N6247022R9006 Synopsis.pdf

N62470-22-R-9006 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR

INDUSTRIAL TYPE FACILITIES LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE NAVAL FACILITIES

ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND AREA OF OPERATIONS, WORLDWIDE.

Description: ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A

STANDARD FORM SF-330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED

HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PACKAGE TO

DOWNLOAD.

Attachments: (a) Past Performance Questionnaire

(b) Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template

(c) LRA Commercial Vehicle Inspection Procedures

(d) SECNAV FORM 5512/1

This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for projects that are Industrial Type Facilities located throughout the Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Area of Operations, but may also include work worldwide. These services will be procured in accordance with 40

U.S.C. Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6.

The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term must not exceed $95,000,000. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term (including option years) is $10,000. Firm fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. Estimated start date is July 2024.

This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code

541330, Engineering Services. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the selection criteria.

The market research study N62470-22-R-9006 conducted by NAVFAC Atlantic included an assessment of relevant qualifications and capabilities of potentially qualified firms. As a result of the market research analysis, a determination was made to solicit this procurement on an unrestricted basis inviting full and open competition. The NAVFAC Atlantic small business office concurs with this decision.

The types of design projects expected to be performed under the contract include, but are not limited to: Airfield Facilities, Waterfront Facilities, Operational Facilities, Water/Wastewater

Treatment Facilities and associated work, Utility System upgrades, Hangars, Administration

Buildings, Religious Facilities, Dining Facilities, Recreational Facilities, Security Buildings, Child Development Centers, Industrial Maintenance Facilities (vehicle maintenance shops, intermediate maintenance activities, public works shops, and warehouses), Ranges, Communication Centers, Recreation, Training Facilities (operational, maintenance, and classroom), Lodging, Laboratory Facilities, Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation

N62470-22-R-9006 SYNOPSIS NOTICE FOR AE SERVICES FOR DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES

FOR INDUSTRIAL TYPE FACILITIES

(RDT&E) Facilities, and Bachelor Quarters. Utilities include steam, low pressure compressed air, fresh water, sanitary sewer, storm water, oily waste water collection, natural gas, high voltage to low voltage electrical, fire protection and alarm systems, control systems, lighting, and communications (telephone, television, fiber optics, cyber security, Supervisory Control and

Data Acquisition (SCADA) control system, and Local Area Network (LAN)).

Work may also include AE services for projects ancillary to facility projects: such as: roads;

parking areas; railroads; bridges; foundations; retaining walls; failure investigation including destructive and non-destructive testing; seismic evaluation and design; progressive collapse analysis; blast resistant design; structural engineering investigations; utility systems including sanitary and storm water systems; storm water management; sediment and erosion control;

earthwork; surveying; pavement design; and civil engineering studies.

Architect-Engineer services that may be required under this contract include DD 1391 documentation, Performance of Post Award Construction Services (PCAS), Design-Build RFPs, Design-Bid-Build Construction Documents (using NAVFAC supported software), cost engineering services including cost estimates, related studies, field investigations, surveying and mapping, tests, evaluations, consultations, program management, conceptual designs, geotechnical subsurface exploration and studies (including but not limited to soil borings), hazardous materials identification, energy computation, life safety code studies, interior space comprehensive planning/design, conceptual designs, risk analysis studies, value engineering, other associated engineering services, shop drawing review, as-built drawing preparation, Operation and Maintenance Support Information (OMSI), commissioning, construction inspection, engineering consultation services during construction, and criteria development and updates (United Facilities Criteria (UFC) and United Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) updates/consultation) for industrial type facilities.

All contractors are advised that a Unique Entity Identifier is required prior to award. Contract must complete the registration in System for Award Management (SAM) Database by selecting

“Entity Information”. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Web site (https://www.sam.gov) Entity

Information section.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest. The prime firm for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF-330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions or provide complete information may affect the Firm’s evaluation or disqualify the Firm from further consideration. Evaluation Criteria 1 through 3 are considered https://www.sam.gov/ most important and are equal among themselves; Criteria 4 through 6 are of slightly less importance and are equal among themselves; and Criterion 7 is of the least importance and will be used as a tie-breaker among technically equal firms. Specific selection criteria include:

