copy of Representations and Certifications in System for Award Management

(SAM);

(5) Contractor Information Sheet (Section 00600);

(6) All fillable provisions in Section 00600. FAR 52.204-8, Annual Representations and Certifications, which requires the offeror to complete the annual representations and certifications electronically via SAM. Ensure you also complete the DFARS provisions;

(7) CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate);

(8) Copy of the email confirmation of receipt notification of successful submission of the VETS-4212 Report, entitled “Federal Contractor Veterans’ Employment Report (VETS-4212 Report),” as required by FAR 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans of the Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans. (If not applicable, provide statement that Offeror has not had contracts subject to this requirement.);

(9) A current balance sheet which will be used for responsibility determination.

(10) Completed Attachment C3 - Coefficient Worksheet (submit excel worksheet)

(11) Completed Attachment C4 - Project Worksheet (submit excel worksheet)

2. BASIS OF EVALUATION

(a) Attachment C4 will be evaluated to determine the reasonableness of the Offeror’s proposal. One or more of the following techniques will be used to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation.

Comparison of proposed prices with the independent Government estimate.

Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

Comparison of information reports obtained from Defense Contract Audit Agency

(DCAA) or other outside agencies as required.

b. NON-COST/PRICE EVALUATION FACTORS

1. Factor 1 – Corporate Experience:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Construction Experience:

i. Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects in which the Offeror was the Prime Contractor that best demonstrates the Offeror’s experience on relevant projects (plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning new minor construction, facility repair, rehabilitation, and alterations) that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the Request for Proposal (RFP). Out of the maximum of five (5) construction projects, at least four (4) projects shall be repair/alteration of existing infrastructure. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as new construction and/or repair, alteration of existing infrastructure completed within the past five years of the proposal issue date for this RFP. Infrastructure is defined as: 1) residential building construction; 2) construction for industrial buildings and warehouses; or 3) nonresidential buildings, other than industrial buildings and warehouses. “New Construction” is defined as construction that provides for new or expanded facilities or infrastructure. New construction does not include repair and/or modernization of an existing facility nor does it include replacement or upgrade to an existing infrastructure. The Offeror must have been a Prime Contractor for the relevant projects and each relevant project shall be $250,000 or more in dollar value and be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

ii. A relevant project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and IDIQ type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

iii. The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C1) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit relevant project information. If the same relevant project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and for design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Do not alter the Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C1) with the exception of expanding the individual blocks on this form; however, total length for each relevant project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” page (or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages) and shall be Arial 11 font (minimum).

iv. For all submitted relevant projects, the description of the relevant project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.:

unique features, area, construction methods). The description shall identify which type of infrastructure each submitted project represents.

v. If the Offeror is a JV or a participant of the Small Business Administration (SBA) Mentor-Protégé Program, relevant project experience shall be submitted for relevant projects completed by the JV entity or SBA Mentor-Protégé as the prime contractor. If the JV or SBA Mentor-Protégé does not have shared experience, relevant projects shall be submitted for each JV partner or for the Mentor and for the Protégé for which they were prime contractors. At least one (1) project from each JV partner, or at least one (1) relevant project from the Mentor and one (1) project from the Protégé, shall be submitted. Offerors are still limited to a total of five

(5) relevant projects combined.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

(1) The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review the first five (5) projects for construction, in the order they were submitted in the proposal. Any projects submitted in excess of the first five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered.

(2) Contracts will be considered relevant if

-it was similar in scope (plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning new minor construction, facility repair, rehabilitation, and alterations). For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as new construction and/or repair, alteration of existing infrastructure completed within the past five years of the proposal issue date for this RFP. Infrastructure is defined as: 1) residential building construction; 2) construction for industrial buildings and warehouses; or 3) nonresidential buildings, other than industrial buildings and warehouses.

-it was valued at $250,000.00 or more per year; AND

-it was completed within five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

2. Factor 2 – Safety

(a) Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership, joint venture, or mentor protégé, the following submittal requirements are required for each Contractor who is a part of the partnership, joint venture, or mentor protégé; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART, and TRC shall not be submitted for subcontractors). The Offeror shall submit the EMR, DART, and TRC rates.

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR):

Include three previous calendar years’ (2016, 2017, 2018) worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. If no EMR exists, the Offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate for the identical range of dates. If there is no EMR premium or equivalent rate for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends shall be addressed as part of the element. Lower EMRs will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate:

OSHA DART Rate, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate. Submit three previous calendar years’ (2016, 2017, 2018) worth of OSHA DART and TRC data. If the OSHA DART and TRC rates cannot be submitted, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that portray negative trends for OSHA DART and TRC data shall be addressed as part of this element. Lower OSHA DART and lower Total TRC Rates will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety:

Technical Approach for Safety should describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Fully describe the safety management system that will be used to oversee safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work. Also describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor levels. Additionally, describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” page or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages, Arial 11 font (minimum).

Note: For a partnership, mentor/protégé or JV, the EMR, OSHA DART, and TRC rates are required for each entity;

however, only one safety narrative is required. Safety narratives for a partnership, mentor/protégé or JV may be up to one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” pages or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages in length, Arial 11 font (minimum).

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the EMR, OSHA DART and TRC Rates to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward or downward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. The Government will not calculate the EMR, DART and TRC Rates. Offerors that do not submit EMR, DART, and TRC rates and do not explain why it did not submit the rates will be rated unacceptable for that element. If extenuating circumstances that affected the rates and negative trends are not addressed, the element will be rated unacceptable.

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety management system, safety performance record, and the Offeror’s methodology of qualifying, evaluating, selecting and overseeing its subcontractors. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety will include, but are not limited to:

OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), CPARS, and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project and the specific management practices that will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support.

Offeror’s EMR will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk EMR Very Low Risk Less than 0.6 Low Risk From 0.6 to less than 0.8 Moderate Risk From 0.8 to 1.0 High Risk Greater than 1.0 to 1.1 Extremely High Risk Greater than 1.1

Offeror’s DART and TRC rates will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

Risk TRC Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater Than 6.0

3. Factor 3 – Past Performance:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(1) If a completed Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS)/Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each relevant project included in Factor 1 for construction experience. If a completed CCASS, ACASS, or CPAR evaluation is not available for a relevant project that was submitted under Factor 1, the Offeror shall submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment C2) for that project. Evidence of customer satisfaction shall be from the owner and/or their representative responsible for the construction contract administration of construction projects. For construction contractors, it shall not be from the prime construction contractor for a subcontractor. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. All PPQs shall be complete, contain client’s signature, and include all information requested in Attachment C2, NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) located the end of Document 00110. This does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation or other evaluation sources (e.g. CPARS, CCASS, ACASS). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. Offerors are responsible for assuring all relevant project information on past performance evaluations and PPQs are consistent with relevant project information submitted for experience. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Ms. Shari Lillie, shari.lillie@navy.mil.

(2) Offerors shall provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience. Offerors shall also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall be Arial 11 font (minimum) and shall not exceed two (2) double-sided 8.5” x 11” pages (or four (4) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages) in total.

(3) The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

(4) Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

(1) This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror’s team performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or JV identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

(2) The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

(3) Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating.

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY

ATTACHMENT C1

CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project No. (check one) : CON #1 CON #2 CON #3 CON #4 CON #5

1. Experience for: Offeror Joint-Venture Other (Explain)

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone Number:

DUNS Number:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

3. Contract Number: Delivery/Task Order Number:

Title:

Location:

4. Award Date (mm/dd/yy): Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

5. Type of work:

New Construction Renovation Repair Alteration Other (explain):

6. Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)

Firm-Fixed Price Cost/Time and Material Other (explain):

Complete Block 7 for Construction Projects. Complete Block 8 for Design Projects.

7. Construction Project:

Award Amount: Final Price:

Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)

Design-Bid-Build Delivery/Task Order (IDIQ) Other (explain):

8. Provide a detailed description of the project and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, square footage, construction methods).

9. Provide a detailed description of what work your firm self-performed on this project:

10. Other Information:

ATTACHMENT C2

Revised 7 December 2011 1

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

Revised 7 December 2011 2

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Revised 7 December 2011 3

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what…