N6247314R4405FINAL_RFP.pdf

RFP N62473-14-R-4405

INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ)

CONTRACT SET-ASIDE FOR SDVOSB FOR PAINTING

PROJECTS ABOARD MARINE CORPS BASE (MCB),

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION (MCAS) CAMP PENDLETON

AND NAVAL WEAPONS STATION (NWS) SEAL BEACH, NWS

SEAL BEACH DETACHMENT FALLBROOK AND NORCO,

CALIFORNIA

The purpose of this IDIQ Construction Contract is to support projects in the areas of painting.

Task Orders will be issued under this basic contract for projects related to painting and other incidental work.

Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment, and materials necessary to complete the work for the task orders issued under this contract. Unless otherwise specified in the task orders, these sections of specifications consist of procedures that are considered the minimum requirements for work that may be specified under an individual task order. See the technical specification for the specific requirements for each individual order. All work shall comply with the requirements indicated and shall be in conformance with all applicable referenced criteria, construction standards, laws, and regulations, including applicable building and fire life safety codes.

RFP N62473-15-R-4405

IDIQ PAINTING

Part 1 Proposal Forms and Documents

CONTRACT NO: N62473-15-R-4405

Contract Specialist: Kristi Beard 760-725-0782 Work Order/Request #: 10277495 Date: May 2015

IDIQ PAINTING

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART 1: Proposal Forms and Documents

Section 00100 Standard Form 1442 - Solicitation, Offer, and Award Section 00201 Instructions to Offerors Section 00210 Basis of Award/Evaluation Factors Section 00600 Representations and Certifications Section 00700 Clauses Section 00801 Contract Type/Performance/Special Contract Requirements Section 00802 Contract Administration Data Section 00803 Task Order Issuance Procedures Section 00830 Davis-Bacon Wage Rates

PART 1 Exhibits Exhibit A Factor 1 – Project Experience Data Sheet Exhibit B Factor 2 – Past Performance Questionnaire Exhibit C Factor 3 – Management Approach and Capabilities of the Offeror –Questionnaire Exhibit D Factor 4 – Safety Information Exhibit E Financial Questionnaire Exhibit F Request For Information (RFI) form

PART 2: Prescriptive General Specifications

Section 01 11 00 Summary Section 01 14 00.05 20 Work Restrictions Section 01 20 00.00 20 Price And Payment Procedures Section 01 30 00 Administrative Requirements Section 01 32 01.00 10 Project Schedule Section 01 33 00 Submittal Procedures Section 01 35 26 Governmental Safety Requirements Section 01 35 40.00 20 Environmental Management Section 01 35 29.13 Health, Safety, and Emergency Response Procedures For Contaminated Sites Section 01 35 40.00 20 Environmental Management Section 01 42 00 Sources for Reference Publications Section 01 45 00.10 20 Quality Control for Minor Construction Section 01 57 20.00 10 Environmental Protection Section 01 62 35 Recycled / Recovered Materials Section 01 74 19 Construction and Demolition Waste Management Section 01 78 00 Closeout Submittals Section 01 78 23 Operation and Maintenance Data

PART 3: Project Program

Not Used on Basic Contract; Used on Individual Task Order.

PART 4: Performance Technical Specifications

Not Used on Basic Contract; Used on Individual Task Order.

PART 5: Prescriptive Technical Specifications

Section 02 41 00 00 Site Demolition Section 02 83 33 13 Removal and Disposal of Lead Containing Paint Section 06 10 00 00 Rough Carpentry Section 07 61 00 00 Metal Roof Restoration Section 07 92 00 00 Joint Sealants Section 09 90 00 00 Paint and Coatings

PART 6: Attachments

A. Forms:

(a) Submittal Transmittal Form

(b) Submittal Register

(c) Contractor’s Production Report and Contractor’s Quality Control Report

(d) Request for Scheduled Base Utility Locator Service

(e) Request For Routine Utility Outage Service

(f) Contractor Deficiency Notice

(g) Contractor Discrepancy Report

(h) Contractor Significant Incident Report

B. MCB Camp Pendleton Range Operations C. 26 Area Laydown Lot Rules D. Naval Weapons Stations (NWS) Seal Beach Fallbrook Detachment Requirements E. MCB Camp Pendleton Boundary Map F. Terminology G. Bid Schedule

NOTE: OFFEROR MUST EXECUTE BLOCKS 14-20C.

INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT SET-ASIDE FOR SDVOSB FOR PAINTING PROJECTS ABOARD MCB CAMP

PENDLETON, NWS SEAL BEACH, NWS FALLBROOK AND NORCO, CA.

This FFP/IDIQ construction contract requires furnishing of all labor, materials, equipment, testing, supervision, quality control, site safety, and management and other incidental w ork necessary to sustainment, restoration, and modernization of various types of facilities located on MCB Camp Pendleton, NWS Seal Beach, Fallbrook Detachment, and Norco, CA, to include painting of interior and exterior facility surfaces, painting of utilities, elastomeric metal roof restoration, and lead-based paint abatement, and other incidental w ork. w ithin the applicable NAICS.

This is a competitive Best Value Source Selection Procurement, using the Low est Price Technically Acceptable process, w hich is RESTRICTED to eligible Service Disabled Veteran Ow ned Small Business (SDVOSB).

NAICS: 238320

Size Standards: $15 Million Task Order Range is $2,000 to $750,000

KRISTI L BEARD 760-725-8197

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

27-May-2015

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________365 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________3 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________29 Jun 2015 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

CAMP PENDLETON ROICC/CODE ROPCN

MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON

PO BOX 555229 BLDG 22101

CAMP PENDLETON CA 92055-5229

N62473

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

12:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N62473-15-R-4405 143

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N62473-15-R-4405

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Camp Pendleton - IDIQ Painting

FFP

FFP This is IDIQ contract with preestablished fixed contract prices. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by the Contracting Officer or their properly authorized representative, who will issue written task orders to the Contractor. Award of the task order will be on a firmfixed price basis.

The maximum value of the contract (minus minimum guarantee of Task Order 0001) will serve as the maximum/not to exceed amount of the entire contract period. The Government has the option to extend the term of the contract for a term of one (1) to forty-eight (48) months by written notice to the Contractor within the performance period specified in the Schedule.

ELINS for MCB Camp Pendleton and NOC Fallbrook:

Base Year: A001 - A013 Option 1: B001 - B013 Option 2: C001 - C013 Option 3: D001 - D013 Option 4: E001 - E013 FOB: Destination

NET AMT

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

NWS Seal Beach & Norco - IDIQ Painting

FFP

FFP

Ordering ELINS for NWS Seal Beach, Fallbrook & Norco:

Base Year: F001 - F013 Option 1: G001 - G013 Option 2: H001 - H013 Option 3: I001 - I013 Option 4: J001 - J013 FOB: Destination

NET AMT

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 N/A N/A N/A Government 0002 N/A N/A N/A Government

DELIVERIES AND PERFORMANCE

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

SECTION 00201

SECTION 00201

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS

1. Inquiries

Inquiries regarding the Request for Proposal (RFP) shall be submitted electronically using the Request for Information (RFI) form provided as Part 1, Exhibit F. The Point of Contact (POC) for inquiries is Kristi Beard at 760-725-0782, or e-mail at kristi.beard@navy.mil. The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 10 days before the proposal receipt date.

2. Proposal Submittal Requirements

Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation shall be formatted as follows and furnished in the number of copies stated herein. A cover letter shall accompany the proposal.

The cover letter shall include—

(a) The solicitation number;

(b) The name, address, telephone and facsimile numbers, and e-mail address of the Offeror;

(c) The DUNS Number, CAGE Code, and TIN of the Offeror;

(d) A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all amendments, terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;

(e) Names, titles, and phone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation and;

(f) Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

Proposals shall be submitted in three-ring binders or bound, with tabs or separators. Page limits, if stipulated, must be adhered to. Proposals shall be submitted on 8.5" X 11" paper, utilizing both sides of the paper, and using at least 12 point font.

The format for the proposal is as follows:

Volume 1 – Price Proposal

Tab 1: Cover Letter Tab 2: SF1442 (Solicitation, Offer, and Award) with blocks 14 through 20c completed.

Tab 3: The Offeror shall submit their prices using the MS Excel ELIN Price Schedule included in the solicitation as Part 6, Attachment G, in a separate sealed envelope, as part of Volume I, Price Proposal.

Offerors shall also include an electronic copy of their MS Excel ELIN Price Schedule on the required CD and shall round all unit prices to the second place behind the decimal (i.e. $1.00 vice $1.004):

Complete all Price ELINs (A001 through J013).

Tab 4: Bid Bond (see clause 5252.228-9302 Bid Guarantee in RFP for Bid Bond amount).

Tab 5: Exhibit “E”, Financial Questionnaire (in sealed envelope from financial institution). Offerors shall submit the Financial Questionnaire to their financial institution and request that the financial institution complete the questionnaire with regard to the Offeror’s firm. Upon completion of the questionnaire, the financial institution should place the completed questionnaire in a sealed envelope showing the return address of the financial institution and forward it to the Offeror so that the Offeror can include the questionnaire (in the sealed envelope) with the Offeror’s proposal.

Tab 6: A print-out of the Offeror’s filled out Representations and Certifications and Active and Inactive Exclusions from the System for Award Management (SAM) and Section 0600. Also, per Section 0600 of the RFP, fill-out responses to FAR clause 52.219-1 “Small Business Program Representations” (APR 2012) and DFARS clause 252.209-7999 “Representations by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law” (Dev 2012-00004) (May 28, 2014).

Tab 7: VET-100 information

Volume 2 – Technical Proposal

Tab 1:

Factor 1 – Experience of the Offeror and the Offeror’s Team o Five (5) projects submitted on the Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit A).

Tab 2:

Factor 2 – Past Performance o Evaluations under Tab 2, following each of the projects, shown for Factor 1, Experience, to which they pertain.

Tab 3:

Factor 3 – Management Approach and Capabilities of the Offeror o Narrative: Factor 3 Worksheet (Exhibit C) o Bondability Letter o If applicable, a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team identified in the Narrative (e.g., joint venture partner, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.).

Tab 3:

Factor 4 – Safety

(For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR and DART Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

o Narrative: Factor 4 Worksheet (Exhibit D).

o Total Recordable Case (TRC) o OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate o Technical Approach for Safety

Offerors are asked to submit only the information/exhibits required. Do not submit any additional information such as brochures, CDs (excludes the required electronic copy indicated below), or other pre -printed materials.

A total of one (1) original, two (2) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy of the complete proposal, in response to this RFP must be received by this office no later than 12:00 p.m., local time, on 29 June 2015.

Electronic copies shall be submitted as one document on CD in an Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). Offerors should address all evaluation factors and shall submit the proposal to the following address:

If you intend to use FedEx, please use the following mailing address:

ROICC Camp Pendleton Attn: Kristi L. Beard 9th St., Bldg. 22101 Camp Pendleton, CA 92055-5229

If you intend to use the USPS, please use the below mailing address and allow additional time for mailing in order for the proposal to arrive at the required due date and time.

ROICC Camp Pendleton Attn: Kristi L. Beard Bldg. 22101, PO Box 555229 Camp Pendleton, CA 92055-5229

LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number.

CONSOLIDATED RFP DOCUMENTS

Within four weeks after contract award, provide one (1) electronic and three (3) hard copies of consolidated RFP documents incorporating the Contractor’s Proposal and all RFP amendments and revisions that are contained in the contract award. Identify the changes to the RFP with “Red-lining” or “Track Changes” feature of SpecsIntact or MS Word to highlight the pre-award modifications in the contract. Identify the amendment source at each addition and deletion by annotation, such as footnote or reference in parenthesis.

3. Pre-Proposal Conference

A pre-proposal conference and site visit will be held at the ROICC Camp Pendleton, Building 22101, Camp Pendleton, CA on Monday, 09 June 2015. Please be present no later than 8:55 a.m. (Pacific Time), in order to start the site visit on time at 9:00 a.m.

The pre-proposal conference will be held at the beginning of the site visit. All prospective offerors are highly encouraged to attend this conference.

In order to make the conference as productive as possible, Proposers who wish to attend the site visit must contact Jon Paul Patton at jon.patton@navy.mil no later than 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, 04 June 2015 so their planned attendance is registered.

Also, Proposers are expected to submit any questions they may have in writing, via email to Kristi Beard at Kristi.beard@navy.mil and Michele Hovis at Michele.hovis@navy.mil at least two business days prior to the pre-proposal conference. The submission of written questions will not preclude anyone from posing questions during the pre-proposal conference.

FAR 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions and FAR 52.236-3, Site Investigation and Conditions Affecting the Work are included in the basic contract award. Accordingly, offerors are urged and expected to inspect the site where this proposed task order will be performed.

Failure of a prospective offer to submit any questions or to attend the conference will be construed to mean that the offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation. Prospective offers are advised that the pre-proposal conference will be held solely for the purpose of explaining the concepts involved in the project and the specifications, terms, and conditions of this solicitation.

No minutes of this meeting will be issued. All prospective offers are advised that this solicitation will remain unchanged unless it is amended in writing. However, if an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgment and receipt of any such amendment shall be applicable.

Contractors attending this site visit will need to have proof of insurance, vehicle registration and their driver’s license, to get a “day” visitor pass, if they don’t already have a decal. Please arrive on time to obtain visitor’s pass prior to the scheduled conference.

4. Joint Venture Offerors

Joint venture Offeror shall provide a copy of the joint venture agreement. The agreement shall include information that identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract, demonstrate the relationship between firms, and identify contractual relationship s and authorities to bind each entity of the joint venture.

The joint venture also needs to complete the online representations and certifications ( see FAR 52.204-99 DEV) for each joint venture member as well as for the joint venture itself.

5. System for Award Management (SAM)

Contractors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to award of a DoD contract.

Contractors may obtain information on registration and annual confirmation requirements via the SAM accessed through https://www.acquisition.gov or by calling 866-606-8220, or 334-206-7828 for international calls. A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor not registered in the SAM. Remember to review the NAICS codes listed in your record and make sure that you have listed the NAICS code for this procurement.

6. Federal Contractor Program

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 22.1303, any contractor or subcontractor with a contract of $25,000 or more with the Federal Government must take affirmative action to hire and promote qualified targeted veterans wh ich includes, special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam-era, recently separated veterans, and any other veterans who served on active duty during a war or in a campaign or expedition for which a campaign badge has been authorized.

Companies must file an annual VETS-100 report, which shows the number of targeted veterans in their work force by job category, hiring location, and number of new hires, including targeted veterans hired during the reporting period and the maximum number and minimum number of employees of such contractor during the period covered by the report. Instructions, information and follow-up assistance is provided at VETS-100 Internet site at http://vets100.cudenver.edu/ or employers may contact the VETS-100 Processing Center at (301) 306-6752 or e-mail at mailto:helpdesk@vets100.com. A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor that has not submitted a required annual form VETS-100, Federal Contractor Veterans' Employment Report (VETS- 100 Report) if subject to the reporting requirements of 38 U.S.C. 4212(d) for that fiscal year.

7. Incurred Expenses

The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

8. No Alternate or Multiple Proposals

Neither multiple proposals, nor proposal variations or options, nor alternate or alternative proposals will be considered in the evaluation.

SECTION 00210

BAS IS OF AWARD AND EVALUATIONS FACTORS

1. BASIS OF AWARD

Selection of contractor(s) will be accomplished using Source Selection Procedures on the basis of Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) to the Government, considering price and other factors combined. The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price. Interested firms are expected to review the RFP and participate in a pre -proposal conference and site visit, provide proposed, and provide proposal information requested to evaluate their technical and past performance factors.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions. If necessary, the Government will conduct discussions with offerors whose proposals have been determined to be within the competitive range. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

In accordance with the Naval Facilities Acquisition Supplement (NFAS) regulations, the number of proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability may be limited to the three (3) lowest priced offers at the discretion of the contracting officer. If the number of proposals to be evaluated is limited, technical proposals shall be provided to the evaluator(s) without any identification of prices or any rank order of prices. If no proposals are found to be technically acceptable within the first group of proposals, then the process described will be conducted again as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies a technically acceptable proposal.

The Government anticipates a single award construction contract. Award of the basic construction contract will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be the most advantageous to t he Government considering the technical and price factors. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the lowest price technically acceptable offer. Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable price and technical terms. Offerors should not assume that they would be contacted or afforded the opportunity to qualify, discuss, or revise their proposal. Firms participating in the pre - proposal conference and site visit will not be compensated for their participation.

2. DEFINITIONS

1. Clarifications are limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated.

2. Communications are exchanges, between the Government and offerors, after receipt of proposals, leading to establishment of the competitive range.

3. Competitive Range See Far 15.306(c).

4. Deficiency is a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

5. Discussions are negotiations conducted in a competitive acquisition. Discussions take place after establishment of the competitive range.

6. Evaluation Notice (EN) is the PCO’s written notification to the offeror for purposes of clarifications, communications, or in support of discussions.

7. Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) is a process used in competitive negotiated contracting where the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price. See FAR 15.101-2.

8. Performance Confidence Assessment is an evaluation of the likelihood (or Government’s confidence) that the offeror will successfully perform the solicitation’s requirements; the evaluation is based upon past performance information.

9. Recency, as it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the time that has elapsed since the past performance reference occurred. Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant.

10. Relevancy, as it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the extent of similarity between the service/support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type and subcontract/teaming or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the source solicitation requirements; ;and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance.

11. Requirements Documents are all aspects of the RFP that convey the needs of the Government to offerors, including the SOO, SOW, PWS, technical requirement documents, and system requirement documents.

12. Requiring Office is the entity (for example, a program management office or other organizational entity) responsible for translating user requirements into the requirements documents within the RFP that communicate those requirements to offerors.

13. Risk, as it pertains to source selection, is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an offeror’s proposed approach to achieving the technical factor or subfactor may involve risk or disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. (For firm-fixed-price contract, the reference to increased cost may be removed from the risk definition.)

14. Source Selection Advisory Council (SSAC) is a group of senior Government personnel who provide counsel during the source selection process and must prepare the comparative analysis of the SSEB’s evaluation results, when directed by the SSA. A SSAC is required for all Source Selections valued at or over $100M.

15. Source Selection Authority (SSA) is the official designated to make the source selection decision.

16. Source Selection Team (SST) is a team that is tailored to the unique acquisition, tasked with carrying out a source selection. Composition of the team generally consists of the SSA, PCO (if different from the SSA), SSAC, SSEB, Advisors, Cost or Price Experts, Legal Counsel, Small Business Specialists, and other subject-matter experts.

17. Significant Weakness in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

18. Source Selection Decision Document (SSDD) is the document that reflects the SSA’s independent, integrated, comparative assessment and decision.

19. Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) is a group of Government and, if needed, approved non-

Government personnel, representing the various functional disciplines relevant to the acquisition.

20. Source Selection Plan (SSP) is a plan that describes how the source selection will be organized, how proposals will be evaluated and analyzed, and how source(s) will be selected.

21. Strength is an aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

22. Weakness means a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See

FAR 15.001.

3. ADJECTIVAL RATINGS/DESCRIPTIONS

Each offeror’s technical factors and past performance will be evaluated separately. Upon the conclusion of the evaluation of the technical factors, an overall non-price factors rating of Acceptable (A) or Unacceptable (U) will be assigned to each offeror’s non-price factors proposal.

• The following adjectival ratings and rating descriptions will be used to assign a rating to each technical factor. Use upper case letter ratings for major technical factor ratings. The addition of plus (+) or minus (-) to an adjective rating is not allowed.

Table A-1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable (A) Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable (U)

Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.

The weaknesses and/or deficiencies (as defined below) of each proposal for each non-price evaluation factor which influenced the assigned adjectival rating shall be identified.

Definitions Weakness A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness

A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency

A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

4. EVALUATION FACTORS

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Experience Factor 2 – Past Performance Factor 3 – Management Approach and Capabilities of the Offeror Factor 4 – Safety

“The distinction between experience and past performance is experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.”

2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor

A. Non-technical Factors:

PRICE

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements

The Offeror shall submit their prices using the MS Excel ELIN Price Schedule included in the solicitation as Attachment G, in a separate sealed envelope, as part of Volume I, Price Proposal:

Complete Price ELINs A001 through J013.

(2) Basis of Evaluation

The price evaluation is based on the total estimated quantity specified in the solicitation for the base year performance plus four (4) 12-month option years for a total maximum duration of 60 months which equates to the sum of ELINS A001 through J013 (Attachment G of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section 0210 of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

i. Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation.

ii. Comparison of proposed prices with the independent Government Estimate

iii. Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

iv. Comparison of market survey results.

a. Exhibit line item numbers (ELIN) unit prices shall be multiplied by the estimated quantity to determine the total price for each ELIN. In the event the total price for an ELIN does not mathematically equate to the product of the unit price and estimated quantity, the unit price shall take precedence over the total price. The unit price shall be considered the Offeror’s intended bid price for the ELIN.

b. A price that is found to be either unreasonably high or unrealistically low in relation to the proposed work may be indicative of an inherent lack of understanding of the solicitation requirements, or in the case of unrealistically low prices, may pose an unacceptable performance risk, and may result in the overall proposal not being considered for award.

c. The Government may determine that an offer will not be considered if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Any inconsistency whether real or apparent, between proposed performance and price must be clearly explained in the price proposal. For example, if unique and innovative approaches are the basis for an apparently unbalanced or inconsistently priced proposal, the nature of these approaches and their impact on price must be completely documented. The burden of proof of price realism rests solely with the offeror.

d. Each ELIN shall be priced independent of other ELINS as if it were stand-alone work (unless otherwise noted in the schedule or elsewhere in the solicitation). Proposals that appear to be unbalanced relative to unit prices may not be considered for award.

B. Technical Factors:

FACTOR 1 – EXPERIENCE

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements. Provide the following for evaluation under Tab 1 of the Technical Proposal Volume II.

(a) Submit Exhibit “A” (Project Experience Data Sheet) under Tab 1, for each Project.

(b) Submittals: Submit five (5) painting projects that best demonstrates the experience of the Offeror and

Offeror’s team, as identified in the narrative submittal for Factor 1, to include painting of interior and exterior facility surfaces, painting of utilities, elastomeric metal roof restoration, and lead-based paint abatement in accordance with the technical sections and attachments of the solicitation. Desirable project dollar values shall range between a minimum of $2,000 and $750,000.

(c) Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Projects may be submitted if substantially (80%) completed by the date of issuance of this RFP.

(d) A project is defined as a painting construction project performed under a single task order or contract.

Multiple award and IDIQ type contracts (basic contracts from which task orders are issued) are not permissible and will not be evaluated.

(e) The attached Offeror’s Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit A – Factor 1 Worksheet) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded.

(f) A completed Exhibit A shall be submitted for each project submitted under this factor.

(g) For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the scope requirements of this solicitation (at least 3-4 sentences).

(h) If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects shall be submitted for each Joint Venture partner. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture partners may be rated unacceptable. Offerors are still required to submit a total of five (5) projects combined.

(i) If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442) that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirements, the proposal shall include relevant experience information of these affiliates/subsidiaries/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies The Offeror must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the proposed firm will have in the performance of this contract. Regarding any such submitted project, if the Offeror fails to demonstrate the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm’s meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract, or fails to make clear the relationship(s), the project will not be considered relevant and will not be evaluated. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

(2) Basis for Evaluation: The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing five (5) relevant painting projects as described in the proposal submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Proposals with fewer than five (5) relevant painting projects or fail to demonstrate experience as required above will be rated Unacceptable. Any project submitted which is: 1) Fewer than, or in excess of the five (5) required projects; 2) Combined projects (see definition); 3) Not 100% or at least 80% complete within the five-year period specified (see definition); or 4) Outside the scope of work of this solicitation, will not be evaluated.

FACTOR 2 –PAST PERFORMANCE

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements. Provide the following in the Technical Proposal Volume II:

(a) Evaluations under Tab 2 immediately following each of the projects, shown for Factor 1, Experience, to which they pertain.

(b) IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED

WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), Part 1, (Exhibit B) included in the solicitation is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project included in Factor 1, Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS

AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. The Offeror should provide completed PPQs in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference in their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Kristi Beard via email at kristi.beard@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date.

(c) In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

(d) The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The

Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

(e) While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

A performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

(a) Past Performance shall be evaluated when using the LPTA process and will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis using the ratings in the following table:

Acceptable (A) Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable (U) Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(b) This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor

1 – Experience of the offeror and offeror’s team and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the PPIRS using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

(c) Offerors will be rated as acceptable when PPQs/CPARS evaluations and information obtained from any other sources reflect, at a minimum, a satisfactory level of performance considering the following: the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior; commitment to customer satisfaction’ record of conforming to specifications and applicable law (i.e., Davis Bacon Wage Determinations/Safety Standards, etc..); quality of workmanship; record of recommending and/or implementing innovative approaches and/or technologies; record of controlling costs; safety performance record; and adherence to schedules.

(d) In the case of an Offeror without record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so spare that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

FACTOR 3 –MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND CAPABILITIES OF THE OFFEROR

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements. Provide the following for evaluation under Tab 3 of the technical proposal Volume II:

(a) Use the Exhibit C – Factor 3 Worksheet to address the following:

� Provide both the single and aggregate bonding capacity of the Offeror (see paragraph (d) below for additional requirements regarding bonding capacity).

� Provide an organizational chart identifying all of the Offeror’s key personnel (names, position titles) and team members (affiliates, subsidiaries), if any, responsible for the execution and technical administration of the contract with corresponding lines of authority. It should also indicate the full-time and part-time positions.

� Provide the percentage of work that the in-house tradespeople employed by the Offeror will perform as the Prime SDVOSB Offeror in accordance with the RFP requirements.

� For the affiliates or other partner members, explain the type of work they will be responsible to perform and the corresponding percentage of work that will be performed by each one. Offerors shall provide a letter of commitment for each affiliate or partner as applicable under separate attachment.

� How the Offeror will respond to proposed task orders that may have short notice site visits and/or response times for submitting proposals.

� Describe the Offeror’s commitment and capability to manage multiple concurrent task orders in various locations within the area of coverage of this contract.

• If only one Project Manager is proposed to manage this contract, the Offeror will describe how the Project Manager will effectively manage work taking place simultaneously at all installations covered under this contract.

� If more than one person is proposed to be Project Manager, indicate how the work is to be divided so it is effectively managed between the different Project Managers.

� Provide a detailed description of each Project Manager’s authority, knowledge of, and experience with IDIQ type of contracts, subcontracting coordination, construction safety, quality control, and anti-terrorism standards.

� Describe how the Offeror will effectively perform quality control management including how the

Offeror will go about selecting a Quality Control Manager (QCM) who meets the requirements of the RFP.

� Submit (under Tab “3”) résumés for the Offeror’s proposed key personnel: Project Manager(s), Quality Control Manager(s), Site Safety Health Officer, and Site Superintendent(s).

(b) Proposals that fail to address all of the elements or submit complete required information under this Factor may be rated Unacceptable.

(c) Offerors shall respond in the space provided on the worksheets using a minimum of 12 pt. Times New

Roman or Arial font. The boxes may be expanded.

(d) The Offeror shall provide a bondability letter from the surety company to demonstrate the minimum single project bonding capacity and aggregate bonding capacity of at least $10,000,000 for the management of multiple concurrent projects at the higher dollar magnitude within the task order range.

The letter will also indicate the current available bonding capacity.

(e) If applicable, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture partner, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.).

(a) The basis of evaluation will be the Offeror's management approach and capabilities to be successful on this IDIQ Contract. Management approach is defined as the Offeror's commitment, capability/resources to fulfill the requirements. The management approach also includes the Offeror’s team composition; the quality control process; the authority, knowledge and experience of the Offeror's Project Manager; the qualifications of the key personnel; the percentage of the effort the Offeror will self-perform; and the Offeror’s bonding capacity.

(b) A well developed approach that demonstrates an ability to coordinate and manage several concurrent projects which could result in annual contract awards of $1,000,000 to $6,000,000.

(c) An approach that identifies areas of risk in logistics and resource management, and provides a well thought-out…