1. Specialized Experience

2. Professional Qualifications

3. Past Performance

4. Quality Control

5. Program Management, Capacity, and Firm Location

6. Commitment to Small Business

7. Volume of Work

Criterion 1- Specialized Experience (SF-330, Part I, Section F):

Firms will be evaluated on specialized experience in performance of services similar to those anticipated under this contract through evaluation of experience in:

1. Design of similar types of facilities.

For the purposes of this evaluation, “similar types of facilities” are defined as follows:

Airfield Facilities, Waterfront Facilities, Operational Facilities, Water/Wastewater Treatment

Facilities and associated work, Utility System upgrades, Hangars, Administration Buildings, Religious Facilities, Dining Facilities, Recreational Facilities, Security Buildings, Child

Development Centers, Industrial Maintenance Facilities (vehicle maintenance shops, intermediate maintenance activities, public works shops, and warehouses), Ranges, Communication Centers, Training Facilities (operational, maintenance, and classroom), Lodging, Laboratory Facilities, Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) Facilities, and

Bachelor Quarters. Utilities include steam, low pressure compressed air, fresh water, sanitary sewer, storm water, oily waste water collection, natural gas, high voltage to low voltage electrical, fire protection and alarm systems, control systems, lighting, and communications

(telephone, television, fiber optics, cyber security, Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition

(SCADA) control system, and Local Area Network (LAN).

2. Design of projects involving the creation of construction phasing plans incorporated in the design.

3. Design of renovations of existing facilities.

4. Experience applying sustainability concepts through an integrated, cost effective design approach and designing in accordance with recognized sustainable third party certification such as (but not limited to) LEED AP, Green Globes Professional, etc.

5. Experience providing PCAS for similar types of facilities (as defined above) for the full performance period of a project’s construction. The project must have been designed by the Firm.

Firms may be considered more favorably by demonstrating the following:

1. Experience with design of similar types of facilities (as defined above) that were performed for DoD contracts.

2. Experience with development and preparation of construction documentation using the latest UFC’s including FC 1-300-09N and UFGS.

3. Experience with design of similar types of facilities that was performed for the US

Government for outside the continental United States.

4. Experience with design of a variety of facility types.

Submission Requirements:

Provide a maximum of five (5) projects with the design completed within the past seven (7) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice that best demonstrate specialized experience of the proposed team in the areas outlined above. For the purpose of this Criterion, a complete design is one for which final design submittals have been accepted by the customer.

Sufficient information to determine the date of completion of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered.

Within the maximum of five (5) relevant design projects, as defined above, firms shall demonstrate experience with design services of the following:

1. One (1) design of new construction of a facility.

2. One (1) design of a full renovation project that includes demolition.

3. One (1) design project for which the firm provided PCAS for the full performance period of a project’s construction. The project must have been designed by the firm and contain at least one of the similar types of facilities.

a. Firms must explicitly identify which project(s) satisfy this requirement.

The following information for each submitted project must be included for consideration:

Date of project design completion (Month and Year) – Section F Item 22. Professional

Services

Project identified as constructed or not constructed. If construction was completed on or before the date of issuance of this notice, then provide date of construction completion

(Month and Year); otherwise, state Construction Not Completed – Section F Item 22.

Construction (if applicable).

Project construction value (US dollars).

Project facility(s) size (SF or SM).

Project facility(s) respective primary function type.

Project facility(s) identified as new construction or renovation design.

If more than the maximum number of projects are submitted, the Government will only evaluate projects up to the maximum number in the order submitted.

All projects provided in the SF-330 must be completed by the actual office/branch/regional office/individual team member proposed to manage and perform work under this contract.

Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation. To enable verification, firms must include the Unique Entity Identifier number along with each firm name in the SF-330 Part 1, Section F, block 25, “Firm Name”. Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). In block 24, include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. For projects performed as a subcontractor or a joint venture involving different partners, specifically indicate the value of the work performed as a subcontractor or by those firms proposed for this contract, and identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration.

NOTE: If the Firm is a joint venture, projects performed by the joint venture should be submitted; however, if there are no projects performed by the joint venture, projects must be submitted for each joint venture partner not to exceed a total of five (5) projects. Firms failing to provide projects from all joint venture partners will be considered to not have not met the requirements of the criterion.

Projects shall be submitted on the SF-330 at Part I, Section F and shall be completed projects.

Projects not completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. Instead, list relevant task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated.

