Amendment 0003.pdf
PDF 122 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6247022R9006
About this file
This document contains an amendment to a solicitation for an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract for architect-engineer services. The Navy seeks design and engineering services for industrial type facilities located throughout the Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command area of operations, worldwide. The solicitation will result in a single IDIQ contract with a total value of $95 million to be awarded on an indefinite-delivery basis against task orders over five years. Services include design of facilities such as utilities involving steam, compressed air, water, sewer, electrical, fire protection, control systems, lighting, and communications. The amendment provides responses to bidder questions seeking clarification on the contract structure, experience requirements, and small business participation goals. Architects and engineers must be licensed in their respective disciplines.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N62470-22-R-9006
Amendment 0003
Amendment 0003 is issued for the following reasons:
1) To provide responses to pre-proposal inquiries
Inquiries & Responses:
17) Question: The RFQ says “This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite
Quantity (IDIQ) contract for multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for projects that are Industrial Type Facilities located throughout the Naval Facilities Engineering Systems
Command Area of Operations, but may also include work worldwide.”
Given the large total contract fee of $95,000,000, we want to confirm that this is correct and only one (1) contract will result from this procurement.
Response: The synopsis states, “This procurement will result in one Indefinite
Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract….”. Propose in accordance with the Synopsis.
18) Question: Please confirm that more than one resume can be provided for each discipline identified in the solicitation.
Response: Please see previous amendment.
19) Question: Amendment #1 states: “…If multiple function types exist in one project (i.e. multiple buildings), provide information identifying cost and size for each primary function type.” Please confirm that (i.e. multiple buildings) refers to FACILITY TYPES.
Response: Propose in accordance with the Synopsis.
20) Question: If site investigation and construction phase services were completed under a separate task order, can they be described as part of the Section F project?
Response: Per the synopsis, a project is a task order or a stand-alone contract award.
21) Question: You have VOSB listed in types of small businesses, but there is no goal for it in the chart. Do you have a goal for VOSB?
Response: No, there is not a separate goal for VOSB. Propose in accordance with the Synopsis.
22) Question: You have FY2023 in the Small Business Goal chart, but based on when this is expected to be awarded after FY2023 has ended. Should we start at FY2024 and end at FY2028?
Response: No, please use the chart provided in synopsis. Propose in accordance with the synopsis.
23) Question: In the original solicitation issued 31-Jan-23, page 3, paragraph Criterion 1- Specialized
Experience (SF-330, Part I, Section F), subparagraph 1. Design of similar facilities. For the purposes of this evaluation, “similar types of facilities” are defined as follows: “…Utilities include steam, low pressure compressed air, fresh water, sanitary sewer, storm water, oily waste water collection, natural gas, high voltage to low voltage electrical, fire protection and alarm systems, control systems, lighting, and communications (telephone, television, fiber optics, cyber security, Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) control system, and Local Area
Network (LAN). “
In Revision 03 of the solicitation issued 22-Feb-23, page 3, paragraph Criterion 1- Specialized
Experience (SF-330, Part I, Section F), subparagraph 1. Design of similar facilities. For the purposes of this evaluation, “similar types of facilities” are defined as follows: The reference to
Utilities does not appear, however there is no notation that this was an intentional omission from the list of similar types of facilities.
Can you please confirm Utilities, specifically, high voltage to low voltage electrical, will be considered a similar facility type?
Response: Utilities are not considered under “similar types of facilities.” Propose in accordance with the synopsis. Revision 03 is the current version.
24) Question: On N6247022R9006+Synopsis+Revision+02, Page 4 of 11, Submission requirements it states that: For the purpose of this Criterion, a complete design is one for which design drawings and specifications have been signed and sealed by the Registered Architect(s) and
Professional Engineer(s).
Please clarify where Architects & Engineers need to be registered in the US or registered
Architect(s) and Professional Engineer(s) out of US are eligible as well?
Response: Per the Synopsis, Architects & Engineers must be licensed in their respective disciplines. Further, these services will be procured in accordance with 40 U.S.C. Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .