19R5007_Amend_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

P-117 Vicenza High School Replacement, Vicenza, Italy

The Purpose of this Amendment is:

1. To revise Section 00 21 16 – Instructions to Proposers to change the time and date for the temporary access pass from 2:00 p.m. Central European Time (CET) on 6 May 2019 to 12:00 p.m. Central European Time (CET) on 8 May 2019.

2. To revise 52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) to reflect updated time and date for the temporary access pass.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 18

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-May-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247019R5007

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

01-May-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-May-2019

CODE

COMMANDER NAVFAC ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247019R5007

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMEND 0001

Amendment 0001 is being issued for the following reasons:

1. To revise Section 00 21 16 – Instructions to Proposers to change the time and date for the temporary access pass from 2:00 p.m. Central European Time (CET) on 6 May 2019 to 12:00 p.m. Central European Time (CET) on 8 May 2019.

2. To revise 52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) to reflect updated time and date for the temporary access pass.

1. To revise Section 00 21 16- Instructions to Proposers to change the time and date for the temporary access pass

FROM:

1. SITE VISIT

This will be the ONLY Government scheduled site visit. Requirements and deadlines below will be strictly enforced. Late requests may not be processed in time for the site visit.

The recommended pre-proposal site visit is scheduled for Wednesday, 22 May 2019 at the US Army Garrison, Vicenza, Italy. The site visit will promptly start at 10:00 a.m., Central European Time (CET) on 22 May 2019 at the main gate Villagio Housing Complex (Villaggio Della Pace), Vicenza Italy.

Accordingly, offerors are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed. Offerors who wish to attend the site visit must contact Dominique Reimann via email at dominique.m.reimann.civ@mail.mil.

Additionally, arrangements must be made for a required temporary access pass. Site visit attendance is limited to two (2) representatives per offeror. The point of contact for the access pass is Deborah Bertuzzo at deborah.bertuzzo2.ln@mail.mil.

The following information is required in order to obtain a pass:

• Name of Company

• Name, first and last, of each attendee

• Telephone number to clarify information

• Nationality of attendee

• Legible copy of Identification Card

Please provide the above information no later than 2:00 p.m. Central European Time (CET) on 6 May 2019. For additional information, please contact Dominique Reimann via email at dominique.m.reimann.civ@mail.mil or phone at +39-0444-71-5904.

Failure of a prospective offeror to attend the site visit will be construed to mean that the offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation. All prospective offers are advised that this solicitation will remain unchanged unless it is amended in writing. However, if an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgement and receipt of any such amendment shall be applicable.

Bring your copy of the solicitation with you, as no copies will be provided at the site visit.

TO:

2. SITE VISIT

This will be the ONLY Government scheduled site visit. Requirements and deadlines below will be strictly enforced. Late requests may not be processed in time for the site visit.

The recommended pre-proposal site visit is scheduled for Wednesday, 22 May 2019 at the US Army Garrison, Vicenza, Italy. The site visit will promptly start at 10:00 a.m., Central European Time (CET) on 22 May 2019 at the main gate Villagio Housing Complex (Villaggio Della Pace), Vicenza Italy.

Accordingly, offerors are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed. Offerors who wish to attend the site visit must contact Dominique Reimann via email at dominique.m.reimann.civ@mail.mil.

Additionally, arrangements must be made for a required temporary access pass. Site visit attendance is limited to two (2) representatives per offeror. The point of contact for the access pass is Deborah Bertuzzo at deborah.bertuzzo2.ln@mail.mil.

The following information is required in order to obtain a pass:

• Name of Company

• Name, first and last, of each attendee

• Telephone number to clarify information

Please provide the above information no later than 12:00 p.m. Central European Time (CET) on 8 May 2019. For additional information, please contact Dominique Reimann via email at dominique.m.reimann.civ@mail.mil or phone at +39-0444-71-5904.

Failure of a prospective offeror to attend the site visit will be construed to mean that the offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation. All prospective offers are advised that this solicitation will remain unchanged unless it is amended in writing. However, if an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

List of Attachments:

(A) Pre Proposal Inquiry Form

(B) Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet

(C) Past Performance Questionnaire

(D) One Day Pass Request Form (DD SECNAV FORM 5512/1)

(E) Schedule B Pricing Form

3. OVERVIEW OF THIS SOURCE SELECTION

This solicitation is conducted as a negotiated procurement utilizing procedures in accordance with FAR Part

36.2. The best value continuum source selection process used in this acquisition is the tradeoff process. This process allows for a tradeoff between non-price factors (i.e., Corporate Experience, Safety, Past Performance, and Technical Solution) and price and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal or other than the highest technically rated proposal to achieve a best-value contract award. Award will be made to that responsible offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to offer the best value to the Government considering the technical and price factors stated herein.

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration any or all offerors at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; to award the contract to other than the offeror submitting the lowest total price; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to be the best value.

This acquisition will result in a firm fixed price contract for construction services. In accordance with FAR 36.205, the statutory cost limitation is $54,278,000 USD for P-117. Award will be made in U.S. Dollars.

The contract completion time for P-117 shall not exceed 835 days after notice to proceed.

The Government intends to award a contract to a single contractor for CLIN 0001, with CLIN 0002, CLIN 0003, CLIN 0004, CLIN 0005, CLIN 0006, CLIN 0007, and CLIN 0008 as priced options. The Government reserves the unilateral right to award Option CLIN 0002 through CLIN 0008 to the contractor at the time of award or within 600 calendar days after contract award. Offerors must submit a price for CLIN 0001 through CLIN 0008 . Offerors not submitting pricing for all CLINs will be considered nonresponsive to the solicitation and will not be evaluated.

INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS: Proposals must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this Request for Proposal (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the best terms from technical, and price standpoints.

4. SITE VISIT

This will be the ONLY Government scheduled site visit. Requirements and deadlines below will be strictly enforced. Late requests may not be processed in time for the site visit.

The recommended pre-proposal site visit is scheduled for Wednesday, 22 May 2019 at the US Army Garrison, Vicenza, Italy. The site visit will promptly start at 10:00 a.m., Central European Time (CET) on 22 May 2019 at the main gate Villagio Housing Complex (Villaggio Della Pace), Vicenza Italy.

Accordingly, offerors are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed. Offerors who wish to attend the site visit must contact Dominique Reimann via email at dominique.m.reimann.civ@mail.mil.

Additionally, arrangements must be made for a required temporary access pass. Site visit attendance is limited to two (2) representatives per offeror. The point of contact for the access pass is Deborah Bertuzzo at deborah.bertuzzo2.ln@mail.mil.

The following information is required in order to obtain a pass:

• Name of Company

• Name, first and last, of each attendee

• Telephone number to clarify information

Please provide the above information no later than 12:00 p.m. Central European Time (CET) on 8 May 2019. For additional information, please contact Dominique Reimann via email at dominique.m.reimann.civ@mail.mil or phone at +39-0444-71-5904.

Failure of a prospective offeror to attend the site visit will be construed to mean that the offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation. All prospective offers are advised that this solicitation will remain unchanged unless it is amended in writing. However, if an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgement and receipt of any such amendment shall be applicable.

Bring your copy of the solicitation with you, as no copies will be provided at the site visit.

5. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD

To be eligible for award, firm(s) must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database as required as required by FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management (Oct 2016).

Entities registering from outside of the United States MUST contact the Federal Service Desk as part of the registration process. The contact information is available at https://www.fsd.gov/.

Note that the System for Award Management (SAM) is required for all offerors, including Joint Ventures (JV) (registration must state the NAME of the JV). Offerors not currently registered in SAM must obtain a DUN & Bradstreet (DUNS) number and a CAGE or NCAGE prior to registering in SAM.

All offerors, including JV offerors, must submit with their proposal a DUNS number. In addition to the DUNS number required for JV offerors, JV offerors must submit with their proposal a DUNS number for each member comprising the JV. DUNS numbers can be obtained at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. The DUNS number is required in order to register in SAM (see above.)

CAGE/NCAGE – A CAGE/NGAGE code is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. JV offerors must acquire a CAGE/NCAGE Code registered in the JV name.

(a) U.S. Offerors, including Joint Venture offerors: U.S. offerors must obtain a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database, part of the SAM registration process (see paragraph above.)

(b) Non-U.S. (foreign) Offerors ONLY, including JV: Non-U.S. offerors must obtain a NATO CAGE (NCAGE) Code instead of a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database. NCAGE codes may be obtained at the NCAGE website https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/AC135Public/scage/CageList.aspx

IMPORTANT NOTICE: If the offeror is registering a new entity in SAM.gov, the offeror must follow new procedures, which include providing an original, signed notarized letter indicating authorized entity Administrator for the entity associated with the DUNS number before a new SAM.gov entity registration will be activated.

IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR THE NEW REGISTRANTS TO CHECK WITH SAM.GOV

HELPDESK DIRECTLY TO ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR TIMELY REGISTRATION

ARE MET.

6. CERTIFICATE OF CLASSIFICATION

SOCIETÀ ORGANISMI DI ATTESTAZIONE (SOA) CERTIFICATION.

The following SOA Certifications are required, offeror must show that the necessary Certifications are in effect as of the date proposals are due, and must be submitted with the proposal:

Societa’ Organismi d’Attestazione (S.O.A.) (Qualifying Agencies) work categories for this project in accordance with Italian D.P.R. 34/00 (Decreto del Presidente della Republica 25 febbraio 2000, n.34).

The Prevailing Work Category: OG-1

The related classifications (sub-categories) and percentages for this work category:

Classification OS-7

Percentage of Work 22,33%

All additional Work Categories other than the Prevailing Category (as required).

First additional Work Category OG-10

Companies that are QUALIFIED in the Prevailing Work Category and pertinent Classification, but NOT QUALIFIED also in the Minor Work Category and pertinent Classification, can still bid against the subject solicitation, by forming a Joint-Venture or subcontracting for the execution of the work pertaining to the categories (or alternatives) for which they are not qualified. Offerors must declare their intention of forming the Joint-Venture or awarding a subcontract. A "Teaming Agreement" or "Letter of Commitment" with the subcontractor must be submitted with the proposal and must identify the qualifications of the subcontractor (attaching the pertinent SOA certificate) and what work they will perform (identifying type and percentage of the work covered by specific SOA certificate).

In the case of a JV, at least one member of the JV must have the required SOA Certifications. The JV member who has the SOA Certification must perform the majority of the work pertinent to the certification. In the case of a JV certification submitted by a subcontractor will not be accepted.

As required by DPR 554, art 75 and DPR 412 /2000 Contracting Officer shall require the apparent successful bidder/offeror to submit additional documentation, upon Contracting Officer’s demand, for evaluation of firm's technical and financial qualifications to execute the work.

Debarment from Award:

As required by article 75 of DPR 554 and DPR 412/2000, Contractors cannot bid if they have a history of, or there is an existing question relative to:

- Bankruptcy

- Pending Charges

- Final Penal Judgment for moral and/or professional misconduct

- Breach of use of unauthorized subcontractors, i.e. anti-trust laws

- Breach of safety / security or labor regulations

- Serious malpractice or negligence

- Tax payments violations

- False or fraudulent representations in prior solicitations

Contractor must submit extract from criminal record or affidavits released by the local court of Contractor’s residence.

Contracting Officer shall review Contractors’ certifications for compliance. Firms who obtained SOA certification are listed in the SOA website. Not submitting the additional documentation is treated as a responsiveness issue.

Contracting Officer shall ensure that the contract provisions stipulate that the contract may be terminated for default if it is discovered after award that the Contractor failed to meet the certification requirements of D.P.R. n. 34, or art 75 of DPR 554, and DPR 412/2000.

7. ANTI-MAFIA LAW

Pre-Award Effect of Anti-Mafia Procedures: Inasmuch as the work of this solicitation is to be performed on land owned by the Italian State, the prospective contractor will be subject to all Italian legislation concerning anti-mafia documentation, including, without limitation: Legislative Decree no. 159 of September 6, 2011, Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252 of June 3, 1998, Legislative Decree no. 490 of August 8, 1994, Law Decree No.

629 of September 6, 1982, and any subsequent anti-mafia laws, integrations and amendments. Only firms that submit the requested documentation will be considered for award. In the event that prior to award any mafia infiltration attempt is determined by the competent Prefect (Prefetto) against an offeror, pursuant to Art. 4 of Legislative Decree no. 490/1994, Art. 10 of Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998, or any other anti-mafia law, no award will be made to said offeror. Furthermore, in the event that prior to award any additional information against an offeror is obtained and validated by the government or provided by the competent Prefect (Prefetto) pursuant to Art. 1, Section 7 of Law decree 629/1982, Art. 10, paragraph 9, of Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998, or any other anti-mafia law, the Government may decide, at its sole discretion, that no award will be made to said offeror.

Subcontractors: ALSO, the Offeror is responsible for complying with Italian Anti-Mafia laws with respect to its subcontractors; and, if necessary, requesting additional information regarding attempts of mafia infiltration from a competent Prefect (Prefetto). The Offeror agrees to provide the Government any appropriate documentation that may indicate mafia-collusion, to include, if available, results of any Prefect (Prefetto) investigations. If after award, a competent Prefect (Prefetto) determines that mafia infiltration attempts have occurred with a subcontractor, then the Offeror agrees, if requested by the Government, to promptly terminate the subject subcontract and replace the mafiacolluded subcontractor at its own cost with a compliant company.

Termination: If during the life of this contract, any mafia infiltration attempt is determined by the Government to have occurred or additional information is provided by the Prefect (Prefetto) against any component of the Contractor or any Subcontractor, pursuant to Art. 1, Section 7 of Law Decree 629/1982, Art 4 of Legislative Decree

no. 490/1994, Art. 10 of Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998, or any other anti-mafia law, the Government at its sole discretion may consider this a failure to execute the work and may terminate the contractor's right to proceed with the work under the "Default" clause of this contract.

Documentation Requirements: Contractor shall submit the following:

The offeror SHALL include a “self-declaration” in accordance with DPR 445/2000, stating that “pursuant to any applicable anti-mafia law in force, none of the causes of forfeiture, suspension or prohibition set forth by Art. 67 of the Code exist with regard to all the persons involved in the subject contract.”

This documentation is to be included in your Price Proposal.

8. ENGLISH SPEAKING REPRESENTATIVE

At all times when any performance of the work at the site is being conducted by any employee of the Contractor or his subcontractors, the contractor shall have a representative present on the site capable of explaining the work operations and receiving instructions in the English language. The Contracting Officer shall have the right to determine, without appeal of such decision, whether the proposed representative has sufficient technical and lingual capabilities, and the Contractor shall immediately replace any individual not acceptable to the Contracting Officer.

9. INQUIRIES, PROPOSAL FORMAT AND DUE DATE

All pre-proposal inquiries (PPI) regarding this RFP shall be submitted electronically to Anna Sarah Bellinger by e-mail at anna.bellinger@navy.mil. Offerors are requested to use the PPI’s submittal Form (Attachment A). Responses will be published as an amendment to the solicitation.

The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 15 calendar days before the solicitation closing date in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiries. There is no guarantee that PPI’s submitted after cutoff date will be answered before the solicitation closes.

Amendments will be posted directly to Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO). Additionally, other postings will be made to NECO under the Additional Documents section on NECO website. Postings to the Additional Documents section of NECO DO NOT generate an automated email to contractors. It is recommended contractors check the NECO Additional Documents section of the RFP periodically to see if additional postings have been made. It is the contractor’s responsibility to check NECO for all postings.

Proposals shall be delivered to:

Commander Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Building A Mailroom ATTN: Anna Sarah Bellinger ACQ34 6506 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23508-1278

ALL SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED AT THE LOCATION SPECIFIED ABOVE PRIOR

TO 2:00 PM (EDT), TUESDAY, 4 JUNE 2019. LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE

CONSIDERED.

Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number.

ELECTRONIC/FACSIMILE SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

Proposal shall be labeled “PRICE PROPOSAL OR NON-PRICE TECHNICAL FACTORS PROPOSAL

FOR RFP N62470-19-R-5007, NAVFAC ATLANTIC P-117 VICENZA HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT,

VICENZA ITALY, ATTN: ANNA SARAH BELLINGER. All pages shall be numbered and binders shall be appropriately tabbed, conforming to the proposal submittal requirements’ structure for each evaluation factor. Price and Non-Price Factors proposals must be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes. Any pricing information included in the Non-Price Factors proposal will not be considered. Similarly, any Non-Price information included in the Price Proposal will not be considered.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for nonconformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

Special Joint Venture (JV) Requirements:

NOTE #1: FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SOLICITATION A JOINT VENTURE (JV) REFERS TO

EITHER (1) A U.S.-STYLED FORMAL LEGAL ENTITY IN THE NATURE OF A PARTNERSHIP,

CORPORATION, LLC, OR OTHER LEGAL ENTITY, COMPRISED OF TWO OR MORE

PERSONS OR COMPANIES, WITH THE NEW ENTITY ACTING AS THE PRIME

CONTRACTOR, OR (2) AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO OR MORE PERSONS OR

COMPANIES TO PROPOSE AS A TEAM, WITH EACH INDIVIDUAL MEMBER ACTING AS A

PRIME CONTRACTOR. EACH JOINT VENTURE MUST PROVIDE ONE (1) NCAGE CODE AND

ONE (1) DUNS NUMBER FOR THE JOINT VENTURE AND ONE (1) DUNS NUMBER FOR EACH

MEMBER COMPRISING THE JOINT VENTURE. EACH JOINT VENTURE MUST BE

REGISTERED IN SAM USING THE NAME OF THE JOINT VENTURE.

JV offerors shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV. The JV Agreement shall take effect upon the submission of the proposal and shall remain in effect until one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government. Submission of the notarized legal document that establishes the JV shall be furnished with the price proposal in its original language version along with a certified English translation of the notarized JV. The Joint Venture must be formed and valid at the time of submission of the proposal. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV.

1. The Joint Venture Agreement shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(a) Name of firms that form the JV and the name of the JV.

(b) Name and title of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each firm that forms the JV.

(c) Solicitation number.

(d) Description of the responsibilities in terms of work category for each member (for example:

Firm A performing 100% of )

(e) The statement "The composition and structure of the JV will remain unchanged from award to one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government.”

(f) Date of issuance of the agreement and notarized signature of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each party.

(g) Statement under oath stating that the Joint Venture (JV) is in compliance at the time of proposal submission with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. This statement must be signed under oath by all members comprising the Joint Venture.

2. The U.S. Government reserves the right to review the actual JV Agreement to determine its basis and compliance with the applicable laws. Any internal agreements affecting the internal composition of the existing JV and its potential liabilities in relation to the contract (performance guarantee, insurance, etc) must be sent to the Contracting Officer to provide notice of the same. Any change in the composition of the JV will require the JV to formally request a Novation Agreement in accordance with FAR 42.12, which will be approved/disapproved at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

PROPOSALS MAY NOT BE HAND DELIVERED. ALL PROPOSALS MUST BE MAILED VIA POSTAL

SERVICES OR COMMERCIAL COURIERS SUCH AS FEDEX, DHL OR UPS.

When mailing proposal package or using a commerical courier, the firm is advised that the Contracting Officer is on a secured base and passes are required to enter the base. Anticipate delays in base access and plan accordingly.

Hand-carried proposals must be delivered to the mailroom located in the basement of Building A, Room 0006.

Proposals shall be delivered to the mailroom between 7:30AM and 1:45PM EDT. A phone is available outside the mail room door, if delivering proposals outside the specified timeframe. If required, contact Joe Goncalves at (757) 322-8125. Government personnel will not pick up proposals at the gate. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure delivery to the location specified.

All visitors to NAVFAC Atlantic at Lafayette River Annex (LRA) who do not have a CAC badge or DBIDS badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass & ID office (Security Department at Commander, Naval Region Mid-Atlantic (CNRMA)). Special Note: DBIDS badges must be programmed for access to the Naval Support Activity, Hampton Roads in order to gain access to the LRA.

Visitors who do not have a CAC or DBIDS badge must complete and submit the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 to NAVFAC Atlantic Security a minimum of seventeen (17) days prior to the proposed date of visit to allow ample time to process and submit the requests to CNRMA.

The SECNAV FORM 5512/1 can be found at the following link:

https://www.cnic.navy.mil/content/dam/cnic/hq/images/DBIDS/SECNAV%20Form%205512-1.pdf

Visitor’s must transmit the completed SECNAV FORM 5512/1 form which contains Privacy Act /PII data to NAVFAC Atlantic Security via AMRDEC Safe File Exchange (SAFE) website found at the following link:

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/Welcome.aspx

Please forward the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 via the AMRDEC SAFE website to all three of the NAVFAC LANT security personnel listed below:

Robert Hernandez / Email: Robert.hernandez3@navy.mil Iris Gholston / Email: iris.gholston@navy.mil Steven K. Anderson / Email: steven.k.anderson@navy.mil

Visitors can contact the NAVFAC Atlantic Security department at 757-322-8116/8044/8116 if they have questions or need assistance.

Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in the attached LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA.

Firms should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the

LRA.

Temporary visitor passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on LRA:

Address: Naval Station Pass and ID Office 9040 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23505 Telephone Number: 757-322-2975 Hours of Operation: 0600-1700 on Monday through Friday

8. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Safety Factor 3 – Past Performance Factor 4 – Technical Solution

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factor 1 Corporate Experience, Factor 2 Safety, and Factor 4 Technical Solution) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance (performance confidence assessment) factor. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance (performance confidence assessment) factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price. Factor 2, Safety will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an offeror is rated Unacceptable for Factor 2, they will not be eligible for award, unless the deficiency(ies) is/are remedied through discussions (if held).

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Non-price Factors:

The Offeror shall submit one original, marker “Original”, five (5) copies marked “copy”, each in a separate three-ring binder, and two (2) electronic copies on separate CDs, with the following characteristics:

• Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format (A4 paper is also acceptable)

• 12-point font, Times New Roman

• Two complete electronic copies of the technical proposal factors as a single .pdf searchable file, each on a separate CD (include the “Original” technical submission). If there are any conflicts between hard and/or electronic copies, the “Original” hard copy will govern.

• Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, Title, phone number, and email address.

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

Submit a minimum of three (3) up to a maximum of five (5) construction projects that best demonstrate experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. To be considered, projects submitted for the Offeror must have been completed within the past ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this RFP. To ensure a project is considered "complete," the documentation should demonstrate delivery of a final deliverable to the client.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as construction of a new educational facility similar to First Grade through Twelfth Grade or University, with a building area no less than 50,000 SF.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or standalone contract. Multiple construction award, Indefinite delivery or Indefinite quantity contracts as a whole should not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors should submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment B) is MANDATORY and SHALL be information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) 81/2” X 11” page size. DUNS numbers for the entity that performed the project shall be noted for the construction projects.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, at least one (1) project should be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

JV offerors shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The Offeror must provide a letter of commitment from the subcontractor and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract. More weight may be given to the Offeror’s projects than to those submitted for subcontractors.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review a maximum of five (5) projects. If more than the maximum number of projects is submitted, the Government will evaluate projects in order of submission up to the maximum number and will not evaluate projects beyond the maximum number specified in the submission requirements.

Offerors that demonstrate experience with relevant projects contracted with the United States Department of Defense Education Activity may be considered more favorably than offerors who do not demonstrate this experience.

Offerors that demonstrate experience with relevant projects located in Italy may be considered more favorably than offerors who do not demonstrate this experience.