All information for Criterion 1 must be submitted in the SF-330, Part I, Section F. The

Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluation of Criterion 1.

Criterion 2- Professional Qualifications (SF-330, Part I, Sections E & G):

Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications, competence, and experience of the proposed key personnel in providing services to accomplish the tasks required under this contract, including participation in example projects as outlined in the SF-330, Part 1, Section G.

Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise. Specific disciplines that must be included in key personnel are: Project Manager, Quality Control Manger, Architect, Civil

Engineer, Landscape Architect, Structural Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, Cost Engineer (Certified Cost Professional or equivalent), Interior

Designer (practicing certified or registered), and Fire Protection Engineer. Engineers and

Architects must be licensed in their respective disciplines. The Fire Protection Engineer must be a registered professional engineer who has passed the fire protection engineering written examination administered by the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying

(NCEES) and has relevant fire protection engineering experience. Other disciplines such as

Planning and Scheduler Professional (PSP or equal) and Value Engineer (CVS or equivalent) are desired but not necessarily required.

Submission Requirements:

SF-330, Part I, Section E. Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate experience in the work proposed under this contract. Resumes are limited to one page each, single sided and should indicate: professional registration (including registration/certification number), certification, licensure and/or accreditation in appropriate disciplines; cite recent

(within the past seven (7) years) project-specific experience in work relevant to the services required under this contract; and indicate proposed role in this contract. Indicate participation of key personnel in example projects in the SF-330, Part 1, Section G. Include any sustainable professional accreditation such as (but not limited to) LEED AP, Green Globes Professional, etc.

Criterion 3- Past Performance (SF-330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided in

Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS for Criterion 1 projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government including contact with points of contact in other criteria. NOTE: Past performance information for projects listed under Criterion 1 may be given greater weight.

Submission Requirements:

SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION FOR EACH EXAMPLE PROJECT

LISTED UNDER CRITERION 1. IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT

AVAILABLE, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment A) included in this notice is provided for the Firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project included under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. DO NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A

COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs must be submitted with your SF-330. If the Firm is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, Firms must complete and submit with their responses the first page of the PPQ (Attachment A), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Firms may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form as posted with this Synopsis. Firms should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If requested by the client, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the

Government's point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Atlantic, Code

CON22, Attn: Ed Flint via email at edward.d.flint.civ@us.navy.mil, prior to the response date.

Firms shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A/E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the

Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 1 Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Information must not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single-sided pages) in total.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

Criterion 4- Quality Control Program (SF-330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the strength of the quality control program proposed by the Firm to ensure quality products and services under this contract, and means of ensuring quality services from their consultants/subcontractors.

Submission Requirements:

Describe the quality control program that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:

1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components.

3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract, specifically for the technical accuracy of and assurance of overall coordination of plans and specifications, and engineering and design services.

4. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

5. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors.

Criterion 5- Program Management, Capacity and Firm Location (SF-330, Part I, Section

H):

Firms will be evaluated on the firm’s ability to plan for and manage work under the contract, the capacity to accomplish the work in the required time, and on the locations of their office(s) that will be performing the work under this contract and demonstrated knowledge of the primary geographic areas in which projects could be located.

Submission Requirements:

1. Provide an organizational chart for the team and discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization. Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants.

Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable. Teams with a demonstrated history of working together may be considered more favorably.

2. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team including consultants for the specified contract performance period. Provide the availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services.

General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.

3. Provide the location of the office(s) that will be performing the work, including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members. Evaluation of Firms will include consideration of their location within the primary geographic area of the anticipated projects. Provide a narrative describing the team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas in which project could be located.

Criterion 6- Commitment to Small Business (SF-330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated in terms of the extent to which they have identified and committed to

Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Women-Owned Small Business

(WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZoneSB), Veteran-

Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and if applicable, Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions

(HBCU/MI) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on: (A) Past performance in utilization of small business concerns, and (B) Participation of small business concerns for this requirement. In support of (A), all firms shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB and HBCU/MI. Large Businesses shall submit three

“final” or “most recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for similar contracts of relative size which show compliance with utilizing the various types of small business firms noted above.

If ISRs are not FINAL or MOST RECENT they will not be considered. If subcontracting goals were not met, provide an explanation. If Individual Subcontracting Reports were not applicable to the similar contracts noted, large businesses shall submit other documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for the contracts. Small Businesses shall also submit documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of relative size. In support of (B), large businesses shall submit a draft

Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in which they will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify and commit to the published Small Business Subcontracting Program. The Secretary of the Navy has assigned the Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command goals for FY2023 in terms of percentages of total planned subcontracting dollars for utilization of small businesses.

Demonstrate the plan to meet these goals:

FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027

SB 40.00% 40.00% 40.00% 40.00% 40.00%

HubZone 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%

SDB 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%

WOSB 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00%

SDVOSB 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%

If a large business firm is selected for award, a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in accordance with FAR 19.7 and DFARS 219.7, will be required and incorporated into the contract award. A draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required from small businesses;

however, small businesses shall submit similar information on the extent to which they identify and commit to subcontracting to large business (LB), SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI if applicable in the performance of this contract.

The Small Business size standard classification is NAICS 541330, Engineering Services, with a size standard $25,500,000.

The attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template (Attachment B) shall be used by large businesses to complete the draft subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their “draft” Small

Business Subcontracting Plans utilizing this template, and ONLY this template.

Criterion 7- Volume of Work (SF-330, Part 1, Section H)

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement

(DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the

Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the Firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified A&E firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD A&E contracts.

Submission Requirements:

Firms do not submit data for this factor.

SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed SF-

330 package. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11 point Times New Roman or larger. Part I shall not exceed seventy-five (75) single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets, dividers, or other requested documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, proof of AE firm registration) provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the Firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. The organizational chart may be one page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11 point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables). Please include your Unique Entity Identifier and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the SF-

330.

**In accordance with FAR 36.601-4(b) contracts for architect-engineer services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering. Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction).

Failure to submit the required proof may result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture should include with their submission a copy of the joint venture agreement. Failure to include the joint venture agreement will result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation.

Architect-Engineer firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit three (3) hard copies of the SF-330 and one (1) CD to Naval Facilities Engineering Systems

Command, Atlantic, Code: CON22, Attn: Ed Flint, 6506 Hampton Blvd., Norfolk, VA 23508.

Firms responding to this announcement by 2:00 PM Norfolk, VA local time, 20 March 2023 will be considered. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The Government will not be held responsible for delays of any commercial carrier. The points of contact are either Ed Flint, Contract Specialist, at edward.d.flint.civ@us.navy.mil or 757-322-4841 or Rebecca Douglas, Contracting Officer, at Rebecca.douglas.civ@us.navy.mil or 757-322-4704.

If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL, or UPS must follow visitor procedures and are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected following LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA (Attachment C). The Commercial Vehicle Inspection location for vehicles coming to NAVFAC Atlantic on the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) is located at Naval

Support Activity (NSA) Hampton Roads at the Meredith Street gate off of Terminal Boulevard.

DBIDS passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID

Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on LRA:

Naval Station Pass and ID Office

9040 Hampton Blvd Building #CD9

Norfolk, VA 23505

Telephone Number: 757-322-2975

Hours of Operation: 0700 – 1530 Monday through Friday (Closed on Federal holidays)

Firms should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the LRA. All visitors to the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) who do not have or meet the requirements for a permanent DBIDS, CAC, Military or Military dependent ID badge who visit LRA or any installation in the Mid-Atlantic Region must complete and submit the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 (Attachment D) to NAVFAC LANT Security a minimum of 17 days prior to the proposed date of visit in order to allow security personnel ample time to process and submit requests.

mailto:Rebecca.douglas.civ@us.navy.mil

Visitors must transmit the completed SECNAV FORM 5512/1 form which contains Privacy Act

/ PII data to NAVFAC Atlantic Security via the new (August 2019) DoD Secure Access File

Exchange (SAFE) website found at the following link:

https://safe.apps.mil/

Please forward the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 via the DoD SAFE website to all three of the

NAVFAC LANT security personnel listed below:

Robert Hernandez / Email: Robert.hernandez3@navy.mil

Iris Gholston / Email: iris.gholston@navy.mil

Steven K. Anderson / Email: steven.k.anderson@navy.mil

Visitors can contact the NAVFAC Atlantic Security department at (757) 322-8116/8044/8115 if they have questions or need assistance.

Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized.

Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to Ed Flint at edward.d.flint.civ@us.navy.mil.