Amend_0003_RFP_N6247319R6005.pdf

ACQR4918222

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to change the price proposal attachment referenced in Section L to ELINS_A_F_PRICE_SPREADSHEET_FOR_NR_IDIQ-REV3. All offerors shall use this attachment to submit their proposals. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 04-Apr-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247319R6005

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

19-Mar-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Apr-2019

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTS CORE

CODE ECOMP

937 NORTH HARBOR DRIVE

SAN DIEGO CA 92132-5190

N62473 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247319R6005

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

Section L - Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors

L1 - PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

1. General: Proposals submitted in response to the solicitation shall be formatted as follows and furnished in the number of copies stated herein. Any proposal submitted that does not conform to the proposal submission requirements will not be considered.

a. Firms shall submit one (1) original proposal and four (4) copies of their proposal in hard copy, prepared on standard, 8-1/2 x 11-inch size paper media in three-ring binders and one (1) original proposal and four (4) copies in the electronic Compact Disc (CDs) format. These CD’s shall be compatible with Microsoft Word and Excel spreadsheet software formats and be virus free. All Excel spreadsheet formulas must be readable.

b. Volume one (1) shall contain the offerors Price proposal and Volume two (2) shall contain the offerors Non- Cost /Price Factors proposal.

c. Table of Contents: A master table of contents for the entire proposal and a table of contents for each volume are required. The master table of contents for the entire proposal should be filed in Volume one (1) and will not count towards the page count. The table of contents page for each volume will not count towards the page count.

VOLUME ONE (1), PRICE PROPOSAL, SHALL BE TABBED AS FOLLOWS:

GENERAL: Cover letter: The cover letter shall include the Offeror information identified in FAR Clause 52.215-1, paragraph (c) (2) subparagraphs (i-v) – Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition (JAN 2004). The cover letter is not included in the total page count.

TAB A: Offerors shall include Standard Form (SF) 33 (Solicitation, Offer and Award), page (1) with blocks 12-18 completed. The offeror shall provide their firm’s CAGE and DUNS number in block 15A of the SF33.

TAB B: Offerors shall include Section B of the RFP, Supplies or Services and Prices, providing an overall grand total proposed price for the entire contract (includes the Two Year Base Period and the Three Year Option Period).

TAB C: Offerors shall include the ELINS_A_F_PRICE_SPREADSHEET_FOR_NR_IDIQ-REV3 Exhibit Line Items (ELINS) (A through E) of the RFP, in both hard copy and electronic (Microsoft Excel) format.

All of the formulas must be readable in the Excel Spreadsheet format.

TAB D: Offerors shall include their companies’ Representations and Certifications, (from Section K of the Solicitation).

VOLUME TWO (2), NON-COST/PRICE FACTORS, SHALL BE TABBED AS FOLLOWS:

TAB A: FACTOR 1– CORPORATE EXPERIENCE OF THE OFFEROR;

1. Project Data Sheet(s), Attachment 1

TAB B: FACTOR 2 – PROGRAM MANAGEMENT APPROACH.

1. Offeror’s proposed approach to adequately perform the requirements of this solicitation in accordance with the instructions.

2. Organizational Chart:

3. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program (QA/QC)

TAB C: FACTOR 3 – SAFETY

1. Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

2. OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates

3. Technical Approach for Safety TAB D: FACTOR 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE on Recent, Relevant Projects

1. Completed CPARS Evaluation, (when available)

2. Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), (Only when there is not a completed CPARS for the project)

d. The text size shall be no less than Times New Roman, 10-point Font, with the exception of reproduced sections of the solicitation document, charts and graphs. Use at least 1-inch margins on the top and bottom and side margins, except for charts, graphs, maps and other illustrations and Excel spreadsheets.

e. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume. Legible tables, charts, graphs, and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans. These displays shall not exceed 11 X 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume, and may only be used for large tables, charts graphs, diagrams and schematics. Page limitations must be adhered to when stipulated.

f. Electronic mail (email) proposals will not be accepted.

g. Offerors shall ensure that proposal disks are virus free, and free of password protection. If access to proposal data is prohibited due to viruses, passwords, or wrong format, the proposal may be rejected.

2. Distribution: The originals shall be clearly identified as the “ORIGINAL”, and bear the original signature(s) of the offeror. The copies shall be complete and clearly identified as “COPY” or “DUPLICATE”. Offerors are advised that the proposals are “For Official Use Only” and they are considered Source Selection Sensitive Information, see FAR 2.101 & 3.104 for further details.

a. Offerors must clearly mark the proposal boxes/containers with the following information:

Solicitation Number: N6247319R6005 Attn: Penny Brown, Code: ACQ4/ECOMP, Bldg. 1, Broadway Complex

b. Proposals shall be shipped/delivered to the following address:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest Attn: Penny Brown, Code ACQ4, Bldg.1 1220 Pacific Highway, Mailroom Bldg. 128 San Diego, CA 92132

3. Notice: Offerors preferring to hand deliver their proposals shall deliver them to the NAVAFAC SW mailroom in building 128 at the address provided above. Offerors should allow themselves sufficient time to meet the delivery date/time schedule in consideration of the limited parking conditions in the area.

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1– Corporate Experience of the Offeror Factor 2 – Program Management Approach Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects

a. The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 1 Corporate Experience of the Offeror, Factor 2 Program Management Approach, and Factor 3 Safety), are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 4 Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects).

When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

a. The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH FACTOR.

a. PRICE FACTOR:

i. Proposal Submission Requirements under Volume 1, Price Proposal, Offerors shall complete the Price Proposal Spreadsheet, Exhibit Line Items Numbers (ELINS) (A through E) titled “ELINS_A_F_PRICE_SPREADSHEET_FOR_NR_IDIQ-REV3” in the attachments of the RFP, in both written and electronic (Microsoft Excel) format. The Offeror shall propose unit prices and total extended price for each ELIN in Exhibits A through E, for all geographic zones indicated for the Two Year Base Period and the Three Year Option Period. No price proposal is required for Exhibit F, ELIN (F001) for the Non-Pre-Established, Fixed Price Work in Annex 18, Spec Item 3. Exhibit F, ELIN (F001) will be competed amongst all IDIQ Contract Awardees at the task order level for natural resource related work that is not covered by an existing ELIN. The Offeror shall include an overall grand total price spreadsheet that includes the overall total extended prices for all the ELINS (A through E) (with the exception of F001) and an overall grand total price for the Two Year Base Period and the Three Year Option Periods.

1). VOLUME (1), PRICE PROPOSAL, SHALL BE TABBED AS FOLLOWS:

GENERAL: Cover letter: The cover letter shall include the Offeror information identified in FAR Clause 52.215-1, paragraph (c) (2) subparagraphs (i-v) – Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition (JAN 2004).

The cover letter is not included in the total page count.

TAB A: Offerors shall include Standard Form (SF) 33 (Solicitation, Offer and Award), page (1) with blocks 12-18 completed. The offeror shall provide their firm’s CAGE and DUNS number in block 15A of the SF33.

TAB B: Offerors shall include Section B of the RFP, Supplies or Services and Prices, providing an overall grand total proposed price for the entire contract (includes the Two Year Base Period and the Three Year Option Period).

TAB C: Offerors shall include the ELINS_A_F_PRICE_SPREADSHEET_FOR_NR_IDIQ-REV3 of the RFP, in both hard copy and electronic (Microsoft Excel) format. All of the formulas must be readable in the Excel Spreadsheet format.

TAB D: Offerors shall include their companies’ Representations and Certifications, (from Section K of the Solicitation).

b. NON-COST/PRICE FACTORS:

i. FACTOR 1 CORPORATE EXPERIENCE OF THE OFFEROR:

1). Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Firms shall utilize the Project Data Sheet, Attachment 1, for submittal of their projects to be evaluated under Factor 1 - Corporate Experience of the Offeror. Projects not submitted using the Project Data Sheet, Attachment 1 will not be evaluated. The Offeror’s projects shall be for task orders or single contracts that fit within the definition of “project” as defined herein. Projects submitted that do not meet the definition of a “project” will not be evaluated.

2). To demonstrate their relevant corporate experience, Offerors shall submit a minimum of four (4) or a maximum of five (5) projects using Attachment (1) in the RFP, Project Data Sheets for projects that have been completed or at least 80% completed within the past five (5) years of the solicitation closing date. Corporate experience may include natural resource-related projects with the Federal Government, agencies of the State or local governments, and/or commercial customers, for work of similar size, scope, and complexity covered under this solicitation. Projects not meeting this size, scope, and complexity criterion will not be considered relevant and will not be evaluated.

3). For purposes of this evaluation, a project is defined as follows:

a. Projects must have a dollar value of at least $30,000;

b. Must have been performed by the Offeror/Proposing firm;

c. Must have been performed within the specific geographic footprint of the States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Oregon, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and/or Washington;

d. A project is work performed for a federal agency and meeting at least one of the three requirements in Paragraphs (1), (2), and/or (3) below:

(1) Work performed pursuant to one specific task order of an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite

Quantity (IDIQ) type contract at one site or multiple sites at a single installation or facility; or

(2) Work performed pursuant to a single contract (i.e. a non IDIQ contract) for one site or multiple sites within a single installation or facility; or

(3) Work performed pursuant to a single contract that is not an IDIQ contract or pursuant to one specific task order of an IDIQ type contract at multiple installations or facilities;

-OR-

(4) A project is for work performed under similar commercial contracts or under contracts or agreements for other governmental (not federal agency) entities.

e. A project is not a basic Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contract.

4). Project Data Sheets shall contain the following information:

a. Contract/Task Order Information: Name and address, contract number and task order number;

title; place of performance; award date; indicate whether the project is at least 80% complete; contract/task order type (fixed price, cost reimbursable, etc.); name and address of procuring organization, procuring organization point of contact, phone number and email address; technical or program manager’s name, phone number, and email address.

b. Cost: Project dollars; value of award, amount added by modification, and final project amount.

c. Contract Role: Specify if the offeror was a prime contractor on the contract/task order or a subcontractor to a prime contractor. If a subcontractor, include company name, point of contact name, phone number, and email address for the prime contractor.

d. Description of work performed: Offeror shall describe its primary role/duties in execution of the work (i.e. the major components of the project which were completed by the prime contractor staff and major components which were subcontracted out.). If the Offeror was a subcontractor on the project, the description, duration, and cost of the work provided should reflect the work performed by the Offeror as the subcontractor, and not work under the project as a whole. Description of work performed should include, as applicable: (a) technical and administrative functions – describe the complexity of functions performed; (b) distinctive and/or unique features of the project; (c) type of action performed; (d) regulatory and stakeholder interactions; (e) summary of work accomplished and how it relates to the work required by this solicitation; and (f) provide a list of any personnel proposed to perform functions of personnel under this solicitation (see Annex 2.9.1), who worked on the project and what their role was on the project compared to what they will be doing under this solicitation. Provide an explanation for projects that were not completed on time.

Proposal Limitations:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience of the Offeror shall be limited to a total of 10 pages (letter size, 8.5”x11”; Font size no smaller than 10-point font).

ii. FACTOR 2, PROGRAM MANAGEMENT APPROACH

1). Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Submit the Offeror’s proposed approach to adequately perform the requirements of this solicitation. Describe the Offeror’s approach that will be employed under the resulting contract. Address the Offeror’s methods of communication within the proposed organization, to include communication with government personnel. Provide a list of office locations for the Prime/Offeror and any Joint Venture Member (if applicable), and Subcontractors (if applicable).

2). Organizational Chart: Include an organizational chart of the Offeror (to include team subcontractors):

The organizational chart shall demonstrate the Offeror’s proposed program management organizational structure, lines of authority between Key Personnel and other (non-key) Personnel of the offeror, and organizational relationships with any proposed subcontractors. Identify the designated safety, and quality control/assurance representatives of the offeror. Failure to include team subcontractors will be rated less favorably.

3). Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program (QA/QC): Provide a description of how the offeror’s quality assurance/quality control program is applied throughout the team, including team subcontractors.

Proposal Limitations:

Factor 2 – Program Management Approach shall be limited to three (3) pages (letter size 8.5”x11”; Font size no smaller than 10-point font). The organizational chart is not included in the three (3) page count.

iii. FACTOR 3, SAFETY:

1). Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information:

a. Experience Modification Rate (EMR) – Submit data for three previous calendar years’ (2018, 2017, and 2016). This rate compares a company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The Offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the Offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends shall be addressed as part of the element.

b. OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable

Case (TRC) Rates - Submit data for three previous calendar years’ (2018, 2017, 2016). If an Offeror cannot submit OSHA DART and TRC rates, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data negatively shall be addressed as part of this element.

c. Technical Approach for Safety – Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The Offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work. The Offeror shall describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor levels. Additionally, describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps, including a description of your “Good Catch” Program. A “Good Catch” Program is defined as a program that recognizes and rewards employees for reporting unsafe and/or unhealthful situations and acts to create a climate of trust and safety. The program should also have procedures in place to address deficiencies and unsafe situations immediately and to document those actions accordingly. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to one-double sided page or two single-sided pages; Font size no smaller than 10 point font.

d. Note: For a partnership or joint venture, the submittal requirements above are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors

iv. FACTOR 4, PAST PERFORMANCE:

1). Solicitation Submittal Requirements: IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS

EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 Corporate Experience of the Offeror. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS

AVAILABLE.

2). IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Penny Brown, via email at penny.brown@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

3). In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/Entity Identifier numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

4). While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance.

(End of Summary of Changes)