Offerors who submit relevant projects that demonstrate experience self-performing relevant features of work may receive a higher rating than those who do not demonstrate self-performance.

Offerors that demonstrate experience with sustainable features may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate experience with sustainable features.

Factor 2 – Safety:

(a) Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following shall address each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; only one safety narrative is required.)

(1) Technical Approach for Safety:

Describe the offeror’s technical approach to safety for its employees as well as the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors, as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also, describe methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to three single-sided, 8 ½ x 11 page size.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record, the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors as well as the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, Government agencies, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Facility Accident and Incident Reporting (FAIR) and Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) databases, and other related resources. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The evaluation will collectively consider the Offeror’s technical approach to safety and other sources of information available to the Government. This Safety Factor will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

Factor 3 – Past Performance:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1 for corporate experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment C) for each project included in Factor 1. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs.

However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Anna Sarah Bellinger, anna.bellinger@navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.”

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating.

Past performance ratings of “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” hold more value than a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance.

Factor 4 – Technical Solution

(a) Request for Proposal Submittal Requirements:

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. Include the following:

Summary of the technical approach, including the means/methods, material and tools to be utilized to complete the work; mitigation plans for anticipated problems, logistical challenges and site constraints.

A Project organizational chart that lists the key positions (Project Manager, Site Safety & Health Officer, Design QCM, Construction QCM, Superintendent, and subcontractors). The organizational chart shall clearly identify the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of a significant subcontractor is being claimed in Factor 2, the firm must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

Provide a project schedule with a Gantt chart. Include the contract duration, all major design submittals and all major aspects of construction project. The contract timeframe identified in the RFP defines the acceptable contract duration; a shorter contract duration is desirable. Provide a narrative that explains the proposed contract duration, scheduling innovations and methods to provide a shorter contract duration.

Narrative shall not exceed five (5) double-sided pages (or ten (10) single-sided pages).

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the narrative considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the technical solution to determine the likelihood that the work will be performed in accordance with the technical requirements of the RFP.

The Government will evaluate a comparison of the contractor’s proposed contract duration and the acceptable contract duration. The Government’s evaluation of the contractor’s proposed schedule is a means of determining whether the contractor understands the scope of work and approaches the tasks in a logical and effective manner.

A higher rating may be provided for a schedule that clearly identifies realistic accelerated contract completion durations.

In addition, the contractor’s proposed contract duration shall become an enforceable part of the contract and will be reflected in the awarded Contract Completion Date (CCD) to the successful offeror.

Price:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offeror shall submit one (1) marked “Original,” one (1) copy and one (1) CD, each in a separate three-ring binder with the following:

- SF-1442, signed

- Amendments (SF30s) Acknowledged

- Completed Schedule B, Pricing Form

- Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

- Required Contractor Responsibility documentation

- SOA Certification

ADDITONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION - In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards.

No purchase or award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them. The Contracting Officer shall require acceptable evidence of the prospective contractor’s current sound financial status, as well as the ability to obtain required resources if the need arises. In regard to resources, the contractor must be prepared to present acceptable evidence of subcontracts, commitments or explicit arrangements that will be in existence at the time of contract award, to rent, purchase or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, services, materials, other resources or personnel. Consideration of a prime contractor’s compliance with limitations on subcontracting shall be taken into account for the time period covered by the contract base period or quantities, plus option periods or quantities, if such options are considered when evaluating offers for award. Pursuant to FAR 9.104-4, the Contracting Officer reserves the right to request adequate evidence of responsibility on the part of any prospective subcontractor(s). In the absence of information clearly indicating that the prospective contractor is responsible, the Contracting Officer shall make a determination of non-responsibility. As a minimum requirement, all offerors are requested to submit, as part of the price proposal submissions, the following

1. One (1) Signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

3. Point of contact from a bank or any financial institution with which the offeror transacts business.

Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the base requirements and all option items. The government intends to evaluate all options and will include the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (Jul 1990) in the solicition. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to execise the options(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey…